Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
20 Wisconsin opinions name it 2 courts 2010–2025 11 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Wisconsin courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Marathon County v. D. K.green2 sentences2025However, collateral consequences to a challenged order may render an appeal not moot if there exists a “‘causal relationship’ between a legal consequence and the challenged order.” Sauk County v. S.A.M., 2022 WI 46, ¶20 , 402 Wis. 2d 379 , 975 N.W.2d 162 (quoted source omitted). ¶14 “Mootness is a doctrine of judicial restraint.” Marathon County v. D.K., 2020 WI 8, ¶19 , 390 Wis. 2d 50 , 937 N.W.2d 901 . 2025However, collateral consequences to a challenged order may render an appeal not moot if there exists a “‘causal relationship’ between a legal consequence and the challenged order.” Sauk County v. S.A.M., 2022 WI 46, ¶20 , 402 Wis. 2d 379 , 975 N.W.2d 162 (quoted source omitted). ¶14 “Mootness is a doctrine of judicial restraint.” Marathon County v. D.K., 2020 WI 8, ¶19 , 390 Wis. 2d 50 , 937 N.W.2d 901 . | 1 | 15 |
Portage Cnty. v. J.W.K. (In Re Mental Commitment of J.W.K.)green2 sentences2020ANALYSIS A. The Commitment is Not a Moot Issue. ¶19 Mootness is a doctrine of judicial restraint. "'An issue is moot when its resolution will have no practical effect on the underlying controversy.'" Portage Cty. v. J.W.K., 2019 WI 54, ¶11 , 386 Wis. 2d 672 , 927 N.W.2d 509 (quoting PRN Assocs. 2020ANALYSIS A. The Commitment is Not a Moot Issue. ¶19 Mootness is a doctrine of judicial restraint. "'An issue is moot when its resolution will have no practical effect on the underlying controversy.'" Portage Cty. v. J.W.K., 2019 WI 54, ¶11 , 386 Wis. 2d 672 , 927 N.W.2d 509 (quoting PRN Assocs. | 1 | 6 |
Collins v. City of Harker Heightsgreen2 sentences2016See Collins, 503 U.S. at 126 . 2016See Collins, 503 U.S. at 126 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wisconsin. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
St. Croix Valley Home Builders Ass'n v. Township of Oak Grove
neutral
2 sentences2020Croix Valley Home Builders Ass’n, Inc. v. Township of Oak Grove, 2010 WI App 96, ¶11 , 327 Wis. 2d 510 , 787 N.W.2d 454 (citation omitted). ¶17 The Licenses Committee sent Blas multiple notices, in accordance with MCO ch. 85, giving her the opportunity to appear at multiple hearings to present her argument for license renewal. 2020Croix Valley Home Builders Ass’n, Inc. v. Township of Oak Grove, 2010 WI App 96, ¶11 , 327 Wis. 2d 510 , 787 N.W.2d 454 (citation omitted). ¶17 The Licenses Committee sent Blas multiple notices, in accordance with MCO ch. 85, giving her the opportunity to appear at multiple hearings to present her argument for license renewal. | 2 | 2014–2020 |
Sauk County v. S. A. M.
green
2 sentences2025However, collateral consequences to a challenged order may render an appeal not moot if there exists a “‘causal relationship’ between a legal consequence and the challenged order.” Sauk County v. S.A.M., 2022 WI 46, ¶20 , 402 Wis. 2d 379 , 975 N.W.2d 162 (quoted source omitted). ¶14 “Mootness is a doctrine of judicial restraint.” Marathon County v. D.K., 2020 WI 8, ¶19 , 390 Wis. 2d 50 , 937 N.W.2d 901 . 2025However, collateral consequences to a challenged order may render an appeal not moot if there exists a “‘causal relationship’ between a legal consequence and the challenged order.” Sauk County v. S.A.M., 2022 WI 46, ¶20 , 402 Wis. 2d 379 , 975 N.W.2d 162 (quoted source omitted). ¶14 “Mootness is a doctrine of judicial restraint.” Marathon County v. D.K., 2020 WI 8, ¶19 , 390 Wis. 2d 50 , 937 N.W.2d 901 . | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Prn Associates LLC v. State of Wisconsin Department of Administration
green
2 sentences2020LLC v. DOA, 2009 WI 53, ¶25 , 317 Wis. 2d 656 , 766 N.W.2d 559 ). 2020LLC v. DOA, 2009 WI 53, ¶25 , 317 Wis. 2d 656 , 766 N.W.2d 559 ). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
State Ex Rel. Mentek v. Schwarz
green
1 sentence2010Mentek, 242 Wis. 2d 94, ¶ 8 . ¶ 12. | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.