Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
118 Pennsylvania opinions name it 2 courts 1969–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth v. Dancergreen2 sentences1975Concurring Opinion by Cercone, J.: While I agree with the majority’s conclusion that appellant is entitled to a PCHA hearing as to the issue of ineffective assistance of counsel, I feel further discussion of this issue is necessary in light of Commonwealth v. Dancer, 460 Pa. 95 , 331 A.2d 435 (1975). 1975Concurring Opinion by Cercone, J.: While I agree with the majority’s conclusion that appellant is entitled to a PCHA hearing as to the issue of ineffective assistance of counsel, I feel further discussion of this issue is necessary in light of Commonwealth v. Dancer, 460 Pa. 95 , 331 A.2d 435 (1975). | 2 | 7 |
Commonwealth v. Bakergreen2 sentences1985That task should be undertaken initially by the PCHA hearing court, ‘but only after it has had a chance to review the facts and applicable law as presented by an advocate. ’ ” Id., 493 Pa. at 245 , 425 A.2d at 1107 (quoting Commonwealth v. Baker, 429 Pa. 209, 214 , 239 A.2d 201, 203 (1968) (emphasis in original)). 4 In Commonwealth v. Finley, supra, a panel of this court reviewed an appeal from an order denying PCHA relief and granting appointed counsel’s petition to withdraw. 1985That task should be undertaken initially by the PCHA hearing court, ‘but only after it has had a chance to review the facts and applicable law as presented by an advocate. ’ ” Id., 493 Pa. at 245 , 425 A.2d at 1107 (quoting Commonwealth v. Baker, 429 Pa. 209, 214 , 239 A.2d 201, 203 (1968) (emphasis in original)). 4 In Commonwealth v. Finley, supra, a panel of this court reviewed an appeal from an order denying PCHA relief and granting appointed counsel’s petition to withdraw. | 2 | 3 |
Commonwealth v. Hollgreen2 sentences1973Commonwealth v. Dickerson, 449 Pa. 70 , 295 A. 2d 282 (1972); Commonwealth v. Godfrey, 434 Pa. 532 , 254 A. 2d 953 (1969); Commonwealth v. Holl, 434 Pa. 312 , 254 A. 2d 11 (1969). 1973Commonwealth v. Dickerson, 449 Pa. 70 , 295 A. 2d 282 (1972); Commonwealth v. Godfrey, 434 Pa. 532 , 254 A. 2d 953 (1969); Commonwealth v. Holl, 434 Pa. 312 , 254 A. 2d 11 (1969). | 2 | 3 |
Commonwealth v. Ungergreen2 sentences1985The Commonwealth contends that under Justice Larsen’s opinion in Commonwealth v. Unger, 494 Pa. 592, 597-98 , 432 A.2d 146, 148-49 (1980), if we determine that defendant was deprived of his right to appeal, we can now dispose of the merits of all issues which were raised in post-verdict motions, and therefore could have been brought in the appeal, even though those issues were not considered at the PCHA hearing below. 1985The Commonwealth contends that under Justice Larsen’s opinion in Commonwealth v. Unger, 494 Pa. 592, 597-98 , 432 A.2d 146, 148-49 (1980), if we determine that defendant was deprived of his right to appeal, we can now dispose of the merits of all issues which were raised in post-verdict motions, and therefore could have been brought in the appeal, even though those issues were not considered at the PCHA hearing below. | 2 | 2 |
Commonwealth v. Wilsongreen2 sentences1985Commonwealth v. Wilson, 430 Pa. 1 , 241 A.2d 760 (1968). 1985Commonwealth v. Wilson, 430 Pa. 1 , 241 A.2d 760 (1968). | 1 | 4 |
Commonwealth v. Millergreen2 sentences1990In Commonwealth v. Larry Miller, 494 Pa. 229 , 431 A.2d 233 (1981), our Supreme Court stated what must be proven to successfully attack a guilty plea in a PCHA hearing on these grounds. [I]n order successfully to attack a guilty plea in a P.C. 1990In Commonwealth v. Larry Miller, 494 Pa. 229 , 431 A.2d 233 (1981), our Supreme Court stated what must be proven to successfully attack a guilty plea in a PCHA hearing on these grounds. [I]n order successfully to attack a guilty plea in a P.C. | 1 | 3 |
Commonwealth v. Gardnergreen2 sentences1984In Commonwealth v. Gardner, 480 Pa. 7 , 389 A.2d 58 (1978) and Commonwealth v. Fox, 476 Pa. 475 , 383 A.2d 199 (1978), the Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that when an appellant raising a claim of ineffectiveness of counsel is represented on appeal by that same counsel, we should entertain the claim only if reversible error is apparent on the record. 1984In Commonwealth v. Gardner, 480 Pa. 7 , 389 A.2d 58 (1978) and Commonwealth v. Fox, 476 Pa. 475 , 383 A.2d 199 (1978), the Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that when an appellant raising a claim of ineffectiveness of counsel is represented on appeal by that same counsel, we should entertain the claim only if reversible error is apparent on the record. | 1 | 3 |
Commonwealth v. Foxgreen2 sentences1984In Commonwealth v. Gardner, 480 Pa. 7 , 389 A.2d 58 (1978) and Commonwealth v. Fox, 476 Pa. 475 , 383 A.2d 199 (1978), the Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that when an appellant raising a claim of ineffectiveness of counsel is represented on appeal by that same counsel, we should entertain the claim only if reversible error is apparent on the record. 1984In Commonwealth v. Gardner, 480 Pa. 7 , 389 A.2d 58 (1978) and Commonwealth v. Fox, 476 Pa. 475 , 383 A.2d 199 (1978), the Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that when an appellant raising a claim of ineffectiveness of counsel is represented on appeal by that same counsel, we should entertain the claim only if reversible error is apparent on the record. | 1 | 3 |
Commonwealth v. Lawsongreen2 sentences1989In addition, appellant claims the prosecution introduced “perjured or obviously false testimony.” As to appellant’s now familiar and previously litigated PCHA claim of ineffectiveness of counsel, the threshold issue remains whether this Court should even consider the merits of this appeal in light of the recent Supreme Court decision in Commonwealth v. Lawson, 519 Pa. 504 , 549 A.2d 107 (1988), wherein the Court stated, “We therefore conclude that a second or any subsequent post-conviction request for relief will not be entertained unless a strong prima facie showing is offered to demonstrate 1989In addition, appellant claims the prosecution introduced “perjured or obviously false testimony.” As to appellant’s now familiar and previously litigated PCHA claim of ineffectiveness of counsel, the threshold issue remains whether this Court should even consider the merits of this appeal in light of the recent Supreme Court decision in Commonwealth v. Lawson, 519 Pa. 504 , 549 A.2d 107 (1988), wherein the Court stated, “We therefore conclude that a second or any subsequent post-conviction request for relief will not be entertained unless a strong prima facie showing is offered to demonstrate | 1 | 2 |
Commonwealth v. Travagliagreen2 sentences1998Furthermore, to merit entitlement to an evidentiary hearing on a claim of ineffectiveness, a defendant must “set forth an offer to prove at an appropriate hearing sufficient facts upon which a reviewing court can conclude that ... counsel may have, in fact, been ineffective.” *369 Commonwealth v. Pettus, 492 Pa. 558, 563 , 424 A.2d 1332, 1335 (1981). 3 For example, in Travaglia, 541 Pa. at 140-41 , 661 A.2d at 368 , in considering a claim of ineffectiveness of counsel for failure to call witnesses at a PCHA hearing, this Court concluded that, without a showing that the result of the hearing wo 1998Furthermore, to merit entitlement to an evidentiary hearing on a claim of ineffectiveness, a defendant must “set forth an offer to prove at an appropriate hearing sufficient facts upon which a reviewing court can conclude that ... counsel may have, in fact, been ineffective.” *369 Commonwealth v. Pettus, 492 Pa. 558, 563 , 424 A.2d 1332, 1335 (1981). 3 For example, in Travaglia, 541 Pa. at 140-41 , 661 A.2d at 368 , in considering a claim of ineffectiveness of counsel for failure to call witnesses at a PCHA hearing, this Court concluded that, without a showing that the result of the hearing wo | 1 | 2 |
Commonwealth v. Carsongreen2 sentences1984See Commonwealth v. Carson, 503 Pa. 369 , 469 A.2d 599 (1983). 1984See Commonwealth v. Carson, 503 Pa. 369 , 469 A.2d 599 (1983). | 1 | 2 |
Commonwealth v. Stantongreen2 sentences1983The findings of the PCHA court, which hears the evidence and passes on the credibility of the witnesses, should be given great deference, (emphasis added) Commonwealth v. Stanton, 294 Pa.Super. 516, 525 , 440 A.2d 585, 590 (1982) (Citations omitted.) In the instant case, the PCH judge did not hear the evidence or see the witnesses, and, although the transcripts of the two hearings were prepared subsequent to the date of his decision and filed with the record in this case, it would be inappropriate for us to make the initial evaluation of their contents or the issues raised. 5 Moreover, without 1983The findings of the PCHA court, which hears the evidence and passes on the credibility of the witnesses, should be given great deference, (emphasis added) Commonwealth v. Stanton, 294 Pa.Super. 516, 525 , 440 A.2d 585, 590 (1982) (Citations omitted.) In the instant case, the PCH judge did not hear the evidence or see the witnesses, and, although the transcripts of the two hearings were prepared subsequent to the date of his decision and filed with the record in this case, it would be inappropriate for us to make the initial evaluation of their contents or the issues raised. 5 Moreover, without | 1 | 2 |
Commonwealth v. Crowthergreen2 sentences1982If he had done so, counsel argues, he could have submitted to the lower court evidence of guilty plea counsel’s ineffectiveness for not objecting to a colloquy that lacked a factual basis and that “failed to inform the [appellant] that a jury would be chosen from members of the community, that he would have a right to participate in the selection of the jury, that the verdict of the jury would have to be unanimous and that they would have to be satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt of his guilt.” (Appellant’s Brief at 29-30); see Commonwealth v. Willis, 492 Pa. 310, 311 , 424 A.2d 876, 877 (1981 1982Our Supreme Court has retroactively applied the right to independent counsel as defined in Commonwealth v. Crowther, supra. See Commonwealth v. Wright, supra. Further, Crowther already had been decided by the time of the order denying appellant’s pro se PCHA petition, from which order this appeal is taken. | 1 | 2 |
Commonwealth v. Bundygreen2 sentences1981(Appellant’s present counsel is not associated with the public defender’s office.) In Commonwealth v. Bundy, 480 Pa. 543 , 391 A.2d 1018 (1978), our Supreme Court held that the appellant was entitled to a new PCHA hearing on his claim of trial counsel ineffectiveness because trial and post-conviction counsel were both members of the public defender’s office. 1981(Appellant’s present counsel is not associated with the public defender’s office.) In Commonwealth v. Bundy, 480 Pa. 543 , 391 A.2d 1018 (1978), our Supreme Court held that the appellant was entitled to a new PCHA hearing on his claim of trial counsel ineffectiveness because trial and post-conviction counsel were both members of the public defender’s office. | 1 | 2 |
Commonwealth v. Drummondgreen2 sentences1980Commonwealth v. Dancer, 460 Pa. 95, 100 , 331 A.2d 435, 438 (1975); Commonwealth v. Drummond, 238 Pa.Super. 311, 318 , 357 A.2d 600, 604 (1976). 1980Commonwealth v. Dancer, 460 Pa. 95, 100 , 331 A.2d 435, 438 (1975); Commonwealth v. Drummond, 238 Pa.Super. 311, 318 , 357 A.2d 600, 604 (1976). | 1 | 2 |
Commonwealth v. Fioregreen2 sentences2015See generally Commonwealth v. Fiore, 665 A.2d 1185, 1191-92 (Pa. Super. 1995). 2015See generally Commonwealth v. Fiore, 665 A.2d 1185, 1191-92 (Pa. Super. 1995). | 1 | 1 |
| Graham v. Floridagreen | 1 | 1 |
| Valutron v. NCR Corp.green | 1 | 1 |
| Commonwealth v. Iseleygreen | 1 | 1 |
| Commonwealth v. Ferrigreen | 1 | 1 |
| People v. Dennisgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Doll v. Loeselgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Heuer v. United Statesgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Mertens v. Wilkinson, Governor of Kentuckygreen | 1 | 1 |
| Commonwealth v. Pettusgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Commonwealth v. Marshgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Beron v. Kramer-Trenton Companygreen | 1 | 1 |
| Commonwealth v. Hoskinsgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Commonwealth v. Silvermangreen | 1 | 1 |
| Commonwealth v. Davenportgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Commonwealth v. DeSimonegreen | 1 | 1 |
| Commonwealth v. Smithgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Commonwealth v. Welchgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Commonwealth v. Alexandergreen | 1 | 1 |
| Commonwealth v. Mautegreen | 1 | 1 |
| Commonwealth v. Williamsgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth v. Clair
green
2 sentences1983For reasons similar to this, Commonwealth v. Clair, 458 Pa. 418 , 326 A.2d 272 (1974), and its progeny require a certain degree of specificity to preserve issues for appellate review, and we do not believe that such specificity was present in this case until the brief was filed. 1983For reasons similar to this, Commonwealth v. Clair, 458 Pa. 418 , 326 A.2d 272 (1974), and its progeny require a certain degree of specificity to preserve issues for appellate review, and we do not believe that such specificity was present in this case until the brief was filed. | 3 | 1977–1983 |
Commonwealth v. Via
green
2 sentences1976In Commonwealth v. Via, 455 Pa. 373 , 316 A.2d 895 (1974), appellant claimed in his second PCHA petition that the Assistant Defender who had represented him at trial and the Assistant Defender who had represented him at his first PCHA hearing (both from the Dauphin County Public Defender’s Office) had been ineffective. 1976In Commonwealth v. Via, 455 Pa. 373 , 316 A.2d 895 (1974), appellant claimed in his second PCHA petition that the Assistant Defender who had represented him at trial and the Assistant Defender who had represented him at his first PCHA hearing (both from the Dauphin County Public Defender’s Office) had been ineffective. | 3 | 1976–1979 |
Douglas v. California
green
2 sentences1979Commonwealth v. Hubbard, supra, 372 A.2d at 695-96 . [4] Appellant also argues that under Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353 , 83 S.Ct. 814 , 9 L.Ed.2d 811 (1963) he was entitled to a trial record to effectively appeal his conviction. 1979Commonwealth v. Hubbard, supra, 372 A.2d at 695-96 . [4] Appellant also argues that under Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353 , 83 S.Ct. 814 , 9 L.Ed.2d 811 (1963) he was entitled to a trial record to effectively appeal his conviction. | 3 | 1971–1979 |
Commonwealth v. Dickerson
green
2 sentences1995The Dickerson court held that the allegations which appellant asserted “raised a question of credibility and the PCHA hearing judge chose to believe (as was his discre *136 tionary right) the testimony given by counsel.” Id. at 73-74 , 295 A.2d at 284 . 1995The Dickerson court held that the allegations which appellant asserted “raised a question of credibility and the PCHA hearing judge chose to believe (as was his discre *136 tionary right) the testimony given by counsel.” Id. at 73-74 , 295 A.2d at 284 . | 2 | 1973–1995 |
Commonwealth v. Jones
green
2 sentences1986As the burden of proving waiver of the federal constitutional right announced in Douglas is on the government, Commonwealth v. Jones, 447 Pa. 228 , 286 A.2d 892 (1971), it follows inextricably that the appellant would, if it were not for the facts at bar, be granted leave to file an appeal from his judgment of sentence as if timely filed. 1986As the burden of proving waiver of the federal constitutional right announced in Douglas is on the government, Commonwealth v. Jones, 447 Pa. 228 , 286 A.2d 892 (1971), it follows inextricably that the appellant would, if it were not for the facts at bar, be granted leave to file an appeal from his judgment of sentence as if timely filed. | 2 | 1973–1986 |
Commonwealth v. Anderson
green
2 sentences1985See Commonwealth v. De Simone, 447 Pa. 380 , 290 A.2d 93 (1972); Commonwealth v. Anderson, 441 Pa. 483 , 272 A.2d 877 (1971); Commonwealth v. Homsher, 264 Pa.Super. 271 , 399 A.2d 772 (1979); Commonwealth v. Dixon, 253 Pa.Super. 383 , 385 A.2d 391 (1978). 1985See Commonwealth v. De Simone, 447 Pa. 380 , 290 A.2d 93 (1972); Commonwealth v. Anderson, 441 Pa. 483 , 272 A.2d 877 (1971); Commonwealth v. Homsher, 264 Pa.Super. 271 , 399 A.2d 772 (1979); Commonwealth v. Dixon, 253 Pa.Super. 383 , 385 A.2d 391 (1978). | 2 | 1971–1985 |
Commonwealth v. Alston
green
2 sentences1985Justice Larsen’s opinion, however, also stated, “It is not necessary to decide whether under these circumstnaces appellate counsel has been ineffective because voluntariness of the plea and counsel effectiveness were considered by the PCHA court: even if counsel has been ineffective in not raising issues on direct appeal, this cannot be prejudicial to the appellant where the same issues not only could have been considered on the merits in the collateral PCHA hearing (Commonwealth v. Alston, 473 Pa. 40 , 373 A.2d 741 (1977)) but in fact were considered on the merits in the PCHA hearing (Commonw 1985Justice Larsen’s opinion, however, also stated, “It is not necessary to decide whether under these circumstnaces appellate counsel has been ineffective because voluntariness of the plea and counsel effectiveness were considered by the PCHA court: even if counsel has been ineffective in not raising issues on direct appeal, this cannot be prejudicial to the appellant where the same issues not only could have been considered on the merits in the collateral PCHA hearing (Commonwealth v. Alston, 473 Pa. 40 , 373 A.2d 741 (1977)) but in fact were considered on the merits in the PCHA hearing (Commonw | 2 | 1980–1985 |
Commonwealth v. Porta
green
2 sentences1984Stated otherwise, “the record of the PCHA hearing leaves no doubt that the Commonwealth introduced no evidence to show that appellant waived his right to appeal ____” Commonwealth v. Porta, 297 Pa.Super. 298 , 302 n. 3, 443 A.2d 845 , 847 n. 3 (1982), petition for allocatur denied September 1, 1982. 1984Stated otherwise, “the record of the PCHA hearing leaves no doubt that the Commonwealth introduced no evidence to show that appellant waived his right to appeal ____” Commonwealth v. Porta, 297 Pa.Super. 298 , 302 n. 3, 443 A.2d 845 , 847 n. 3 (1982), petition for allocatur denied September 1, 1982. | 2 | 1983–1984 |
Commonwealth v. Weiss
green
2 sentences1984Later in the PCHA hearing, the prosecutor attempted to call the appellant to the stand as a hostile witness “to establish that he had familiarity with his jury trial rights and for the purpose of showing that had he known of the colloquy defect, [appellant] wouldn’t have changed his opinion as to pleading guilty at that time.” Id. at 24 . 1984Later in the PCHA hearing, the prosecutor attempted to call the appellant to the stand as a hostile witness “to establish that he had familiarity with his jury trial rights and for the purpose of showing that had he known of the colloquy defect, [appellant] wouldn’t have changed his opinion as to pleading guilty at that time.” Id. at 24 . | 2 | 1981–1984 |
Commonwealth v. Triplett
green
2 sentences1983While we may consider the waiver issue sua sponte, Commonwealth v. Triplett, 476 Pa. 83 , 381 A.2d 877 (1977), Commonwealth v. Harper, 292 Pa.Super. 192 , 436 A.2d 1217 (1981), under the present circumstances we attribute the narrowness of the question presented by appellant to clerical error or oversight rather than an intentional abandonment of a claim of error. 1983While we may consider the waiver issue sua sponte, Commonwealth v. Triplett, 476 Pa. 83 , 381 A.2d 877 (1977), Commonwealth v. Harper, 292 Pa.Super. 192 , 436 A.2d 1217 (1981), under the present circumstances we attribute the narrowness of the question presented by appellant to clerical error or oversight rather than an intentional abandonment of a claim of error. | 2 | 1980–1983 |
Anders v. California
green
2 sentences1981See Post Conviction Hearing Act § 4(b)(2).” Here, such “extraordinary circumstances” clearly exist: the assistance afforded to appellant at his first PCHA hearing, the first proceeding at which he could have raised this claim, 2 falls far below the standards for effective representation set forth by the Supreme Court in Anders v. California, supra, and by this Court in Commonwealth v. Baker, supra. In Anders, the United States Supreme Court held that “[t]he constitutional requirement of substantial equality and fair play can only be attained where counsel acts in the role of an active advocate 1981See Post Conviction Hearing Act § 4(b)(2).” Here, such “extraordinary circumstances” clearly exist: the assistance afforded to appellant at his first PCHA hearing, the first proceeding at which he could have raised this claim, 2 falls far below the standards for effective representation set forth by the Supreme Court in Anders v. California, supra, and by this Court in Commonwealth v. Baker, supra. In Anders, the United States Supreme Court held that “[t]he constitutional requirement of substantial equality and fair play can only be attained where counsel acts in the role of an active advocate | 2 | 1973–1981 |
Commonwealth v. Abney
green
2 sentences1980The PCHA hearing court found and the record supports a finding that, “neither Mr. Purnell nor defendant’s sister, who testified at the evidentiary hearing before us, nor the defendant himself, . . ., ever stated or intimated that defendant’s trial counsel had been advised that there was an exculpatory eyewitness to the incident.” See Commonwealth v. Abney, 465 Pa. 304 , 350 A.2d 407 (1976); Commonwealth v. Owens, 454 Pa. 268 , 312 A.2d 378 (1973). [H]ad appellant clearly established that he had communicated to his attorney the existence of the two witnesses and his attorney, without investigat 1980The PCHA hearing court found and the record supports a finding that, “neither Mr. Purnell nor defendant’s sister, who testified at the evidentiary hearing before us, nor the defendant himself, . . ., ever stated or intimated that defendant’s trial counsel had been advised that there was an exculpatory eyewitness to the incident.” See Commonwealth v. Abney, 465 Pa. 304 , 350 A.2d 407 (1976); Commonwealth v. Owens, 454 Pa. 268 , 312 A.2d 378 (1973). [H]ad appellant clearly established that he had communicated to his attorney the existence of the two witnesses and his attorney, without investigat | 2 | 1977–1980 |
Commonwealth v. Hubbard
red
2 sentences1979Commonwealth v. Hubbard, supra, 372 A.2d at 695-96 . . 1979Commonwealth v. Hubbard, supra, 372 A.2d at 695-96 . . | 2 | 1977–1979 |
Commonwealth v. Small, E., Aplt.
green
2 sentences2023Finally, Appellant relies on Commonwealth v. Small, 238 A.3d 1267 (Pa. 2020), apparently to argue that the PCRA court erred in crediting him with knowledge of the actual content of Seip’s testimony at the PCHA hearing on March 20, 1986. 2023Finally, Appellant relies on Commonwealth v. Small, 238 A.3d 1267 (Pa. 2020), apparently to argue that the PCRA court erred in crediting him with knowledge of the actual content of Seip’s testimony at the PCHA hearing on March 20, 1986. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
| Roper v. Simmons green | 1 | 2011–2011 |
| Commonwealth v. Giknis green | 1 | 2005–2005 |
| Commonwealth v. Fernandez green | 1 | 2005–2005 |
| Commonwealth v. Bruno green | 1 | 2005–2005 |
| Commonwealth v. Warren green | 1 | 1999–1999 |
| Commonwealth v. Beasley green | 1 | 1996–1996 |
| Commonwealth v. Neely green | 1 | 1993–1993 |
| Commonwealth v. Scott green | 1 | 1993–1993 |
| Commonwealth v. Cabeza green | 1 | 1993–1993 |
| Commonwealth v. Weiss green | 1 | 1993–1993 |
| Commonwealth v. Sheehan green | 1 | 1991–1991 |
| Commonwealth v. Polk green | 1 | 1990–1990 |
| Commonwealth v. Griffin green | 1 | 1990–1990 |
| Commonwealth v. Ross green | 1 | 1990–1990 |
| Commonwealth v. Berthesi green | 1 | 1990–1990 |
| Commonwealth v. Lowenberg green | 1 | 1985–1985 |
| Commonwealth v. Dixon neutral | 1 | 1985–1985 |
| Commonwealth v. Homsher neutral | 1 | 1985–1985 |
| Commonwealth v. Skurkis green | 1 | 1985–1985 |
| Commonwealth v. Box green | 1 | 1984–1984 |
| Commonwealth v. Sherard neutral | 1 | 1984–1984 |
| Commonwealth v. Smith green | 1 | 1984–1984 |
| Commonwealth v. Prowell green | 1 | 1984–1984 |
| Commonwealth v. Mangini green | 1 | 1983–1983 |
| Commonwealth v. McCaskill neutral | 1 | 1983–1983 |
| Commonwealth v. Harper green | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.