18 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1972–2023 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Riley v. Stategreen2 sentences2023This Court declined to determine that such a waiver was involuntary per se, holding instead that “the question of a voluntary and knowing waiver depends on the totality of the circumstances[,] and the state has a heavy burden in showing that the juvenile did understand and waive his rights.” Id. at 128 . 2023This Court declined to determine that such a waiver was involuntary per se, holding instead that “the question of a voluntary and knowing waiver depends on the totality of the circumstances[,] and the state has a heavy burden in showing that the juvenile did understand and waive his rights.” Id. at 128. | 4 | 7 |
Marshall v. Stategreen2 sentences2023They are . . .” and listing the Riley factors); Marshall v. State, 248 Ga. 227, 228-230 (282 SE2d 301) (1981) (noting that Riley held that “‘the question of a voluntary and knowing waiver depends on the totality of the circumstances,’ to be analyzed by a consideration of nine factors” and then listing and applying the Riley factors); Howe v. State, 250 Ga. 811, 812-813 (301 SE2d 280) (1983) (noting that “Riley . . . adopted a totality of the circumstances test,” but listing and applying the nine Riley factors and concluding that “[b]ased upon the totality of the circumstances, as reflected in 2023They are . . .” and listing the Riley factors); Marshall v. State, 248 Ga. 227, 228-230 (282 SE2d 301) (1981) (noting that Riley held that “‘the question of a voluntary and knowing waiver depends on the totality of the circumstances,’ to be analyzed by a consideration of nine factors” and then listing and applying the Riley factors); Howe v. State, 250 Ga. 811, 812-813 (301 SE2d 280) (1983) (noting that “Riley . . . adopted a totality of the circumstances test,” but listing and applying the nine Riley factors and concluding that “[b]ased upon the totality of the circumstances, as reflected in | 4 | 4 |
Crawford v. Stategreen2 sentences2023See, e.g., Williams v. State, 238 Ga. 298, 302-303 (232 SE2d 535) (1977) (explaining that in Riley, “[w]e found that ‘the question of a voluntary and knowing waiver depends on the totality of the circumstances” and holding that “under the totality of the 18 circumstances[,] . . . the trial court did not err in admitting [the juvenile defendant’s] confession”); Crawford v. State, 240 Ga. 321, 323-324 (240 SE2d 824) (1977) (explaining that Riley “adopted a totality of the circumstances test” and holding that “[c]onsidering all the circumstances,” the State failed to prove “from the totality of t 2023See, e.g., Williams v. State, 238 Ga. 298, 302-303 (232 SE2d 535) (1977) (explaining that in Riley, “[w]e found that ‘the question of a voluntary and knowing waiver depends on the totality of the circumstances” and holding that “under the totality of the 18 circumstances[,] . . . the trial court did not err in admitting [the juvenile defendant’s] confession”); Crawford v. State, 240 Ga. 321, 323-324 (240 SE2d 824) (1977) (explaining that Riley “adopted a totality of the circumstances test” and holding that “[c]onsidering all the circumstances,” the State failed to prove “from the totality of t | 3 | 4 |
| Brooks v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
Love v. Stategreen2 sentences2023See, e.g., Williams v. State, 238 Ga. 298, 302-303 (232 SE2d 535) (1977) (explaining that in Riley, “[w]e found that ‘the question of a voluntary and knowing waiver depends on the totality of the circumstances” and holding that “under the totality of the 18 circumstances[,] . . . the trial court did not err in admitting [the juvenile defendant’s] confession”); Crawford v. State, 240 Ga. 321, 323-324 (240 SE2d 824) (1977) (explaining that Riley “adopted a totality of the circumstances test” and holding that “[c]onsidering all the circumstances,” the State failed to prove “from the totality of t 2023See, e.g., Williams v. State, 238 Ga. 298, 302-303 (232 SE2d 535) (1977) (explaining that in Riley, “[w]e found that ‘the question of a voluntary and knowing waiver depends on the totality of the circumstances” and holding that “under the totality of the 18 circumstances[,] . . . the trial court did not err in admitting [the juvenile defendant’s] confession”); Crawford v. State, 240 Ga. 321, 323-324 (240 SE2d 824) (1977) (explaining that Riley “adopted a totality of the circumstances test” and holding that “[c]onsidering all the circumstances,” the State failed to prove “from the totality of t | 1 | 1 |
| Bedford v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
Oubre v. Woldemichaelgreen2 sentences2023They are . . .” and listing the Riley factors); Marshall v. State, 248 Ga. 227, 228-230 (282 SE2d 301) (1981) (noting that Riley held that “‘the question of a voluntary and knowing waiver depends on the totality of the circumstances,’ to be analyzed by a consideration of nine factors” and then listing and applying the Riley factors); Howe v. State, 250 Ga. 811, 812-813 (301 SE2d 280) (1983) (noting that “Riley . . . adopted a totality of the circumstances test,” but listing and applying the nine Riley factors and concluding that “[b]ased upon the totality of the circumstances, as reflected in 2023They are . . .” and listing the Riley factors); Marshall v. State, 248 Ga. 227, 228-230 (282 SE2d 301) (1981) (noting that Riley held that “‘the question of a voluntary and knowing waiver depends on the totality of the circumstances,’ to be analyzed by a consideration of nine factors” and then listing and applying the Riley factors); Howe v. State, 250 Ga. 811, 812-813 (301 SE2d 280) (1983) (noting that “Riley . . . adopted a totality of the circumstances test,” but listing and applying the nine Riley factors and concluding that “[b]ased upon the totality of the circumstances, as reflected in | 1 | 1 |
| Couch v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| Lane v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
Henry v. Stategreen2 sentences2023They are . . .” and listing the Riley factors); Marshall v. State, 248 Ga. 227, 228-230 (282 SE2d 301) (1981) (noting that Riley held that “‘the question of a voluntary and knowing waiver depends on the totality of the circumstances,’ to be analyzed by a consideration of nine factors” and then listing and applying the Riley factors); Howe v. State, 250 Ga. 811, 812-813 (301 SE2d 280) (1983) (noting that “Riley . . . adopted a totality of the circumstances test,” but listing and applying the nine Riley factors and concluding that “[b]ased upon the totality of the circumstances, as reflected in 2023They are . . .” and listing the Riley factors); Marshall v. State, 248 Ga. 227, 228-230 (282 SE2d 301) (1981) (noting that Riley held that “‘the question of a voluntary and knowing waiver depends on the totality of the circumstances,’ to be analyzed by a consideration of nine factors” and then listing and applying the Riley factors); Howe v. State, 250 Ga. 811, 812-813 (301 SE2d 280) (1983) (noting that “Riley . . . adopted a totality of the circumstances test,” but listing and applying the nine Riley factors and concluding that “[b]ased upon the totality of the circumstances, as reflected in | 1 | 1 |
Norris v. Stategreen2 sentences2023See, e.g., Williams v. State, 238 Ga. 298, 302-303 (232 SE2d 535) (1977) (explaining that in Riley, “[w]e found that ‘the question of a voluntary and knowing waiver depends on the totality of the circumstances” and holding that “under the totality of the 18 circumstances[,] . . . the trial court did not err in admitting [the juvenile defendant’s] confession”); Crawford v. State, 240 Ga. 321, 323-324 (240 SE2d 824) (1977) (explaining that Riley “adopted a totality of the circumstances test” and holding that “[c]onsidering all the circumstances,” the State failed to prove “from the totality of t 2023See, e.g., Williams v. State, 238 Ga. 298, 302-303 (232 SE2d 535) (1977) (explaining that in Riley, “[w]e found that ‘the question of a voluntary and knowing waiver depends on the totality of the circumstances” and holding that “under the totality of the 18 circumstances[,] . . . the trial court did not err in admitting [the juvenile defendant’s] confession”); Crawford v. State, 240 Ga. 321, 323-324 (240 SE2d 824) (1977) (explaining that Riley “adopted a totality of the circumstances test” and holding that “[c]onsidering all the circumstances,” the State failed to prove “from the totality of t | 1 | 1 |
Gilliam v. Stategreen2 sentences2023They are . . .” and listing the Riley factors); Marshall v. State, 248 Ga. 227, 228-230 (282 SE2d 301) (1981) (noting that Riley held that “‘the question of a voluntary and knowing waiver depends on the totality of the circumstances,’ to be analyzed by a consideration of nine factors” and then listing and applying the Riley factors); Howe v. State, 250 Ga. 811, 812-813 (301 SE2d 280) (1983) (noting that “Riley . . . adopted a totality of the circumstances test,” but listing and applying the nine Riley factors and concluding that “[b]ased upon the totality of the circumstances, as reflected in 2023They are . . .” and listing the Riley factors); Marshall v. State, 248 Ga. 227, 228-230 (282 SE2d 301) (1981) (noting that Riley held that “‘the question of a voluntary and knowing waiver depends on the totality of the circumstances,’ to be analyzed by a consideration of nine factors” and then listing and applying the Riley factors); Howe v. State, 250 Ga. 811, 812-813 (301 SE2d 280) (1983) (noting that “Riley . . . adopted a totality of the circumstances test,” but listing and applying the nine Riley factors and concluding that “[b]ased upon the totality of the circumstances, as reflected in | 1 | 1 |
James v. Stategreen2 sentences2023They are . . .” and listing the Riley factors); Marshall v. State, 248 Ga. 227, 228-230 (282 SE2d 301) (1981) (noting that Riley held that “‘the question of a voluntary and knowing waiver depends on the totality of the circumstances,’ to be analyzed by a consideration of nine factors” and then listing and applying the Riley factors); Howe v. State, 250 Ga. 811, 812-813 (301 SE2d 280) (1983) (noting that “Riley . . . adopted a totality of the circumstances test,” but listing and applying the nine Riley factors and concluding that “[b]ased upon the totality of the circumstances, as reflected in 2023They are . . .” and listing the Riley factors); Marshall v. State, 248 Ga. 227, 228-230 (282 SE2d 301) (1981) (noting that Riley held that “‘the question of a voluntary and knowing waiver depends on the totality of the circumstances,’ to be analyzed by a consideration of nine factors” and then listing and applying the Riley factors); Howe v. State, 250 Ga. 811, 812-813 (301 SE2d 280) (1983) (noting that “Riley . . . adopted a totality of the circumstances test,” but listing and applying the nine Riley factors and concluding that “[b]ased upon the totality of the circumstances, as reflected in | 1 | 1 |
| Murray v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
Allen v. Stategreen2 sentences2023See, e.g., Williams v. State, 238 Ga. 298, 302-303 (232 SE2d 535) (1977) (explaining that in Riley, “[w]e found that ‘the question of a voluntary and knowing waiver depends on the totality of the circumstances” and holding that “under the totality of the 18 circumstances[,] . . . the trial court did not err in admitting [the juvenile defendant’s] confession”); Crawford v. State, 240 Ga. 321, 323-324 (240 SE2d 824) (1977) (explaining that Riley “adopted a totality of the circumstances test” and holding that “[c]onsidering all the circumstances,” the State failed to prove “from the totality of t 2023See, e.g., Williams v. State, 238 Ga. 298, 302-303 (232 SE2d 535) (1977) (explaining that in Riley, “[w]e found that ‘the question of a voluntary and knowing waiver depends on the totality of the circumstances” and holding that “under the totality of the 18 circumstances[,] . . . the trial court did not err in admitting [the juvenile defendant’s] confession”); Crawford v. State, 240 Ga. 321, 323-324 (240 SE2d 824) (1977) (explaining that Riley “adopted a totality of the circumstances test” and holding that “[c]onsidering all the circumstances,” the State failed to prove “from the totality of t | 1 | 1 |
Nhek v. Stategreen2 sentences2023See, e.g., Williams v. State, 238 Ga. 298, 302-303 (232 SE2d 535) (1977) (explaining that in Riley, “[w]e found that ‘the question of a voluntary and knowing waiver depends on the totality of the circumstances” and holding that “under the totality of the 18 circumstances[,] . . . the trial court did not err in admitting [the juvenile defendant’s] confession”); Crawford v. State, 240 Ga. 321, 323-324 (240 SE2d 824) (1977) (explaining that Riley “adopted a totality of the circumstances test” and holding that “[c]onsidering all the circumstances,” the State failed to prove “from the totality of t 2023See, e.g., Williams v. State, 238 Ga. 298, 302-303 (232 SE2d 535) (1977) (explaining that in Riley, “[w]e found that ‘the question of a voluntary and knowing waiver depends on the totality of the circumstances” and holding that “under the totality of the 18 circumstances[,] . . . the trial court did not err in admitting [the juvenile defendant’s] confession”); Crawford v. State, 240 Ga. 321, 323-324 (240 SE2d 824) (1977) (explaining that Riley “adopted a totality of the circumstances test” and holding that “[c]onsidering all the circumstances,” the State failed to prove “from the totality of t | 1 | 1 |
Berry v. Stategreen2 sentences2023See, e.g., Williams v. State, 238 Ga. 298, 302-303 (232 SE2d 535) (1977) (explaining that in Riley, “[w]e found that ‘the question of a voluntary and knowing waiver depends on the totality of the circumstances” and holding that “under the totality of the 18 circumstances[,] . . . the trial court did not err in admitting [the juvenile defendant’s] confession”); Crawford v. State, 240 Ga. 321, 323-324 (240 SE2d 824) (1977) (explaining that Riley “adopted a totality of the circumstances test” and holding that “[c]onsidering all the circumstances,” the State failed to prove “from the totality of t 2023See, e.g., Williams v. State, 238 Ga. 298, 302-303 (232 SE2d 535) (1977) (explaining that in Riley, “[w]e found that ‘the question of a voluntary and knowing waiver depends on the totality of the circumstances” and holding that “under the totality of the 18 circumstances[,] . . . the trial court did not err in admitting [the juvenile defendant’s] confession”); Crawford v. State, 240 Ga. 321, 323-324 (240 SE2d 824) (1977) (explaining that Riley “adopted a totality of the circumstances test” and holding that “[c]onsidering all the circumstances,” the State failed to prove “from the totality of t | 1 | 1 |
Green v. Stategreen2 sentences2023See, e.g., Williams v. State, 238 Ga. 298, 302-303 (232 SE2d 535) (1977) (explaining that in Riley, “[w]e found that ‘the question of a voluntary and knowing waiver depends on the totality of the circumstances” and holding that “under the totality of the 18 circumstances[,] . . . the trial court did not err in admitting [the juvenile defendant’s] confession”); Crawford v. State, 240 Ga. 321, 323-324 (240 SE2d 824) (1977) (explaining that Riley “adopted a totality of the circumstances test” and holding that “[c]onsidering all the circumstances,” the State failed to prove “from the totality of t 2023See, e.g., Williams v. State, 238 Ga. 298, 302-303 (232 SE2d 535) (1977) (explaining that in Riley, “[w]e found that ‘the question of a voluntary and knowing waiver depends on the totality of the circumstances” and holding that “under the totality of the 18 circumstances[,] . . . the trial court did not err in admitting [the juvenile defendant’s] confession”); Crawford v. State, 240 Ga. 321, 323-324 (240 SE2d 824) (1977) (explaining that Riley “adopted a totality of the circumstances test” and holding that “[c]onsidering all the circumstances,” the State failed to prove “from the totality of t | 1 | 1 |
State v. Leegreen2 sentences2023See, e.g., Williams v. State, 238 Ga. 298, 302-303 (232 SE2d 535) (1977) (explaining that in Riley, “[w]e found that ‘the question of a voluntary and knowing waiver depends on the totality of the circumstances” and holding that “under the totality of the 18 circumstances[,] . . . the trial court did not err in admitting [the juvenile defendant’s] confession”); Crawford v. State, 240 Ga. 321, 323-324 (240 SE2d 824) (1977) (explaining that Riley “adopted a totality of the circumstances test” and holding that “[c]onsidering all the circumstances,” the State failed to prove “from the totality of t 2023See, e.g., Williams v. State, 238 Ga. 298, 302-303 (232 SE2d 535) (1977) (explaining that in Riley, “[w]e found that ‘the question of a voluntary and knowing waiver depends on the totality of the circumstances” and holding that “under the totality of the 18 circumstances[,] . . . the trial court did not err in admitting [the juvenile defendant’s] confession”); Crawford v. State, 240 Ga. 321, 323-324 (240 SE2d 824) (1977) (explaining that Riley “adopted a totality of the circumstances test” and holding that “[c]onsidering all the circumstances,” the State failed to prove “from the totality of t | 1 | 1 |
JEW v. Stategreen2 sentences2023They are . . .” and listing the Riley factors); Marshall v. State, 248 Ga. 227, 228-230 (282 SE2d 301) (1981) (noting that Riley held that “‘the question of a voluntary and knowing waiver depends on the totality of the circumstances,’ to be analyzed by a consideration of nine factors” and then listing and applying the Riley factors); Howe v. State, 250 Ga. 811, 812-813 (301 SE2d 280) (1983) (noting that “Riley . . . adopted a totality of the circumstances test,” but listing and applying the nine Riley factors and concluding that “[b]ased upon the totality of the circumstances, as reflected in 2023They are . . .” and listing the Riley factors); Marshall v. State, 248 Ga. 227, 228-230 (282 SE2d 301) (1981) (noting that Riley held that “‘the question of a voluntary and knowing waiver depends on the totality of the circumstances,’ to be analyzed by a consideration of nine factors” and then listing and applying the Riley factors); Howe v. State, 250 Ga. 811, 812-813 (301 SE2d 280) (1983) (noting that “Riley . . . adopted a totality of the circumstances test,” but listing and applying the nine Riley factors and concluding that “[b]ased upon the totality of the circumstances, as reflected in | 1 | 1 |
Williams v. Stategreen2 sentences2023See, e.g., Williams v. State, 238 Ga. 298, 302-303 (232 SE2d 535) (1977) (explaining that in Riley, “[w]e found that ‘the question of a voluntary and knowing waiver depends on the totality of the circumstances” and holding that “under the totality of the 18 circumstances[,] . . . the trial court did not err in admitting [the juvenile defendant’s] confession”); Crawford v. State, 240 Ga. 321, 323-324 (240 SE2d 824) (1977) (explaining that Riley “adopted a totality of the circumstances test” and holding that “[c]onsidering all the circumstances,” the State failed to prove “from the totality of t 2023See, e.g., Williams v. State, 238 Ga. 298, 302-303 (232 SE2d 535) (1977) (explaining that in Riley, “[w]e found that ‘the question of a voluntary and knowing waiver depends on the totality of the circumstances” and holding that “under the totality of the 18 circumstances[,] . . . the trial court did not err in admitting [the juvenile defendant’s] confession”); Crawford v. State, 240 Ga. 321, 323-324 (240 SE2d 824) (1977) (explaining that Riley “adopted a totality of the circumstances test” and holding that “[c]onsidering all the circumstances,” the State failed to prove “from the totality of t | 1 | 1 |
Smith v. Stategreen2 sentences2023See, e.g., Williams v. State, 238 Ga. 298, 302-303 (232 SE2d 535) (1977) (explaining that in Riley, “[w]e found that ‘the question of a voluntary and knowing waiver depends on the totality of the circumstances” and holding that “under the totality of the 18 circumstances[,] . . . the trial court did not err in admitting [the juvenile defendant’s] confession”); Crawford v. State, 240 Ga. 321, 323-324 (240 SE2d 824) (1977) (explaining that Riley “adopted a totality of the circumstances test” and holding that “[c]onsidering all the circumstances,” the State failed to prove “from the totality of t 2023See, e.g., Williams v. State, 238 Ga. 298, 302-303 (232 SE2d 535) (1977) (explaining that in Riley, “[w]e found that ‘the question of a voluntary and knowing waiver depends on the totality of the circumstances” and holding that “under the totality of the 18 circumstances[,] . . . the trial court did not err in admitting [the juvenile defendant’s] confession”); Crawford v. State, 240 Ga. 321, 323-324 (240 SE2d 824) (1977) (explaining that Riley “adopted a totality of the circumstances test” and holding that “[c]onsidering all the circumstances,” the State failed to prove “from the totality of t | 1 | 1 |
Jackson v. Stategreen2 sentences2023They are . . .” and listing the Riley factors); Marshall v. State, 248 Ga. 227, 228-230 (282 SE2d 301) (1981) (noting that Riley held that “‘the question of a voluntary and knowing waiver depends on the totality of the circumstances,’ to be analyzed by a consideration of nine factors” and then listing and applying the Riley factors); Howe v. State, 250 Ga. 811, 812-813 (301 SE2d 280) (1983) (noting that “Riley . . . adopted a totality of the circumstances test,” but listing and applying the nine Riley factors and concluding that “[b]ased upon the totality of the circumstances, as reflected in 2023They are . . .” and listing the Riley factors); Marshall v. State, 248 Ga. 227, 228-230 (282 SE2d 301) (1981) (noting that Riley held that “‘the question of a voluntary and knowing waiver depends on the totality of the circumstances,’ to be analyzed by a consideration of nine factors” and then listing and applying the Riley factors); Howe v. State, 250 Ga. 811, 812-813 (301 SE2d 280) (1983) (noting that “Riley . . . adopted a totality of the circumstances test,” but listing and applying the nine Riley factors and concluding that “[b]ased upon the totality of the circumstances, as reflected in | 1 | 1 |
| McKoon v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
State v. McBridegreen2 sentences2023They are . . .” and listing the Riley factors); Marshall v. State, 248 Ga. 227, 228-230 (282 SE2d 301) (1981) (noting that Riley held that “‘the question of a voluntary and knowing waiver depends on the totality of the circumstances,’ to be analyzed by a consideration of nine factors” and then listing and applying the Riley factors); Howe v. State, 250 Ga. 811, 812-813 (301 SE2d 280) (1983) (noting that “Riley . . . adopted a totality of the circumstances test,” but listing and applying the nine Riley factors and concluding that “[b]ased upon the totality of the circumstances, as reflected in 2023They are . . .” and listing the Riley factors); Marshall v. State, 248 Ga. 227, 228-230 (282 SE2d 301) (1981) (noting that Riley held that “‘the question of a voluntary and knowing waiver depends on the totality of the circumstances,’ to be analyzed by a consideration of nine factors” and then listing and applying the Riley factors); Howe v. State, 250 Ga. 811, 812-813 (301 SE2d 280) (1983) (noting that “Riley . . . adopted a totality of the circumstances test,” but listing and applying the nine Riley factors and concluding that “[b]ased upon the totality of the circumstances, as reflected in | 1 | 1 |
Massey v. Stategreen2 sentences2023See, e.g., Williams v. State, 238 Ga. 298, 302-303 (232 SE2d 535) (1977) (explaining that in Riley, “[w]e found that ‘the question of a voluntary and knowing waiver depends on the totality of the circumstances” and holding that “under the totality of the 18 circumstances[,] . . . the trial court did not err in admitting [the juvenile defendant’s] confession”); Crawford v. State, 240 Ga. 321, 323-324 (240 SE2d 824) (1977) (explaining that Riley “adopted a totality of the circumstances test” and holding that “[c]onsidering all the circumstances,” the State failed to prove “from the totality of t 2023See, e.g., Williams v. State, 238 Ga. 298, 302-303 (232 SE2d 535) (1977) (explaining that in Riley, “[w]e found that ‘the question of a voluntary and knowing waiver depends on the totality of the circumstances” and holding that “under the totality of the 18 circumstances[,] . . . the trial court did not err in admitting [the juvenile defendant’s] confession”); Crawford v. State, 240 Ga. 321, 323-324 (240 SE2d 824) (1977) (explaining that Riley “adopted a totality of the circumstances test” and holding that “[c]onsidering all the circumstances,” the State failed to prove “from the totality of t | 1 | 1 |
State v. Powellgreen1 sentence2023They are . . .” and listing the Riley factors); Marshall v. State, 248 Ga. 227, 228-230 (282 SE2d 301) (1981) (noting that Riley held that “‘the question of a voluntary and knowing waiver depends on the totality of the circumstances,’ to be analyzed by a consideration of nine factors” and then listing and applying the Riley factors); Howe v. State, 250 Ga. 811, 812-813 (301 SE2d 280) (1983) (noting that “Riley . . . adopted a totality of the circumstances test,” but listing and applying the nine Riley factors and concluding that “[b]ased upon the totality of the circumstances, as reflected in | 1 | 1 |
Daniels v. Stategreen2 sentences2023They are . . .” and listing the Riley factors); Marshall v. State, 248 Ga. 227, 228-230 (282 SE2d 301) (1981) (noting that Riley held that “‘the question of a voluntary and knowing waiver depends on the totality of the circumstances,’ to be analyzed by a consideration of nine factors” and then listing and applying the Riley factors); Howe v. State, 250 Ga. 811, 812-813 (301 SE2d 280) (1983) (noting that “Riley . . . adopted a totality of the circumstances test,” but listing and applying the nine Riley factors and concluding that “[b]ased upon the totality of the circumstances, as reflected in 2023They are . . .” and listing the Riley factors); Marshall v. State, 248 Ga. 227, 228-230 (282 SE2d 301) (1981) (noting that Riley held that “‘the question of a voluntary and knowing waiver depends on the totality of the circumstances,’ to be analyzed by a consideration of nine factors” and then listing and applying the Riley factors); Howe v. State, 250 Ga. 811, 812-813 (301 SE2d 280) (1983) (noting that “Riley . . . adopted a totality of the circumstances test,” but listing and applying the nine Riley factors and concluding that “[b]ased upon the totality of the circumstances, as reflected in | 1 | 1 |
State v. Burtongreen2 sentences2023They are . . .” and listing the Riley factors); Marshall v. State, 248 Ga. 227, 228-230 (282 SE2d 301) (1981) (noting that Riley held that “‘the question of a voluntary and knowing waiver depends on the totality of the circumstances,’ to be analyzed by a consideration of nine factors” and then listing and applying the Riley factors); Howe v. State, 250 Ga. 811, 812-813 (301 SE2d 280) (1983) (noting that “Riley . . . adopted a totality of the circumstances test,” but listing and applying the nine Riley factors and concluding that “[b]ased upon the totality of the circumstances, as reflected in 2023They are . . .” and listing the Riley factors); Marshall v. State, 248 Ga. 227, 228-230 (282 SE2d 301) (1981) (noting that Riley held that “‘the question of a voluntary and knowing waiver depends on the totality of the circumstances,’ to be analyzed by a consideration of nine factors” and then listing and applying the Riley factors); Howe v. State, 250 Ga. 811, 812-813 (301 SE2d 280) (1983) (noting that “Riley . . . adopted a totality of the circumstances test,” but listing and applying the nine Riley factors and concluding that “[b]ased upon the totality of the circumstances, as reflected in | 1 | 1 |
Chapman v. Stategreen2 sentences2023They are . . .” and listing the Riley factors); Marshall v. State, 248 Ga. 227, 228-230 (282 SE2d 301) (1981) (noting that Riley held that “‘the question of a voluntary and knowing waiver depends on the totality of the circumstances,’ to be analyzed by a consideration of nine factors” and then listing and applying the Riley factors); Howe v. State, 250 Ga. 811, 812-813 (301 SE2d 280) (1983) (noting that “Riley . . . adopted a totality of the circumstances test,” but listing and applying the nine Riley factors and concluding that “[b]ased upon the totality of the circumstances, as reflected in 2023They are . . .” and listing the Riley factors); Marshall v. State, 248 Ga. 227, 228-230 (282 SE2d 301) (1981) (noting that Riley held that “‘the question of a voluntary and knowing waiver depends on the totality of the circumstances,’ to be analyzed by a consideration of nine factors” and then listing and applying the Riley factors); Howe v. State, 250 Ga. 811, 812-813 (301 SE2d 280) (1983) (noting that “Riley . . . adopted a totality of the circumstances test,” but listing and applying the nine Riley factors and concluding that “[b]ased upon the totality of the circumstances, as reflected in | 1 | 1 |
Howe v. Stategreen2 sentences2023They are . . .” and listing the Riley factors); Marshall v. State, 248 Ga. 227, 228-230 (282 SE2d 301) (1981) (noting that Riley held that “‘the question of a voluntary and knowing waiver depends on the totality of the circumstances,’ to be analyzed by a consideration of nine factors” and then listing and applying the Riley factors); Howe v. State, 250 Ga. 811, 812-813 (301 SE2d 280) (1983) (noting that “Riley . . . adopted a totality of the circumstances test,” but listing and applying the nine Riley factors and concluding that “[b]ased upon the totality of the circumstances, as reflected in 2023They are . . .” and listing the Riley factors); Marshall v. State, 248 Ga. 227, 228-230 (282 SE2d 301) (1981) (noting that Riley held that “‘the question of a voluntary and knowing waiver depends on the totality of the circumstances,’ to be analyzed by a consideration of nine factors” and then listing and applying the Riley factors); Howe v. State, 250 Ga. 811, 812-813 (301 SE2d 280) (1983) (noting that “Riley . . . adopted a totality of the circumstances test,” but listing and applying the nine Riley factors and concluding that “[b]ased upon the totality of the circumstances, as reflected in | 1 | 1 |
Hanifa v. Stategreen2 sentences2023They are . . .” and listing the Riley factors); Marshall v. State, 248 Ga. 227, 228-230 (282 SE2d 301) (1981) (noting that Riley held that “‘the question of a voluntary and knowing waiver depends on the totality of the circumstances,’ to be analyzed by a consideration of nine factors” and then listing and applying the Riley factors); Howe v. State, 250 Ga. 811, 812-813 (301 SE2d 280) (1983) (noting that “Riley . . . adopted a totality of the circumstances test,” but listing and applying the nine Riley factors and concluding that “[b]ased upon the totality of the circumstances, as reflected in 2023They are . . .” and listing the Riley factors); Marshall v. State, 248 Ga. 227, 228-230 (282 SE2d 301) (1981) (noting that Riley held that “‘the question of a voluntary and knowing waiver depends on the totality of the circumstances,’ to be analyzed by a consideration of nine factors” and then listing and applying the Riley factors); Howe v. State, 250 Ga. 811, 812-813 (301 SE2d 280) (1983) (noting that “Riley . . . adopted a totality of the circumstances test,” but listing and applying the nine Riley factors and concluding that “[b]ased upon the totality of the circumstances, as reflected in | 1 | 1 |
State v. Rodriguezgreen2 sentences2023See, e.g., Williams v. State, 238 Ga. 298, 302-303 (232 SE2d 535) (1977) (explaining that in Riley, “[w]e found that ‘the question of a voluntary and knowing waiver depends on the totality of the circumstances” and holding that “under the totality of the 18 circumstances[,] . . . the trial court did not err in admitting [the juvenile defendant’s] confession”); Crawford v. State, 240 Ga. 321, 323-324 (240 SE2d 824) (1977) (explaining that Riley “adopted a totality of the circumstances test” and holding that “[c]onsidering all the circumstances,” the State failed to prove “from the totality of t 2023See, e.g., Williams v. State, 238 Ga. 298, 302-303 (232 SE2d 535) (1977) (explaining that in Riley, “[w]e found that ‘the question of a voluntary and knowing waiver depends on the totality of the circumstances” and holding that “under the totality of the 18 circumstances[,] . . . the trial court did not err in admitting [the juvenile defendant’s] confession”); Crawford v. State, 240 Ga. 321, 323-324 (240 SE2d 824) (1977) (explaining that Riley “adopted a totality of the circumstances test” and holding that “[c]onsidering all the circumstances,” the State failed to prove “from the totality of t | 1 | 1 |
| Nelson v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| Johnson v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| Coppolla v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| Heard v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| Wilson v. Downiegreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Gates v. California
green
2 sentences1986We there held that ‘the question of a voluntary and knowing waiver depends on the totality of the circumstances,’ to be analyzed by a consideration of nine factors promulgated by West v. United States, 399 F2d 467, 469 (1968), cert. den. 393 U. S. 1102 .” Marshall v. State, 248 Ga. 227, 228-229 (3) ( 282 SE2d 301 ) (1981). 1986We there held that `the question of a voluntary and knowing waiver depends on the totality of the circumstances,' to be analyzed by a consideration of nine factors promulgated by West v. United States, 399 F2d 467, 469 (1968), cert. den. 393 U. S. 1102 ." Marshall v. State, 248 Ga. 227, 228-229 (3) ( 282 SE2d 301 ) (1981). | 5 | 1977–1986 |
Lester v. State
green
2 sentences2023They are . . .” and listing the Riley factors); Marshall v. State, 248 Ga. 227, 228-230 (282 SE2d 301) (1981) (noting that Riley held that “‘the question of a voluntary and knowing waiver depends on the totality of the circumstances,’ to be analyzed by a consideration of nine factors” and then listing and applying the Riley factors); Howe v. State, 250 Ga. 811, 812-813 (301 SE2d 280) (1983) (noting that “Riley . . . adopted a totality of the circumstances test,” but listing and applying the nine Riley factors and concluding that “[b]ased upon the totality of the circumstances, as reflected in 2023They are . . .” and listing the Riley factors); Marshall v. State, 248 Ga. 227, 228-230 (282 SE2d 301) (1981) (noting that Riley held that “‘the question of a voluntary and knowing waiver depends on the totality of the circumstances,’ to be analyzed by a consideration of nine factors” and then listing and applying the Riley factors); Howe v. State, 250 Ga. 811, 812-813 (301 SE2d 280) (1983) (noting that “Riley . . . adopted a totality of the circumstances test,” but listing and applying the nine Riley factors and concluding that “[b]ased upon the totality of the circumstances, as reflected in | 2 | 2022–2023 |
Williams v. State
green
2 sentences2023Relying on a decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit that similarly declined to apply a per se rule excluding evidence of a juvenile’s incriminating statements to the police, the Riley Court went on to say that age alone is not determinative of whether a person can 11 Three years before Riley was decided, this Court summarily held in Williams v. State, 231 Ga. 508 (202 SE2d 433) (1973), that the trial court did not err by admitting into evidence a juvenile’s statement to the police, noting that the statement was made in the presence of his mother and after he was a 2023Relying on a decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit that similarly declined to apply a per se rule excluding evidence of a juvenile’s incriminating statements to the police, the Riley Court went on to say that age alone is not determinative of whether a person can 11 Three years before Riley was decided, this Court summarily held in Williams v. State, 231 Ga. 508 (202 SE2d 433) (1973), that the trial court did not err by admitting into evidence a juvenile’s statement to the police, noting that the statement was made in the presence of his mother and after he was a | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.