Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
20 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1964–2026 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Allengreen2 sentences2026See id. at 351-52 . ¶ 17 Turning to defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, we note that as the Illinois Supreme Court explained in People v. Graham, 206 Ill. 2d 465, 476 (2003): “Ineffective assistance of counsel claims are analyzed under the test established in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). [Citation.] Under Strickland, a defendant must prove that defense counsel’s performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness and that this substandard performance created a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s errors, the result of the proceeding wo 2026See id. at 351-52 . ¶ 17 Turning to defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, we note that as the Illinois Supreme Court explained in People v. Graham, 206 Ill. 2d 465, 476 (2003): “Ineffective assistance of counsel claims are analyzed under the test established in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). [Citation.] Under Strickland, a defendant must prove that defense counsel’s performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness and that this substandard performance created a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s errors, the result of the proceeding wo | 2 | 2 |
People v. Staleygreen2 sentences2007See Allen, 222 Ill. 2d at 346, citing Staley, 67 Ill. 2d at 36-37 , 364 N.E.2d at 73 . 2007See Allen, 222 Ill. 2d at 346, citing Staley, 67 Ill. 2d at 36-37 , 364 N.E.2d at 73 . | 2 | 2 |
People v. Mitchellgreen2 sentences2002See Mitchell , 189 Ill. 2d at 326-27 . 2002See Mitchell, 189 Ill. 2d at 326-27 . | 2 | 2 |
Jackson v. Dennogreen2 sentences1969People v. Jolliff, supra; People v. Jackson, supra; see also Jackson v. Denno, 12 L Ed2d 908, 84 S Ct 1774 ; People v. Strader, 38 Ill.2d 93 , 230 NE2d 569 ; People v. Thigpen, supra. Only one of the 4 officers present at the premises at the time the alleged confession was made testified concerning it. 1969People v. Jolliff, supra; People v. Jackson, supra; see also Jackson v. Denno, 12 L Ed2d 908, 84 S Ct 1774 ; People v. Strader, 38 Ill2d 93, 230 NE2d 569 ; People v. Thigpen, supra. Only one of the 4 officers present at the premises at the time the alleged confession was made testified concerning it. | 2 | 2 |
People v. Roygreen2 sentences1992However, since the trial judge is presumed to have considered only admissible evidence, he may be presumed to have considered the time, content, and circumstances under which the statement [sic] was made in determining the reliability of the statements [sic]. * * * In Roy , the failure to conduct a hearing was not held to be error even though the trial court never specifically articulated its findings as to the reliability of the statements [sic]." ( Hart, 214 Ill.App.3d at 524 , 158 Ill.Dec. 103 , 573 N.E.2d 1288 , citing People v. Roy, 201 Ill.App.3d at 183, 146 Ill.Dec. 874 , 558 N.E.2d 120 1992However, since the trial judge is presumed to have considered only admissible evidence, he may be presumed to have considered the time, content, and circumstances under which the statement [sic] was made in determining the reliability of the statements [sic]. * * * In Roy , the failure to conduct a hearing was not held to be error even though the trial court never specifically articulated its findings as to the reliability of the statements [sic]." ( Hart, 214 Ill.App.3d at 524 , 158 Ill.Dec. 103 , 573 N.E.2d 1288 , citing People v. Roy, 201 Ill.App.3d at 183, 146 Ill.Dec. 874 , 558 N.E.2d 120 | 1 | 2 |
People v. Grahamgreen1 sentence2026See id. at 351-52 . ¶ 17 Turning to defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, we note that as the Illinois Supreme Court explained in People v. Graham, 206 Ill. 2d 465, 476 (2003): “Ineffective assistance of counsel claims are analyzed under the test established in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). [Citation.] Under Strickland, a defendant must prove that defense counsel’s performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness and that this substandard performance created a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s errors, the result of the proceeding wo | 1 | 1 |
People v. Johnsongreen2 sentences2024See People v. Johnson, 159 Ill. 2d 97, 126 , 636 N.E.2d 485, 498 (1994); People v. Moore, 207 Ill. 2d 68, 77-78 , 797 N.E.2d 631, 637 (2003). 2024See People v. Johnson, 159 Ill. 2d 97, 126 , 636 N.E.2d 485, 498 (1994); People v. Moore, 207 Ill. 2d 68, 77-78 , 797 N.E.2d 631, 637 (2003). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Krankelgreen2 sentences2024Specifically, the State asserts defendant’s reported statement about his counsel’s performance in the PSI was insufficient to trigger an inquiry where it did “not make it clear that defense counsel did not do something they were supposed to do.” The State alternatively asserts the failure to conduct an inquiry was harmless given defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance is meritless. ¶ 11 Pursuant to People v. Krankel, 102 Ill. 2d 181, 189 , 464 N.E.2d 1045, 1049 (1984), and its progeny, when a defendant presents a trial court with a pro se posttrial claim of ineffective assistance of counse 2024Specifically, the State asserts defendant’s reported statement about his counsel’s performance in the PSI was insufficient to trigger an inquiry where it did “not make it clear that defense counsel did not do something they were supposed to do.” The State alternatively asserts the failure to conduct an inquiry was harmless given defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance is meritless. ¶ 11 Pursuant to People v. Krankel, 102 Ill. 2d 181, 189 , 464 N.E.2d 1045, 1049 (1984), and its progeny, when a defendant presents a trial court with a pro se posttrial claim of ineffective assistance of counse | 1 | 1 |
People v. Mooregreen2 sentences2024See People v. Johnson, 159 Ill. 2d 97, 126 , 636 N.E.2d 485, 498 (1994); People v. Moore, 207 Ill. 2d 68, 77-78 , 797 N.E.2d 631, 637 (2003). 2024See People v. Johnson, 159 Ill. 2d 97, 126 , 636 N.E.2d 485, 498 (1994); People v. Moore, 207 Ill. 2d 68, 77-78 , 797 N.E.2d 631, 637 (2003). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Hart
green
2 sentences1993App. 3d 512 , 573 N.E.2d 1288 , also a bench trial, following Roy the appellate court said: “In Roy, the failure to conduct a hearing was not held to be error even though the trial court never specifically articulated its findings as to the reliability of the statements. 1992However, since the trial judge is presumed to have considered only admissible evidence, he may be presumed to have considered the time, content, and circumstances under which the statement [sic] was made in determining the reliability of the statements [sic]. *** In Roy, the failure to conduct a hearing was not held to be error even though the trial court never specifically articulated its findings as to the reliability of the statements [sic].” (Hart, 214 Ill. | 3 | 1992–1993 |
People v. Patrick
green
2 sentences2015Patrick, 2011 IL 111666, ¶¶ 36-37 . 2015Patrick, 2011 IL 111666, ¶¶ 36-37 . | 2 | 2015–2015 |
People v. Jardon
green
2 sentences2011The cases cited, People v. Jardon, 393 Ill.App.3d 725 , 332 Ill. 2011The cases cited, People v. Jardon, 393 Ill.App.3d 725 , 332 Ill. | 2 | 2011–2011 |
Strickland v. Washington
green
1 sentence2026See id. at 351-52 . ¶ 17 Turning to defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, we note that as the Illinois Supreme Court explained in People v. Graham, 206 Ill. 2d 465, 476 (2003): “Ineffective assistance of counsel claims are analyzed under the test established in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). [Citation.] Under Strickland, a defendant must prove that defense counsel’s performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness and that this substandard performance created a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s errors, the result of the proceeding wo | 1 | 2026–2026 |
People v. Reese
green
1 sentence2024Reese, 2017 IL 120011, ¶ 48 . 4 The failure to conduct a hearing after the court becomes aware of restraints constitutes an abuse of discretion and due process violation. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
People v. Kuntu
green
1 sentence2020Id. at 161 . | 1 | 2020–2020 |
In Re Summary Suspension of Driver's License of Trainor
green
2 sentences1991Trainor, 156 Ill. 1991App. 3d at 923 , 510 N.E.2d at 618 .) The 30-day time period was deemed mandatory and, thus, the failure to conduct the hearing within 30 days violated the defendant’s due process rights. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
People v. Dean
green
2 sentences1979The court, however, held that violations of section 5 — 3(4) “are not jurisdictional, but rather entitle the minor to immediate release from detention.” ( 52 Ill. 1979App. 3d 383 , 367 N.E.2d 419 (1977).) In Dean, the juvenile contended that the failure to conduct a hearing on the revocation of his probation within 15 days of his detention deprived the court of jurisdiction and entitled him to a dismissal of the charge. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
People v. Thomas
neutral
2 sentences1974This is approved procedure (People v. Thomas (1967), 88 Ill.App.2d 71 , 232 N.E.2d 259 ) and would be proper if the failure to conduct a hearing on the motion were the only trial error. 1974This is approved procedure (People v. Thomas (1967), 88 Ill.App.2d 71 , 232 N.E.2d 259 ) and would be proper if the failure to conduct a hearing on the motion were the only trial error. | 1 | 1974–1974 |
The People v. Jolliff
green
1 sentence1969People v. Jolliff, supra; People v. Jackson, supra; see also Jackson v. Denno, 12 L Ed2d 908, 84 S Ct 1774 ; People v. Strader, 38 Ill.2d 93 , 230 NE2d 569 ; People v. Thigpen, supra. Only one of the 4 officers present at the premises at the time the alleged confession was made testified concerning it. | 1 | 1969–1969 |
The PEOPLE v. Strader
green
2 sentences1969People v. Jolliff, supra; People v. Jackson, supra; see also Jackson v. Denno, 12 L Ed2d 908, 84 S Ct 1774 ; People v. Strader, 38 Ill.2d 93 , 230 NE2d 569 ; People v. Thigpen, supra. Only one of the 4 officers present at the premises at the time the alleged confession was made testified concerning it. 1969People v. Jolliff, supra; People v. Jackson, supra; see also Jackson v. Denno, 12 L Ed2d 908, 84 S Ct 1774 ; People v. Strader, 38 Ill2d 93, 230 NE2d 569 ; People v. Thigpen, supra. Only one of the 4 officers present at the premises at the time the alleged confession was made testified concerning it. | 1 | 1969–1969 |
The PEOPLE v. Thigpen
green
1 sentence1969People v. Jolliff, supra; People v. Jackson, supra; see also Jackson v. Denno, 12 L Ed2d 908, 84 S Ct 1774 ; People v. Strader, 38 Ill2d 93, 230 NE2d 569 ; People v. Thigpen, supra. Only one of the 4 officers present at the premises at the time the alleged confession was made testified concerning it. | 1 | 1969–1969 |
The People v. Wright
green
2 sentences1964See Jackson v. Denno, (U.S.) 12 L. ed. 2d 908, 84 S. Ct. 1774 ; People v. Wright, 30 Ill.2d 519 ; People v. Beattie, 31 Ill.2d 257 . 1964See Jackson v. Denno, (U.S.) 12 L.ed.2d 908, 84 S.Ct. 1774 ; People v. Wright, 30 Ill.2d 519 ; People v. Beattie, 31 Ill.2d 257 . | 1 | 1964–1964 |
The PEOPLE v. Beattie
green
2 sentences1964See Jackson v. Denno, (U.S.) 12 L. ed. 2d 908, 84 S. Ct. 1774 ; People v. Wright, 30 Ill.2d 519 ; People v. Beattie, 31 Ill.2d 257 . 1964See Jackson v. Denno, (U.S.) 12 L.ed.2d 908, 84 S.Ct. 1774 ; People v. Wright, 30 Ill.2d 519 ; People v. Beattie, 31 Ill.2d 257 . | 1 | 1964–1964 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.