Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
21 New Hampshire opinions name it 1 courts 1999–2025 8 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Hampshire courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Hannigan v. City of Concordgreen2 sentences2024“The superior court was obligated to treat the factual findings of both boards as prima facie lawful and reasonable and could not set aside their decisions absent unreasonableness or an identified error of law.” Hannigan v. City of Concord, 144 N.H. 68, 70 (1999). 2024“The superior court was obligated to treat the factual findings of both boards as prima facie lawful and reasonable and could not set aside their decisions absent unreasonableness or an identified error of law.” Hannigan v. City of Concord, 3 144 N.H. 68, 70 (1999); see RSA 677:6, :15, V (2016). | 3 | 3 |
Trustees of Dartmouth College v. Town of Hanovergreen2 sentences2025Id. 2021“The trial court must treat the factual findings of the planning board as prima facie lawful and reasonable and cannot set aside its decision absent unreasonableness or an identified error of law.” Trustees of Dartmouth Coll., 171 N.H. at 504 . | 1 | 7 |
Ferson-Lake, LLC v. City of Nashuagreen2 sentences2010“The review by the superior court is not to determine whether it agrees with the planning board’s findings, but to determine whether there is evidence upon which they could have been reasonably based.” Id. “[T]he appealing party must demonstrate that an error of law was committed or must persuade the trial court by the balance of probabilities that the board’s decision was unreasonable.” Feins v. Town of Wilmot, 154 N.H. 715, 717 (2007) (quotations omitted). 2010The superior court is obligated to treat the factual findings of the planning board as prima facie lawful and reasonable and cannot set aside its decision absent unreasonableness or an identified error of law.” Ferson-Lake, 159 N.H. at 526 (citation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Feins v. Town of Wilmotgreen1 sentence2010“The review by the superior court is not to determine whether it agrees with the planning board’s findings, but to determine whether there is evidence upon which they could have been reasonably based.” Id. “[T]he appealing party must demonstrate that an error of law was committed or must persuade the trial court by the balance of probabilities that the board’s decision was unreasonable.” Feins v. Town of Wilmot, 154 N.H. 715, 717 (2007) (quotations omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Deer Leap Associates v. Town of Windhamgreen2 sentences1999Deer Leap Assocs. v. Town of Windham, 136 N.H. 555, 557 , 618 A.2d 837, 838 (1992) (planning board); Dube v. Town of Hudson, 140 N.H. 135, 137 , 663 A.2d 626, 628 (1995) (ZBA); see RSA 677:6, :15, V (1996). 1999Deer Leap Assocs. v. Town of Windham, 136 N.H. 555, 557 , 618 A.2d 837, 838 (1992) (planning board); Dube v. Town of Hudson, 140 N.H. 135, 137 , 663 A.2d 626, 628 (1995) (ZBA); see RSA 677:6, :15, V (1996). | 1 | 1 |
Dube v. Town of Hudsongreen2 sentences1999Deer Leap Assocs. v. Town of Windham, 136 N.H. 555, 557 , 618 A.2d 837, 838 (1992) (planning board); Dube v. Town of Hudson, 140 N.H. 135, 137 , 663 A.2d 626, 628 (1995) (ZBA); see RSA 677:6, :15, V (1996). 1999Deer Leap Assocs. v. Town of Windham, 136 N.H. 555, 557 , 618 A.2d 837, 838 (1992) (planning board); Dube v. Town of Hudson, 140 N.H. 135, 137 , 663 A.2d 626, 628 (1995) (ZBA); see RSA 677:6, :15, V (1996). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Hampshire. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Limited Editions Properties, Inc. v. Town of Hebron
green
2 sentences2016Id. 2016Id. | 2 | 2016–2016 |
Derry Senior Development, LLC v. Town of Derry
green
2 sentences2009Id. 2009Id. | 2 | 2009–2009 |
Summa Humma Entersprises, LLC v. Town of Tilton
green
2 sentences2008Id. 2007Id. | 2 | 2007–2008 |
State v. Addison
green
1 sentence2015In this manner, the defendant asserts that “[h]is case bears the characteristics of those in which defendants were sentenced to life, and is an outlier when compared to cases in which defendants were sentenced to death.” The State argues that the defendant’s “statistical, mathematical approach to comparative proportionality review stands in direct contrast” to the qualitative, precedent-seeking approach we adopted in Proportionality Framework, and that his approach should be rejected because it “fails to establish any unique footprint of the comparison cases or the defendant’s case.” We have r | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Motorsports Holdings, LLC v. Town of Tamworth
green
1 sentence2011Id. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Bayson Properties, Inc. v. City of Lebanon
green
1 sentence2004Id. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.