Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
23 Texas opinions name it 3 courts 1982–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Anderson v. Stategreen2 sentences2020See id. (stating that the trial court has discretion to determine whether bias exists and when a trial court overrules a challenge for cause, the decision will be reviewed in light of all of the answers the prospective juror gave). 2015App. 1992) (citing Anderson v. State, 633 S.W.2d 851, 854 (Tex.Cr.App.1982) that “where the juror states he believes that he can set aside any influences he may have, and the trial court overrules a challenge for cause, its decision will be reviewed in light of all the answers the prospective juror gives”). | 9 | 15 |
Mays v. Stategreen2 sentences1992Anderson, 633 S.W.2d at 854 ; see also Williams v. State, 773 S.W.2d 525, 537 (Tex.Crim.App.), cert, denied, 493 U.S. 900 , 110 S.Ct. 257 , 107 L.Ed.2d 207 (1988); Faulder v. State, 745 S.W.2d 327, 339-40 (Tex.Crim.App. 1987); Cordova v. State, 733 S.W.2d 175, 180-81 (Tex.Crim.App. 1987); Mays v. State, 726 S.W.2d 937, 950 (Tex.Crim.App. 1986). 1992Anderson, 633 S.W.2d at 854 ; see also Williams v. State, 773 S.W.2d 525, 537 (Tex.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 900 , 110 S.Ct. 257 , 107 L.Ed.2d 207 (1988); Faulder v. State, 745 S.W.2d 327, 339-40 (Tex.Crim.App.1987); Cordova v. State, 733 S.W.2d 175, 180-81 (Tex.Crim.App.1987); Mays v. State, 726 S.W.2d 937, 950 (Tex.Crim.App.1986). | 2 | 3 |
Swap Shop v. Fortunegreen2 sentences2004Anderson , 633 S.W.2d at 854 ; see Swap Shop v. Fortune , 365 S.W.2d 151 (Tex. 1963); Wade v. Austin , 524 S.W.2d 79 (Tex.Civ.App.--Texarkana 1975, no writ); Brown v. Herring , 466 S.W.2d 664 (Tex.Civ.App--Eastland 1971, writ ref'd n.r.e.). 1982See Swap Shop v. Fortune, supra; Wade v. Austin, 524 S.W.2d 79 (Tex.Civ.App.—Texarkana 1975); Brown v. Herring, 466 S.W.2d 664 (Tex.Civ.App. — Eastland 1971). | 2 | 2 |
Cordova v. Stategreen2 sentences1992Anderson, 633 S.W.2d at 854 ; see also Williams v. State, 773 S.W.2d 525, 537 (Tex.Crim.App.), cert, denied, 493 U.S. 900 , 110 S.Ct. 257 , 107 L.Ed.2d 207 (1988); Faulder v. State, 745 S.W.2d 327, 339-40 (Tex.Crim.App. 1987); Cordova v. State, 733 S.W.2d 175, 180-81 (Tex.Crim.App. 1987); Mays v. State, 726 S.W.2d 937, 950 (Tex.Crim.App. 1986). 1992Anderson, 633 S.W.2d at 854 ; see also Williams v. State, 773 S.W.2d 525, 537 (Tex.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 900 , 110 S.Ct. 257 , 107 L.Ed.2d 207 (1988); Faulder v. State, 745 S.W.2d 327, 339-40 (Tex.Crim.App.1987); Cordova v. State, 733 S.W.2d 175, 180-81 (Tex.Crim.App.1987); Mays v. State, 726 S.W.2d 937, 950 (Tex.Crim.App.1986). | 2 | 2 |
Faulder v. Stategreen2 sentences2015Faulder v. State, 745 S.W.2d 327 (Tex. Cr. 1992Anderson, 633 S.W.2d at 854 ; see also Williams v. State, 773 S.W.2d 525, 537 (Tex.Crim.App.), cert, denied, 493 U.S. 900 , 110 S.Ct. 257 , 107 L.Ed.2d 207 (1988); Faulder v. State, 745 S.W.2d 327, 339-40 (Tex.Crim.App. 1987); Cordova v. State, 733 S.W.2d 175, 180-81 (Tex.Crim.App. 1987); Mays v. State, 726 S.W.2d 937, 950 (Tex.Crim.App. 1986). | 1 | 3 |
Clark v. Stategreen2 sentences2015If the law is adequately and correctly explained and the trial court does not abuse its discretion the and juror states that he believes that he can set aside any biases he may have, and the trial court overrules a challenge for cause, its decision 44 will be reviewed in light of all of the answers the prospective juror gives Clark v. State, 717 S.W.2d 910, 917 (Tex. Crim. 1987Anderson v. State, supra.” In Clark, supra, this Court, quoting from Pierson v. State, 614 S.W.2d 102 (Tex.Cr.App.1981) (On original submission), held that “Under Adams v. Texas, 448 U.S. 38 , 100 S.Ct. 2521 , 85 L.Ed.2d 581 (1980), prospective jurors who have serious attitudes, but who nonetheless state that they can honestly determine the facts and abide by the law, may not be excluded from jury service” under the principle of law stated in Witherspoon v. Illinois, supra. Also see Mays v. State, 726 S.W.2d 937 (Tex.Cr.App.1986). | 1 | 2 |
Smith v. Stategreen1 sentence2012Smith v. State, 297 S.W.3d 260, 268 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Chambers v. Stategreen1 sentence2002Chambers v. State , 866 S.W.2d 9, 22 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Brooks v. United Statesgreen2 sentences1992Anderson, 633 S.W.2d at 854 ; see also Williams v. State, 773 S.W.2d 525, 537 (Tex.Crim.App.), cert, denied, 493 U.S. 900 , 110 S.Ct. 257 , 107 L.Ed.2d 207 (1988); Faulder v. State, 745 S.W.2d 327, 339-40 (Tex.Crim.App. 1987); Cordova v. State, 733 S.W.2d 175, 180-81 (Tex.Crim.App. 1987); Mays v. State, 726 S.W.2d 937, 950 (Tex.Crim.App. 1986). 1992Anderson, 633 S.W.2d at 854 ; see also Williams v. State, 773 S.W.2d 525, 537 (Tex.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 900 , 110 S.Ct. 257 , 107 L.Ed.2d 207 (1988); Faulder v. State, 745 S.W.2d 327, 339-40 (Tex.Crim.App.1987); Cordova v. State, 733 S.W.2d 175, 180-81 (Tex.Crim.App.1987); Mays v. State, 726 S.W.2d 937, 950 (Tex.Crim.App.1986). | 1 | 1 |
King v. United Statesgreen2 sentences1992Anderson, 633 S.W.2d at 854 ; see also Williams v. State, 773 S.W.2d 525, 537 (Tex.Crim.App.), cert, denied, 493 U.S. 900 , 110 S.Ct. 257 , 107 L.Ed.2d 207 (1988); Faulder v. State, 745 S.W.2d 327, 339-40 (Tex.Crim.App. 1987); Cordova v. State, 733 S.W.2d 175, 180-81 (Tex.Crim.App. 1987); Mays v. State, 726 S.W.2d 937, 950 (Tex.Crim.App. 1986). 1992Anderson, 633 S.W.2d at 854 ; see also Williams v. State, 773 S.W.2d 525, 537 (Tex.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 900 , 110 S.Ct. 257 , 107 L.Ed.2d 207 (1988); Faulder v. State, 745 S.W.2d 327, 339-40 (Tex.Crim.App.1987); Cordova v. State, 733 S.W.2d 175, 180-81 (Tex.Crim.App.1987); Mays v. State, 726 S.W.2d 937, 950 (Tex.Crim.App.1986). | 1 | 1 |
Williams v. Stategreen2 sentences1992Anderson, 633 S.W.2d at 854 ; see also Williams v. State, 773 S.W.2d 525, 537 (Tex.Crim.App.), cert, denied, 493 U.S. 900 , 110 S.Ct. 257 , 107 L.Ed.2d 207 (1988); Faulder v. State, 745 S.W.2d 327, 339-40 (Tex.Crim.App. 1987); Cordova v. State, 733 S.W.2d 175, 180-81 (Tex.Crim.App. 1987); Mays v. State, 726 S.W.2d 937, 950 (Tex.Crim.App. 1986). 1992Anderson, 633 S.W.2d at 854 ; see also Williams v. State, 773 S.W.2d 525, 537 (Tex.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 900 , 110 S.Ct. 257 , 107 L.Ed.2d 207 (1988); Faulder v. State, 745 S.W.2d 327, 339-40 (Tex.Crim.App.1987); Cordova v. State, 733 S.W.2d 175, 180-81 (Tex.Crim.App.1987); Mays v. State, 726 S.W.2d 937, 950 (Tex.Crim.App.1986). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Gant v. Dumas Glass and Mirror, Inc.
green
2 sentences2016When, as here, the trial court overrules a challenge for cause, there is “an implied finding that bias or prejudice does not exist such that it constitutes disqualification.” Gant, 935 S.W.2d at 207 . 2015When, as here, the trial court overrules a challenge for cause, there is “an implied finding that bias or 9 prejudice does not exist such that it constitutes disqualification.” Gant, 935 S.W.2d at 207 . | 2 | 2015–2016 |
Brown v. Herring
neutral
2 sentences2004Anderson , 633 S.W.2d at 854 ; see Swap Shop v. Fortune , 365 S.W.2d 151 (Tex. 1963); Wade v. Austin , 524 S.W.2d 79 (Tex.Civ.App.--Texarkana 1975, no writ); Brown v. Herring , 466 S.W.2d 664 (Tex.Civ.App--Eastland 1971, writ ref'd n.r.e.). 1982See Swap Shop v. Fortune, supra; Wade v. Austin, 524 S.W.2d 79 (Tex.Civ.App.—Texarkana 1975); Brown v. Herring, 466 S.W.2d 664 (Tex.Civ.App. — Eastland 1971). | 2 | 1982–2004 |
Wade v. Austin
green
2 sentences2004Anderson , 633 S.W.2d at 854 ; see Swap Shop v. Fortune , 365 S.W.2d 151 (Tex. 1963); Wade v. Austin , 524 S.W.2d 79 (Tex.Civ.App.--Texarkana 1975, no writ); Brown v. Herring , 466 S.W.2d 664 (Tex.Civ.App--Eastland 1971, writ ref'd n.r.e.). 1982See Swap Shop v. Fortune, supra; Wade v. Austin, 524 S.W.2d 79 (Tex.Civ.App.—Texarkana 1975); Brown v. Herring, 466 S.W.2d 664 (Tex.Civ.App. — Eastland 1971). | 2 | 1982–2004 |
Hallett v. Houston Northwest Medical Center
green
2 sentences1995In order to preserve error where the trial court overrules a challenge for cause to a prospective juror, a party must give notice to the trial court of two things prior to exercising any peremptory challenges: (1) the party must inform the trial court that it will exhaust all peremptory challenges; and (2), the party must inform the trial court that after exercising all its peremptory challenges, specific objectionable jurors will remain on the jury list. 1 Hallett, 689 S.W.2d at 890 . 1995In order to preserve error where the trial court overrules a challenge for cause to a prospective juror, a party must give notice to the trial court of two things prior to exercising any peremptory challenges: (1) the party must inform the trial court that it will exhaust all peremptory challenges; and (2), the party must inform the trial court that after exercising all its peremptory challenges, specific objectionable jurors will remain on the jury list. [1] Hallett, 689 S.W.2d at 890 . | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Pierson v. State
green
1 sentence1987Anderson v. State, supra.” In Clark, supra, this Court, quoting from Pierson v. State, 614 S.W.2d 102 (Tex.Cr.App.1981) (On original submission), held that “Under Adams v. Texas, 448 U.S. 38 , 100 S.Ct. 2521 , 85 L.Ed.2d 581 (1980), prospective jurors who have serious attitudes, but who nonetheless state that they can honestly determine the facts and abide by the law, may not be excluded from jury service” under the principle of law stated in Witherspoon v. Illinois, supra. Also see Mays v. State, 726 S.W.2d 937 (Tex.Cr.App.1986). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Adams v. Texas
green
2 sentences1987Anderson v. State, supra.” In Clark, supra, this Court, quoting from Pierson v. State, 614 S.W.2d 102 (Tex.Cr.App.1981) (On original submission), held that “Under Adams v. Texas, 448 U.S. 38 , 100 S.Ct. 2521 , 85 L.Ed.2d 581 (1980), prospective jurors who have serious attitudes, but who nonetheless state that they can honestly determine the facts and abide by the law, may not be excluded from jury service” under the principle of law stated in Witherspoon v. Illinois, supra. Also see Mays v. State, 726 S.W.2d 937 (Tex.Cr.App.1986). 1987Anderson v. State, supra.” In Clark, supra, this Court, quoting from Pierson v. State, 614 S.W.2d 102 (Tex.Cr.App.1981) (On original submission), held that “Under Adams v. Texas, 448 U.S. 38 , 100 S.Ct. 2521 , 85 L.Ed.2d 581 (1980), prospective jurors who have serious attitudes, but who nonetheless state that they can honestly determine the facts and abide by the law, may not be excluded from jury service” under the principle of law stated in Witherspoon v. Illinois, supra. Also see Mays v. State, 726 S.W.2d 937 (Tex.Cr.App.1986). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.