Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
22 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1981–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Boswell, O'Toole, Davis & Pickering v. Stewartgreen2 sentences2023In re Union Carbide Corp., 273 S.W.3d 152, 156 (Tex. 2008) (orig. proceeding) (quoting Boswell, O’ Toole, Davis & Pickering v. Stewart, 531 S.W.2d 380, 382 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1975, no writ)). 7 Musick does not contend that the severance fails to satisfy the Guaranty Federal requirements. 2008The Halls reference Boswell, O’Toole, Davis & Pickering v. Stewart, 531 S.W.2d 380, 382 (Tex.Civ.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1975, no writ), in which the court stated that a trial judge may “proceed to trial of the intervention claim; he may sever the intervention; he may order a separate trial; he may strike the intervention for good cause.” See also Saldana v. Saldana, 791 S.W.2d 316, 320-21 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 1990, no writ). 1 However, Rule 60 does not provide for such options as equal alternatives; it provides only that an intervention is “subject to being stricken out by the court for | 4 | 4 |
Saldana v. Saldanagreen2 sentences2010Ultimately, the trial court may decide to: “(a) try the intervention claim; (b) sever the intervention; (c) order a separate trial on the intervention issues; or (d) strike the intervention for good cause.” Saldana v. Saldana, 791 S.W.2d 316, 320 (Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 1990, no writ). 2010Ultimately, the trial court may decide to: "(a) try the intervention claim; (b) sever the intervention; (c) order a separate trial on the intervention issues; or (d) strike the intervention for good cause." Saldana v. Saldana , 791 S.W.2d 316, 320 (Tex. App.-Corpus Christi 1990, no writ). | 3 | 3 |
cluster 658638green2 sentences2001See, e.g., Walker v. City of Mesquite , 858 F.2d 1071 (5th Cir. 1988); Shults v. Champion Int'l Corp. , 35 F.3d 1056, 1061 (6th Cir. 1994); In re Brand Name Prescription Drugs Antitrust Litig ., 115 F.3d 456, 457-58 (7th Cir. 1997); Croyden Assoc. v. Alleco, Inc. , 969 F.2d 675 (8th Cir. 1991); Gottlieb v. Wiles , 11 F.3d 1004, 1012 (10th Cir. 1993); Guthrie v. Evans , 815 F.2d 626 (11th Cir. 1987) (all imposing an intervention requirement); Carlough v. Amchem Prods., Inc., 5 F.3d 707, 710-14 (3d Cir. 1993) (declining to entertain appeal from order denying intervention because objecting class 2001See, e.g., Walker v. City of Mesquite, 858 F.2d 1071 (5th Cir.1988); Shults v. Champion Int'l Corp., 35 F.3d 1056, 1061 (6th Cir.1994); In re Brand Name Prescription Drugs Antitrust Litig., 115 F.3d 456, 457-58 (7th Cir. 1997); Croyden Assoc. v. Alleco, Inc., 969 F.2d 675 (8th Cir.1992); Gottlieb v. Wiles, 11 F.3d 1004, 1012 (10th Cir.1993); Guthrie v. Evans, 815 F.2d 626 (11th Cir.1987) (all imposing an intervention requirement); Carlough v. Amchem Prods., Inc., 5 F.3d 707, 710-14 (3d Cir.1993) (declining to entertain appeal from order denying intervention because objecting class members woul | 3 | 3 |
In Re SMDgreen2 sentences2014See Mauldin, 428 S.W.3d at 263 ; In re S.M.D., 329 S.W.3d at 13, 16 ; see also In re H.B.N.S., Nos. 14-05-00410-CV, 14-05-00102-CV, 2007 WL 2034913 , at *3-4 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] July 17, 2007, pet. denied) (mem. op.) (Standing to intervene is measured at the time the intervention is filed.). 2014See Mauldin, 428 S.W.3d at 263 ; In re S.M.D., 329 S.W.3d at 13, 16 ; see also In re H.B.N.S., Nos. 14-05-00410-CV, 14-05-00102-CV, 2007 WL 2034913 , at *3-4 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] July 17, 2007, pet. denied) (mem. op.) (Standing to intervene is measured at the time the intervention is filed.). | 2 | 2 |
Marca E. Mauldin v. Jerry Clements and Janet Clementsgreen2 sentences2014See Mauldin, 428 S.W.3d at 263 ; In re S.M.D., 329 S.W.3d at 13, 16 ; see also In re H.B.N.S., Nos. 14-05-00410-CV, 14-05-00102-CV, 2007 WL 2034913 , at *3-4 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] July 17, 2007, pet. denied) (mem. op.) (Standing to intervene is measured at the time the intervention is filed.). 2014See Mauldin, 428 S.W.3d at 263 ; In re S.M.D., 329 S.W.3d at 13, 16 ; see also In re H.B.N.S., Nos. 14-05-00410-CV, 14-05-00102-CV, 2007 WL 2034913 , at *3-4 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] July 17, 2007, pet. denied) (mem. op.) (Standing to intervene is measured at the time the intervention is filed.). | 2 | 2 |
No. 93-1429green2 sentences2001See, e.g., Walker v. City of Mesquite , 858 F.2d 1071 (5th Cir. 1988); Shults v. Champion Int'l Corp. , 35 F.3d 1056, 1061 (6th Cir. 1994); In re Brand Name Prescription Drugs Antitrust Litig ., 115 F.3d 456, 457-58 (7th Cir. 1997); Croyden Assoc. v. Alleco, Inc. , 969 F.2d 675 (8th Cir. 1991); Gottlieb v. Wiles , 11 F.3d 1004, 1012 (10th Cir. 1993); Guthrie v. Evans , 815 F.2d 626 (11th Cir. 1987) (all imposing an intervention requirement); Carlough v. Amchem Prods., Inc., 5 F.3d 707, 710-14 (3d Cir. 1993) (declining to entertain appeal from order denying intervention because objecting class 2001See, e.g., Walker v. City of Mesquite, 858 F.2d 1071 (5th Cir.1988); Shults v. Champion Int'l Corp., 35 F.3d 1056, 1061 (6th Cir.1994); In re Brand Name Prescription Drugs Antitrust Litig., 115 F.3d 456, 457-58 (7th Cir. 1997); Croyden Assoc. v. Alleco, Inc., 969 F.2d 675 (8th Cir.1992); Gottlieb v. Wiles, 11 F.3d 1004, 1012 (10th Cir.1993); Guthrie v. Evans, 815 F.2d 626 (11th Cir.1987) (all imposing an intervention requirement); Carlough v. Amchem Prods., Inc., 5 F.3d 707, 710-14 (3d Cir.1993) (declining to entertain appeal from order denying intervention because objecting class members woul | 2 | 2 |
J.A. Shults and Joan Shults, Hugh Brown v. Champion International Corporationgreen2 sentences2001See, e.g., Walker v. City of Mesquite , 858 F.2d 1071 (5th Cir. 1988); Shults v. Champion Int'l Corp. , 35 F.3d 1056, 1061 (6th Cir. 1994); In re Brand Name Prescription Drugs Antitrust Litig ., 115 F.3d 456, 457-58 (7th Cir. 1997); Croyden Assoc. v. Alleco, Inc. , 969 F.2d 675 (8th Cir. 1991); Gottlieb v. Wiles , 11 F.3d 1004, 1012 (10th Cir. 1993); Guthrie v. Evans , 815 F.2d 626 (11th Cir. 1987) (all imposing an intervention requirement); Carlough v. Amchem Prods., Inc., 5 F.3d 707, 710-14 (3d Cir. 1993) (declining to entertain appeal from order denying intervention because objecting class 2001See, e.g., Walker v. City of Mesquite, 858 F.2d 1071 (5th Cir.1988); Shults v. Champion Int'l Corp., 35 F.3d 1056, 1061 (6th Cir.1994); In re Brand Name Prescription Drugs Antitrust Litig., 115 F.3d 456, 457-58 (7th Cir. 1997); Croyden Assoc. v. Alleco, Inc., 969 F.2d 675 (8th Cir.1992); Gottlieb v. Wiles, 11 F.3d 1004, 1012 (10th Cir.1993); Guthrie v. Evans, 815 F.2d 626 (11th Cir.1987) (all imposing an intervention requirement); Carlough v. Amchem Prods., Inc., 5 F.3d 707, 710-14 (3d Cir.1993) (declining to entertain appeal from order denying intervention because objecting class members woul | 2 | 2 |
San Juan 1990-A, L.P. v. Meridian Oil Inc.green2 sentences2001See, e.g., Walker v. City of Mesquite, 858 F.2d 1071 (5th Cir.1988); Shults v. Champion Int'l Corp., 35 F.3d 1056, 1061 (6th Cir.1994); In re Brand Name Prescription Drugs Antitrust Litig., 115 F.3d 456, 457-58 (7th Cir. 1997); Croyden Assoc. v. Alleco, Inc., 969 F.2d 675 (8th Cir.1992); Gottlieb v. Wiles, 11 F.3d 1004, 1012 (10th Cir.1993); Guthrie v. Evans, 815 F.2d 626 (11th Cir.1987) (all imposing an intervention requirement); Carlough v. Amchem Prods., Inc., 5 F.3d 707, 710-14 (3d Cir.1993) (declining to entertain appeal from order denying intervention because objecting class members woul 2001The court in San Juan also recognized that “an exception to the intervention requirement may exist when a procedural flaw in the notice of the proposed settlement provided to class members is so deficient that it results in a due process violation.” Id. at 165 . | 2 | 2 |
cluster 512611green2 sentences2001See, e.g., Walker v. City of Mesquite , 858 F.2d 1071 (5th Cir. 1988); Shults v. Champion Int'l Corp. , 35 F.3d 1056, 1061 (6th Cir. 1994); In re Brand Name Prescription Drugs Antitrust Litig ., 115 F.3d 456, 457-58 (7th Cir. 1997); Croyden Assoc. v. Alleco, Inc. , 969 F.2d 675 (8th Cir. 1991); Gottlieb v. Wiles , 11 F.3d 1004, 1012 (10th Cir. 1993); Guthrie v. Evans , 815 F.2d 626 (11th Cir. 1987) (all imposing an intervention requirement); Carlough v. Amchem Prods., Inc., 5 F.3d 707, 710-14 (3d Cir. 1993) (declining to entertain appeal from order denying intervention because objecting class 2001See, e.g., Walker v. City of Mesquite, 858 F.2d 1071 (5th Cir.1988); Shults v. Champion Int'l Corp., 35 F.3d 1056, 1061 (6th Cir.1994); In re Brand Name Prescription Drugs Antitrust Litig., 115 F.3d 456, 457-58 (7th Cir. 1997); Croyden Assoc. v. Alleco, Inc., 969 F.2d 675 (8th Cir.1992); Gottlieb v. Wiles, 11 F.3d 1004, 1012 (10th Cir.1993); Guthrie v. Evans, 815 F.2d 626 (11th Cir.1987) (all imposing an intervention requirement); Carlough v. Amchem Prods., Inc., 5 F.3d 707, 710-14 (3d Cir.1993) (declining to entertain appeal from order denying intervention because objecting class members woul | 2 | 2 |
O'REILLY v. Brodiegreen2 sentences2001See, e.g., Walker v. City of Mesquite , 858 F.2d 1071 (5th Cir. 1988); Shults v. Champion Int'l Corp. , 35 F.3d 1056, 1061 (6th Cir. 1994); In re Brand Name Prescription Drugs Antitrust Litig ., 115 F.3d 456, 457-58 (7th Cir. 1997); Croyden Assoc. v. Alleco, Inc. , 969 F.2d 675 (8th Cir. 1991); Gottlieb v. Wiles , 11 F.3d 1004, 1012 (10th Cir. 1993); Guthrie v. Evans , 815 F.2d 626 (11th Cir. 1987) (all imposing an intervention requirement); Carlough v. Amchem Prods., Inc., 5 F.3d 707, 710-14 (3d Cir. 1993) (declining to entertain appeal from order denying intervention because objecting class 2001See, e.g., Walker v. City of Mesquite, 858 F.2d 1071 (5th Cir.1988); Shults v. Champion Int'l Corp., 35 F.3d 1056, 1061 (6th Cir.1994); In re Brand Name Prescription Drugs Antitrust Litig., 115 F.3d 456, 457-58 (7th Cir. 1997); Croyden Assoc. v. Alleco, Inc., 969 F.2d 675 (8th Cir.1992); Gottlieb v. Wiles, 11 F.3d 1004, 1012 (10th Cir.1993); Guthrie v. Evans, 815 F.2d 626 (11th Cir.1987) (all imposing an intervention requirement); Carlough v. Amchem Prods., Inc., 5 F.3d 707, 710-14 (3d Cir.1993) (declining to entertain appeal from order denying intervention because objecting class members woul | 2 | 2 |
In Re Brand Name Prescription Drugs Antitrust Litigationgreen2 sentences2001See, e.g., Walker v. City of Mesquite , 858 F.2d 1071 (5th Cir. 1988); Shults v. Champion Int'l Corp. , 35 F.3d 1056, 1061 (6th Cir. 1994); In re Brand Name Prescription Drugs Antitrust Litig ., 115 F.3d 456, 457-58 (7th Cir. 1997); Croyden Assoc. v. Alleco, Inc. , 969 F.2d 675 (8th Cir. 1991); Gottlieb v. Wiles , 11 F.3d 1004, 1012 (10th Cir. 1993); Guthrie v. Evans , 815 F.2d 626 (11th Cir. 1987) (all imposing an intervention requirement); Carlough v. Amchem Prods., Inc., 5 F.3d 707, 710-14 (3d Cir. 1993) (declining to entertain appeal from order denying intervention because objecting class 2001See, e.g., Walker v. City of Mesquite, 858 F.2d 1071 (5th Cir.1988); Shults v. Champion Int'l Corp., 35 F.3d 1056, 1061 (6th Cir.1994); In re Brand Name Prescription Drugs Antitrust Litig., 115 F.3d 456, 457-58 (7th Cir. 1997); Croyden Assoc. v. Alleco, Inc., 969 F.2d 675 (8th Cir.1992); Gottlieb v. Wiles, 11 F.3d 1004, 1012 (10th Cir.1993); Guthrie v. Evans, 815 F.2d 626 (11th Cir.1987) (all imposing an intervention requirement); Carlough v. Amchem Prods., Inc., 5 F.3d 707, 710-14 (3d Cir.1993) (declining to entertain appeal from order denying intervention because objecting class members woul | 2 | 2 |
General Motors Corp. v. Bloyedgreen2 sentences2001See Bloyed , 916 S.W.2d at 955 . 2001See Bloyed, 916 S.W.2d at 955 . | 2 | 2 |
In Re Union Carbide Corp.green1 sentence2023In re Union Carbide Corp., 273 S.W.3d 152, 156 (Tex. 2008) (orig. proceeding) (quoting Boswell, O’ Toole, Davis & Pickering v. Stewart, 531 S.W.2d 380, 382 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1975, no writ)). 7 Musick does not contend that the severance fails to satisfy the Guaranty Federal requirements. | 1 | 1 |
Safety National Casualty Corp. v. Stategreen1 sentence2018See 273 S.W.3d at 157. | 1 | 1 |
Northrup v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.green1 sentence2003Co., 72 S.W.3d 1, 10 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 2001, pet. denied) (stating that “imposition of the intervention requirement is appropriate in non-settlement class actions”). | 1 | 1 |
Sanes v. Clarkgreen1 sentence2001See Sanes, 25 S.W.3d at 804-05 . | 1 | 1 |
Helton v. Kimbellgreen1 sentence1990See Helton v. Kimbell, 621 S.W.2d 675 (Tex.Civ.App.1981, no writ); St. | 1 | 1 |
Inter-Continental Corporation v. Moodygreen1 sentence1981Boswell, O’Toole, Davis & Pickering v. Stewart, 531 S.W.2d 380, 382 (Tex.Civ.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1975, no writ); Inter-Continental Corp. v. Moody, 411 S.W.2d 578, 589 (Tex.Civ.App.-Houston 1966, writ ref’d n.r. e.). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Van Dyke v. Boswell, O'Toole, Davis & Pickering
green
2 sentences2015Since the trial court granted separate trials for 27 the intervention claim for fees and the malpractice counterclaim, the res judicata effects of the action on the intervention claim for fees cannot preclude the malpractice counterclaim.” Id. at 384 . 1985Thus, the malpractice issues were not actually litigated in the trial on the intervention claim for fees." 697 S.W.2d at 384 . | 3 | 1985–2015 |
Verburgt v. Dorner
green
2 sentences2014Verburgt, 959 S.W.2d at 617 . 2014Verburgt, 959 S.W.2d at 617 . | 2 | 2014–2014 |
Schwartz v. Taheny
green
2 sentences2003Id. at 623 . 2003Id. | 2 | 2003–2003 |
Arthur S. Guthrie, Keiter Parrott v. David C. Evans
green
2 sentences2001See, e.g., Walker v. City of Mesquite , 858 F.2d 1071 (5th Cir. 1988); Shults v. Champion Int'l Corp. , 35 F.3d 1056, 1061 (6th Cir. 1994); In re Brand Name Prescription Drugs Antitrust Litig ., 115 F.3d 456, 457-58 (7th Cir. 1997); Croyden Assoc. v. Alleco, Inc. , 969 F.2d 675 (8th Cir. 1991); Gottlieb v. Wiles , 11 F.3d 1004, 1012 (10th Cir. 1993); Guthrie v. Evans , 815 F.2d 626 (11th Cir. 1987) (all imposing an intervention requirement); Carlough v. Amchem Prods., Inc., 5 F.3d 707, 710-14 (3d Cir. 1993) (declining to entertain appeal from order denying intervention because objecting class 2001See, e.g., Walker v. City of Mesquite, 858 F.2d 1071 (5th Cir.1988); Shults v. Champion Int'l Corp., 35 F.3d 1056, 1061 (6th Cir.1994); In re Brand Name Prescription Drugs Antitrust Litig., 115 F.3d 456, 457-58 (7th Cir. 1997); Croyden Assoc. v. Alleco, Inc., 969 F.2d 675 (8th Cir.1992); Gottlieb v. Wiles, 11 F.3d 1004, 1012 (10th Cir.1993); Guthrie v. Evans, 815 F.2d 626 (11th Cir.1987) (all imposing an intervention requirement); Carlough v. Amchem Prods., Inc., 5 F.3d 707, 710-14 (3d Cir.1993) (declining to entertain appeal from order denying intervention because objecting class members woul | 2 | 2001–2001 |
Croyden Associates v. Alleco
green
2 sentences2001See, e.g., Walker v. City of Mesquite , 858 F.2d 1071 (5th Cir. 1988); Shults v. Champion Int'l Corp. , 35 F.3d 1056, 1061 (6th Cir. 1994); In re Brand Name Prescription Drugs Antitrust Litig ., 115 F.3d 456, 457-58 (7th Cir. 1997); Croyden Assoc. v. Alleco, Inc. , 969 F.2d 675 (8th Cir. 1991); Gottlieb v. Wiles , 11 F.3d 1004, 1012 (10th Cir. 1993); Guthrie v. Evans , 815 F.2d 626 (11th Cir. 1987) (all imposing an intervention requirement); Carlough v. Amchem Prods., Inc., 5 F.3d 707, 710-14 (3d Cir. 1993) (declining to entertain appeal from order denying intervention because objecting class 2001See, e.g., Walker v. City of Mesquite, 858 F.2d 1071 (5th Cir.1988); Shults v. Champion Int'l Corp., 35 F.3d 1056, 1061 (6th Cir.1994); In re Brand Name Prescription Drugs Antitrust Litig., 115 F.3d 456, 457-58 (7th Cir. 1997); Croyden Assoc. v. Alleco, Inc., 969 F.2d 675 (8th Cir.1992); Gottlieb v. Wiles, 11 F.3d 1004, 1012 (10th Cir.1993); Guthrie v. Evans, 815 F.2d 626 (11th Cir.1987) (all imposing an intervention requirement); Carlough v. Amchem Prods., Inc., 5 F.3d 707, 710-14 (3d Cir.1993) (declining to entertain appeal from order denying intervention because objecting class members woul | 2 | 2001–2001 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.