losing party desires test (Georgia) · Go Syfert
← Georgia issues

losing party desires test in Georgia

18 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1919–1957 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

CaseFollowedCited
Beall v. Mineral Tone Co.green
ga · 1929 · cited in 7 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 1930–1938
2 sentences

1938Especially -would this be apparent, where, without a motion for new trial, the cross-bill complains that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict in favor of the opposite party, and that a charge thereon was error because there was no evidence to authorize it, since, "as several times held by this court, if the case has been tried by a jury and a verdict rendered' therein, and the losing party desires to test the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict, a motion for a new trial is indispensable.” Beall v. Mineral Tone Co., 167 Ga. 667, 670 ( 146 S. E. 473 ); Schroeder v.

1938Especially -would this be apparent, where, without a motion for new trial, the cross-bill complains that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict in favor of the opposite party, and that a charge thereon was error because there was no evidence to authorize it, since, "as several times held by this court, if the case has been tried by a jury and a verdict rendered' therein, and the losing party desires to test the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict, a motion for a new trial is indispensable.” Beall v. Mineral Tone Co., 167 Ga. 667, 670 ( 146 S. E. 473 ); Schroeder v.

27
Chandler v. Penningtongreen
gactapp · 1954 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 1957–1957
2 sentences

1957“Where a verdict by a jury is returned in a cause duly on trial (whether by direction or otherwise), and the losing party desires to test the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict, a motion for new trial is indispensable [citing numerous cases].” Kenny v. Hannah, 211 Ga. 545 (2) ( 87 S. E. 2d 51 ); Chandler v. Pennington, 89 Ga. App. 676, 677 ( 80 S. E. 2d 843); Baker v. Decatur Lumber &c.

1957“Where a verdict by a jury is returned in a cause duly on trial (whether by direction or otherwise), and the losing party desires to test the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict, a motion for new trial is indispensable [citing numerous cases].” Kenny v. Hannah, 211 Ga. 545 (2) ( 87 S. E. 2d 51 ); Chandler v. Pennington, 89 Ga. App. 676, 677 ( 80 S. E. 2d 843); Baker v. Decatur Lumber &c.

11
Fleming v. Collinsgreen
ga · 1940 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 1955–1955
2 sentences

1955Beall v. Mineral Tone Co., supra; Sheftall v. Johnson, 171 Ga. 890 ( 157 S. E. 94 ); Head v. North American Life Insurance Co., 172 Ga. 766 ( 158 S. E. 746 ); Durden v. Harper, 174 Ga. 570 ( 163 S. E. 192 ); Hamilton National Bank v. Robertson, 177 Ga. 734 ( 171 S. E. 293 ); Fleming v. Collins, 190 Ga. 210, 212 ( 9 S. E. 2d 157 ); City of Macon v. Herrington, 198 Ga. 576, 586 ( 32 S. E. 2d 517 ). 3.

1955Beall v. Mineral Tone Co., supra; Sheftall v. Johnson, 171 Ga. 890 ( 157 S. E. 94 ); Head v. North American Life Insurance Co., 172 Ga. 766 ( 158 S. E. 746 ); Durden v. Harper, 174 Ga. 570 ( 163 S. E. 192 ); Hamilton National Bank v. Robertson, 177 Ga. 734 ( 171 S. E. 293 ); Fleming v. Collins, 190 Ga. 210, 212 ( 9 S. E. 2d 157 ); City of Macon v. Herrington, 198 Ga. 576, 586 ( 32 S. E. 2d 517 ). 3.

11
City of MacOn v. Herringtongreen
ga · 1944 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 1955–1955
2 sentences

1955Beall v. Mineral Tone Co., supra; Sheftall v. Johnson, 171 Ga. 890 ( 157 S. E. 94 ); Head v. North American Life Insurance Co., 172 Ga. 766 ( 158 S. E. 746 ); Durden v. Harper, 174 Ga. 570 ( 163 S. E. 192 ); Hamilton National Bank v. Robertson, 177 Ga. 734 ( 171 S. E. 293 ); Fleming v. Collins, 190 Ga. 210, 212 ( 9 S. E. 2d 157 ); City of Macon v. Herrington, 198 Ga. 576, 586 ( 32 S. E. 2d 517 ). 3.

1955Beall v. Mineral Tone Co., supra; Sheftall v. Johnson, 171 Ga. 890 ( 157 S. E. 94 ); Head v. North American Life Insurance Co., 172 Ga. 766 ( 158 S. E. 746 ); Durden v. Harper, 174 Ga. 570 ( 163 S. E. 192 ); Hamilton National Bank v. Robertson, 177 Ga. 734 ( 171 S. E. 293 ); Fleming v. Collins, 190 Ga. 210, 212 ( 9 S. E. 2d 157 ); City of Macon v. Herrington, 198 Ga. 576, 586 ( 32 S. E. 2d 517 ). 3.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (15)

CaseCitedYears
Mackin v. Blalock green
ga · 1909
2 sentences

1955The plaintiff did not file a motion for new trial, and there is no brief of the evidence in the record. “ ‘Where a case has been tried by a jury and a verdict rendered therein, and the losing party desires to test the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict, a motion for a new trial is indispensable.’ Mackin v. Blalock, 133 Ga. 550 (4) ( 66 S. E. 265 , 134 Am.

1955The plaintiff did not file a motion for new trial, and there is no brief of the evidence in the record. “ ‘Where a case has been tried by a jury and a verdict rendered therein, and the losing party desires to test the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict, a motion for a new trial is indispensable.’ Mackin v. Blalock, 133 Ga. 550 (4) ( 66 S. E. 265 , 134 Am.

91919–1955
Sheftall v. Johnson neutral
ga · 1930
2 sentences

1936“Where a ease has- been tried by a jury and a verdict rendered therein, and the losing party desires to test the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict, a motion for a new trial is indispensable.” Beall v. Mineral Tone Co., 167 Ga. 667, 670 ( 146 S. E. 473 ), and cit.; Shippen Hardwood Lumber Co. v. Johnson, 168 Ga. 112 ( 147 S. E. 115 ); Sheftall v. Johnson, 171 Ga. 890 ( 157 S. E. 94 ); Head v. North American Life Ins.

1936“Where a ease has- been tried by a jury and a verdict rendered therein, and the losing party desires to test the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict, a motion for a new trial is indispensable.” Beall v. Mineral Tone Co., 167 Ga. 667, 670 ( 146 S. E. 473 ), and cit.; Shippen Hardwood Lumber Co. v. Johnson, 168 Ga. 112 ( 147 S. E. 115 ); Sheftall v. Johnson, 171 Ga. 890 ( 157 S. E. 94 ); Head v. North American Life Ins.

41934–1955
Mobley v. Ellis green
gactapp · 1928
2 sentences

1934“Where a ease has been tried by a jury and a verdict rendered therein, and the losing party desires to test the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict, a motion for a new trial is indispensable.” Beall v. Mineral Tone Co., 167 Ga. 667 ( 146 S. E. 473 ); Sheftall v. Johnson, 171 Ga. 890 ( 157 S. E. 94 ); Mobley v. Ellis, 37 Ga. App. 683 ( 141 S. E. 321 ), and cit. 2.

1934“Where a ease has been tried by a jury and a verdict rendered therein, and the losing party desires to test the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict, a motion for a new trial is indispensable.” Beall v. Mineral Tone Co., 167 Ga. 667 ( 146 S. E. 473 ); Sheftall v. Johnson, 171 Ga. 890 ( 157 S. E. 94 ); Mobley v. Ellis, 37 Ga. App. 683 ( 141 S. E. 321 ), and cit. 2.

41934–1936
Head v. North American Life Insurance neutral
ga · 1931
2 sentences

1955Beall v. Mineral Tone Co., supra; Sheftall v. Johnson, 171 Ga. 890 ( 157 S. E. 94 ); Head v. North American Life Insurance Co., 172 Ga. 766 ( 158 S. E. 746 ); Durden v. Harper, 174 Ga. 570 ( 163 S. E. 192 ); Hamilton National Bank v. Robertson, 177 Ga. 734 ( 171 S. E. 293 ); Fleming v. Collins, 190 Ga. 210, 212 ( 9 S. E. 2d 157 ); City of Macon v. Herrington, 198 Ga. 576, 586 ( 32 S. E. 2d 517 ). 3.

1955Beall v. Mineral Tone Co., supra; Sheftall v. Johnson, 171 Ga. 890 ( 157 S. E. 94 ); Head v. North American Life Insurance Co., 172 Ga. 766 ( 158 S. E. 746 ); Durden v. Harper, 174 Ga. 570 ( 163 S. E. 192 ); Hamilton National Bank v. Robertson, 177 Ga. 734 ( 171 S. E. 293 ); Fleming v. Collins, 190 Ga. 210, 212 ( 9 S. E. 2d 157 ); City of Macon v. Herrington, 198 Ga. 576, 586 ( 32 S. E. 2d 517 ). 3.

21936–1955
Hamilton National Bank v. Robertson neutral
ga · 1933
2 sentences

1955Beall v. Mineral Tone Co., supra; Sheftall v. Johnson, 171 Ga. 890 ( 157 S. E. 94 ); Head v. North American Life Insurance Co., 172 Ga. 766 ( 158 S. E. 746 ); Durden v. Harper, 174 Ga. 570 ( 163 S. E. 192 ); Hamilton National Bank v. Robertson, 177 Ga. 734 ( 171 S. E. 293 ); Fleming v. Collins, 190 Ga. 210, 212 ( 9 S. E. 2d 157 ); City of Macon v. Herrington, 198 Ga. 576, 586 ( 32 S. E. 2d 517 ). 3.

1955Beall v. Mineral Tone Co., supra; Sheftall v. Johnson, 171 Ga. 890 ( 157 S. E. 94 ); Head v. North American Life Insurance Co., 172 Ga. 766 ( 158 S. E. 746 ); Durden v. Harper, 174 Ga. 570 ( 163 S. E. 192 ); Hamilton National Bank v. Robertson, 177 Ga. 734 ( 171 S. E. 293 ); Fleming v. Collins, 190 Ga. 210, 212 ( 9 S. E. 2d 157 ); City of Macon v. Herrington, 198 Ga. 576, 586 ( 32 S. E. 2d 517 ). 3.

21936–1955
Nuckolls v. Jordan neutral
gactapp · 1934
2 sentences

1936Co., 172 Ga. 766 (2) ( 158 S. E. 746 ), and cit.; Mobley v. Ellis, 37 Ga. App. 683 ( 141 S. E. 321 ), and cit.; Nuckolls v. Jordan, 49 Ga. App. 79 ( 174 S. E. 250 ). 3.

1936Co., 172 Ga. 766 (2) ( 158 S. E. 746 ), and cit.; Mobley v. Ellis, 37 Ga. App. 683 ( 141 S. E. 321 ), and cit.; Nuckolls v. Jordan, 49 Ga. App. 79 ( 174 S. E. 250 ). 3.

21934–1936
Baker v. Decatur Lumber & Supply Co. green
ga · 1955
2 sentences

1957Co., 211 Ga. 510 ( 87 S. E. 2d 89 ). 2.

1957Co., 211 Ga. 510 ( 87 S. E. 2d 89 ). 2.

11957–1957
Kenny v. Hannah neutral
ga · 1955
2 sentences

1957“Where a verdict by a jury is returned in a cause duly on trial (whether by direction or otherwise), and the losing party desires to test the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict, a motion for new trial is indispensable [citing numerous cases].” Kenny v. Hannah, 211 Ga. 545 (2) ( 87 S. E. 2d 51 ); Chandler v. Pennington, 89 Ga. App. 676, 677 ( 80 S. E. 2d 843); Baker v. Decatur Lumber &c.

1957“Where a verdict by a jury is returned in a cause duly on trial (whether by direction or otherwise), and the losing party desires to test the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict, a motion for new trial is indispensable [citing numerous cases].” Kenny v. Hannah, 211 Ga. 545 (2) ( 87 S. E. 2d 51 ); Chandler v. Pennington, 89 Ga. App. 676, 677 ( 80 S. E. 2d 843); Baker v. Decatur Lumber &c.

11957–1957
Durden v. Harper neutral
ga · 1932
2 sentences

1955Beall v. Mineral Tone Co., supra; Sheftall v. Johnson, 171 Ga. 890 ( 157 S. E. 94 ); Head v. North American Life Insurance Co., 172 Ga. 766 ( 158 S. E. 746 ); Durden v. Harper, 174 Ga. 570 ( 163 S. E. 192 ); Hamilton National Bank v. Robertson, 177 Ga. 734 ( 171 S. E. 293 ); Fleming v. Collins, 190 Ga. 210, 212 ( 9 S. E. 2d 157 ); City of Macon v. Herrington, 198 Ga. 576, 586 ( 32 S. E. 2d 517 ). 3.

1955Beall v. Mineral Tone Co., supra; Sheftall v. Johnson, 171 Ga. 890 ( 157 S. E. 94 ); Head v. North American Life Insurance Co., 172 Ga. 766 ( 158 S. E. 746 ); Durden v. Harper, 174 Ga. 570 ( 163 S. E. 192 ); Hamilton National Bank v. Robertson, 177 Ga. 734 ( 171 S. E. 293 ); Fleming v. Collins, 190 Ga. 210, 212 ( 9 S. E. 2d 157 ); City of Macon v. Herrington, 198 Ga. 576, 586 ( 32 S. E. 2d 517 ). 3.

11955–1955
Schroeder v. Schroeder green
ga · 1915
2 sentences

1938Especially -would this be apparent, where, without a motion for new trial, the cross-bill complains that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict in favor of the opposite party, and that a charge thereon was error because there was no evidence to authorize it, since, "as several times held by this court, if the case has been tried by a jury and a verdict rendered' therein, and the losing party desires to test the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict, a motion for a new trial is indispensable.” Beall v. Mineral Tone Co., 167 Ga. 667, 670 ( 146 S. E. 473 ); Schroeder v.

1938Especially -would this be apparent, where, without a motion for new trial, the cross-bill complains that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict in favor of the opposite party, and that a charge thereon was error because there was no evidence to authorize it, since, "as several times held by this court, if the case has been tried by a jury and a verdict rendered' therein, and the losing party desires to test the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict, a motion for a new trial is indispensable.” Beall v. Mineral Tone Co., 167 Ga. 667, 670 ( 146 S. E. 473 ); Schroeder v.

11938–1938
Sanders v. State neutral
ga · 1890
2 sentences

1936The question must be made and passed upon in the court below, by a motion for a new trial." (Italics mine.) Bacon v. Jones, 117 Ga. 497 (2) ( 43 S. E. 689 ); Beall v. Mineral Tone Co., 167 Ga. 667 ( 146 S. E. 473 ); Sanders v. State, 84 Ga. 217 ( 10 S. E. 629 ), and cit.; Mobley v. Ellis, 37 Ga. App. 683 ( 141 S. E. 321 ), and cit.; Hamilton Bank v. Robertson, 177 Ga. 734 ( 171 S. E. 293 ).

1936The question must be made and passed upon in the court below, by a motion for a new trial." (Italics mine.) Bacon v. Jones, 117 Ga. 497 (2) ( 43 S. E. 689 ); Beall v. Mineral Tone Co., 167 Ga. 667 ( 146 S. E. 473 ); Sanders v. State, 84 Ga. 217 ( 10 S. E. 629 ), and cit.; Mobley v. Ellis, 37 Ga. App. 683 ( 141 S. E. 321 ), and cit.; Hamilton Bank v. Robertson, 177 Ga. 734 ( 171 S. E. 293 ).

11936–1936
Bacon & Sons v. Jones neutral
ga · 1903
2 sentences

1936The question must be made and passed upon in the court below, by a motion for a new trial." (Italics mine.) Bacon v. Jones, 117 Ga. 497 (2) ( 43 S. E. 689 ); Beall v. Mineral Tone Co., 167 Ga. 667 ( 146 S. E. 473 ); Sanders v. State, 84 Ga. 217 ( 10 S. E. 629 ), and cit.; Mobley v. Ellis, 37 Ga. App. 683 ( 141 S. E. 321 ), and cit.; Hamilton Bank v. Robertson, 177 Ga. 734 ( 171 S. E. 293 ).

1936The question must be made and passed upon in the court below, by a motion for a new trial." (Italics mine.) Bacon v. Jones, 117 Ga. 497 (2) ( 43 S. E. 689 ); Beall v. Mineral Tone Co., 167 Ga. 667 ( 146 S. E. 473 ); Sanders v. State, 84 Ga. 217 ( 10 S. E. 629 ), and cit.; Mobley v. Ellis, 37 Ga. App. 683 ( 141 S. E. 321 ), and cit.; Hamilton Bank v. Robertson, 177 Ga. 734 ( 171 S. E. 293 ).

11936–1936
Shippen Hardwood Lumber Co. v. Johnson green
ga · 1929
2 sentences

1936“Where a ease has- been tried by a jury and a verdict rendered therein, and the losing party desires to test the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict, a motion for a new trial is indispensable.” Beall v. Mineral Tone Co., 167 Ga. 667, 670 ( 146 S. E. 473 ), and cit.; Shippen Hardwood Lumber Co. v. Johnson, 168 Ga. 112 ( 147 S. E. 115 ); Sheftall v. Johnson, 171 Ga. 890 ( 157 S. E. 94 ); Head v. North American Life Ins.

1936“Where a ease has- been tried by a jury and a verdict rendered therein, and the losing party desires to test the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict, a motion for a new trial is indispensable.” Beall v. Mineral Tone Co., 167 Ga. 667, 670 ( 146 S. E. 473 ), and cit.; Shippen Hardwood Lumber Co. v. Johnson, 168 Ga. 112 ( 147 S. E. 115 ); Sheftall v. Johnson, 171 Ga. 890 ( 157 S. E. 94 ); Head v. North American Life Ins.

11936–1936
Bosworth v. Nelson green
ga · 1931
1 sentence

1935Where a case has been tried by a jury and a verdict directed and returned therein, and the losing party desires to test the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict, a motion for a new trial is indispensable; and, where there is no motion for a new trial, “an assignment of error complaining that the court erred in directing a verdict is insufficiently specific to present to this court the question whether the court erred in directing a verdict, unless it is alleged that the court erred because there were issues of fact which should have been submitted to a jury and evidence introduce

11935–1935
Jones Bros. v. Richards neutral
gactapp · 1919
2 sentences

1928R. 220 ); Jones v. Richards, 23 Ga. App. 560 ( 99 S. E. 11 ).

1928R. 220 ); Jones v. Richards, 23 Ga. App. 560 ( 99 S. E. 11 ).

11928–1928

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check