Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
18 Illinois opinions name it 3 courts 1956–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State Farm Lloyds v. Marchettigreen1 sentence2016See State Farm Lloyds v. Marchetti, 962 S.W.2d 58, 61 (Tex. App. 1997) (“While broad, general provisions for coverage under a policy may be limited by specific exclusions, we cannot endorse broad, general exclusions which seek to render illusory narrow and specific provisions of coverage.”). ¶ 19 Therefore, the circuit court erroneously construed the definitions and the language of the Exclusion broadly to include mold-related claims when any policy exclusion, regardless of its label, that excludes coverage must be narrowly construed. | 1 | 1 |
Hoekstra v. Stategreen1 sentence2000See Hoekstra, supra. Accordingly, Claimants claim is dismissed. | 1 | 1 |
Coston Paschal & Buesing Bros. Trucking, Inc. v. Stategreen1 sentence2000See Paschal v. State (1999), 43 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Smith v. City of Chicago
green
2 sentences2010However, the claimants appear to smudge the concepts of unconstitutionality “on its face” and unconstitutionality “as applied.” We note initially that the claimants rely heavily on Smith v. City of Chicago, 524 F.3d 834 (7th Cir. 2008), in which the Seventh Circuit held that Illinois’s Drug Asset Forfeiture Procedure Act (725 ILCS 150/1 et seq. 2010However, the claimants appear to smudge the concepts of unconstitutionality "on its face" and unconstitutionality "as applied." We note initially that the claimants rely heavily on Smith v. City of Chicago, 524 F.3d 834 (7th Cir. 2008), in which the Seventh Circuit held that Illinois's Drug Asset Forfeiture Procedure Act (725 ILCS 150/1 et seq. | 2 | 2010–2010 |
Hirschhorn v. Auto-Owners Insurance
green
2 sentences2016Therefore, Castlemane Farms does not support the Exclusion’s applicability to the Claimants’ claim. ¶ 25 The Liquidator and the circuit court also cite Hirschhorn v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co., 2012 WI 20, ¶¶ 41-43 , 338 Wis. 2d 761 , 809 N.W.2d 529 , where bat guano or bat feces was considered a pollutant under a pollution exclusion. 2016Therefore, Castlemane Farms does not support the Exclusion’s applicability to the Claimants’ claim. ¶ 25 The Liquidator and the circuit court also cite Hirschhorn v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co., 2012 WI 20, ¶¶ 41-43 , 338 Wis. 2d 761 , 809 N.W.2d 529 , where bat guano or bat feces was considered a pollutant under a pollution exclusion. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Shirley Pittman, Individually and as Class Representatives v. Chicago Board of Education
green
1 sentence2000The State relies on Pittman v. Chicago Board of Education (1995), 64 F. 3d 1098, 1104 , which found: “If tenure for principals were a term in a contract between the principals and the board of education, the state could not abrogate the term without a greater showing of justification than has been attempted. | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Douglas Theater Corp. v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.
green
1 sentence1998Douglas Theatre Corp. v. Chicago Title & Trust Co. (1st Dist. 1997), 288 Ill. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Guarantee Electrical Co. v. State
neutral
1 sentence1996(Guarantee Electric Co. v. State (1991), 43 Ill. | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Estate of Riha v. Christ Hospital
green
1 sentence1995Estate of Rika v. Christ Hospital (1989), 187 Ill. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Pink v. State
neutral
2 sentences1994Judge Burke in writing the opinion of this Court in Pink v. State (1991), 44 Ill. 1994Judge Burke in writing the opinion of this Court in Pink v. State (1991), 44 Ill. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
In re Ward
green
1 sentence1993Ward v. State (1981), 35 Ill. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Dilbeck v. State
neutral
1 sentence1993Based on the authority of Dilbeck v. State, supra, Claimants claim of an enforceable oral contract must fail. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Ryan v. State
neutral
1 sentence1993This Court’s opinion in Ryan v. State (1990), 43 Ill. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Griffin v. State
neutral
1 sentence1993Griffin v. State (1983), 36 Ill. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Taylor v. STATE UNIVERSITIES RET. SYS.
green
1 sentence1993This cause comes on to be heard on the Claimants motion for summary judgment or, in the alternative, judgment on the pleadings, and the Respondents motion to dismiss, due notice having been given, and the Court being advised, finds: The underlying facts of this case are reported in Taylor v. State Universities Retirement System, 203 Ill. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Steen v. State
neutral
1 sentence1980Although we recognize that Claimants have cited it for authority as to the elements and presumptions that they argue should be taken into consideration, we reaffirm what Judge Burks said in Steen v. State (1973), 29 Ill. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Dixon Fruit Co. v. State
neutral
1 sentence1979This Court has previously held in 22 Ill. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Mello v. Lepisto
green
1 sentence1977Respondent takes the position that the Claimants should have kept the water gate in repair themselves, and that Respondent’s only duty was not to actively invade the property rights of the Claimants, citing Laney v. Jasper, 39 Ill. 46 ; Mello v. Lepisto, 77 Ill.App.2d 399 . | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Laney v. Jasper
neutral
1 sentence1977Respondent takes the position that the Claimants should have kept the water gate in repair themselves, and that Respondent’s only duty was not to actively invade the property rights of the Claimants, citing Laney v. Jasper, 39 Ill. 46 ; Mello v. Lepisto, 77 Ill.App.2d 399 . | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Heine v. Degen
neutral
1 sentence1956Redmond v. Commerce Trust Co. 144 F.2d 140 ; Heine v. Degen, 362 Ill. 357, 365 ; Newberry Library v. Board of Education, 387 Ill. 85 . | 1 | 1956–1956 |
Newberry Library v. Board of Education
green
1 sentence1956Redmond v. Commerce Trust Co. 144 F.2d 140 ; Heine v. Degen, 362 Ill. 357, 365 ; Newberry Library v. Board of Education, 387 Ill. 85 . | 1 | 1956–1956 |
Redmond v. Commerce Trust Co.
green
1 sentence1956Redmond v. Commerce Trust Co. 144 F.2d 140 ; Heine v. Degen, 362 Ill. 357, 365 ; Newberry Library v. Board of Education, 387 Ill. 85 . | 1 | 1956–1956 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.