Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
22 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1997–2023 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Meyer v. Wallsgreen2 sentences2021When, as in the instant case, the complaint seeks monetary damages, the claim “is an individual-capacity claim” if “the complaint indicates that the damages are sought . . . from the pocket of the individual defendant.” Meyer, 347 N.C. at 110 (quoting Anita R. 2021When, as in the instant case, the complaint seeks monetary damages, the claim “is an individual-capacity claim” if “the complaint indicates that the damages are sought . . . from the pocket of the individual defendant.” Meyer, 347 N.C. at 110 (quoting Anita R. | 8 | 18 |
Mullis v. Sechrestgreen2 sentences2011If the former, it is an official-capacity claim; if the latter, it is an individual-capacity claim; and if it is both, then the claims proceed in both capacities.” Id. at 552 , 495 S.E.2d at 723 (quoting Meyer v. Walls, 347 N.C. 97, 110 , 489 S.E.2d 880, 887 (1997)). 2011If the former, it is an official-capacity claim; if the latter, it is an individual-capacity claim; and if it is both, then the claims proceed in both capacities.” Id. at 552 , 495 S.E.2d at 723 (quoting Meyer v. Walls, 347 N.C. 97, 110 , 489 S.E.2d 880, 887 (1997)). | 3 | 6 |
Loy v. Martingreen1 sentence2003See id. (listing same factors as grounds for determining claim was an individual-capacity claim). | 1 | 1 |
Kentucky v. Grahamgreen2 sentences1997Id.; see also Kentucky v. Graham, 473 U.S. 159, 166 , 87 L. 1997Id.; see also Kentucky v. Graham, 473 U.S. 159, 166 , 87 L. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Paquette v. County of Durham
green
1 sentence2014Paquette v. Cnty. of Durham, 155 N.C. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
White v. Crisp
green
1 sentence2014In White v. Crisp, 138 N.C. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Mabrey v. Smith
green
1 sentence2003Mabrey v. Smith, 144 N.C. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.