Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
22 Ohio opinions name it 1 courts 2000–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Delaware v. Prousegreen2 sentences2004In Delaware v. Prouse (1979), 440 U.S. 648 , 653 , the court held that an officer may stop an automobile under the Terry stop exception if the officer possesses the requisite reasonable suspicion based upon specific and articulable facts. 2004In Delaware v. Prouse (1979), 440 U.S. 648 , 653 , 59 L.Ed.2d 660 , the court held that an officer may stop an automobile under the Terry stop exception if the officer possesses the requisite reasonable suspicion based upon specific and articulable facts. | 3 | 20 |
State v. Gedeongreen2 sentences2014Delaware v. Prouse (1979), 440 U.S. 648, 653 , 99 S.Ct. 1391 , 59 L.Ed.2d 660 ; State v. Gedeon (1992), 81 Ohio App.3d 617, 618 , 611 N.E.2d 972 ; State v. Heinrichs (1988), 46 Ohio App.3d 63 , 545 N.E.2d 1304 ; United States v. Cortez (1981), 449 U.S. 411, 417 , 101 S.Ct. 690 , 66 L.Ed.2d 621 . 2014Delaware v. Prouse (1979), 440 U.S. 648, 653 , 99 S.Ct. 1391 , 59 L.Ed.2d 660 ; State v. Gedeon (1992), 81 Ohio App.3d 617, 618 , 611 N.E.2d 972 ; State v. Heinrichs (1988), 46 Ohio App.3d 63 , 545 N.E.2d 1304 ; United States v. Cortez (1981), 449 U.S. 411, 417 , 101 S.Ct. 690 , 66 L.Ed.2d 621 . | 2 | 15 |
State v. Walker-Stokesgreen2 sentences2011See State v. 9 Walker-Stokes, 180 Ohio App.3d 36 , 2008-Ohio-6552, ¶ 40 (holding that the exclusionary rule does not apply to a Terry stop violation involving the subject of an outstanding arrest warrant and expressly overruling Jamison). {¶ 25} There being no merit to Samuels’ sole assigned error, it is overruled, and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. .......... 2011See State v. 9 Walker-Stokes, 180 Ohio App.3d 36 , 2008-Ohio-6552, ¶ 40 (holding that the exclusionary rule does not apply to a Terry stop violation involving the subject of an outstanding arrest warrant and expressly overruling Jamison). {¶ 25} There being no merit to Samuels’ sole assigned error, it is overruled, and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. .......... | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Stateo v. Heinrichs
green
2 sentences2014Delaware v. Prouse (1979), 440 U.S. 648, 653 , 99 S.Ct. 1391 , 59 L.Ed.2d 660 ; State v. Gedeon (1992), 81 Ohio App.3d 617, 618 , 611 N.E.2d 972 ; State v. Heinrichs (1988), 46 Ohio App.3d 63 , 545 N.E.2d 1304 ; United States v. Cortez (1981), 449 U.S. 411, 417 , 101 S.Ct. 690 , 66 L.Ed.2d 621 . 2014Delaware v. Prouse (1979), 440 U.S. 648, 653 , 99 S.Ct. 1391 , 59 L.Ed.2d 660 ; State v. Gedeon (1992), 81 Ohio App.3d 617, 618 , 611 N.E.2d 972 ; State v. Heinrichs (1988), 46 Ohio App.3d 63 , 545 N.E.2d 1304 ; United States v. Cortez (1981), 449 U.S. 411, 417 , 101 S.Ct. 690 , 66 L.Ed.2d 621 . | 15 | 2000–2014 |
United States v. Cortez
green
2 sentences2016Delaware v. Prouse, 440 U.S. 648, 653 , 99 S.Ct. 1391 , 59 L.Ed.2d 660 (1979); United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 417 , 101 S. Ct. 690 , 66 L.Ed.2d 621 (1981). 2016Delaware v. Prouse, 440 U.S. 648, 653 , 99 S.Ct. 1391 , 59 L.Ed.2d 660 (1979); United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 417 , 101 S. Ct. 690 , 66 L.Ed.2d 621 (1981). | 3 | 2011–2016 |
Terry v. Ohio
green
1 sentence2025Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968); Delaware v. Prouse, 440 U.S. 648, 653 (1979). | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Dayton v. Erickson
green
1 sentence2011Delaware v. Prouse (1979), 440 U.S. 648, 653 , 99 S.Ct. 1391 , 59 L.Ed.2d 660 ; State v. Gedeon (1992), 81 Ohio App.3d 617, 618 , 611 N.E.2d 972 ; State v. Heinrichs (1988), 46 Ohio App.3d 63 , 545 N.E.2d 1304 . {¶ 18} When “an officer has an articulable reasonable suspicion or probable cause to stop a motorist for any criminal violation, including a minor traffic violation, the stop is constitutionally valid regardless of the officers underlying subjective intent or motivation for stopping the vehicle in question.” Dayton v. Erickson, 76 Ohio St.3d 3 , 11–12, –8– 1996-Ohio-431 , 665 N.E.2d 10 | 1 | 2011–2011 |
City of Dayton v. Erickson
green
2 sentences2011Delaware v. Prouse (1979), 440 U.S. 648, 653 , 99 S.Ct. 1391 , 59 L.Ed.2d 660 ; State v. Gedeon (1992), 81 Ohio App.3d 617, 618 , 611 N.E.2d 972 ; State v. Heinrichs (1988), 46 Ohio App.3d 63 , 545 N.E.2d 1304 . {¶ 18} When “an officer has an articulable reasonable suspicion or probable cause to stop a motorist for any criminal violation, including a minor traffic violation, the stop is constitutionally valid regardless of the officers underlying subjective intent or motivation for stopping the vehicle in question.” Dayton v. Erickson, 76 Ohio St.3d 3 , 11–12, –8– 1996-Ohio-431 , 665 N.E.2d 10 2011Delaware v. Prouse (1979), 440 U.S. 648, 653 , 99 S.Ct. 1391 , 59 L.Ed.2d 660 ; State v. Gedeon (1992), 81 Ohio App.3d 617, 618 , 611 N.E.2d 972 ; State v. Heinrichs (1988), 46 Ohio App.3d 63 , 545 N.E.2d 1304 . {¶ 18} When “an officer has an articulable reasonable suspicion or probable cause to stop a motorist for any criminal violation, including a minor traffic violation, the stop is constitutionally valid regardless of the officers underlying subjective intent or motivation for stopping the vehicle in question.” Dayton v. Erickson, 76 Ohio St.3d 3 , 11–12, –8– 1996-Ohio-431 , 665 N.E.2d 10 | 1 | 2011–2011 |
State v. Mays
green
2 sentences2011Delaware v. Prouse (1979), 440 U.S. 648, 653 , 99 S.Ct. 1391 , 59 L.Ed.2d 660 ; State v. Gedeon (1992), 81 Ohio App.3d 617, 618 , 611 N.E.2d 972 ; State v. Heinrichs (1988), 46 Ohio App.3d 63 , 545 N.E.2d 1304 . {¶ 18} When “an officer has an articulable reasonable suspicion or probable cause to stop a motorist for any criminal violation, including a minor traffic violation, the stop is constitutionally valid regardless of the officers underlying subjective intent or motivation for stopping the vehicle in question.” Dayton v. Erickson, 76 Ohio St.3d 3 , 11–12, –8– 1996-Ohio-431 , 665 N.E.2d 10 2011Delaware v. Prouse (1979), 440 U.S. 648, 653 , 99 S.Ct. 1391 , 59 L.Ed.2d 660 ; State v. Gedeon (1992), 81 Ohio App.3d 617, 618 , 611 N.E.2d 972 ; State v. Heinrichs (1988), 46 Ohio App.3d 63 , 545 N.E.2d 1304 . {¶ 18} When “an officer has an articulable reasonable suspicion or probable cause to stop a motorist for any criminal violation, including a minor traffic violation, the stop is constitutionally valid regardless of the officers underlying subjective intent or motivation for stopping the vehicle in question.” Dayton v. Erickson, 76 Ohio St.3d 3 , 11–12, –8– 1996-Ohio-431 , 665 N.E.2d 10 | 1 | 2011–2011 |
California v. Hodari D.
green
1 sentence2006In County of Sacramento v. Lewis (1998), 523 U.S. 833 , 843-844 , the United States Supreme Court developed the exception to the Terry stop rule refined in California v. Hodari D. (1991), 499 U.S. 621 : {¶ 22} "[O]ur cases foreclose finding a seizure. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
County of Sacramento v. Lewis
green
1 sentence2006In County of Sacramento v. Lewis (1998), 523 U.S. 833 , 843-844 , the United States Supreme Court developed the exception to the Terry stop rule refined in California v. Hodari D. (1991), 499 U.S. 621 : {¶ 22} "[O]ur cases foreclose finding a seizure. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
State v. Bland, Unpublished Decision (7-15-2004)
neutral
1 sentence2005Delaware v. Prouse (1979), 440 U.S. 648 , 653 , 59 L.Ed.2d 660 , 99 S. Ct. 1391 ; State v. Gedeon (1992), 81 Ohio App.3d 617 , 618 , 611 N.E.2d 972 ; State v. Heinrichs (1988), 46 Ohio App.3d 63 , 545 N.E.2d 1304 ." State v. Bland, Cuyahoga App. No. 83430, 2004-Ohio-3742, ¶ 12 . | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.