Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
19 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 2013–2026 11 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Clark v. Stategreen2 sentences2026The need to inform the court of the basis for an objection is greater for constitutional complaints than for nonconstitutional ones “because constitutional error is subject to a much stricter harm analysis on appeal.” Clark v. State, 365 S.W.3d 333, 339-40 (Tex. Crim. 2026The need to inform the court of the basis for an objection is greater for constitutional complaints than for nonconstitutional ones “because constitutional error 9 is subject to a much stricter harm analysis on appeal.” Clark v. State, 365 S.W.3d 333, 340 (Tex. Crim. | 12 | 16 |
Davis v. Stategreen1 sentence2015App. 2012) (“[T]he trial court should know when it is being asked to make a constitutional ruling because constitutional error is subject to a much stricter harm analysis on appeal.”); see also Davis v. State, 313 S.W.3d 317, 347 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Reyna v. State
green
2 sentences2018The trial court considered Appellant's proffer under rule 412, not the constitution; thus, Appellant has not preserved his constitutional complaint for our review. 9 See Reyna , 168 S.W.3d at 179-80 ; see also Clark , 365 S.W.3d at 340 ("[T]he trial court should know when it is being asked to make a constitutional ruling because constitutional error is subject to a much stricter harm analysis on appeal."). *370 3. 2013“Whether a party’s particular complaint is preserved depends on whether the complaint on appeal comports with the complaint made at trial.” Pena, 285 S.W.3d at 464 (citing Reyna, 168 S.W.3d at 177 ). | 2 | 2013–2018 |
Estelle v. Williams
green
1 sentence2023The cases show, for example, that it is not an uncommon defense tactic to produce the defendant in jail clothes in the hope of eliciting sympathy from the jury.” Estelle, 425 U.S. at 507–08 (citations omitted). –7– constitutional ruling because constitutional error is subject to a much stricter harm analysis on appeal”). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Davis v. State
green
1 sentence2021We also believe “the trial court should know when it is being asked to make a constitutional ruling because constitutional error is subject to a much stricter harm analysis on appeal.” Id. at 340 (citing to TEX. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Pena v. State
green
1 sentence2013“Whether a party’s particular complaint is preserved depends on whether the complaint on appeal comports with the complaint made at trial.” Pena, 285 S.W.3d at 464 (citing Reyna, 168 S.W.3d at 177 ). | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.