Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
17 Indiana opinions name it 1 courts 1980–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Lloydgreen2 sentences2018State v. Lloyd , 800 N.E.2d 196 , 199 (Ind. Ct. App. 2003). 2010State v. Lloyd, 800 N.E.2d 196, 199 (Ind.Ct.App.2003). | 2 | 4 |
Nasser v. Stategreen2 sentences2003Nasser v. State, 646 N.E.2d 673, 675 (Ind.Ct.App.1995). 1998Nasser v. State, 646 N.E.2d 673, 675 (Ind.Ct.App.1995); Baran v. State, 639 N.E.2d 642, 645-46 (Ind.1994); Ind.Code § 9-30-6-5(d). [4] Evidence that Officer Miller was certified and that the BAC Datamaster had been inspected for compliance was admitted. | 2 | 2 |
Hornback v. Stategreen1 sentence2001Hornback v. State, 693 N.E.2d 81, 84 (Ind.Ct.App.1998). | 1 | 1 |
Baran v. Stategreen1 sentence1998Nasser v. State, 646 N.E.2d 673, 675 (Ind.Ct.App.1995); Baran v. State, 639 N.E.2d 642, 645-46 (Ind.1994); Ind.Code § 9-30-6-5(d). [4] Evidence that Officer Miller was certified and that the BAC Datamaster had been inspected for compliance was admitted. | 1 | 1 |
Cobb v. Stategreen2 sentences1995Cobb v. State (1992), Ind.App., 585 N.E.2d 40, 43 (The key requirement is that the witness through which a business record is to be admitted must have personal knowledge of the various elements of the foundation). 1995Cobb v. State (1992), Ind.App., 585 N.E.2d 40, 43 (The key requirement is that the witness through which a business record is to be admitted must have personal knowledge of the various elements of the foundation). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hartman v. State
green
2 sentences1986Hartman v. State (1980), Ind.App., 401 N.E.2d 723, 725 . 1984Boothe v. State, (1982) Ind.App., 439 N.E.2d 708 ; Hartman v. State, (1980) Ind.App., 401 N.E.2d 723 . | 3 | 1982–1986 |
Boothe v. State
green
2 sentences1989Sell v. State (1986), Ind.App., 496 N.E.2d 799 ; Boothe v. State (1982), Ind.App., 439 N.E.2d 708 . 1984Boothe v. State, (1982) Ind.App., 439 N.E.2d 708 ; Hartman v. State, (1980) Ind.App., 401 N.E.2d 723 . | 2 | 1984–1989 |
Sell v. State
green
2 sentences1989Sell v. State (1986), Ind.App., 496 N.E.2d 799 ; Boothe v. State (1982), Ind.App., 439 N.E.2d 708 . 1987Sell v. State (1986), Ind.App., 496 N.E.2d 799, 801 . | 2 | 1987–1989 |
Klebs v. State
neutral
2 sentences1982The operator used techniques approved by the department of toxicology.” 3 Klebs v. State, (1974) 159 Ind.App. 180, 183 , 305 N.E.2d 781, 783 , cert. denied, (1974) 419 U.S. 869 , 95 S.Ct. 127 , 42 L.Ed.2d 107 . 1982The operator used techniques approved by the department of toxicology.” 3 Klebs v. State, (1974) 159 Ind.App. 180, 183 , 305 N.E.2d 781, 783 , cert. denied, (1974) 419 U.S. 869 , 95 S.Ct. 127 , 42 L.Ed.2d 107 . | 2 | 1980–1982 |
Ramirez v. State
green
1 sentence2018Ramirez v. State , 928 N.E.2d 214 (Ind. Ct. App. 2010), trans. denied . [20] Accordingly, for the results of a chemical breath test to be admissible, three foundational requirements must be satisfied: (1) the person who administered the test must be certified by the Department of Toxicology, (2) the equipment used in the test must have been inspected and approved by the Department of Toxicology, and (3) the operator must have followed the procedures approved by the Department of Toxicology. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
English v. State
green
1 sentence1995For the results of a breathalyzer test to be admissible, three foundational elements must be demonstrated: (1) that the test was administered by an operator certified by the State Department of Toxicology; (2) that the equipment used in the test was inspected and approved by the State Department of Toxicology; and (8) that the operator used techniques approved by the State Department of Toxicology. 1.0. 9-80-6-5(d), English v. State (1992), Ind.App., 603 N.E.2d 161, 163 , reh. denied. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Oller v. State
green
1 sentence1992IND.CODE 9-30-6-5(d)y; Oller v. State (1984), Ind.App., 469 N.E.2d 1227, 1230 . | 1 | 1992–1992 |
England v. Chrysler Corp.
green
2 sentences1982The operator used techniques approved by the department of toxicology.” 3 Klebs v. State, (1974) 159 Ind.App. 180, 183 , 305 N.E.2d 781, 783 , cert. denied, (1974) 419 U.S. 869 , 95 S.Ct. 127 , 42 L.Ed.2d 107 . 1982The operator used techniques approved by the department of toxicology.” 3 Klebs v. State, (1974) 159 Ind.App. 180, 183 , 305 N.E.2d 781, 783 , cert. denied, (1974) 419 U.S. 869 , 95 S.Ct. 127 , 42 L.Ed.2d 107 . | 1 | 1982–1982 |
State v. Ellison
green
1 sentence1982The operator used techniques approved by the department of toxicology.” 3 Klebs v. State, (1974) 159 Ind.App. 180, 183 , 305 N.E.2d 781, 783 , cert. denied, (1974) 419 U.S. 869 , 95 S.Ct. 127 , 42 L.Ed.2d 107 . | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.