83 New York opinions name it 3 courts 1962–2023 8 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New York courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People ex rel. McDaniels v. Corcorangreen2 sentences2014“A hearing is not automatically required whenever a parent seeks modification of a custody [or visitation] order” (Matter of Wurmlinger v Freer, 256 AD2d 1069, 1069 [1998]) and, here, “the mother failed to ‘make a sufficient evidentiary showing of a change in circumstances to require a hearing’ ” (Matter of Warrior v Beatman, 70 AD3d 1358, 1359 [2010], lv denied 14 NY3d 711 [2010]). 2014“A hearing is not automatically required whenever a parent seeks modification of a custody [or visitation] order” (Matter of Wurmlinger v Freer, 256 AD2d 1069, 1069 [1998]) and, here, “the mother failed to ‘make a sufficient evidentiary showing of a change in circumstances to require a hearing’ ” (Matter of Warrior v Beatman, 70 AD3d 1358, 1359 [2010], lv denied 14 NY3d 711 [2010]). | 3 | 4 |
Featherstone v. Francogreen2 sentences2014Our review of the Department’s determination “is limited to the facts and record adduced before [the Department]” (Matter of Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32, 39 [2001] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; accord Matter of Featherstone v Franco, 95 NY2d 550, 554 [2000]; see Matter of Ames v Johnston, 169 AD2d 84, 86 [1991]). 2014Our review of the Department’s determination “is limited to the facts and record adduced before [the Department]” (Matter of Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32, 39 [2001] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; accord Matter of Featherstone v Franco, 95 NY2d 550, 554 [2000]; see Matter of Ames v Johnston, 169 AD2d 84, 86 [1991]). | 3 | 3 |
Moore v. Mooregreen2 sentences2014The mother and the Attorney for the Children appeal from an order dismissing the petition without a hearing. -2- 772 CAF 13-01636 It is well settled that a party seeking a change in an established custody arrangement must show “a change in circumstances [that] reflects a real need for change to ensure the best interest[s] of the child[ren]” (Matter of Irwin v Neyland, 213 AD2d 773, 773 ; see Matter of Moore v Moore, 78 AD3d 1630, 1630 , lv denied 16 NY3d 704 ; Matter of Hight v Hight, 19 AD3d 1159, 1160 ). 2014It is well settled that a party seeking a change in an established custody arrangement must show “a change in circumstances [that] reflects a real need for change to ensure the best interest[s] of the child[ren]” (Matter of Irwin v Neyland, 213 AD2d 773, 773 [1995]; see Matter of Moore v Moore, 78 AD3d 1630, 1630 [2010], lv denied 16 NY3d 704 [2011]; Matter of Hight v Hight, 19 AD3d 1159, 1160 [2005]). | 3 | 3 |
Kelly v. Safirgreen2 sentences2014Our review of the Department’s determination “is limited to the facts and record adduced before [the Department]” (Matter of Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32, 39 [2001] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; accord Matter of Featherstone v Franco, 95 NY2d 550, 554 [2000]; see Matter of Ames v Johnston, 169 AD2d 84, 86 [1991]). 2014Our review of the Department’s determination “is limited to the facts and record adduced before [the Department]” (Matter of Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32, 39 [2001] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; accord Matter of Featherstone v Franco, 95 NY2d 550, 554 [2000]; see Matter of Ames v Johnston, 169 AD2d 84, 86 [1991]). | 3 | 3 |
Ames v. Johnstongreen2 sentences2014Our review of the Department’s determination “is limited to the facts and record adduced before [the Department]” (Matter of Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32, 39 [2001] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; accord Matter of Featherstone v Franco, 95 NY2d 550, 554 [2000]; see Matter of Ames v Johnston, 169 AD2d 84, 86 [1991]). 2014Our review of the Department’s determination “is limited to the facts and record adduced before [the Department]” (Matter of Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32, 39 [2001] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; accord Matter of Featherstone v Franco, 95 NY2d 550, 554 [2000]; see Matter of Ames v Johnston, 169 AD2d 84, 86 [1991]). | 3 | 3 |
Fisher v. Brown Group, Inc.green2 sentences2014“A hearing is not automatically required whenever a parent seeks modification of a custody [or visitation] order” (Matter of Wurmlinger v Freer, 256 AD2d 1069, 1069 [1998]) and, here, “the mother failed to ‘make a sufficient evidentiary showing of a change in circumstances to require a hearing’ ” (Matter of Warrior v Beatman, 70 AD3d 1358, 1359 [2010], lv denied 14 NY3d 711 [2010]). 2014“A hearing is not automatically required whenever a parent seeks modification of a custody [or visitation] order” (Matter of Wurmlinger v Freer, 256 AD2d 1069, 1069 [1998]) and, here, “the mother failed to ‘make a sufficient evidentiary showing of a change in circumstances to require a hearing’ ” (Matter of Warrior v Beatman, 70 AD3d 1358, 1359 [2010], lv denied 14 NY3d 711 [2010]). | 2 | 4 |
People v. Jacksongreen2 sentences2015The allegations raised in the petition either have been, or could have been, raised in prior appeals or in motions pursuant to CPL article 440 (see People v Jackson, 119 AD3d 1346, 1347 [2014]; People v Jackson, 71 AD3d 1457, 1458 [2010], lv dismissed in part and denied in part 17 NY3d 774 [2011]; People v Jackson, 262 AD2d 1031 , 1031-1032 [1999], lv denied 94 NY2d 881 [2000]). 2015The allegations raised in the petition either have been, or could have been, raised in prior appeals or in motions pursuant to CPL article 440 (see People v Jackson, 119 AD3d 1346, 1347 [2014]; People v Jackson, 71 AD3d 1457, 1458 [2010], lv dismissed in part and denied in part 17 NY3d 774 [2011]; People v Jackson, 262 AD2d 1031 , 1031-1032 [1999], lv denied 94 NY2d 881 [2000]). | 2 | 3 |
People v. Jacksongreen2 sentences2015The allegations raised in the petition either have been, or could have been, raised in prior appeals or in motions pursuant to CPL article 440 (see People v Jackson, 119 AD3d 1346, 1347 [2014]; People v Jackson, 71 AD3d 1457, 1458 [2010], lv dismissed in part and denied in part 17 NY3d 774 [2011]; People v Jackson, 262 AD2d 1031 , 1031-1032 [1999], lv denied 94 NY2d 881 [2000]). 2015The allegations raised in the petition either have been, or could have been, raised in prior appeals or in motions pursuant to CPL article 440 (see People v Jackson, 119 AD3d 1346, 1347 [2014]; People v Jackson, 71 AD3d 1457, 1458 [2010], lv dismissed in part and denied in part 17 NY3d 774 [2011]; People v Jackson, 262 AD2d 1031 , 1031-1032 [1999], lv denied 94 NY2d 881 [2000]). | 2 | 3 |
Irwin v. Neylandgreen2 sentences2014The mother and the Attorney for the Children appeal from an order dismissing the petition without a hearing. -2- 772 CAF 13-01636 It is well settled that a party seeking a change in an established custody arrangement must show “a change in circumstances [that] reflects a real need for change to ensure the best interest[s] of the child[ren]” (Matter of Irwin v Neyland, 213 AD2d 773, 773 ; see Matter of Moore v Moore, 78 AD3d 1630, 1630 , lv denied 16 NY3d 704 ; Matter of Hight v Hight, 19 AD3d 1159, 1160 ). 2014It is well settled that a party seeking a change in an established custody arrangement must show “a change in circumstances [that] reflects a real need for change to ensure the best interest[s] of the child[ren]” (Matter of Irwin v Neyland, 213 AD2d 773, 773 [1995]; see Matter of Moore v Moore, 78 AD3d 1630, 1630 [2010], lv denied 16 NY3d 704 [2011]; Matter of Hight v Hight, 19 AD3d 1159, 1160 [2005]). | 2 | 3 |
Hight v. Hightgreen2 sentences2014The mother and the Attorney for the Children appeal from an order dismissing the petition without a hearing. -2- 772 CAF 13-01636 It is well settled that a party seeking a change in an established custody arrangement must show “a change in circumstances [that] reflects a real need for change to ensure the best interest[s] of the child[ren]” (Matter of Irwin v Neyland, 213 AD2d 773, 773 ; see Matter of Moore v Moore, 78 AD3d 1630, 1630 , lv denied 16 NY3d 704 ; Matter of Hight v Hight, 19 AD3d 1159, 1160 ). 2014It is well settled that a party seeking a change in an established custody arrangement must show “a change in circumstances [that] reflects a real need for change to ensure the best interest[s] of the child[ren]” (Matter of Irwin v Neyland, 213 AD2d 773, 773 [1995]; see Matter of Moore v Moore, 78 AD3d 1630, 1630 [2010], lv denied 16 NY3d 704 [2011]; Matter of Hight v Hight, 19 AD3d 1159, 1160 [2005]). | 2 | 3 |
People ex rel. Feliz v. Smithgreen2 sentences2022Feliz v Smith , 203 AD3d 1422, 1423 [3d Dept 2022], lv denied 38 NY3d 909 [2022]). 2022Feliz v Smith , 203 AD3d 1422, 1423 [3d Dept 2022], lv denied 38 NY3d 909 [2022]). | 2 | 2 |
Bustamante v. Larguegreen2 sentences2021The Family Court properly dismissed the father's petition without a hearing because, even reading the allegations liberally in favor of the father, he did not allege conduct committed by respondent, the mother's boyfriend, which would constitute a family offense against the subject child ( see Matter of Bustamante v Largue , 112 AD3d 819, 820 [2d Dept 2013]). 2021The Family Court properly dismissed the father's petition without a hearing because, even reading the allegations liberally in favor of the father, he did not allege conduct committed by respondent, the mother's boyfriend, which would constitute a family offense against the subject child ( see Matter of Bustamante v Largue , 112 AD3d 819, 820 [2d Dept 2013]). | 2 | 2 |
Panzer v. Woodgreen2 sentences2017As for the merits of the appeal, “even according the mother every favorable inference, as we must, we find that Family Court did not err in dismissing the mother’s petition without a hearing” (Matter of Gerber v Gerber, 141 AD3d 901, 902 [2016] [citations omitted]; see Matter of Panzer v Wood, 100 AD3d 1119 , 1120 [2012], lv dismissed 20 NY3d 1001 [2013]). 2017As for the merits of the appeal, “even according the mother every favorable inference, as we must, we find that Family Court did not err in dismissing the mother’s petition without a hearing” (Matter of Gerber v Gerber, 141 AD3d 901, 902 [2016] [citations omitted]; see Matter of Panzer v Wood, 100 AD3d 1119 , 1120 [2012], lv dismissed 20 NY3d 1001 [2013]). | 2 | 2 |
Matter of Gerber v. Gerbergreen2 sentences2017As for the merits of the appeal, “even according the mother every favorable inference, as we must, we find that Family Court did not err in dismissing the mother’s petition without a hearing” (Matter of Gerber v Gerber, 141 AD3d 901, 902 [2016] [citations omitted]; see Matter of Panzer v Wood, 100 AD3d 1119 , 1120 [2012], lv dismissed 20 NY3d 1001 [2013]). 2017As for the merits of the appeal, “even according the mother every favorable inference, as we must, we find that Family Court did not err in dismissing the mother’s petition without a hearing” (Matter of Gerber v Gerber, 141 AD3d 901, 902 [2016] [citations omitted]; see Matter of Panzer v Wood, 100 AD3d 1119 , 1120 [2012], lv dismissed 20 NY3d 1001 [2013]). | 2 | 2 |
Akwesasne Convenience Store Ass'n v. Stategreen2 sentences2017As for the merits of the appeal, “even according the mother every favorable inference, as we must, we find that Family Court did not err in dismissing the mother’s petition without a hearing” (Matter of Gerber v Gerber, 141 AD3d 901, 902 [2016] [citations omitted]; see Matter of Panzer v Wood, 100 AD3d 1119 , 1120 [2012], lv dismissed 20 NY3d 1001 [2013]). 2017As for the merits of the appeal, “even according the mother every favorable inference, as we must, we find that Family Court did not err in dismissing the mother’s petition without a hearing” (Matter of Gerber v Gerber, 141 AD3d 901, 902 [2016] [citations omitted]; see Matter of Panzer v Wood, 100 AD3d 1119 , 1120 [2012], lv dismissed 20 NY3d 1001 [2013]). | 2 | 2 |
Ford v. Baldigreen2 sentences2016Accordingly, we find that Family Court erred in dismissing the mother’s petition without a hearing (see Matter of Ford v Baldi, 123 AD3d 1399, 1400 [2014]; Matter of Freedman v Horike, 107 AD3d at 1333-1334 ; Matter of Giovanni v Hall, 86 AD3d 676, 677 [2011]). 2016Here, even according the mother every favorable inference, as we must (see Matter of Harrell v Fox, 137 AD3d at 1354 ; Matter of Ford v Baldi, 123 AD3d 1399, 1400 [2014]; Matter of Tod ZZ. v Paula ZZ., 113 AD3d 1005, 1006 [2014]; see also Family Ct Act § 165 [a]; CPLR 3026), we find that Family Court did not err in dismissing the mother’s petition without a hearing (see Matter of Lowe v Bonelli, 129 AD3d 1135, 1137 [2015]). | 2 | 2 |
Akshar v. Millsgreen2 sentences2015Lastly, because petitioner’s challenges implicated purely legal questions, Supreme Court did not err in dismissing the petition without a hearing (see Matter of Kenny v Fiala, 127 AD3d at 1360 ; Matter of Akshar v Mills, 249 AD2d 786, 788 [1998], lv dismissed 92 NY2d 962 [1998]). . 2015Finally, to the extent that the arguments submitted before Supreme Court were purely legal, that court properly dismissed the petition without a hearing (see Matter of Akshar v Mills, 249 AD2d 786, 787-788 [1998], lv dismissed 92 NY2d 962 [1998]). | 2 | 2 |
| Timson v. Timsongreen | 2 | 2 |
Jordan v. Lebowitzgreen2 sentences2014“A hearing is not automatically required whenever a parent seeks modification of a custody [or visitation] order” (Matter of Wurmlinger v Freer, 256 AD2d 1069, 1069 [1998]) and, here, “the mother failed to ‘make a sufficient evidentiary showing of a change in circumstances to require a hearing’ ” (Matter of Warrior v Beatman, 70 AD3d 1358, 1359 [2010], lv denied 14 NY3d 711 [2010]). 2014“A hearing is not automatically required whenever a parent seeks modification of a custody [or visitation] order” (Matter of Wurmlinger v Freer, 256 AD2d 1069, 1069 [1998]) and, here, “the mother failed to ‘make a sufficient evidentiary showing of a change in circumstances to require a hearing’ ” (Matter of Warrior v Beatman, 70 AD3d 1358, 1359 [2010], lv denied 14 NY3d 711 [2010]). | 1 | 4 |
Caso v. Nassau County Police Departmentgreen2 sentences2017The Family Court properly dismissed the appellant’s petition for custody without a hearing, as the appellant’s recourse was to seek adoption, and not mere custody, of the subject child (see Matter of McHarris v Administration for Children’s Servs., 53 AD3d 660, 660 [2008]; Matter of Snypes v Administration for Children’s Servs., 308 AD2d 593, 593 [2003]; Matter of Patience B. v Administration for Children’s Servs., 306 AD2d 473, 473 [2003]; Social Services Law § 384-b [11]). 2003The Family Court properly granted the respondent’s motion to dismiss the petition without a hearing, as the appellant’s recourse was to seek adoption, not mere custody of the child (see Matter of Patience B. v Administration for Children’s Servs., 306 AD2d 473 [2003]; Matter of Irons v Ford, 289 AD2d 576, 577 [2001]; Matter of Charles H., 207 AD2d 788, 789 [1994]; Social Services Law § 384-b [1]). | 1 | 2 |
Freedman v. Horikegreen2 sentences2016Accordingly, we find that Family Court erred in dismissing the mother’s petition without a hearing (see Matter of Ford v Baldi, 123 AD3d 1399, 1400 [2014]; Matter of Freedman v Horike, 107 AD3d at 1333-1334 ; Matter of Giovanni v Hall, 86 AD3d 676, 677 [2011]). 2015Accordingly, the Family Court erred in, in effect, dismissing the petition without a hearing (see Matter of Freedman v Horike, 107 AD3d 1332, 1333-1334 [2013]; Matter of Schnock v Sexton, 101 AD3d 1437, 1437-1438 [2012]; Matter of Zelodius C. v Danny L., 39 AD3d 320, 320 [2007]). | 1 | 2 |
Matter of Harrell v. Foxgreen2 sentences2016As a final matter, we note that, although not required, the appointment of an attorney for the child is the “strongly preferred practice” in contested custody proceedings (Matter of Ames v Ames, 97 AD3d 914, 916 [2012], lv denied 20 NY3d 852 [2012]; accord Matter of Harrell v Fox, 137 AD3d at 1355 ; see Family Ct Act § 249 [a]). 2016Here, even according the mother every favorable inference, as we must (see Matter of Harrell v Fox, 137 AD3d at 1354 ; Matter of Ford v Baldi, 123 AD3d 1399, 1400 [2014]; Matter of Tod ZZ. v Paula ZZ., 113 AD3d 1005, 1006 [2014]; see also Family Ct Act § 165 [a]; CPLR 3026), we find that Family Court did not err in dismissing the mother’s petition without a hearing (see Matter of Lowe v Bonelli, 129 AD3d 1135, 1137 [2015]). | 1 | 2 |
| Deochand v. Deochandgreen | 1 | 2 |
| Blackstock v. Pricegreen | 1 | 2 |
| Mobley v. Ishmaelgreen | 1 | 2 |
| Davies v. Daviesgreen | 1 | 2 |
| Matter of Gonzalez v. Annuccigreen | 1 | 1 |
| Hartley v. Postgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Hill v. Flynngreen | 1 | 1 |
| Grady v. Grellergreen | 1 | 1 |
| McHarris v. Administration for Children's Servicesgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Matter of Shazzi T. v. Ernest G.green | 1 | 1 |
| Matter of Brown-Winfield v. Baileygreen | 1 | 1 |
| ESPOSITO, LINDSAY A. v. MAGILL, MATTHEW E.green | 1 | 1 |
| Gelling v. McNabbgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Matter of Lashlee v. Lashleegreen | 1 | 1 |
| Matter of Acevedo v. Acevedogreen | 1 | 1 |
| Machado v. Tanourygreen | 1 | 1 |
| Watts v. Leonardgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Matter of Arnold v. Arnoldgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
MATTER OF JACKSON v. Walsh
neutral
2 sentences2015The allegations raised in the petition either have been, or could have been, raised in prior appeals or in motions pursuant to CPL article 440 (see People v Jackson, 119 AD3d 1346, 1347 [2014]; People v Jackson, 71 AD3d 1457, 1458 [2010], lv dismissed in part and denied in part 17 NY3d 774 [2011]; People v Jackson, 262 AD2d 1031 , 1031-1032 [1999], lv denied 94 NY2d 881 [2000]). 2015The allegations raised in the petition either have been, or could have been, raised in prior appeals or in motions pursuant to CPL article 440 (see People v Jackson, 119 AD3d 1346, 1347 [2014]; People v Jackson, 71 AD3d 1457, 1458 [2010], lv dismissed in part and denied in part 17 NY3d 774 [2011]; People v Jackson, 262 AD2d 1031 , 1031-1032 [1999], lv denied 94 NY2d 881 [2000]). | 3 | 2015–2015 |
People v. Jackson
green
2 sentences2015The allegations raised in the petition either have been, or could have been, raised in prior appeals or in motions pursuant to CPL article 440 (see People v Jackson, 119 AD3d 1346, 1347 [2014]; People v Jackson, 71 AD3d 1457, 1458 [2010], lv dismissed in part and denied in part 17 NY3d 774 [2011]; People v Jackson, 262 AD2d 1031 , 1031-1032 [1999], lv denied 94 NY2d 881 [2000]). 2015The allegations raised in the petition either have been, or could have been, raised in prior appeals or in motions pursuant to CPL article 440 (see People v Jackson, 119 AD3d 1346, 1347 [2014]; People v Jackson, 71 AD3d 1457, 1458 [2010], lv dismissed in part and denied in part 17 NY3d 774 [2011]; People v Jackson, 262 AD2d 1031 , 1031-1032 [1999], lv denied 94 NY2d 881 [2000]). | 3 | 2015–2015 |
Loriann Q. v. Frank R.
green
2 sentences2021The Family Court did not improperly rely on hearsay, but took into account the representation of an Administration for Children's Services court liaison that an investigation concerning the father's allegations was unfounded, which provided additional assurance that the child was not at immediate risk of harm ( see Matter of Loriann Q. v Frank R., 53 AD3d 735 [3d Dept 2008]). 2021The Family Court did not improperly rely on hearsay, but took into account the representation of an Administration for Children's Services court liaison that an investigation concerning the father's allegations was unfounded, which provided additional assurance that the child was not at immediate risk of harm ( see Matter of Loriann Q. v Frank R., 53 AD3d 735 [3d Dept 2008]). | 2 | 2021–2021 |
Matter of Castagnini v. Hyman-Hunt
neutral
2 sentences2018Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly dismissed the father's petition without a hearing ( see Matter of Castagnini v Hyman-Hunt, 123 AD3d 926, 926 ; Matter of Fasano v Battista, 68 AD3d 863, 864 ; Matter of Riedel v Riedel, 61 AD3d 979 ; Matter of Miller v Lee , 225 AD2d 778, 779 ). 2016Accordingly, the Family Court properly dismissed the father’s petition without a hearing (see Matter of Valencia v Ripley, 128 AD3d 711, 712 [2015]; Matter of Castagnini v Hyman-Hunt, 123 AD3d 926 [2014]; Macchio v Macchio, 120 AD3d 560 [2014]). | 2 | 2016–2018 |
Macchio v. Macchio
green
2 sentences2016Accordingly, the Family Court properly dismissed the father’s petition without a hearing (see Matter of Valencia v Ripley, 128 AD3d 711, 712 [2015]; Matter of Castagnini v Hyman-Hunt, 123 AD3d 926 [2014]; Macchio v Macchio, 120 AD3d 560 [2014]). 2015Therefore, the Family Court properly granted that branch of the mother’s motion which was to dismiss the petition without a hearing (see Macchio v Macchio, 120 AD3d 560 [2014]; Connor v Connor, 104 AD3d 638 [2013]). | 2 | 2015–2016 |
JONES LANG WOOTTON USA v. LeBOEUF, LAMB, GREENE & McRAE
green
2 sentences2015Lastly, because petitioner’s challenges implicated purely legal questions, Supreme Court did not err in dismissing the petition without a hearing (see Matter of Kenny v Fiala, 127 AD3d at 1360 ; Matter of Akshar v Mills, 249 AD2d 786, 788 [1998], lv dismissed 92 NY2d 962 [1998]). . 2015Finally, to the extent that the arguments submitted before Supreme Court were purely legal, that court properly dismissed the petition without a hearing (see Matter of Akshar v Mills, 249 AD2d 786, 787-788 [1998], lv dismissed 92 NY2d 962 [1998]). | 2 | 2015–2015 |
In re Estate of Wirth
green
2 sentences2014Accordingly, the Family Court properly dismissed the petition without a hearing (see Matter of Collazo v Collazo, 78 AD3d 1177 [2010]; Matter of Walberg v Rudden, 14 AD3d 572 [2005]). 2010Accordingly, the Family Court properly, in effect, dismissed the petition without a hearing (see Matter of Reilly v Reilly, 64 AD3d 660 [2009]; Matter of Rodriguez v Hangartner, 59 AD3d at 630 ; Matter of Dann v Dann, 51 AD3d 1345 [2008]; Matter of Walberg v Rudden, 14 AD3d 572 [2005]; Smoczkiewicz v Smoczkiewicz, 2 AD3d 705, 706 [2003]; Matter of Cooke v Miller, 300 AD2d 959 [2002]; Matter of Brocher v Brocher, 213 AD2d 544 [1995]). | 2 | 2010–2014 |
In re Amir J.-L.
green
2 sentences2013Accordingly, under the circumstances of this case, the Family Court properly denied the father’s petition without a hearing (see Matter of Secrist v Brown, 83 AD3d at 1400 ; Matter of Amir J.-L., 57 AD3d at 669 ). 2013Accordingly, under the circumstances of this case, the Family Court properly denied the father’s petition without a hearing (see Matter of Secrist v Brown, 83 AD3d at 1400 ; Matter of Amir J.-L., 57 AD3d at 669 ). | 2 | 2013–2013 |
Secrist v. Brown
green
2 sentences2013Accordingly, under the circumstances of this case, the Family Court properly denied the father’s petition without a hearing (see Matter of Secrist v Brown, 83 AD3d at 1400 ; Matter of Amir J.-L., 57 AD3d at 669 ). 2013Accordingly, under the circumstances of this case, the Family Court properly denied the father’s petition without a hearing (see Matter of Secrist v Brown, 83 AD3d at 1400 ; Matter of Amir J.-L., 57 AD3d at 669 ). | 2 | 2013–2013 |
| Matter of Silverman v. Leibowitz green | 1 | 2023–2023 |
| Battinelli v. Battinelli green | 1 | 2022–2022 |
| Matter of Milton v. Tormey-Milton green | 1 | 2022–2022 |
| Marrale v. Marrale green | 1 | 2022–2022 |
| Matter of Rosenberg v. Rosenberg green | 1 | 2022–2022 |
| Matter of Pagnani v. Suffolk County Dept. of Social Servs. green | 1 | 2021–2021 |
| Foster v. Bartlett green | 1 | 2021–2021 |
| MATTER OF CHASM HYDRO, INC. v. New York State Dept. of Envtl. Conservation green | 1 | 2021–2021 |
| Magee v. Magee green | 1 | 2021–2021 |
| Matter of Besen v. Besen neutral | 1 | 2021–2021 |
| James v. Hickey green | 1 | 2019–2019 |
| Riedel v. Riedel green | 1 | 2018–2018 |
| Fasano v. Battista neutral | 1 | 2018–2018 |
| Handibode v. Martensen green | 1 | 2018–2018 |
| Lamarche v. Jessie green | 1 | 2018–2018 |
| Matter of Cusano v. Coitino neutral | 1 | 2018–2018 |
| Miller v. Lee green | 1 | 2018–2018 |
| Gentile v. Gentile green | 1 | 2018–2018 |
| Lucido v. Mancuso green | 1 | 2017–2017 |
| People v. Mack green | 1 | 2017–2017 |
| Sullivan v. Plotnick neutral | 1 | 2016–2016 |
| Klass v. Low green | 1 | 2016–2016 |
| Matter of Ruiz v. Sciallo green | 1 | 2016–2016 |
| Eugenio v. City of Yonkers neutral | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.