Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
20 Ohio opinions name it 1 courts 1999–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Terrell
neutral
2 sentences2008State v. Dehler , 73 Ohio St.3d 307 , 1995-Ohio-320 , 652 N.E.2d 987 ; State v. Terrell , 72 Ohio St.3d 247 , 1995-Ohio-54 , 648 N.E.2d 1353 ; State v. Smith (Jan. 29, 1996), Cuyahoga App. No. 68643, unreported, reopening disallowed (June 14, 1996), Motion No. 71793. {¶ 4} Finally, a substantive review of Halder's brief in support of the application for reopening fails to support the claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. 2008State v. Dehler , 73 Ohio St.3d 307 , 1995-Ohio-320 , 652 N.E.2d 987 ; State v. Terrell , 72 Ohio St.3d 247 , 1995-Ohio-54 , 648 N.E.2d 1353 ; State v. Smith (Jan. 29, 1996), Cuyahoga App. No. 68643, unreported, reopening disallowed (June 14, 1996), Motion No. 71793. {¶ 4} Finally, a substantive review of Halder's brief in support of the application for reopening fails to support the claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. | 15 | 1999–2008 |
State v. Dehler
green
2 sentences2008State v. Dehler , 73 Ohio St.3d 307 , 1995-Ohio-320 , 652 N.E.2d 987 ; State v. Terrell , 72 Ohio St.3d 247 , 1995-Ohio-54 , 648 N.E.2d 1353 ; State v. Smith (Jan. 29, 1996), Cuyahoga App. No. 68643, unreported, reopening disallowed (June 14, 1996), Motion No. 71793. {¶ 4} Finally, a substantive review of Halder's brief in support of the application for reopening fails to support the claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. 2008State v. Dehler , 73 Ohio St.3d 307 , 1995-Ohio-320 , 652 N.E.2d 987 ; State v. Terrell , 72 Ohio St.3d 247 , 1995-Ohio-54 , 648 N.E.2d 1353 ; State v. Smith (Jan. 29, 1996), Cuyahoga App. No. 68643, unreported, reopening disallowed (June 14, 1996), Motion No. 71793. {¶ 4} Finally, a substantive review of Halder's brief in support of the application for reopening fails to support the claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. | 14 | 1999–2008 |
State v. Murnahan
red
2 sentences2000In State v. Murnahan (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 60 , 584 N.E.2d 1204 , the Supreme Court of Ohio established that a claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel may be barred from review on res judicata principles unless circumstances render the application of the doctrine of res judicata unjust. 2000In State v. Murnahan (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 60 , 584 N.E.2d 1204 , the Supreme Court of Ohio established that a claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel may be barred from review on res judicata principles unless circumstances render the application of the doctrine of res judicata unjust. | 5 | 1999–2002 |
State v. Terrell
neutral
2 sentences2008State v. Dehler , 73 Ohio St.3d 307 , 1995-Ohio-320 , 652 N.E.2d 987 ; State v. Terrell , 72 Ohio St.3d 247 , 1995-Ohio-54 , 648 N.E.2d 1353 ; State v. Smith (Jan. 29, 1996), Cuyahoga App. No. 68643, unreported, reopening disallowed (June 14, 1996), Motion No. 71793. {¶ 4} Finally, a substantive review of Halder's brief in support of the application for reopening fails to support the claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. 2002State v. Terrell , 72 Ohio St.3d 247 , 1995-Ohio-54 , 648 N.E.2d 1353 ; State v. Smith (Jan. 29, 1996), Cuyahoga App. No. 68643, reopening disallowed (June 14, 1996), Motion No. 71793. {¶ 11} Accordingly, Turner's application for reopening is denied. | 4 | 2002–2008 |
State v. Dehler
green
2 sentences2008State v. Dehler , 73 Ohio St.3d 307 , 1995-Ohio-320 , 652 N.E.2d 987 ; State v. Terrell , 72 Ohio St.3d 247 , 1995-Ohio-54 , 648 N.E.2d 1353 ; State v. Smith (Jan. 29, 1996), Cuyahoga App. No. 68643, unreported, reopening disallowed (June 14, 1996), Motion No. 71793. {¶ 4} Finally, a substantive review of Halder's brief in support of the application for reopening fails to support the claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. 2002State v Dehler , 73 Ohio St.3d 307 , 1995-Ohio-320 , 652 N.E.2d 987 ; State v. Terrell , 72 Ohio St.3d 247 , 1995-Ohio-54 , 648 N.E.2d 1353 ; State v. Smith (Jan. 29, 1996), Cuyahoga App. No. 68643, reopening disallowed (June 14, 1996), Motion No. 71793. {¶ 4} Finally, a substantive review of Bobo's argument in support of his application for reopening fails to support the claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. | 2 | 2002–2008 |
State v. Twyford
green
1 sentence2023State v. Tyford, 106 Ohio St.3d 176 , 2005-Ohio-4380 , 833 N.E.2d 289 ; State v. Robinson, 8th Dist. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Glatz v. Beaman
green
1 sentence2002KENNETH A. ROCCO, P.J., and ANN DYKE, J., CONCUR . 1 (March 9, 2000), Cuyahoga App. No. 75512, unreported. 2 See, also, State v. Cooey (1995), 73 Ohio St.3d 411 , 653 N.E.2d 252 ; State v. Reddick (1995), 72 Ohio St.3d 88 , 647 N.E.2d 784 . 3 State v. Klein (Apr. 8, 1991), Cuyahoga App. No. 58389, unreported, reopening disallowed (Mar. 15, 1994), Motion No. 49260, affirmed (1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 1481 , 634 N.E.2d 1027 . 4 State v. Perry (1967), 10 Ohio St.2d 175 ; 226 N.E.2d 104 . 5 State v. Murnahan (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 60 , 584 N.E.2d 1204 . 6 State v. Dehler (1995), 73 Ohio St.3d 307 , 652 | 1 | 2002–2002 |
State ex rel. Borsick v. Maschari
neutral
1 sentence2002KENNETH A. ROCCO, P.J., and ANN DYKE, J., CONCUR . 1 (March 9, 2000), Cuyahoga App. No. 75512, unreported. 2 See, also, State v. Cooey (1995), 73 Ohio St.3d 411 , 653 N.E.2d 252 ; State v. Reddick (1995), 72 Ohio St.3d 88 , 647 N.E.2d 784 . 3 State v. Klein (Apr. 8, 1991), Cuyahoga App. No. 58389, unreported, reopening disallowed (Mar. 15, 1994), Motion No. 49260, affirmed (1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 1481 , 634 N.E.2d 1027 . 4 State v. Perry (1967), 10 Ohio St.2d 175 ; 226 N.E.2d 104 . 5 State v. Murnahan (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 60 , 584 N.E.2d 1204 . 6 State v. Dehler (1995), 73 Ohio St.3d 307 , 652 | 1 | 2002–2002 |
State v. Reddick
green
2 sentences2002KENNETH A. ROCCO, P.J., and ANN DYKE, J., CONCUR . 1 (March 9, 2000), Cuyahoga App. No. 75512, unreported. 2 See, also, State v. Cooey (1995), 73 Ohio St.3d 411 , 653 N.E.2d 252 ; State v. Reddick (1995), 72 Ohio St.3d 88 , 647 N.E.2d 784 . 3 State v. Klein (Apr. 8, 1991), Cuyahoga App. No. 58389, unreported, reopening disallowed (Mar. 15, 1994), Motion No. 49260, affirmed (1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 1481 , 634 N.E.2d 1027 . 4 State v. Perry (1967), 10 Ohio St.2d 175 ; 226 N.E.2d 104 . 5 State v. Murnahan (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 60 , 584 N.E.2d 1204 . 6 State v. Dehler (1995), 73 Ohio St.3d 307 , 652 2002KENNETH A. ROCCO, P.J., and ANN DYKE, J., CONCUR . 1 (March 9, 2000), Cuyahoga App. No. 75512, unreported. 2 See, also, State v. Cooey (1995), 73 Ohio St.3d 411 , 653 N.E.2d 252 ; State v. Reddick (1995), 72 Ohio St.3d 88 , 647 N.E.2d 784 . 3 State v. Klein (Apr. 8, 1991), Cuyahoga App. No. 58389, unreported, reopening disallowed (Mar. 15, 1994), Motion No. 49260, affirmed (1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 1481 , 634 N.E.2d 1027 . 4 State v. Perry (1967), 10 Ohio St.2d 175 ; 226 N.E.2d 104 . 5 State v. Murnahan (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 60 , 584 N.E.2d 1204 . 6 State v. Dehler (1995), 73 Ohio St.3d 307 , 652 | 1 | 2002–2002 |
State v. Cooey
green
2 sentences2002KENNETH A. ROCCO, P.J., and ANN DYKE, J., CONCUR . 1 (March 9, 2000), Cuyahoga App. No. 75512, unreported. 2 See, also, State v. Cooey (1995), 73 Ohio St.3d 411 , 653 N.E.2d 252 ; State v. Reddick (1995), 72 Ohio St.3d 88 , 647 N.E.2d 784 . 3 State v. Klein (Apr. 8, 1991), Cuyahoga App. No. 58389, unreported, reopening disallowed (Mar. 15, 1994), Motion No. 49260, affirmed (1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 1481 , 634 N.E.2d 1027 . 4 State v. Perry (1967), 10 Ohio St.2d 175 ; 226 N.E.2d 104 . 5 State v. Murnahan (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 60 , 584 N.E.2d 1204 . 6 State v. Dehler (1995), 73 Ohio St.3d 307 , 652 2002KENNETH A. ROCCO, P.J., and ANN DYKE, J., CONCUR . 1 (March 9, 2000), Cuyahoga App. No. 75512, unreported. 2 See, also, State v. Cooey (1995), 73 Ohio St.3d 411 , 653 N.E.2d 252 ; State v. Reddick (1995), 72 Ohio St.3d 88 , 647 N.E.2d 784 . 3 State v. Klein (Apr. 8, 1991), Cuyahoga App. No. 58389, unreported, reopening disallowed (Mar. 15, 1994), Motion No. 49260, affirmed (1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 1481 , 634 N.E.2d 1027 . 4 State v. Perry (1967), 10 Ohio St.2d 175 ; 226 N.E.2d 104 . 5 State v. Murnahan (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 60 , 584 N.E.2d 1204 . 6 State v. Dehler (1995), 73 Ohio St.3d 307 , 652 | 1 | 2002–2002 |
State v. Perry
green
2 sentences2002KENNETH A. ROCCO, P.J., and ANN DYKE, J., CONCUR . 1 (March 9, 2000), Cuyahoga App. No. 75512, unreported. 2 See, also, State v. Cooey (1995), 73 Ohio St.3d 411 , 653 N.E.2d 252 ; State v. Reddick (1995), 72 Ohio St.3d 88 , 647 N.E.2d 784 . 3 State v. Klein (Apr. 8, 1991), Cuyahoga App. No. 58389, unreported, reopening disallowed (Mar. 15, 1994), Motion No. 49260, affirmed (1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 1481 , 634 N.E.2d 1027 . 4 State v. Perry (1967), 10 Ohio St.2d 175 ; 226 N.E.2d 104 . 5 State v. Murnahan (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 60 , 584 N.E.2d 1204 . 6 State v. Dehler (1995), 73 Ohio St.3d 307 , 652 2002KENNETH A. ROCCO, P.J., and ANN DYKE, J., CONCUR . 1 (March 9, 2000), Cuyahoga App. No. 75512, unreported. 2 See, also, State v. Cooey (1995), 73 Ohio St.3d 411 , 653 N.E.2d 252 ; State v. Reddick (1995), 72 Ohio St.3d 88 , 647 N.E.2d 784 . 3 State v. Klein (Apr. 8, 1991), Cuyahoga App. No. 58389, unreported, reopening disallowed (Mar. 15, 1994), Motion No. 49260, affirmed (1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 1481 , 634 N.E.2d 1027 . 4 State v. Perry (1967), 10 Ohio St.2d 175 ; 226 N.E.2d 104 . 5 State v. Murnahan (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 60 , 584 N.E.2d 1204 . 6 State v. Dehler (1995), 73 Ohio St.3d 307 , 652 | 1 | 2002–2002 |