Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
19 Arkansas opinions name it 1 courts 1983–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arkansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Greene v. Stategreen2 sentences2016Greene v. State, 356 Ark. 59, 65 , 146 S.W.3d 871, 877 (2003). 2016Greene v. State, 356 Ark. 59, 65 , 146 S.W.3d 871, 877 (2003). | 3 | 3 |
Williams v. Stategreen2 sentences2023Id.; see also Williams v. State, 2019 Ark. 129 , 571 S.W.3d 921 . 2023Id.; see also Williams v. State, 2019 Ark. 129 , 571 S.W.3d 921 . | 2 | 2 |
Robinson v. Stategreen2 sentences2017See Robinson v. State, 2014 Ark. 310 , 439 S.W.3d 32 (per curiam) (This court may affirm the denial of a Rule 37.1 petition, regardless of the adequacy of the order, when the allegations in the petition are such that it is conclusive on the face of the petition that no relief is warranted.). 2017See Robinson v. State, 2014 Ark. 310 , 439 S.W.3d 32 (per curiam) (This court may affirm the denial of a Rule 37.1 petition, regardless of the adequacy of the order, when the allegations in the petition are such that it is conclusive on the face of the petition that no relief is warranted.). | 1 | 1 |
Guevara v. Stategreen1 sentence2015See, e.g., Guevara v. State, 2014 Ark. 200 ; Sales v. State, 2013 Ark. 218 ; Simmons v. State, 2012 Ark. 58 (per curiam). 3 Cite as 2015 Ark. 112 It is well settled that this court does not reverse the denial of postconviction relief unless the circuit court’s findings are clearly erroneous. | 1 | 1 |
Sales v. Stategreen2 sentences2015See Sales v. State, 2014 Ark. 384 , 441 S.W.3d 883 . 2015See Sales v. State, 2014 Ark. 384 , 441 S.W.3d 883 . | 1 | 1 |
Buchanan v. Hobbsgreen1 sentence2014See Buchanan v. Hobbs, 2014 Ark. 105 , 2014 WL 891006 (per curiam). | 1 | 1 |
Brown v. Stategreen2 sentences2000Stewart v. State, 295 Ark. 48 , 746 S.W.2d 58 (1988); see also Brown v. State, 291 Ark. 143 , 722 S.W.2d 845 (1987) (trial court must look at entire record when denying a petition without a hearing). 2000Stewart v. State, 295 Ark. 48 , 746 S.W.2d 58 (1988); see also Brown v. State, 291 Ark. 143 , 722 S.W.2d 845 (1987) (trial court must look at entire record when denying a petition without a hearing). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Strickland v. Washington
green
2 sentences2015Sims now appeals, challenging the circuit court’s findings and the court’s failure to hold a hearing. ' On review, we assess the effectiveness of counsel under the two-prong standard set 1¡¡forth by the Supreme Court of the United States in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). 2015Sims now appeals, challenging the circuit court’s findings and the court’s failure to hold a hearing. ' On review, we assess the effectiveness of counsel under the two-prong standard set 1¡¡forth by the Supreme Court of the United States in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). | 3 | 2007–2015 |
Bryant v. State
green
2 sentences2019Bryant, 2019 Ark. 183 , 575 S.W.3d 547 . 2019Bryant, 2019 Ark. 183 , 575 S.W.3d 547 . | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Dixon v. State
green
2 sentences2016The origin of this line of reasoning is Dixon v. State, 260 Ark. 857 , 545 S.W.2d 606 (1977), where this court stated, “We adopt 7 Cite as 2016 Ark. 350 The State admits that it failed to disclose two videos, one of which was a Taser video made by Detective Mike McCoy. 2016The origin of this line of reasoning is Dixon v. State, 260 Ark. 857 , 545 S.W.2d 606 (1977), where this court stated, “We adopt 7 Cite as 2016 Ark. 350 The State admits that it failed to disclose two videos, one of which was a Taser video made by Detective Mike McCoy. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Turner v. State
green
1 sentence2016Turner contends on appeal that the circuit court erred in denying his petition for postconviction relief because (1) trial counsel was ineffective in failing to object to certain statements made by the prosecutor during closing argument, and (2) trial counsel was Cite as 2016 Ark. 96 ineffective in failing to make a motion to dismiss for lack of a speedy trial and in failing to make an adequate record that the time for speedy trial had run before the trial started. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Van Winkle v. State
green
1 sentence2016Van Winkle now appeals, arguing four points in support of reversal: (1) that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to present his only viable defense, which is that he was actually innocent; (2) that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to move for a change of venue; (3) that his sentence for employing a firearm in the commission of an offense is void as both Cite as 2016 Ark. 98 structural error and ineffective assistance of trial counsel; and (4) that the circuit court erred in denying his request for a hearing. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Thacker v. State
green
1 sentence2016The origin of this line of reasoning is Dixon v. State, 260 Ark. 857 , 545 S.W.2d 606 (1977), where this court stated, “We adopt 7 Cite as 2016 Ark. 350 The State admits that it failed to disclose two videos, one of which was a Taser video made by Detective Mike McCoy. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Beverage v. State
green
1 sentence2015See, e.g., Guevara v. State, 2014 Ark. 200 ; Sales v. State, 2013 Ark. 218 ; Simmons v. State, 2012 Ark. 58 (per curiam). 3 Cite as 2015 Ark. 112 It is well settled that this court does not reverse the denial of postconviction relief unless the circuit court’s findings are clearly erroneous. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Johnson v. State
green
1 sentence2014Johnson now appeals Cite as 2014 Ark. 74 the denial of postconviction relief. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Sanders v. State
green
2 sentences2004This court recently addressed a petitioner’s right to an evidentiary hearing in a death-sentence case, Sanders v. State, 352 Ark. 16 , 98 S.W.3d 35 (2003), where we explained that Rule 37.3 clearly grants the trial court discretion to decide whether the files and records are sufficient to address the petition without a hearing. 2004This court recently addressed a petitioner’s right to an evidentiary hearing in a death-sentence case, Sanders v. State, 352 Ark. 16 , 98 S.W.3d 35 (2003), where we explained that Rule 37.3 clearly grants the trial court discretion to decide whether the files and records are sufficient to address the petition without a hearing. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Stewart v. State
neutral
2 sentences2000Stewart v. State, 295 Ark. 48 , 746 S.W.2d 58 (1988); see also Brown v. State, 291 Ark. 143 , 722 S.W.2d 845 (1987) (trial court must look at entire record when denying a petition without a hearing). 2000Stewart v. State, 295 Ark. 48 , 746 S.W.2d 58 (1988); see also Brown v. State, 291 Ark. 143 , 722 S.W.2d 845 (1987) (trial court must look at entire record when denying a petition without a hearing). | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Stevens v. State
green
2 sentences1983In Stevens v. State, 262 Ark. 216 , 555 S.W.2d 229 (1977), we considered a Rule 37 petition for relief when the trial court had denied the petition without a hearing. 1983In Stevens v. State, 262 Ark. 216 , 555 S.W.2d 229 (1977), we considered a Rule 37 petition for relief when the trial court had denied the petition without a hearing. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.