Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1990–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Federal Vending, Inc. v. Steak & Ale of Florida, Inc.green1 sentence2026Vending, Inc. v. Steak & Ale of Fla., Inc., 687 So. 2d 1366, 1368 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997), and claim for costs, see § 57.041(1), Fla. Stat. (2025). | 1 | 1 |
Rogan v. Stategreen1 sentence2014See Rogan v. State, 203 So.2d 24 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967). | 1 | 1 |
Johnson v. Stategreen1 sentence2009See Johnson v. State, 938 So.2d 639, 640 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006). | 1 | 1 |
Boyd v. Stategreen2 sentences2007Our review of Diaz's motion for judgment of acquittal is de novo, see Boyd v. State, 910 So.2d 167, 180 (Fla.2005); Tibbs v. State, 397 So.2d 1120 (Fla.1981), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the State. 2007Boyd, 910 So.2d at 180 ; Banks v. State, 732 So.2d 1065 (Fla.1999). | 1 | 1 |
Lindsey v. Stategreen1 sentence2003See Lindsey v. State, 839 So.2d 737 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003). | 1 | 1 |
Smith v. Stategreen1 sentence2003See Smith v. State, 697 So.2d 991 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997)(it is the trial court's responsibility to make findings of fact as to witness credibility). | 1 | 1 |
Wallace v. Townsellgreen1 sentence1990Cf. Wallace v Townsell, 471 So.2d 662, 665 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Diaz v. State
green
1 sentence2011Id. at 803-04 . | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Diaz v. State
green
1 sentence2008Id. at 1287 . *1277 Subsequently, the trial court summarily denied Diaz's rule 3.850 motion, arguing ineffective assistance of counsel. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Banks v. State
green
1 sentence2007Boyd, 910 So.2d at 180 ; Banks v. State, 732 So.2d 1065 (Fla.1999). | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Tibbs v. State
green
1 sentence2007Our review of Diaz's motion for judgment of acquittal is de novo, see Boyd v. State, 910 So.2d 167, 180 (Fla.2005); Tibbs v. State, 397 So.2d 1120 (Fla.1981), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the State. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Green v. State
green
1 sentence2003While we recognize that our opinion in Hersey conflicts with Green v. State, 839 So.2d 748 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003), which held that the curative effect of Chapter 02-210 could not be applied retroactively because retroactive application would violate the ex post facto clauses of the United States and Florida Constitution, Diaz’s claim would still lack merit because he was not adversely affected by the amendments made by Chapter 99-188. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Heggs v. State
green
1 sentence2001We reverse the order only insofar as it denied Diaz’ claim for resentencing under Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla. 2000). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Wood v. State
green
1 sentence2001He contends that he is subject to being deported on account of the Florida prior convictions. [1] Diaz' motion is timely because it was filed within the window period created by Wood v. State, 750 So.2d 592 (Fla.1999). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.