Account information only. It is never shown to the AI client you connect, and it is kept apart from your research — which is not logged at all.
Your token is the key to the MCP: claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode take it in the URL; Claude Code and the rest take it as a bearer header. It is also in your welcome email. Install instructions.
No token yet. One token per address, shown once and mailed to you with setup steps — claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode need it in the URL; Claude Code and the rest take it as a bearer header. Install instructions.
Your MCP token. Anyone holding it can search on your subscription, so keep it off shared screens.
Header form (recommended) — this endpoint, with
Authorization: Bearer <your token>.
URL form — for claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode, which cannot set a header. The whole credential is in the address:
The dedicated fast index: searches run on a machine nobody else queues for, with full-text highlighted excerpts. Higher MCP limits, and semantic search when it lands.
See ProThank you.
Manage billingDelete my account: email [email protected] and it is done by hand, usually the same day. (Self-serve deletion is not built yet.)
Free, and it takes a minute. Registered visitors skip the Cloudflare checks, and your MCP token for Claude or ChatGPT is issued at the end of this.
Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
Here is your MCP token. It is shown once — it is also in the welcome email we just sent you, with setup steps.
Header form (recommended) — this endpoint, with
Authorization: Bearer <your token>.
URL form — for claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode, which cannot set a header. The whole credential is in the address:
That address already had a token, so we did not issue a second one — two live credentials for one mailbox is how people end up with a working laptop and a broken office machine. Your connector URL is in your inbox under “Your Syfert legal research connector URL”; if it is gone, call 904-383-7448.
19 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1978–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Huguley v. Stategreen2 sentences1997See Fields v. State, 189 Ga. App. 532, 533 ( 376 SE2d 912 ), where we followed Huguley v. State, 253 Ga. 709, 710 ( 324 SE2d 729 ) which decried being forced to “[review] the entire record and transcript with very little assistance from counsel who is in a far better position to perceive error than is an appellate court looking at a cold record,” and we therefore held and announced that “the Anders motion will no longer be entertained in this court.” In Fields and later cases when an appellant’s attorney avers his criminal appeal is frivolous, we have reviewed each record for substantive error 1997See Fields v. State, 189 Ga. App. 532, 533 ( 376 SE2d 912 ), where we followed Huguley v. State, 253 Ga. 709, 710 ( 324 SE2d 729 ) which decried being forced to “[review] the entire record and transcript with very little assistance from counsel who is in a far better position to perceive error than is an appellate court looking at a cold record,” and we therefore held and announced that “the Anders motion will no longer be entertained in this court.” In Fields and later cases when an appellant’s attorney avers his criminal appeal is frivolous, we have reviewed each record for substantive error | 2 | 3 |
Anders v. Californiagreen2 sentences1989During appeal, an Anders motion (Anders v. California, 386 U. S. 738 (87 SC 1396, 18 LE2d 493)) was filed in this case. 1985However, since the instant case was docketed in this court on June 14, 1984, and since the parties have proceeded under the guidelines of Anders v. California, supra, we will not apply the rule of Huguley , but will instead entertain the Anders motion filed by Rich’s counsel. | 1 | 12 |
Farmer v. Georgia Department of Corrections.green2 sentences2022We conclude that the Anders motion is unduly burdensome in that it tends to force the court to assume the role of counsel for the appellant.”). 4 argument related to any of the legal authorities he lists, much less any argument regarding the sufficiency of the evidence underlying his convictions.3 In reaching the foregoing conclusion, we acknowledge the significant liberty interests at stake when reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a 3 See Farmer v. Dep’t of Corr., 346 Ga. App. 387, 394 (2) ( 816 SE2d 376 (2018) (“[M]ere conclusory statements are not the type of meaningful arg 2022We conclude that the Anders motion is unduly burdensome in that it tends to force the court to assume the role of counsel for the appellant.”). 4 argument related to any of the legal authorities he lists, much less any argument regarding the sufficiency of the evidence underlying his convictions.3 In reaching the foregoing conclusion, we acknowledge the significant liberty interests at stake when reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a 3 See Farmer v. Dep’t of Corr., 346 Ga. App. 387, 394 (2) ( 816 SE2d 376 (2018) (“[M]ere conclusory statements are not the type of meaningful arg | 1 | 1 |
Reed v. City of Atlantagreen2 sentences2022We conclude that the Anders motion is unduly burdensome in that it tends to force the court to assume the role of counsel for the appellant.”). 4 argument related to any of the legal authorities he lists, much less any argument regarding the sufficiency of the evidence underlying his convictions.3 In reaching the foregoing conclusion, we acknowledge the significant liberty interests at stake when reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a 3 See Farmer v. Dep’t of Corr., 346 Ga. App. 387, 394 (2) ( 816 SE2d 376 (2018) (“[M]ere conclusory statements are not the type of meaningful arg 2022We conclude that the Anders motion is unduly burdensome in that it tends to force the court to assume the role of counsel for the appellant.”). 4 argument related to any of the legal authorities he lists, much less any argument regarding the sufficiency of the evidence underlying his convictions.3 In reaching the foregoing conclusion, we acknowledge the significant liberty interests at stake when reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a 3 See Farmer v. Dep’t of Corr., 346 Ga. App. 387, 394 (2) ( 816 SE2d 376 (2018) (“[M]ere conclusory statements are not the type of meaningful arg | 1 | 1 |
Time Warner Entertainment Co. v. Six Flags Over Georgia, LLCgreen2 sentences2022We conclude that the Anders motion is unduly burdensome in that it tends to force the court to assume the role of counsel for the appellant.”). 4 argument related to any of the legal authorities he lists, much less any argument regarding the sufficiency of the evidence underlying his convictions.3 In reaching the foregoing conclusion, we acknowledge the significant liberty interests at stake when reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a 3 See Farmer v. Dep’t of Corr., 346 Ga. App. 387, 394 (2) ( 816 SE2d 376 (2018) (“[M]ere conclusory statements are not the type of meaningful arg 2022We conclude that the Anders motion is unduly burdensome in that it tends to force the court to assume the role of counsel for the appellant.”). 4 argument related to any of the legal authorities he lists, much less any argument regarding the sufficiency of the evidence underlying his convictions.3 In reaching the foregoing conclusion, we acknowledge the significant liberty interests at stake when reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a 3 See Farmer v. Dep’t of Corr., 346 Ga. App. 387, 394 (2) ( 816 SE2d 376 (2018) (“[M]ere conclusory statements are not the type of meaningful arg | 1 | 1 |
Woods v. Hallgreen2 sentences2022We conclude that the Anders motion is unduly burdensome in that it tends to force the court to assume the role of counsel for the appellant.”). 4 argument related to any of the legal authorities he lists, much less any argument regarding the sufficiency of the evidence underlying his convictions.3 In reaching the foregoing conclusion, we acknowledge the significant liberty interests at stake when reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a 3 See Farmer v. Dep’t of Corr., 346 Ga. App. 387, 394 (2) ( 816 SE2d 376 (2018) (“[M]ere conclusory statements are not the type of meaningful arg 2022We conclude that the Anders motion is unduly burdensome in that it tends to force the court to assume the role of counsel for the appellant.”). 4 argument related to any of the legal authorities he lists, much less any argument regarding the sufficiency of the evidence underlying his convictions.3 In reaching the foregoing conclusion, we acknowledge the significant liberty interests at stake when reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a 3 See Farmer v. Dep’t of Corr., 346 Ga. App. 387, 394 (2) ( 816 SE2d 376 (2018) (“[M]ere conclusory statements are not the type of meaningful arg | 1 | 1 |
Jackson v. Virginiared1 sentence1997See Fields v. State, 189 Ga. App. 532, 533 ( 376 SE2d 912 ), where we followed Huguley v. State, 253 Ga. 709, 710 ( 324 SE2d 729 ) which decried being forced to “[review] the entire record and transcript with very little assistance from counsel who is in a far better position to perceive error than is an appellate court looking at a cold record,” and we therefore held and announced that “the Anders motion will no longer be entertained in this court.” In Fields and later cases when an appellant’s attorney avers his criminal appeal is frivolous, we have reviewed each record for substantive error | 1 | 1 |
Scott v. Stategreen2 sentences1997See Scott v. State, 193 Ga. App. 577 ( 388 SE2d 416 ). 1997See Scott v. State, 193 Ga. App. 577 ( 388 SE2d 416 ). | 1 | 1 |
Fields v. Stategreen2 sentences1997See Fields v. State, 189 Ga. App. 532, 533 ( 376 SE2d 912 ), where we followed Huguley v. State, 253 Ga. 709, 710 ( 324 SE2d 729 ) which decried being forced to “[review] the entire record and transcript with very little assistance from counsel who is in a far better position to perceive error than is an appellate court looking at a cold record,” and we therefore held and announced that “the Anders motion will no longer be entertained in this court.” In Fields and later cases when an appellant’s attorney avers his criminal appeal is frivolous, we have reviewed each record for substantive error 1997See Fields v. State, 189 Ga. App. 532, 533 ( 376 SE2d 912 ), where we followed Huguley v. State, 253 Ga. 709, 710 ( 324 SE2d 729 ) which decried being forced to “[review] the entire record and transcript with very little assistance from counsel who is in a far better position to perceive error than is an appellate court looking at a cold record,” and we therefore held and announced that “the Anders motion will no longer be entertained in this court.” In Fields and later cases when an appellant’s attorney avers his criminal appeal is frivolous, we have reviewed each record for substantive error | 1 | 1 |
Whittle v. Stategreen2 sentences1997Id., quoting Whittle v. State, 210 Ga. App. 841, 842 ( 437 SE2d 842 ) (dissent). 1997Id., quoting Whittle v. State, 210 Ga. App. 841, 842 ( 437 SE2d 842 ) (dissent). | 1 | 1 |
Simpson v. Stategreen2 sentences1988In Simpson v. State, 183 Ga. App. 377, 378 ( 359 SE2d 13 ) (1987), we denied an Anders motion based, in part, on the inadequacy of the supporting brief, stating: "[C]ounsel should, at a minimum, endeavor to provide the court with a statement of the facts of the case, identifying the offense of which the defendant was convicted and summarizing the evidence presented at trial. 1988In Simpson v. State, 183 Ga. App. 377, 378 ( 359 SE2d 13 ) (1987), we denied an Anders motion based, in part, on the inadequacy of the supporting brief, stating: "[C]ounsel should, at a minimum, endeavor to provide the court with a statement of the facts of the case, identifying the offense of which the defendant was convicted and summarizing the evidence presented at trial. | 1 | 1 |
O'NEAL v. Stategreen2 sentences1985See O’Neal v. State, 254 Ga. 1 ( 325 SE2d 759 ) (1985). 3 See State v. Johnston, 249 Ga. 413 (3) ( 291 SE2d 543 ) (1982), concerning the trial court’s discretion, pursuant to a motion in limine, to make its decision as to the admissibility of evidence either before or during trial. 1985See O’Neal v. State, 254 Ga. 1 ( 325 SE2d 759 ) (1985). 3 See State v. Johnston, 249 Ga. 413 (3) ( 291 SE2d 543 ) (1982), concerning the trial court’s discretion, pursuant to a motion in limine, to make its decision as to the admissibility of evidence either before or during trial. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Johnstongreen2 sentences1985See O’Neal v. State, 254 Ga. 1 ( 325 SE2d 759 ) (1985). 3 See State v. Johnston, 249 Ga. 413 (3) ( 291 SE2d 543 ) (1982), concerning the trial court’s discretion, pursuant to a motion in limine, to make its decision as to the admissibility of evidence either before or during trial. 1985See O’Neal v. State, 254 Ga. 1 ( 325 SE2d 759 ) (1985). 3 See State v. Johnston, 249 Ga. 413 (3) ( 291 SE2d 543 ) (1982), concerning the trial court’s discretion, pursuant to a motion in limine, to make its decision as to the admissibility of evidence either before or during trial. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Bethay v. State
green
2 sentences1981In my opinion, Anders v. California, 386 U. S. 738 (87 SC 1396, 18 LE2d 493) (1966) and Bethay v. State, 237 Ga. 625 ( 229 SE2d 406 ) (1976), require us to find the appeal to be “wholly frivolous” rather than “ample evidence to support the conviction” before we can grant a so-called Anders motion. 1981In my opinion, Anders v. California, 386 U. S. 738 (87 SC 1396, 18 LE2d 493) (1966) and Bethay v. State, 237 Ga. 625 ( 229 SE2d 406 ) (1976), require us to find the appeal to be “wholly frivolous” rather than “ample evidence to support the conviction” before we can grant a so-called Anders motion. | 3 | 1981–1988 |
Hughes v. State
neutral
2 sentences2001In Hughes v. State, 251 Ga. 393 ( 306 SE2d 242 ) (1983), this Court granted appellate counsel’s Anders motion and dismissed the appeal as frivolous. 2001In Hughes v. State, 251 Ga. 393 ( 306 SE2d 242 ) (1983), this Court granted appellate counsel’s Anders motion and dismissed the appeal as frivolous. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Rowland v. State
green
1 sentence1997Id., quoting Whittle v. State, 210 Ga. App. 841, 842 ( 437 SE2d 842 ) (dissent). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Jackson v. State
neutral
2 sentences1986When an Anders motion is filed, we conscientiously examine “the record and transcript to determine independently if there are any meritorious errors of law.” Jackson v. State, 169 Ga. App. 701 ( 314 SE2d 716 ) (1984). 1986When an Anders motion is filed, we conscientiously examine “the record and transcript to determine independently if there are any meritorious errors of law.” Jackson v. State, 169 Ga. App. 701 ( 314 SE2d 716 ) (1984). | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Laster v. State
green
1 sentence1984Givens v. State, 251 Ga. 346 ( 305 SE2d 589 ). | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Givens v. State
neutral
1 sentence1984Givens v. State, 251 Ga. 346 ( 305 SE2d 589 ). | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Smith v. Hart
green
2 sentences1980Smith v. Hart, 243 Ga. 59 ( 252 SE2d 470 ) (1979); Frazier v. Rutledge, 243 Ga. 39 ( 252 SE2d 465 ) (1979). 1980Smith v. Hart, 243 Ga. 59 ( 252 SE2d 470 ) (1979); Frazier v. Rutledge, 243 Ga. 39 ( 252 SE2d 465 ) (1979). | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Frazier v. Rutledge
neutral
2 sentences1980Smith v. Hart, 243 Ga. 59 ( 252 SE2d 470 ) (1979); Frazier v. Rutledge, 243 Ga. 39 ( 252 SE2d 465 ) (1979). 1980Smith v. Hart, 243 Ga. 59 ( 252 SE2d 470 ) (1979); Frazier v. Rutledge, 243 Ga. 39 ( 252 SE2d 465 ) (1979). | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Corn v. State
green
1 sentence1978This court affirmed the death sentence in Corn v. State, 240 Ga. 130 (1977), and the Court of Appeals dismissed his appeal on an Anders motion (Anders v. California, 386 U. S. 738 (1966)) by his counsel in Corn v. State, 142 Ga. App. 361 ( 255 SE2d 687 ) (1977). | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Corn v. State
green
1 sentence1978This court affirmed the death sentence in Corn v. State, 240 Ga. 130 (1977), and the Court of Appeals dismissed his appeal on an Anders motion (Anders v. California, 386 U. S. 738 (1966)) by his counsel in Corn v. State, 142 Ga. App. 361 ( 255 SE2d 687 ) (1977). | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.