Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
20 Oklahoma opinions name it 2 courts 1928–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oklahoma courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Samedan Oil Corp. v. Corporation Commissiongreen2 sentences2023See Samedan Oil Corp. v. Corporation Comm'n , 1988 OK 56, ¶ 7 , 755 P.2d 664, 668 ("Parties to an action on appeal are not permitted to secure a reversal of a judgment upon error which they have invited, acquiesced or tacitly conceded in, or to assume an inconsistent position from that taken in the trial court."); See also Tinker Fed. 2023See Samedan Oil Corp. v. Corporation Comm'n , 1988 OK 56, ¶ 7 , 755 P.2d 664, 668 ("Parties to an action on appeal are not permitted to secure a reversal of a judgment upon error which they have invited, acquiesced or tacitly conceded in, or to assume an inconsistent position from that taken in the trial court."); See also Tinker Fed. | 1 | 4 |
Dills v. Callowaygreen2 sentences1996“A party on appeal in the Supreme Court will not be permitted to secure a reversal of a judgment upon an error which he has invited and acquiesced in, or assume a position inconsistent with that taken in the trial court.” Id. at 132 (quoting Dills v. Calloway, 175 Okla. 395 , 52 P.2d 707, 709 (1935)). 1996“A party on appeal in the Supreme Court will not be permitted to secure a reversal of a judgment upon an error which he has invited and acquiesced in, or assume a position inconsistent with that taken in the trial court.” Id. at 132 (quoting Dills v. Calloway, 175 Okla. 395 , 52 P.2d 707, 709 (1935)). | 1 | 1 |
Oklahomans for Life, Inc. v. State Fair of Oklahoma, Inc.green1 sentence1995Oklahomans For Life, Inc. v. State Fair of Okl, Okl., 634 P.2d 704, 706 (1981) (the dismissal of a party defendant was held to be terminal and hence at once appealable as a final order); Frazier v. Bryan Memorial Hosp. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oklahoma. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Union Texas Petroleum, a Division of Allied Chemical Corp. v. Corporation Commission
green
2 sentences2016Grant stated in his final report as guardian that Boulware directed him “to transfer the money to a different account where it would not be subject to the payment on death beneficiary clause.” Grant claimed he transferred $ 95,291.87 “to a different account where [BLB] and [CLB] would not be the beneficiaries on a payment on death account.” He also testified he left $ 30,000 in the TFCU account because BLB and CLB were “the full beneficiaries on the death beneficiary.” *770 ¶ 20 “Parties to an action on appeal are not permitted to secure a reversal of a judgment upon error which they have invi 1994Union Texas Petroleum v. Corporation Commission of State of Okl., 651 P.2d 652 (Okl. 1981). | 4 | 1988–2016 |
Hutchins v. Richardson
neutral
2 sentences1938“A party on appeal in the Supreme Court will not be permitted to secure a reversal of a judgment upon error which he has invited and acquiesced in, or assume a position inconsistent with that taken in the trial court.” Hutchins v. Richardson, 100 Okla. 80 , 227 P. 432 , and cases cited. 1938“A party on appeal in the Supreme Court will not be permitted to secure a reversal of a judgment upon error which he has invited and acquiesced in, or assume a position inconsistent with that taken in the trial court.” Hutchins v. Richardson, 100 Okla. 80 , 227 P. 432 , and cases cited. | 3 | 1928–1938 |
Allen v. Oklahoma State Bank of Enid
neutral
2 sentences1938The error, if any, was invited by defendant and he may not now complain, for, as held in Allen v. Oklahoma State Bank, 133 Okla. 14 , 270 P. 838 , ‘.‘a party, on an appeal to the Supreme Court, will not be permitted to secure a reversal of a judgment upon error which he has invited and acquiesced in.” See, also, Skaggs v. Gypsy Oil Co., 169 Okla. 209 , 36 P. (2d) 865 . 1938The error, if any, was invited by defendant and he may not now complain, for, as held in Allen v. Oklahoma State Bank, 133 Okla. 14 , 270 P. 838 , ‘.‘a party, on an appeal to the Supreme Court, will not be permitted to secure a reversal of a judgment upon error which he has invited and acquiesced in.” See, also, Skaggs v. Gypsy Oil Co., 169 Okla. 209 , 36 P. (2d) 865 . | 3 | 1934–1938 |
Cimarron Valley Pipe Line Co. v. Holmes
green
2 sentences1958In Cimarron Valley Pipe Line Co. v. Holmes, 182 Okl. 450 , 78 P.2d 403 , in the first paraagraph of the syllabus, we said: “A party on appeal in the Supreme Court will not be permitted to secure a reversal of a judgment upon error which he has invited or acquiesced in, or assume a position inconsistent with that taken in the trial court.” The burden of showing a separation, if any was required, rested on defendants. 1958In Cimarron Valley Pipe Line Co. v. Holmes, 182 Okl. 450 , 78 P.2d 403 , in the first paraagraph of the syllabus, we said: “A party on appeal in the Supreme Court will not be permitted to secure a reversal of a judgment upon error which he has invited or acquiesced in, or assume a position inconsistent with that taken in the trial court.” The burden of showing a separation, if any was required, rested on defendants. | 2 | 1958–1982 |
Muskogee Electric Traction Co. v. Dunnam
neutral
2 sentences1934In the case of Hutchins v. Richardson, 100 Okla. 80 , 227 P. 432 , this court held: “A party on appeal in the Supreme Court will not be permitted to secure a reversal of a judgment upon error which he has invited, * * * or assume a position inconsistent with that in the trial court.” To the same effect is the ease of Muskogee Electric Traction Co. v. Dunnam, 129 Okla. 70 , 263 P. 1091 , and this court also held in Carter Oil Co. v. Kennedy, 137 Okla. 168 , 278 P. 640 : “Where a party to an action requests the court to instruct the jury and the court gives the instruction requested, the party m 1934In the case of Hutchins v. Richardson, 100 Okla. 80 , 227 P. 432 , this court held: “A party on appeal in the Supreme Court will not be permitted to secure a reversal of a judgment upon error which he has invited, * * * or assume a position inconsistent with that in the trial court.” To the same effect is the ease of Muskogee Electric Traction Co. v. Dunnam, 129 Okla. 70 , 263 P. 1091 , and this court also held in Carter Oil Co. v. Kennedy, 137 Okla. 168 , 278 P. 640 : “Where a party to an action requests the court to instruct the jury and the court gives the instruction requested, the party m | 2 | 1934–1935 |
TINKER FEDERAL CREDIT UNION v. GRANT
green
2 sentences2023Credit Union v. Grant , 2017 OK CIV APP 9, ¶ 20 , 391 P.3d 766, 770 . 2023Credit Union v. Grant , 2017 OK CIV APP 9, ¶ 20 , 391 P.3d 766, 770 . | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Ferrell v. State Ex Rel. Department of Highways
green
1 sentence1996“A party on appeal in the Supreme Court will not be permitted to secure a reversal of a judgment upon an error which he has invited and acquiesced in, or assume a position inconsistent with that taken in the trial court.” Id. at 132 (quoting Dills v. Calloway, 175 Okla. 395 , 52 P.2d 707, 709 (1935)). | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Cities Service Oil Company v. Merritt
green
2 sentences1982Cimarron Valley Pipe Line Co. v. Holmes, 182 Okl. 450 , 78 P.2d 403 (1938); Cities Service Oil Co. v. Merritt, 332 P.2d 677 (Okl.1958). 1982Cimarron Valley Pipe Line Co. v. Holmes, 182 Okl. 450 , 78 P.2d 403 (1938); Cities Service Oil Co. v. Merritt, 332 P.2d 677 (Okl. 1958). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Westheimer v. Neustadt
green
1 sentence1967The trial court based the judgment upon the rule stated in Westheimer v. Neustadt, Okl., 362 P.2d 110 . | 1 | 1967–1967 |
Skaggs v. Gypsy Oil Co.
green
2 sentences1938The error, if any, was invited by defendant and he may not now complain, for, as held in Allen v. Oklahoma State Bank, 133 Okla. 14 , 270 P. 838 , ‘.‘a party, on an appeal to the Supreme Court, will not be permitted to secure a reversal of a judgment upon error which he has invited and acquiesced in.” See, also, Skaggs v. Gypsy Oil Co., 169 Okla. 209 , 36 P. (2d) 865 . 1938The error, if any, was invited by defendant and he may not now complain, for, as held in Allen v. Oklahoma State Bank, 133 Okla. 14 , 270 P. 838 , ‘.‘a party, on an appeal to the Supreme Court, will not be permitted to secure a reversal of a judgment upon error which he has invited and acquiesced in.” See, also, Skaggs v. Gypsy Oil Co., 169 Okla. 209 , 36 P. (2d) 865 . | 1 | 1938–1938 |
Beatty v. Beatty
green
2 sentences1935Green v. Sammons, 142 Okla. 36 , 284 P. 1115 ; Hunt v. Van Siclen, 136 Okla. 69 , 276 P. 182 ; Muskogee Electric Traction Co. v. Dunnam, 129 Okla. 70 , 263 P. 1091 ; Kurz v. Stafford et al., 135 Okla. 121 , 274 P. 674 ; Beatty et al. v. Beatty et al., 114 Okla. 5 , 242 P. 766 ; Great American Ins. 1935Green v. Sammons, 142 Okla. 36 , 284 P. 1115 ; Hunt v. Van Siclen, 136 Okla. 69 , 276 P. 182 ; Muskogee Electric Traction Co. v. Dunnam, 129 Okla. 70 , 263 P. 1091 ; Kurz v. Stafford et al., 135 Okla. 121 , 274 P. 674 ; Beatty et al. v. Beatty et al., 114 Okla. 5 , 242 P. 766 ; Great American Ins. | 1 | 1935–1935 |
Green v. Sammons
neutral
2 sentences1935Green v. Sammons, 142 Okla. 36 , 284 P. 1115 ; Hunt v. Van Siclen, 136 Okla. 69 , 276 P. 182 ; Muskogee Electric Traction Co. v. Dunnam, 129 Okla. 70 , 263 P. 1091 ; Kurz v. Stafford et al., 135 Okla. 121 , 274 P. 674 ; Beatty et al. v. Beatty et al., 114 Okla. 5 , 242 P. 766 ; Great American Ins. 1935Green v. Sammons, 142 Okla. 36 , 284 P. 1115 ; Hunt v. Van Siclen, 136 Okla. 69 , 276 P. 182 ; Muskogee Electric Traction Co. v. Dunnam, 129 Okla. 70 , 263 P. 1091 ; Kurz v. Stafford et al., 135 Okla. 121 , 274 P. 674 ; Beatty et al. v. Beatty et al., 114 Okla. 5 , 242 P. 766 ; Great American Ins. | 1 | 1935–1935 |
Hunt v. Van Siclen
neutral
2 sentences1935Green v. Sammons, 142 Okla. 36 , 284 P. 1115 ; Hunt v. Van Siclen, 136 Okla. 69 , 276 P. 182 ; Muskogee Electric Traction Co. v. Dunnam, 129 Okla. 70 , 263 P. 1091 ; Kurz v. Stafford et al., 135 Okla. 121 , 274 P. 674 ; Beatty et al. v. Beatty et al., 114 Okla. 5 , 242 P. 766 ; Great American Ins. 1935Green v. Sammons, 142 Okla. 36 , 284 P. 1115 ; Hunt v. Van Siclen, 136 Okla. 69 , 276 P. 182 ; Muskogee Electric Traction Co. v. Dunnam, 129 Okla. 70 , 263 P. 1091 ; Kurz v. Stafford et al., 135 Okla. 121 , 274 P. 674 ; Beatty et al. v. Beatty et al., 114 Okla. 5 , 242 P. 766 ; Great American Ins. | 1 | 1935–1935 |
Hovey v. Elliott
green
2 sentences1935Defendant contends that the judgment upon which the claim is based is void on its face, citing Hovey v. Elliott, 167 U. S. 409 . 42 L. 1935Defendant contends that the judgment upon which the claim is based is void on its face, citing Hovey v. Elliott, 167 U. S. 409 . 42 L. | 1 | 1935–1935 |
Kurz v. Stafford
green
2 sentences1935Green v. Sammons, 142 Okla. 36 , 284 P. 1115 ; Hunt v. Van Siclen, 136 Okla. 69 , 276 P. 182 ; Muskogee Electric Traction Co. v. Dunnam, 129 Okla. 70 , 263 P. 1091 ; Kurz v. Stafford et al., 135 Okla. 121 , 274 P. 674 ; Beatty et al. v. Beatty et al., 114 Okla. 5 , 242 P. 766 ; Great American Ins. 1935Green v. Sammons, 142 Okla. 36 , 284 P. 1115 ; Hunt v. Van Siclen, 136 Okla. 69 , 276 P. 182 ; Muskogee Electric Traction Co. v. Dunnam, 129 Okla. 70 , 263 P. 1091 ; Kurz v. Stafford et al., 135 Okla. 121 , 274 P. 674 ; Beatty et al. v. Beatty et al., 114 Okla. 5 , 242 P. 766 ; Great American Ins. | 1 | 1935–1935 |
Carter Oil Co. v. Kennedy
green
2 sentences1934In the case of Hutchins v. Richardson, 100 Okla. 80 , 227 P. 432 , this court held: “A party on appeal in the Supreme Court will not be permitted to secure a reversal of a judgment upon error which he has invited, * * * or assume a position inconsistent with that in the trial court.” To the same effect is the ease of Muskogee Electric Traction Co. v. Dunnam, 129 Okla. 70 , 263 P. 1091 , and this court also held in Carter Oil Co. v. Kennedy, 137 Okla. 168 , 278 P. 640 : “Where a party to an action requests the court to instruct the jury and the court gives the instruction requested, the party m 1934In the case of Hutchins v. Richardson, 100 Okla. 80 , 227 P. 432 , this court held: “A party on appeal in the Supreme Court will not be permitted to secure a reversal of a judgment upon error which he has invited, * * * or assume a position inconsistent with that in the trial court.” To the same effect is the ease of Muskogee Electric Traction Co. v. Dunnam, 129 Okla. 70 , 263 P. 1091 , and this court also held in Carter Oil Co. v. Kennedy, 137 Okla. 168 , 278 P. 640 : “Where a party to an action requests the court to instruct the jury and the court gives the instruction requested, the party m | 1 | 1934–1934 |
Doggett v. Doggett
green
2 sentences1928In Hutchins v. Richardson, 100 Okla. 80 , 227 Pac. 432 , this court announced the rule stated in the first paragraph of the syllabus herein: “A party on appeal in the Supreme Court will not he permitted to secure a reversal of a judgment upon error which he has invited and acquiesced in. or assume a position inconsistent with that taken in the trial court.” Doggett v. Doggett, 85 Okla. 90 , 203 Pac. 223 . 1928In Hutchins v. Richardson, 100 Okla. 80 , 227 Pac. 432 , this court announced the rule stated in the first paragraph of the syllabus herein: “A party on appeal in the Supreme Court will not he permitted to secure a reversal of a judgment upon error which he has invited and acquiesced in. or assume a position inconsistent with that taken in the trial court.” Doggett v. Doggett, 85 Okla. 90 , 203 Pac. 223 . | 1 | 1928–1928 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.