four-corners rule (Wisconsin) · Go Syfert
← Wisconsin issues

four-corners rule in Wisconsin

23 Wisconsin opinions name it 2 courts 2007–2025 5 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Wisconsin courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (12)

CaseFollowedCited
ESTATE OF SUSTACHE v. American Family Mutual Insurance Companygreen
wis · 2008 · cited in 7 Wisconsin opinions naming this issue, 2010–2020
2 sentences

2020See Sustache, 311 Wis. 2d 548, ¶¶27-29 . ¶42 Water Well did not disturb Wisconsin coverage law: a court is bound by the four-corners rule when deciding whether the Complaint alleges a covered claim triggering the insurer's duty to defend.

2019Thus, under the four-corners test, the insurer has a duty to defend so long as the insurer " ' could be held bound to indemnify the insured, assuming that the injured person proved the allegations of the complaint, regardless of the actual outcome of the case.' " Sustache , 311 Wis.2d 548 , ¶22, 751 N.W.2d 845 (emphasis added) (quoting Grieb , 33 Wis.2d at 558 , 148 N.W.2d 103 , which in turn quotes 29A Am.

47
Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Bradley Corp.green
wis · 2003 · cited in 5 Wisconsin opinions naming this issue, 2008–2024
2 sentences

2019The duty to defend is broader because it is defined through the four-corners test, in which pertinent policy language *554 is strictly compared with " 'the nature of the claim[s] alleged against the insured [as expressed within the four corners of the complaint] *223 ... even though the suit may be groundless, false or fraudulent.' " Id. , ¶21 (quoting Grieb v. Citizens Cas.

2019See Fireman's Fund , 261 Wis.2d 4 , ¶¶19-21, 660 N.W.2d 666 (duty depends on "arguable," not "actual," obligation to indemnify). ¶22 Our supreme court has strongly emphasized that "there is no exception to the four-corners rule in duty to defend cases in Wisconsin." Water Well , 369 Wis.2d 607 , ¶24, 881 N.W.2d 285 .

35
Olson v. Farrargreen
wis · 2012 · cited in 7 Wisconsin opinions naming this issue, 2016–2025
2 sentences

2025As our supreme court explained in Olson v. Farrar, “the purpose of the four-corners rule has been served once the insurer has elected to provide a defense pending a final determination on coverage[,]” at which point “[t]he four-corners rule is not further implicated, and the court proceeds to a determination of coverage.” 2012 WI 3, ¶34 , 338 Wis. 2d 215 , 809 N.W.2d 1 (emphasis added).

2025As our supreme court explained in Olson v. Farrar, “the purpose of the four-corners rule has been served once the insurer has elected to provide a defense pending a final determination on coverage[,]” at which point “[t]he four-corners rule is not further implicated, and the court proceeds to a determination of coverage.” 2012 WI 3, ¶34 , 338 Wis. 2d 215 , 809 N.W.2d 1 (emphasis added).

27
Water Well Solutions Service Group Inc. v. Consolidated Insurance Companygreen
wis · 2016 · cited in 7 Wisconsin opinions naming this issue, 2016–2025
2 sentences

2025The Majority concludes, based on application of the four-corners rule, see Water Well Solutions Service Group, Inc. v. Consolidated Insurance Co., 2016 WI 54, ¶15 , 369 Wis. 2d 607 , 881 N.W.2d 285 , that Auto-Owners Insurance Company (Auto-Owners) owed its insured, Harmony Jones, a duty to defend.

2025The Majority concludes, based on application of the four-corners rule, see Water Well Solutions Service Group, Inc. v. Consolidated Insurance Co., 2016 WI 54, ¶15 , 369 Wis. 2d 607 , 881 N.W.2d 285 , that Auto-Owners Insurance Company (Auto-Owners) owed its insured, Harmony Jones, a duty to defend.

27
Professional Office Buildings, Inc. v. Royal Indemnity Co.green
wisctapp · 1988 · cited in 4 Wisconsin opinions naming this issue, 2007–2016
2 sentences

2016Co., 145 Wis. 2d 573, 578-79, 580-84 , 427 N.W.2d 427 (Ct. App. 1998). ¶41 Importantly, the four-corners rule generally protects the insured: "[W]ithout the four-corners rule, 'the duty to defend would often be empty.

2016Co., 145 Wis. 2d 573, 578-79, 580-84 , 427 N.W.2d 427 (Ct. App. 1998). ¶41 Importantly, the four-corners rule generally protects the insured: "[W]ithout the four-corners rule, 'the duty to defend would often be empty.

24
Baumann v. Elliottgreen
wisctapp · 2005 · cited in 6 Wisconsin opinions naming this issue, 2007–2019
2 sentences

2018The four-corners rule generally "ensure[s] that insurers do not frustrate the expectations of their insureds by resolving the coverage issue in their own favor while coverage remains fairly debatable." Baumann v. Elliott , 2005 WI App 186 , ¶ 10, 286 Wis. 2d 667 , 704 N.W.2d 361 . ¶ 29 To achieve this purpose, an insured benefits from several interpretive rules that govern our review of the insurance policy and the complaint.

2018The four-corners rule generally "ensure[s] that insurers do not frustrate the expectations of their insureds by resolving the coverage issue in their own favor while coverage remains fairly debatable." Baumann v. Elliott , 2005 WI App 186 , ¶ 10, 286 Wis. 2d 667 , 704 N.W.2d 361 . ¶ 29 To achieve this purpose, an insured benefits from several interpretive rules that govern our review of the insurance policy and the complaint.

16
Doyle v. Engelkegreen
wis · 1998 · cited in 5 Wisconsin opinions naming this issue, 2007–2019
2 sentences

2019See also Talley v. Mustafa , 2018 WI 47 , ¶21, 381 Wis.2d 393 , 911 N.W.2d 55 (overruling Doyle v. Engelke , 219 Wis.2d 277 , 580 N.W.2d 245 (1998), on the ground that the court in Doyle used the four-corners test, which defines the duty to defend, to resolve a "coverage" issue).

2019See also Talley v. Mustafa , 2018 WI 47 , ¶21, 381 Wis.2d 393 , 911 N.W.2d 55 (overruling Doyle v. Engelke , 219 Wis.2d 277 , 580 N.W.2d 245 (1998), on the ground that the court in Doyle used the four-corners test, which defines the duty to defend, to resolve a "coverage" issue).

15
Risser v. Klausergreen
wis · 1997 · cited in 1 Wisconsin opinions naming this issue, 2025–2025
2 sentences

2025Id. at 182, 202–03. ¶24 The Risser court concluded the section struck did not meet the definition of “appropriation” as “an expenditure or setting aside of public funds for a particular purpose.” Id. at 192–93.

2025Id. at 182, 202–03. ¶24 The Risser court concluded the section struck did not meet the definition of “appropriation” as “an expenditure or setting aside of public funds for a particular purpose.” Id. at 192–93.

11
Archie A. Talley v. Mustafa Mustafagreen
wis · 2018 · cited in 1 Wisconsin opinions naming this issue, 2019–2019
2 sentences

2019See also Talley v. Mustafa , 2018 WI 47 , ¶21, 381 Wis.2d 393 , 911 N.W.2d 55 (overruling Doyle v. Engelke , 219 Wis.2d 277 , 580 N.W.2d 245 (1998), on the ground that the court in Doyle used the four-corners test, which defines the duty to defend, to resolve a "coverage" issue).

2019See also Talley v. Mustafa , 2018 WI 47 , ¶21, 381 Wis.2d 393 , 911 N.W.2d 55 (overruling Doyle v. Engelke , 219 Wis.2d 277 , 580 N.W.2d 245 (1998), on the ground that the court in Doyle used the four-corners test, which defines the duty to defend, to resolve a "coverage" issue).

11
Oddsen v. Henrygreen
wisctapp · 2016 · cited in 1 Wisconsin opinions naming this issue, 2017–2017
2 sentences

2017Olson concluded that the four-corners rule is not further implicated where "the insurer has elected to provide a defense pending a final determination on coverage." Id., ¶ 34; see also Oddsen v. Henry, 2016 WI App 30, ¶ 21 , 368 Wis. 2d 318 , 878 N.W.2d 720 .

2017Olson concluded that the four-corners rule is not further implicated where "the insurer has elected to provide a defense pending a final determination on coverage." Id., ¶ 34; see also Oddsen v. Henry, 2016 WI App 30, ¶ 21 , 368 Wis. 2d 318 , 878 N.W.2d 720 .

11
Miller v. Westport Ins. Corp.green
kan · 2009 · cited in 1 Wisconsin opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
1 sentence

2016Corp., 200 P.3d 419, 424 (Kan. 2009), the court explained that an insurer "must look beyond the effect of the In four states, because of conflicting cases, it is unclear whether they allow for exceptions to the four-corners rule.

11
Guaranty Bank v. Chubb Corp.green
ca7 · 2008 · cited in 1 Wisconsin opinions naming this issue, 2012–2012
1 sentence

2012The insurance company could refuse to defend in the hope that the facts as they emerged in the litigation that its insured had asked it to defend would reveal that there was no coverage." Guaranty Bank v. Chubb Corp., 538 F.3d 587, 593 (7th Cir. 2008) (discussing Wisconsin law). ¶ 33.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (1)

CaseNegativeCited
Baumann v. Elliottgreen
wisctapp · 2005 · cited in 6 Wisconsin opinions naming this issue, 2007–2019
2 sentences

2018The four-corners rule generally "ensure[s] that insurers do not frustrate the expectations of their insureds by resolving the coverage issue in their own favor while coverage remains fairly debatable." Baumann v. Elliott , 2005 WI App 186 , ¶ 10, 286 Wis. 2d 667 , 704 N.W.2d 361 . ¶ 29 To achieve this purpose, an insured benefits from several interpretive rules that govern our review of the insurance policy and the complaint.

2018The four-corners rule generally "ensure[s] that insurers do not frustrate the expectations of their insureds by resolving the coverage issue in their own favor while coverage remains fairly debatable." Baumann v. Elliott , 2005 WI App 186 , ¶ 10, 286 Wis. 2d 667 , 704 N.W.2d 361 . ¶ 29 To achieve this purpose, an insured benefits from several interpretive rules that govern our review of the insurance policy and the complaint.

16

Also cited on this issue (18)

CaseCitedYears
Grieb v. Citizens Casualty Co. green
wis · 1967
2 sentences

2019Thus, under the four-corners test, the insurer has a duty to defend so long as the insurer " ' could be held bound to indemnify the insured, assuming that the injured person proved the allegations of the complaint, regardless of the actual outcome of the case.' " Sustache , 311 Wis.2d 548 , ¶22, 751 N.W.2d 845 (emphasis added) (quoting Grieb , 33 Wis.2d at 558 , 148 N.W.2d 103 , which in turn quotes 29A Am.

2019Thus, under the four-corners test, the insurer has a duty to defend so long as the insurer " ' could be held bound to indemnify the insured, assuming that the injured person proved the allegations of the complaint, regardless of the actual outcome of the case.' " Sustache , 311 Wis.2d 548 , ¶22, 751 N.W.2d 845 (emphasis added) (quoting Grieb , 33 Wis.2d at 558 , 148 N.W.2d 103 , which in turn quotes 29A Am.

52007–2019
Smith v. Katz green
wis · 1999
2 sentences

2017"The insurer's duty arises when the allegations in the complaint coincide with the coverage provided by the policy."27 Thus, "[i]f the [factual] allegations in the complaint, construed liberally, appear to give rise to coverage, insurers are required to provide a defense until the final resolution of the coverage question by a court."28 The proper application of the four-corners rule presents a question of law that the court 25 Fireman's Fund, 261 Wis. 2d 4, ¶17 . 26 In Water Well Solutions Service Group, Inc. v. Consolidated Insurance Co., 2016 WI 54, ¶24 , 369 Wis. 2d 607 , 881 N.W.2d 285 ,

2017"The insurer's duty arises when the allegations in the complaint coincide with the coverage provided by the policy."27 Thus, "[i]f the [factual] allegations in the complaint, construed liberally, appear to give rise to coverage, insurers are required to provide a defense until the final resolution of the coverage question by a court."28 The proper application of the four-corners rule presents a question of law that the court 25 Fireman's Fund, 261 Wis. 2d 4, ¶17 . 26 In Water Well Solutions Service Group, Inc. v. Consolidated Insurance Co., 2016 WI 54, ¶24 , 369 Wis. 2d 607 , 881 N.W.2d 285 ,

32008–2017
Berg v. Fall green
wisctapp · 1987
2 sentences

2016Berg, 138 Wis. 2d at 123 .

2007Ironically, the Berg court cited to Grieb for the four-corners rule, see Berg, 138 Wis. 2d at 122 , but not to Grieb's reference to the exceptions to the rule.

32007–2016
David M. Marks v. Houston Casualty Company green
wis · 2016
2 sentences

2017Co., 2016 WI 53, ¶¶61-76 , 369 Wis. 2d 547 , 881 N.W.2d 309 ). ¶7 In the case now before us, if we were to stop our analysis after determining that there was an initial grant of coverage, the parties would not receive a full four-corners analysis.

2017Co., 2016 WI 53, ¶¶61-76 , 369 Wis. 2d 547 , 881 N.W.2d 309 ). ¶7 In the case now before us, if we were to stop our analysis after determining that there was an initial grant of coverage, the parties would not receive a full four-corners analysis.

22016–2017
Estate of Sustache Ex Rel. Sustache v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. green
wisctapp · 2007
2 sentences

2016In Estate of Sustache, the court of appeals examined whether the exceptions to the four-corners rule acknowledged in Griebe had been foreclosed by Doyle and Smith , but ultimately concluded only that "this issue warrants supreme court comment at some point in the future." Estate of Sustache, 2007 WI App 144, ¶ 20 , 303 Wis. 2d 714 , 735 N.W.2d 186 .

2016In Estate of Sustache, the court of appeals examined whether the exceptions to the four-corners rule acknowledged in Griebe had been foreclosed by Doyle and Smith , but ultimately concluded only that "this issue warrants supreme court comment at some point in the future." Estate of Sustache, 2007 WI App 144, ¶ 20 , 303 Wis. 2d 714 , 735 N.W.2d 186 .

22008–2016
Great Lakes Beverages, LLC v. Wochinski green
wisctapp · 2017
2 sentences

2025Great Lakes Beverages, LLC v. Wochinski, 2017 WI App 13, ¶15 , 373 Wis. 2d 649 , 892 N.W.2d 333 . ¶6 Whether an insurer has a duty to defend is determined through application of the four-corners rule, whereby the circuit court is limited to comparing “the four corners of the underlying complaint to the terms of the entire insurance policy.” Water Well Sols.

2025Great Lakes Beverages, LLC v. Wochinski, 2017 WI App 13, ¶15 , 373 Wis. 2d 649 , 892 N.W.2d 333 . ¶6 Whether an insurer has a duty to defend is determined through application of the four-corners rule, whereby the circuit court is limited to comparing “the four corners of the underlying complaint to the terms of the entire insurance policy.” Water Well Sols.

12025–2025
Elliott v. Donahue green
wis · 1992
2 sentences

2019We now quote the discussion that followed, with emphasis on the statements that appear most pertinent here: "An insurer does not breach its contractual duty to *229 defend by denying coverage where the issue of coverage is fairly debatable as long as the insurer provides coverage and defense once coverage is established." Elliott [ v. Donahue , 169 Wis.2d 310 , 317, 485 N.W.2d 403 (1992) ].

2019We now quote the discussion that followed, with emphasis on the statements that appear most pertinent here: "An insurer does not breach its contractual duty to *229 defend by denying coverage where the issue of coverage is fairly debatable as long as the insurer provides coverage and defense once coverage is established." Elliott [ v. Donahue , 169 Wis.2d 310 , 317, 485 N.W.2d 403 (1992) ].

12019–2019
Newhouse Ex Rel. Skow v. Citizens Security Mutual Insurance green
wis · 1993
2 sentences

2019The supreme court concluded that, on these facts, Citizens breached its contractual duty to defend its insured, rejecting both of the following closely related arguments by Citizens: (1) that Citizens "was entitled to rely on the circuit court's decision that no coverage existed under its policy until the court of appeals reversed that decision," and (2) that Citizens "was not required to defend [the insured] at the liability trial because that trial occurred after the circuit court ruled there was no coverage under Citizens' policy and before the court of appeals reversed that determination."

2019The supreme court concluded that, on these facts, Citizens breached its contractual duty to defend its insured, rejecting both of the following closely related arguments by Citizens: (1) that Citizens "was entitled to rely on the circuit court's decision that no coverage existed under its policy until the court of appeals reversed that decision," and (2) that Citizens "was not required to defend [the insured] at the liability trial because that trial occurred after the circuit court ruled there was no coverage under Citizens' policy and before the court of appeals reversed that determination."

12019–2019
Stuart v. Weisflog's Showroom Gallery, Inc. green
wis · 2008
2 sentences

2017Wisconsin Stat. § 802.01(1)(a) requires complaints to "plead facts, which if true, would entitle the plaintiff to relief."33 Data Key Partners v. Permira Advisors LLC, 2014 WI 86, ¶21 , 356 Wis. 2d 665 , 849 N.W.2d 693 . 34 Stuart v. Weisflog's Showroom Gallery, Inc., 2008 WI 86, ¶36 , 311 Wis. 2d 492 , 753 N.W.2d 448 (internal quotation marks and quoted source omitted).

2017Wisconsin Stat. § 802.01(1)(a) requires complaints to "plead facts, which if true, would entitle the plaintiff to relief."33 Data Key Partners v. Permira Advisors LLC, 2014 WI 86, ¶21 , 356 Wis. 2d 665 , 849 N.W.2d 693 . 34 Stuart v. Weisflog's Showroom Gallery, Inc., 2008 WI 86, ¶36 , 311 Wis. 2d 492 , 753 N.W.2d 448 (internal quotation marks and quoted source omitted).

12017–2017
American Family Mutual Insurance v. American Girl, Inc. green
wis · 2004
2 sentences

2017Girl, Inc., 2004 WI 2, ¶24 , 268 Wis. 2d 16 , 673 N.W.2d 65 ("First, we examine the facts of the insured's claim to determine whether the policy's insuring agreement makes an initial grant of coverage."). (continued) 18 No. 2015AP79.ssa "[W]e must focus on the incident or injury that gives rise to the claim, not the plaintiff's theory of liability."34 ¶64 In applying the four-corners rule in the instant case, the court is guided by the following rules for interpreting an insurance policy: • Words and phrases in insurance contracts are subject to the same rules of construction that apply to con

2017Girl, Inc., 2004 WI 2, ¶24 , 268 Wis. 2d 16 , 673 N.W.2d 65 ("First, we examine the facts of the insured's claim to determine whether the policy's insuring agreement makes an initial grant of coverage."). (continued) 18 No. 2015AP79.ssa "[W]e must focus on the incident or injury that gives rise to the claim, not the plaintiff's theory of liability."34 ¶64 In applying the four-corners rule in the instant case, the court is guided by the following rules for interpreting an insurance policy: • Words and phrases in insurance contracts are subject to the same rules of construction that apply to con

12017–2017
Data Key Partners v. Permira Advisors LLC green
wis · 2014
2 sentences

2017Wisconsin Stat. § 802.01(1)(a) requires complaints to "plead facts, which if true, would entitle the plaintiff to relief."33 Data Key Partners v. Permira Advisors LLC, 2014 WI 86, ¶21 , 356 Wis. 2d 665 , 849 N.W.2d 693 . 34 Stuart v. Weisflog's Showroom Gallery, Inc., 2008 WI 86, ¶36 , 311 Wis. 2d 492 , 753 N.W.2d 448 (internal quotation marks and quoted source omitted).

2017Wisconsin Stat. § 802.01(1)(a) requires complaints to "plead facts, which if true, would entitle the plaintiff to relief."33 Data Key Partners v. Permira Advisors LLC, 2014 WI 86, ¶21 , 356 Wis. 2d 665 , 849 N.W.2d 693 . 34 Stuart v. Weisflog's Showroom Gallery, Inc., 2008 WI 86, ¶36 , 311 Wis. 2d 492 , 753 N.W.2d 448 (internal quotation marks and quoted source omitted).

12017–2017
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Easy PC Solutions, LLC neutral
wisctapp · 2015
2 sentences

2016Co. v. Easy PC Sols., LLC, 2016 WI App 9, ¶ 8 , 366 Wis. 2d 629 , 874 N.W.2d 585 .

2016Co. v. Easy PC Sols., LLC, 2016 WI App 9, ¶ 8 , 366 Wis. 2d 629 , 874 N.W.2d 585 .

12016–2016
Weiss v. United Fire & Casualty Co. green
wis · 1995
2 sentences

2016Co., 197 Wis. 2d 365, 393 , 541 N.W.2d 753 (1995). ¶30 In sum, we follow our long-standing precedent that duty-to-defend cases are governed by the four-corners rule, with no exceptions.17 3.

2016Co., 197 Wis. 2d 365, 393 , 541 N.W.2d 753 (1995). ¶30 In sum, we follow our long-standing precedent that duty-to-defend cases are governed by the four-corners rule, with no exceptions.17 3.

12016–2016
Atlantic Mutual Insurance v. Badger Medical Supply Co. green
wisctapp · 1995
2 sentences

2016Id. 12 No. 2014AP2484.awb without exceptions, in duty to defend cases for so long because it generally favors Wisconsin insureds."); majority op., ¶26 ("The four-corners rule ultimately favors insureds in another way."). ¶73 One has to wonder if the majority's absolutist application of the four-corners rule is as beneficial to insureds as the majority proclaims, then why is the insured losing here? ¶74 Its proffered concerns regarding the consideration of extrinsic facts are equally unpersuasive.

2016The majority conjures a scenario in which "this judicially-created burden" would "rewrite the contractual duty to defend to be triggered whenever any claim is made rather than only those claims covered under the actual policy terms." Id. ¶75 The majority's reasoning is misguided because allowing consideration of extrinsic facts in this case would not require Consolidated to imagine any claims other than those the plaintiff has already alleged.

12016–2016
Marks v. Houston Casualty Co. green
wisctapp · 2015
1 sentence

2015Priesler, 360 Wis. 2d 129, ¶ 21 ; Sustache II, 311 Wis. 2d 548, ¶ 20 ; Doyle, 219 Wis. 2d at 284 n.3 (noting long line of cases indicating that courts are to make coverage decisions based on the allegations in the complaint); Professional Office Bldgs., 145 Wis. 2d at 580-82 ; Marks, 2015 WI App 44, ¶ 8 .

12015–2015
Frederick W. Preisler v. Kuettel's Septic Service, LLC green
wis · 2014
1 sentence

2015Priesler, 360 Wis. 2d 129, ¶ 21 ; Sustache II, 311 Wis. 2d 548, ¶ 20 ; Doyle, 219 Wis. 2d at 284 n.3 (noting long line of cases indicating that courts are to make coverage decisions based on the allegations in the complaint); Professional Office Bldgs., 145 Wis. 2d at 580-82 ; Marks, 2015 WI App 44, ¶ 8 .

12015–2015
Maryland Casualty Co. v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance green
calctapp · 2000
2 sentences

2007But once Mitsubishi responded as they did, and everybody else got involved, that immediately changed the character of the District's involvement in this case as well." [21] Travelers did not claim an inability to pay the defense costs, nor did the trial court discuss that factor. [22] Moreover, were we to adopt the alternative approach of equitable subrogation discussed and rejected in Maryland Casualty Co. v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co., 81 Cal. App.4th 1082 , 97 Cal.Rptr.2d 374 (2000), Travelers' claim would still fail.

2007But once Mitsubishi responded as they did, and everybody else got involved, that immediately changed the character of the District's involvement in this case as well." [21] Travelers did not claim an inability to pay the defense costs, nor did the trial court discuss that factor. [22] Moreover, were we to adopt the alternative approach of equitable subrogation discussed and rejected in Maryland Casualty Co. v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co., 81 Cal. App.4th 1082 , 97 Cal.Rptr.2d 374 (2000), Travelers' claim would still fail.

12007–2007
Midway Motor Lodge v. Hartford Insurance Group green
wisctapp · 1999
2 sentences

2007Group, 226 Wis. 2d 23, 35-36 , 593 N.W.2d 852 (Ct. App. 1999); but see Baumann, 286 Wis. 2d 667, ¶¶ 17-18 .

2007Group, 226 Wis. 2d 23, 35-36 , 593 N.W.2d 852 (Ct. App. 1999); but see Baumann, 286 Wis. 2d 667, ¶¶ 17-18 .

12007–2007

Statutes the citing opinions construe

WI § Wis. Stat. § 802.08 (13) WI § Wis. Stat. § 808.10 (5) WI § Wis. Stat. § 7.54 (3) WI § Wis. Stat. § 806.04 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

TX 46 (1956–2026) IL 35 (1992–2026) IN 24 (1984–2025) WI 23 (2007–2025) DE 13 (2014–2025) PA 11 (1975–2017) MS 10 (2001–2016) OR 8 (2010–2023) CO 6 (1981–2015) FL 5 (2008–2022) MD 4 (2005–2008) OH 3 (2018–2025) CT 2 (2014–2018) WA 2 (2003–2003) MI 2 (2005–2015) NM 2 (1991–2023) VA 2 (1996–2024) MO 2 (2014–2014) TN 2 (2011–2019) UT 2 (1993–2021)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check