21 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1996–2025 8 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Olivo v. Stategreen2 sentences2025See Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 523 (Tex. Crim. 2025See Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 523 (Tex. Crim. | 4 | 4 |
Graves v. Stategreen2 sentences2025See Graves v. State, 539 S.W.2d 890, 891-92 (Tex. Crim. 2025See Graves v. State, 539 S.W.2d 890, 891-92 (Tex. Crim. | 3 | 3 |
Thadeaus Roy Culberson v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Floridagreen2 sentences2015See Culberson v. Wainwright, 453 F.2d 1219 , 1220–21 (5th Cir. 1972) (per curiam). cert. denied, 407 U.S. 913 (1972) (concluding Waller had no effect on Diaz rule permitting subsequent prosecution after victim dies and upholding manslaughter conviction against claim of double jeopardy premised on conviction for assault obtained before victim died). 2015See Culberson v. Wainwright, 453 F.2d 1219, 1220-21 (5th Cir.1972) (per curiam), cert. denied, 407 U.S; 913, 92 S.Ct. 2449 , 32 L.Ed.2d 688 (1972) (concluding Waller had no effect on Diaz rule permitting subsequent prosecution after victim dies and upholding -mam slaughter conviction against claim of double jeopardy premised on conviction for assault obtained before victim died). | 2 | 2 |
Kemp v. Stategreen2 sentences2012Gaal , 332 S.W.3d at 454 ; see Kemp , 846 S.W.2d at 306 . 2012Gaal, 332 S.W.3d at 454 ; see Kemp, 846 S.W.2d at 306 . | 2 | 2 |
Campos v. Stategreen2 sentences2005See Campos , 977 S.W.2d at 464 . 2005See Campos , 977 S.W.2d at 464 . | 2 | 2 |
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Havnergreen2 sentences2001See Merrell Dow Pharm. v. Havner , 953 S.W.2d 706, 711 (Tex. 1997). 2001See Merrell Dow Pharm. v. Havner, 953 S.W.2d 706, 711 (Tex.1997). | 2 | 2 |
York v. Stategreen2 sentences2025See Diaz, 223 U.S. at 448-49 ; see also York v. State, 342 S.W.3d 528, 551 (Tex. Crim. 2025See Diaz, 223 U.S. at 448-49 ; see also York v. State, 342 S.W.3d 528, 551 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Diaz v. United Statesgreen2 sentences2025See Diaz, 223 U.S. at 448-49 ; see also York v. State, 342 S.W.3d 528, 551 (Tex. Crim. 2025See Diaz, 223 U.S. at 448-49 ; see also York v. State, 342 S.W.3d 528, 551 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Frazer v. Stategreen2 sentences2025See Frazer v. State, 99 Tex. Crim. 89 , 91–92, 268 S.W. 164, 166 (1924) (holding jurors’ discussion during deliberations in murder case of their personal knowledge regarding gunpowder burns and trajectory of bullet based on jurors’ “different experiences in 36 Diaz’s motion for new trial on this basis. 2025See Frazer v. State, 99 Tex. Crim. 89 , 91–92, 268 S.W. 164, 166 (1924) (holding jurors’ discussion during deliberations in murder case of their personal knowledge regarding gunpowder burns and trajectory of bullet based on jurors’ “different experiences in 36 Diaz’s motion for new trial on this basis. | 1 | 1 |
Mata v. Stategreen1 sentence2025See Saenz, 976 S.W.2d at 321–23 (holding defendant was not entitled to new trial under Rule 21.3 even though he had presented evidence that juror had discussed his personal experience as gang member with jury in murder case involving fourteen-year old gang-member, and that five members of jury with firearm experience had “educated” remaining members of jury “who, presumably lacked that experience” because defendant did not show any detrimental impact);15 see also Mata v. State, 517 S.W.3d 257, 268 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi–Edinburg 2017, pet. ref’d) (holding trial court did not abuse discretio | 1 | 1 |
Saenz v. Stategreen1 sentence2025See Saenz, 976 S.W.2d at 321–23 (holding defendant was not entitled to new trial under Rule 21.3 even though he had presented evidence that juror had discussed his personal experience as gang member with jury in murder case involving fourteen-year old gang-member, and that five members of jury with firearm experience had “educated” remaining members of jury “who, presumably lacked that experience” because defendant did not show any detrimental impact);15 see also Mata v. State, 517 S.W.3d 257, 268 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi–Edinburg 2017, pet. ref’d) (holding trial court did not abuse discretio | 1 | 1 |
Hawkins v. Stategreen2 sentences2024See id. at 76– 77 (“The only adverse ruling—and thus the only occasion for making a mistake—was the trial court’s denial of the motion for mistrial.”). 2024See id. at 76– 77 (“The only adverse ruling—and thus the only occasion for making a mistake—was the trial court’s denial of the motion for mistrial.”). | 1 | 1 |
Exxon Mobil Corporation, Whm Custom Services, Inc., and Disa, Inc. v. Gilberto Rinconesgreen1 sentence2024Tex. Dep’t of Transp. v. Lara, 625 S.W.3d 46 , 59 (Tex. 2021); Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Rincones, 520 S.W.3d 572, 586 (Tex. 2017) (“protected opposition must at least alert an employer to the employee’s reasonable belief that unlawful discrimination is at issue.” (cleaned up)). | 1 | 1 |
Hill v. Stategreen2 sentences2015See Graves v. State, 539 S.W.2d 890, 891-92 (Tex.Crim.App.1976); Hill v. State, 141 Tex.Crim. 169 , 149 S.W.2d 93, 95-96 (1941); Curtis v. State, 22 Tex.App. 227 , 236-37, 3 S.W. 86, 87-88 (1886); Johnson, 19 Tex.App. at 461. 2015See Graves v. State, 539 S.W.2d 890, 891-92 (Tex.Crim.App.1976); Hill v. State, 141 Tex.Crim. 169 , 149 S.W.2d 93, 95-96 (1941); Curtis v. State, 22 Tex.App. 227 , 236-37, 3 S.W. 86, 87-88 (1886); Johnson, 19 Tex.App. at 461. | 1 | 1 |
Young v. Reedgreen1 sentence2015See Culberson v. Wainwright, 453 F.2d 1219 , 1220–21 (5th Cir. 1972) (per curiam). cert. denied, 407 U.S. 913 (1972) (concluding Waller had no effect on Diaz rule permitting subsequent prosecution after victim dies and upholding manslaughter conviction against claim of double jeopardy premised on conviction for assault obtained before victim died). | 1 | 1 |
Curtis v. Stategreen2 sentences2015See Graves v. State, 539 S.W.2d 890, 891-92 (Tex.Crim.App.1976); Hill v. State, 141 Tex.Crim. 169 , 149 S.W.2d 93, 95-96 (1941); Curtis v. State, 22 Tex.App. 227 , 236-37, 3 S.W. 86, 87-88 (1886); Johnson, 19 Tex.App. at 461. 2015See Graves v. State, 539 S.W.2d 890, 891-92 (Tex.Crim.App.1976); Hill v. State, 141 Tex.Crim. 169 , 149 S.W.2d 93, 95-96 (1941); Curtis v. State, 22 Tex.App. 227 , 236-37, 3 S.W. 86, 87-88 (1886); Johnson, 19 Tex.App. at 461. | 1 | 1 |
In Re Dickasongreen1 sentence2011In re Brookshire Grocery Co., 250 S.W.3d 66, 72 (Tex.2008) (orig. proceeding); In re Dickason, 987 S.W.2d 570, 571 (Tex.1998) (orig. proceeding). | 1 | 1 |
In Re Brookshire Grocery Co.green1 sentence2011In re Brookshire Grocery Co., 250 S.W.3d 66, 72 (Tex.2008) (orig. proceeding); In re Dickason, 987 S.W.2d 570, 571 (Tex.1998) (orig. proceeding). | 1 | 1 |
Llanes v. Corpus Christi Independent School Districtgreen1 sentence2006Llanes , 64 S.W.3d at 642 (although employee need not identify specific law when making report, or establish actual violation of law, there must be some law prohibiting complained-of conduct to give rise to whistleblower claim). 28. | 1 | 1 |
Chambers v. Conawaygreen2 sentences1996See Chambers v. Conaway, 883 S.W.2d 156, 158 (Tex.1993). 1996See Chambers v. Conaway, 883 S.W.2d 156, 158 (Tex.1993). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Strickland v. Washington
green
2 sentences2012Based on the record before us and the strong presumption of reasonable assistance, as well as the absence of any explanation regarding defense counsel’s strategy, we cannot say that Diaz has met his burden of showing by a preponderance of the evidence that his counsel’s failure to file a motion to recuse the trial court judge or failure to object that the same judge who had signed the blood warrant presided over the suppression hearing and the trial fell below the standard of prevailing professional norms. 2 See Strickland, 466 U.S. at 688-89 , 104 S.Ct. at 2065 . 2012Based on the record before us and the strong presumption of reasonable assistance, as well as the absence of any explanation regarding defense counsel’s strategy, we cannot say that Diaz has met his burden of showing by a preponderance of the evidence that his counsel’s failure to file a motion to recuse the trial court judge or failure to object that the same judge who had signed the blood warrant presided over the suppression hearing and the trial fell below the standard of prevailing professional norms. 2 See Strickland, 466 U.S. at 688-89 , 104 S.Ct. at 2065 . | 2 | 2012–2012 |
Gaal v. State
green
2 sentences2012Gaal , 332 S.W.3d at 454 ; see Kemp , 846 S.W.2d at 306 . 2012Gaal, 332 S.W.3d at 454 ; see Kemp, 846 S.W.2d at 306 . | 2 | 2012–2012 |
Archie v. State
green
1 sentence2024Archie v. State, 221 S.W.3d 695 , 700–01 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Webb v. State
green
1 sentence2024Webb, 36 S.W.3d at 176 ; Conatser, 645 S.W.3d at 931. 4) Barker Balancing After a review of the Barker factors, we uphold the trial court’s ruling denying Diaz’s motion for a speedy trial. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Rosenkrans v. State
green
1 sentence2015App. 1972) (Defendant’s admission constituted a “judicial admission” because he was sworn in as a witness). 6 Rosenkrans v. State, 758 S.W.2d 388 (Tex.App.—Austin 1988, pet. ref’d) provides an example of an oral stipulation in support of a guilty plea: 7 trial court took judicial notice of Diaz’s plea papers (Supp. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Logan v. Slayton
green
1 sentence2015See Culberson v. Wainwright, 453 F.2d 1219, 1220-21 (5th Cir.1972) (per curiam), cert. denied, 407 U.S; 913, 92 S.Ct. 2449 , 32 L.Ed.2d 688 (1972) (concluding Waller had no effect on Diaz rule permitting subsequent prosecution after victim dies and upholding -mam slaughter conviction against claim of double jeopardy premised on conviction for assault obtained before victim died). | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Westphal v. Diaz
green
1 sentence1997With one justice dissenting, the court of appeals affirmed the trial court’s summary judgment on Carolyn Westphal’s claims and the claims she brought for Mr. Westphal’s estate, holding that the limitations period had expired before she filed suit. 918 S.W.2d at 546 . | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.