Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
21 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1998–2024 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
S.L.B. v. C.E.B.green1 sentence2024App. 4 Cir. 7/27/18), 252 So.3d 950, 966 (quoting Bowden v. Brown, 48,268, p. 17 (La. | 1 | 1 |
La. Household Goods v. La. Public Serv.green1 sentence2018See , e.g., Louisiana Household Goods Carriers v. Louisiana Public Service Commission , 99-3184 (La. 6/30/00), 762 So.2d 1081 (holding the Louisiana Public Service Commission had broad discretion to admit evidence that would not be admissible in a judicial proceeding, provided the evidence is probative and relevant). | 1 | 1 |
Loucious v. Crest Industriesgreen1 sentence2016However, to ensure the reliability of factual findings, the Legislature has mandated that the hearing officer’s findings be based on “competent evidence.” Loucious v. Crest Indus., 15-690, pp. 6-7 (La.App. 3 Cir. 12/16/15), 181 So.3d 956, 960 (quoting Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225, p. 13 (La. 3/4/98), 708 So.2d 375, 383 ). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co.
green
2 sentences2022This more relaxed evidentiary standard for workers’ compensation claims was explained in Richard v. Quality Constr. & Prod., LLC, 2018-0965, p. 6 (La. App. 3 Cir. 6/5/19), 275 So.3d 328 , 335 (quoting Chaisson, 1997-1225, p. 10, 708 So.2d at 381 ), as follows: This more relaxed standard for the admissibility of evidence is the general rule in proceedings before administrative agencies. 2018Instead, he found that it was not "competent evidence" as defined by the supreme court in Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co. , 97-1225, p. 13 (La. 3/4/98), 708 So.2d 375 , 383 : The Legislature in fashioning a relaxed evidentiary standard for worker's compensation proceedings envisioned the broad admission of evidence that might fall outside of the technical rules of evidence. ... | 10 | 1998–2022 |
Maryland v. Craig
green
2 sentences2009Maryland v. Craig, 497 U.S. 836 , 110 S.Ct. 3157 , 111 L.Ed.2d 666 (1990); Michael H. 2009Maryland v. Craig, 497 U.S. 836 , 110 S.Ct. 3157 , 111 L.Ed.2d 666 (1990); Michael H. | 3 | 1999–2009 |
Folse v. Folse
green
2 sentences2007C.E. art. 1101(B) provides for a relaxed evidentiary standard to be applied in child custody proceedings to promote the purposes of those proceedings. 98-1976, p. 11, 738 So.2d at 1046 . 2007C.E. art. 1101(B) provides for a relaxed evidentiary standard to be applied in child custody proceedings to promote the purposes of those proceedings. 98-1976, p. 11, 738 So.2d at 1046 . | 3 | 2006–2007 |
State v. Miller
green
2 sentences2009State v. Miller, 98-0301 (La.9/9/98), 718 So.2d 960 (where evidence of uncharged misconduct is admissible to show "lustful disposition"). 2009State v. Miller, 98-0301 (La.9/9/98), 718 So.2d 960 (where evidence of uncharged misconduct is admissible to show “lustful disposition”). | 2 | 2009–2009 |
Crowson v. Crowson
green
1 sentence2024App. 2 Cir. 9/22/99), 742 So.2d 107, 110 , recognized that whether evidence is relevant or not is within the discretion of the trial court. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Richard v. Quality Constr.
neutral
1 sentence2022This more relaxed evidentiary standard for workers’ compensation claims was explained in Richard v. Quality Constr. & Prod., LLC, 2018-0965, p. 6 (La. App. 3 Cir. 6/5/19), 275 So.3d 328 , 335 (quoting Chaisson, 1997-1225, p. 10, 708 So.2d at 381 ), as follows: This more relaxed standard for the admissibility of evidence is the general rule in proceedings before administrative agencies. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Charles v. Lake Charles Memorial Hospital
neutral
2 sentences2018However, to ensure the reliability of the factual findings, the Legislature has mandated that the hearing officer's findings be based on "competent evidence." Further, despite the more relaxed nature of a worker's compensation proceeding, "the rule concerning expert testimony is more stringent [.]" Charles v. Lake Charles Mem'l Hosp. , 06-1590, p. 6 (La.App. 3 Cir. 5/30/07), 959 So.2d 571 , 576, writ denied , 07-1607 (La. 10/26/07), 959 So.2d 571 . 2018However, to ensure the reliability of the factual findings, the Legislature has mandated that the hearing officer's findings be based on "competent evidence." Further, despite the more relaxed nature of a worker's compensation proceeding, "the rule concerning expert testimony is more stringent [.]" Charles v. Lake Charles Mem'l Hosp. , 06-1590, p. 6 (La.App. 3 Cir. 5/30/07), 959 So.2d 571 , 576, writ denied , 07-1607 (La. 10/26/07), 959 So.2d 571 . | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Bowden v. Brown
neutral
1 sentence2018App. 2 Cir. 5/15/13), 114 So.3d 1194 , 1205. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Davis v. Petroleum Club of Lafayette
green
1 sentence2007The Louisiana Supreme Court granted writs and reversed in Davis v. Petroleum Club of Lafayette, 01-2818 (La.1/11/02), 806 So.2d 654 , stating in pertinent part: Because Wilson Joseph Davis, Sr. has not complied with the requirement of La. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Spreadbury v. STATE, DEPT. OF PUB. SAFETY
green
1 sentence2001App. 1 Cir. 11/5/99), 745 So.2d 1204 , this court recognized a more relaxed evidentiary standard in an administrative hearing appeal as established by the Supreme Court in Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225 (La.3/4/98), 708 So.2d 375 . | 1 | 2001–2001 |
State in Interest of CW v. Womack
neutral
1 sentence1999State in the Interest of CW v. Womack, 28,310 (La.App. 2 Cir. 2/28/96), 669 So.2d 700 , superceded on other grounds by LA.CH. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Touchard v. Williams
red
1 sentence1999Touchard v. Williams, 617 So.2d 885 (La.1993). | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.