familiarity standard (Texas) · Go Syfert
← Texas issues

familiarity standard in Texas

18 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 1997–2016 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (7)

CaseFollowedCited
Hightower v. Saxtongreen
texapp · 2001 · cited in 8 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2003–2008
2 sentences

2008Hightower v. Saxton , 54 S.W.3d 380, 389 (Tex. App.-Waco 2001, no pet.); Keeton v. Carrasco , 53 S.W.3d 13, 25 (Tex. App.-San Antonio 2001, pet. denied).

2008Hightower v. Saxton, 54 S.W.3d 380, 389 (Tex. App.–Waco 2001, no pet.); Keeton v. Carrasco, 53 S.W.3d 13, 25 (Tex. App.–San Antonio 2001, pet. denied).

88
Keeton v. Carrascogreen
texapp · 2001 · cited in 7 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2003–2008
2 sentences

2008Hightower v. Saxton , 54 S.W.3d 380, 389 (Tex. App.-Waco 2001, no pet.); Keeton v. Carrasco , 53 S.W.3d 13, 25 (Tex. App.-San Antonio 2001, pet. denied).

2008Hightower v. Saxton, 54 S.W.3d 380, 389 (Tex. App.–Waco 2001, no pet.); Keeton v. Carrasco, 53 S.W.3d 13, 25 (Tex. App.–San Antonio 2001, pet. denied).

77
Silvas v. Ghiatasgreen
texapp · 1997 · cited in 5 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2001–2004
2 sentences

2004Silvas v. Ghiatas, 954 S.W.2d 50, 53 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1997, writ denied).

2004Silvas v. Ghiatas, 954 S.W.2d 50, 53 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1997, writ denied).

55
Knetsch v. Gaitondegreen
texapp · 1995 · cited in 2 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1997–2001
2 sentences

2001Silvas v. Ghiatas, 954 S.W.2d 50, 53 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 1997, writ denied) (citing Knetsch v. Gaitonde, 898 S.W.2d 386, 388 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 1995, no writ)).

1997See Knetsch v. Gaitonde, 898 S.W.2d 386, 388 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 1995, no writ); see also Connor v. Waltrip, 791 S.W.2d 537, 541-42 (Tex.App.— Dallas 1990, no writ) (McClung, J., concurring).

22
Terry A. Leonard, P.A. v. Glenngreen
texapp · 2009 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
1 sentence

2016In Leonard v. Glenn, 293 S.W.3d 669, 676 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 2009), rev’d on other grounds, 332 S.W.3d 403 (2011), the relevant claim was the alleged- negligent prescription of indomethacin for an individual with renal disease that was documented in the medical records, which allegedly resulted in renal failure.

11
In Re Volkswagen of America, Inc.green
ca5 · 2007 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015
1 sentence

2015In re Volkswagen process to secure the attendance of witnesses, cost of q(America, Iuc .. 506 F.3d at 380.The public interest attendance for willing witnesses, and the familiarity factors include: "(1) the administrative difficulties of the forum with the law that will govern the case flowing from court congestion, (2) the local interest were more convenient for the parties elsewhere, the in having localized interests decided at home, (3) parties could have agreed to that at the time.

11
Connor v. Waltripgreen
texapp · 1990 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1997–1997
2 sentences

1997See Knetsch v. Gaitonde, 898 S.W.2d 386, 388 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 1995, no writ); see also Connor v. Waltrip, 791 S.W.2d 537, 541-42 (Tex.App.— Dallas 1990, no writ) (McClung, J., concurring).

1997See Knetsch v. Gaitonde, 898 S.W.2d 386, 388 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 1995, no writ); see also Connor v. Waltrip, 791 S.W.2d 537, 541-42 (Tex.App.— Dallas 1990, no writ) (McClung, J., concurring).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
Simonson v. Keppard green
texapp · 2007
2 sentences

2015Center at Waxahachie v. Wallace, 278 (2) has knowledge of accepted standards of care for S.W.3d 552, 558 (Tex.App.Dallas 2009, no pet.)(citations health care providers for the diagnosis, care, or treatment omitted).Compare Simonson v. Keppard, 225 S.W.3d 868 , of the illness, injury, or condition involved in the claim; 873 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2007, no pet.)(physician not qualified and to opine on standard of care for nurse practitioner because (3) is qualified on the basis of training or experience his report does not “state that he either has knowledge of to offer an expert opinion regarding tho

2008Id. at 873 .

22008–2015
Leonard v. Glenn green
tex · 2011
1 sentence

2016In Leonard v. Glenn, 293 S.W.3d 669, 676 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 2009), rev’d on other grounds, 332 S.W.3d 403 (2011), the relevant claim was the alleged- negligent prescription of indomethacin for an individual with renal disease that was documented in the medical records, which allegedly resulted in renal failure.

12016–2016

Where else courts name it

TX 18 (1997–2016) AR 3 (2014–2024) IL 2 (1986–1987)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check