Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
17 Maryland opinions name it 2 courts 1954–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Clark v. Stategreen2 sentences1968See Clark v. State, 208 Md. 316, 321 , et seq., where Judge Hammond for the court in an able and exhaustive opinion traces the evolution of the so-called ‘Lord Mansfield rule’. * * * Clearly, the rule is relaxed under the new law.” “We find no requirement in the statute [§ 66 F] that proof of nonaccess must be clear and convincing, as the appellant contends. 1964See Clark v. State, 208 Md. 316, 321 , et. seq., where Judge Hammond for the court in an able and exhaustive opinion traces the evolution of the so-called “Lord Mansfield rule”. | 2 | 3 |
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Lockhartgreen2 sentences1984Comm’n v. Lockhart, 285 Md. 586 , 403 A.2d 1241 (1979), we said: “Many times in recent years this Court has quoted from Ex Parte Brounsall, 2 Cowp. 829 (1778), what has come to be known as ‘the Lord Mansfield rule.’ It is to the effect that in disciplinary proceedings the inquiry is to whether after the conduct of such individual it is proper that he should continue to be a member of a profession *687 which should stand free from all suspicion, such proceedings not being by way of punishment, but the court in such cases exercises its discretion whether a man whom they have formerly admitted to 1984Comm’n v. Lockhart, 285 Md. 586 , 403 A.2d 1241 (1979), we said: “Many times in recent years this Court has quoted from Ex Parte Brounsall, 2 Cowp. 829 (1778), what has come to be known as ‘the Lord Mansfield rule.’ It is to the effect that in disciplinary proceedings the inquiry is to whether after the conduct of such individual it is proper that he should continue to be a member of a profession *687 which should stand free from all suspicion, such proceedings not being by way of punishment, but the court in such cases exercises its discretion whether a man whom they have formerly admitted to | 1 | 3 |
Shelley v. Smithgreen2 sentences1975In Shelley v. Smith, 249 Md. 619, 627, 630-31 , 241 A. 2d 682, 686, 688 (1968), an equity case brought to establish the *104 right of a child to inherit from a man not married to his mother at the time of his conception and birth, the Court of Appeals said: “The case at bar is not, of course, the kind of paternity proceeding envisaged by Code, Art. 16, § 66F and the relaxation of the Lord Mansfield rule, as set forth in § 66F (b), at least at first blush, does not appear to be applicable to any but the special proceeding therein provided. 1975In Shelley v. Smith, 249 Md. 619, 627, 630-31 , 241 A. 2d 682, 686, 688 (1968), an equity case brought to establish the *104 right of a child to inherit from a man not married to his mother at the time of his conception and birth, the Court of Appeals said: “The case at bar is not, of course, the kind of paternity proceeding envisaged by Code, Art. 16, § 66F and the relaxation of the Lord Mansfield rule, as set forth in § 66F (b), at least at first blush, does not appear to be applicable to any but the special proceeding therein provided. | 1 | 2 |
Aron v. Brockgreen2 sentences2014See also Aron v. Brock, 118 Md.App. 475, 526 , 703 A.2d 208 (1997). *294 Indeed, in Eades v. State, 75 Md.App. at 419 , 541 A.2d 1001 , Judge Karwacki carefully noted the difference between these two very different contexts: Because the court in the case sub judice elicited juror Skinner’s statements during his interview of the individual jurors immediately following the return of their verdict, juror Skinner’s response to the court’s question did not run afoul of Lord Mansfield’s rule. 2014See also Aron v. Brock, 118 Md.App. 475, 526 , 703 A.2d 208 (1997). *294 Indeed, in Eades v. State, 75 Md.App. at 419 , 541 A.2d 1001 , Judge Karwacki carefully noted the difference between these two very different contexts: Because the court in the case sub judice elicited juror Skinner’s statements during his interview of the individual jurors immediately following the return of their verdict, juror Skinner’s response to the court’s question did not run afoul of Lord Mansfield’s rule. | 1 | 1 |
Eades v. Stategreen2 sentences2014See also Aron v. Brock, 118 Md.App. 475, 526 , 703 A.2d 208 (1997). *294 Indeed, in Eades v. State, 75 Md.App. at 419 , 541 A.2d 1001 , Judge Karwacki carefully noted the difference between these two very different contexts: Because the court in the case sub judice elicited juror Skinner’s statements during his interview of the individual jurors immediately following the return of their verdict, juror Skinner’s response to the court’s question did not run afoul of Lord Mansfield’s rule. 2014See also Aron v. Brock, 118 Md.App. 475, 526 , 703 A.2d 208 (1997). *294 Indeed, in Eades v. State, 75 Md.App. at 419 , 541 A.2d 1001 , Judge Karwacki carefully noted the difference between these two very different contexts: Because the court in the case sub judice elicited juror Skinner’s statements during his interview of the individual jurors immediately following the return of their verdict, juror Skinner’s response to the court’s question did not run afoul of Lord Mansfield’s rule. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Dayhoff v. State
green
2 sentences2017The Court of Appeals held in Dayhoff v. State, 206 Md. 25, 32 , 109 A.2d 760 (1954): In this state the accepted rule is that where a child is born of a married woman neither the husband nor the wife is a competent witness to prove non-access at a time when according to the laws of nature the husband could have been the father of the child... 2017The Court of Appeals held in Dayhoff v. State, 206 Md. 25, 32 , 109 A.2d 760 (1954): In this state the accepted rule is that where a child is born of a married woman neither the husband nor the wife is a competent witness to prove non-access at a time when according to the laws of nature the husband could have been the father of the child... | 3 | 1958–2017 |
Hale v. State
green
2 sentences1954In Hale v. State, 175 Md. 319 , 2 A. 2d 17 , decided November 3, 1938, a prosecution for bastardy, the Lord Mansfield rule was set out. 1954In Hale v. State, 175 Md. 319 , 2 A. 2d 17 , decided November 3, 1938, a prosecution for bastardy, the Lord Mansfield rule was set out. | 3 | 1954–1968 |
Hicks v. State
green
2 sentences1954In the case of Commissioner of Public Welfare v. Koehler, 284 N. Y. 260 , 30 N. E. 2d 587 , decided November 19, 1940, the Court of Appeals of New York held in adjudging the defendant as the father of the child and directing him to pay for its support, that in the absence of statute “* * * it is well settled that neither husband nor wife are competent to prove non-access during wedlock, whatever may be the form of legal proceedings, or whoever may be the parties thereto.” The opinion further pointed out that the New York Legislature had provided that in paternity proceedings, brought in the ci 1954In the case of Commissioner of Public Welfare v. Koehler, 284 N. Y. 260 , 30 N. E. 2d 587 , decided November 19, 1940, the Court of Appeals of New York held in adjudging the defendant as the father of the child and directing him to pay for its support, that in the absence of statute “* * * it is well settled that neither husband nor wife are competent to prove non-access during wedlock, whatever may be the form of legal proceedings, or whoever may be the parties thereto.” The opinion further pointed out that the New York Legislature had provided that in paternity proceedings, brought in the ci | 2 | 1954–2001 |
Schmidt v. State
green
2 sentences1954In the case of Commissioner of Public Welfare v. Koehler, 284 N. Y. 260 , 30 N. E. 2d 587 , decided November 19, 1940, the Court of Appeals of New York held in adjudging the defendant as the father of the child and directing him to pay for its support, that in the absence of statute “* * * it is well settled that neither husband nor wife are competent to prove non-access during wedlock, whatever may be the form of legal proceedings, or whoever may be the parties thereto.” The opinion further pointed out that the New York Legislature had provided that in paternity proceedings, brought in the ci 1954In the case of Commissioner of Public Welfare v. Koehler, 284 N. Y. 260 , 30 N. E. 2d 587 , decided November 19, 1940, the Court of Appeals of New York held in adjudging the defendant as the father of the child and directing him to pay for its support, that in the absence of statute “* * * it is well settled that neither husband nor wife are competent to prove non-access during wedlock, whatever may be the form of legal proceedings, or whoever may be the parties thereto.” The opinion further pointed out that the New York Legislature had provided that in paternity proceedings, brought in the ci | 2 | 1954–2001 |
Wernsing v. General Motors Corp.
green
2 sentences1997Judge Motz noted in Allen : Maryland follows Lord Mansfield’s rule and thus “it is well settled that a juror [in Maryland] cannot be heard to impeach his own verdict.” Harford Sands, 320 Md. at 145 , 577 A.2d 7 (quoting Wernsing, 298 Md. at 411 , 470 A.2d 802 ). 1997Judge Motz noted in Allen : Maryland follows Lord Mansfield’s rule and thus “it is well settled that a juror [in Maryland] cannot be heard to impeach his own verdict.” Harford Sands, 320 Md. at 145 , 577 A.2d 7 (quoting Wernsing, 298 Md. at 411 , 470 A.2d 802 ). | 2 | 1991–1997 |
Harford Sands, Inc. v. Groft
green
2 sentences1997Judge Motz noted in Allen : Maryland follows Lord Mansfield’s rule and thus “it is well settled that a juror [in Maryland] cannot be heard to impeach his own verdict.” Harford Sands, 320 Md. at 145 , 577 A.2d 7 (quoting Wernsing, 298 Md. at 411 , 470 A.2d 802 ). 1991Maryland follows Lord Mansfield’s rule and thus "it is well settled that a juror [in Maryland] cannot be heard to impeach his own verdict.” Harford Sands, 320 Md. at 145 , 577 A.2d 7 (quoting Wemsing, 298 Md. at 411 , 470 A.2d 802 ). | 2 | 1991–1997 |
Morris v. Morris
green
2 sentences2001R. 646, per Lord Robertson).” The Delaware case of Morris v. Morris, 13 A. 2d 603 , draws the distinction between situations where there is premarital intercourse or knowledge of pregnancy and where there is not; saying, that, where there is, the presumption arises and the Lord Mansfield rule, where it has found favor, is applied, but that where there is not, the Poulett rule should control because in such case, to raise a presumption would amount to consecrating “an utterly false supposition”. 2001R. 646, per Lord Robertson).” The Delaware case of Morris v. Morris, 13 A. 2d 603 , draws the distinction between situations where there is premarital intercourse or knowledge of pregnancy and where there is not; saying, that, where there is, the presumption arises and the Lord Mansfield rule, where it has found favor, is applied, but that where there is not, the Poulett rule should control because in such case, to raise a presumption would amount to consecrating “an utterly false supposition”. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Kerpelman
green
2 sentences1984To similar effect see, among others, Mandel, 294 Md. at 588, 451 A.2d at 923; and Kerpelman, 288 Md. at 381-82 , 420 A.2d at 959 . 1984To similar effect see, among others, Mandel, 294 Md. at 588, 451 A.2d at 923; and Kerpelman, 288 Md. at 381-82 , 420 A.2d at 959 . | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Kelly v. Huber Baking Co.
green
1 sentence1982Kelly v. Huber Baking Co., 145 Md. 321, 328 . *72 It would serve no useful purpose to classify the Maryland cases as following the strict Lord Mansfield’s rule, the “Iowa Rule,” or some intermediate rule. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Wright v. Illinois & Mississippi Telegraph Co.
green
1 sentence1982Supreme Court in Wright v. Illinois and Mississippi Telegraph Co., 20 Iowa 195 . | 1 | 1982–1982 |
In Re Barton
green
2 sentences1977City v. Posner, 275 Md. 250, 255 , 339 A. 2d 657 (1975); In re Barton, 273 Md. 377, 381 , 329 A. 2d 102 (1974); Maryland St. 1977City v. Posner, 275 Md. 250, 255 , 339 A. 2d 657 (1975); In re Barton, 273 Md. 377, 381 , 329 A. 2d 102 (1974); Maryland St. | 1 | 1977–1977 |
BAR ASS'N OF BALTO CITY v. Posner
green
2 sentences1977City v. Posner, 275 Md. 250, 255 , 339 A. 2d 657 (1975); In re Barton, 273 Md. 377, 381 , 329 A. 2d 102 (1974); Maryland St. 1977City v. Posner, 275 Md. 250, 255 , 339 A. 2d 657 (1975); In re Barton, 273 Md. 377, 381 , 329 A. 2d 102 (1974); Maryland St. | 1 | 1977–1977 |
In Re Meyerson
green
2 sentences1976It was more succinctly put by Judge Singley for the Court in Posner when he said that “the purpose of the proceeding [is] to protect the public by determining a lawyer’s fitness to *415 practice law ....” Judge Digges referred for the Court in Agnew to the Lord Mansfield rule and then posed what he called “the underlying question” of “whether, after the conduct of this man [(convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude)], it is proper that he should continue [as] a member of [the legal] profession.” He replied: “In the absence of a compelling exculpatory explanation, we think that the answer 1976It was more succinctly put by Judge Singley for the Court in Posner when he said that “the purpose of the proceeding [is] to protect the public by determining a lawyer’s fitness to *415 practice law ....” Judge Digges referred for the Court in Agnew to the Lord Mansfield rule and then posed what he called “the underlying question” of “whether, after the conduct of this man [(convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude)], it is proper that he should continue [as] a member of [the legal] profession.” He replied: “In the absence of a compelling exculpatory explanation, we think that the answer | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Hall v. State
green
2 sentences1968Its subsequent history will be found in Hawbecker v. Hawbecker, 43 Md. 516 (1876); Scanlon v. Walshe, 81 Md. 118 , 31 Atl. 498 (1895); Howell v. Howell, 166 Md. 531 , 171 Atl. 869 (1934); Honward v. Harward, 173 Md. 339 , 196 Atl. 318 (1938); Hale v. State, 175 Md. 319 , 2 A. 2d 17 (1938); Hall v. State, 176 Md. 488 , 5 A. 2d 916 (1939); Dayhoff v. State, 206 Md. 25 , 109 A. 2d 760 (1954); Clark v. State, 208 Md. 316 , 118 A. 2d *622 366 (1955); Note, The “Lord Mansfield Rule” As To “Bastardising The Issue”, 3 Md. 1968Its subsequent history will be found in Hawbecker v. Hawbecker, 43 Md. 516 (1876); Scanlon v. Walshe, 81 Md. 118 , 31 Atl. 498 (1895); Howell v. Howell, 166 Md. 531 , 171 Atl. 869 (1934); Honward v. Harward, 173 Md. 339 , 196 Atl. 318 (1938); Hale v. State, 175 Md. 319 , 2 A. 2d 17 (1938); Hall v. State, 176 Md. 488 , 5 A. 2d 916 (1939); Dayhoff v. State, 206 Md. 25 , 109 A. 2d 760 (1954); Clark v. State, 208 Md. 316 , 118 A. 2d *622 366 (1955); Note, The “Lord Mansfield Rule” As To “Bastardising The Issue”, 3 Md. | 1 | 1968–1968 |
Harward v. Harward
green
2 sentences1968Its subsequent history will be found in Hawbecker v. Hawbecker, 43 Md. 516 (1876); Scanlon v. Walshe, 81 Md. 118 , 31 Atl. 498 (1895); Howell v. Howell, 166 Md. 531 , 171 Atl. 869 (1934); Honward v. Harward, 173 Md. 339 , 196 Atl. 318 (1938); Hale v. State, 175 Md. 319 , 2 A. 2d 17 (1938); Hall v. State, 176 Md. 488 , 5 A. 2d 916 (1939); Dayhoff v. State, 206 Md. 25 , 109 A. 2d 760 (1954); Clark v. State, 208 Md. 316 , 118 A. 2d *622 366 (1955); Note, The “Lord Mansfield Rule” As To “Bastardising The Issue”, 3 Md. 1968Its subsequent history will be found in Hawbecker v. Hawbecker, 43 Md. 516 (1876); Scanlon v. Walshe, 81 Md. 118 , 31 Atl. 498 (1895); Howell v. Howell, 166 Md. 531 , 171 Atl. 869 (1934); Honward v. Harward, 173 Md. 339 , 196 Atl. 318 (1938); Hale v. State, 175 Md. 319 , 2 A. 2d 17 (1938); Hall v. State, 176 Md. 488 , 5 A. 2d 916 (1939); Dayhoff v. State, 206 Md. 25 , 109 A. 2d 760 (1954); Clark v. State, 208 Md. 316 , 118 A. 2d *622 366 (1955); Note, The “Lord Mansfield Rule” As To “Bastardising The Issue”, 3 Md. | 1 | 1968–1968 |
Howell v. Howell
green
2 sentences1968Its subsequent history will be found in Hawbecker v. Hawbecker, 43 Md. 516 (1876); Scanlon v. Walshe, 81 Md. 118 , 31 Atl. 498 (1895); Howell v. Howell, 166 Md. 531 , 171 Atl. 869 (1934); Honward v. Harward, 173 Md. 339 , 196 Atl. 318 (1938); Hale v. State, 175 Md. 319 , 2 A. 2d 17 (1938); Hall v. State, 176 Md. 488 , 5 A. 2d 916 (1939); Dayhoff v. State, 206 Md. 25 , 109 A. 2d 760 (1954); Clark v. State, 208 Md. 316 , 118 A. 2d *622 366 (1955); Note, The “Lord Mansfield Rule” As To “Bastardising The Issue”, 3 Md. 1968Its subsequent history will be found in Hawbecker v. Hawbecker, 43 Md. 516 (1876); Scanlon v. Walshe, 81 Md. 118 , 31 Atl. 498 (1895); Howell v. Howell, 166 Md. 531 , 171 Atl. 869 (1934); Honward v. Harward, 173 Md. 339 , 196 Atl. 318 (1938); Hale v. State, 175 Md. 319 , 2 A. 2d 17 (1938); Hall v. State, 176 Md. 488 , 5 A. 2d 916 (1939); Dayhoff v. State, 206 Md. 25 , 109 A. 2d 760 (1954); Clark v. State, 208 Md. 316 , 118 A. 2d *622 366 (1955); Note, The “Lord Mansfield Rule” As To “Bastardising The Issue”, 3 Md. | 1 | 1968–1968 |
Craufurd v. Blackburn
green
2 sentences1968Although much adverse critical comment 3 has been aimed at the Lord Mansfield rule it has, until our decision today, been embedded in the law of Maryland, at least since Craufurd v. Blackburn, 17 Md. 49 (1861). 1968Although much adverse critical comment 3 has been aimed at the Lord Mansfield rule it has, until our decision today, been embedded in the law of Maryland, at least since Craufurd v. Blackburn, 17 Md. 49 (1861). | 1 | 1968–1968 |
Hawbecker v. Hawbecker
green
2 sentences1968Its subsequent history will be found in Hawbecker v. Hawbecker, 43 Md. 516 (1876); Scanlon v. Walshe, 81 Md. 118 , 31 Atl. 498 (1895); Howell v. Howell, 166 Md. 531 , 171 Atl. 869 (1934); Honward v. Harward, 173 Md. 339 , 196 Atl. 318 (1938); Hale v. State, 175 Md. 319 , 2 A. 2d 17 (1938); Hall v. State, 176 Md. 488 , 5 A. 2d 916 (1939); Dayhoff v. State, 206 Md. 25 , 109 A. 2d 760 (1954); Clark v. State, 208 Md. 316 , 118 A. 2d *622 366 (1955); Note, The “Lord Mansfield Rule” As To “Bastardising The Issue”, 3 Md. 1968Its subsequent history will be found in Hawbecker v. Hawbecker, 43 Md. 516 (1876); Scanlon v. Walshe, 81 Md. 118 , 31 Atl. 498 (1895); Howell v. Howell, 166 Md. 531 , 171 Atl. 869 (1934); Honward v. Harward, 173 Md. 339 , 196 Atl. 318 (1938); Hale v. State, 175 Md. 319 , 2 A. 2d 17 (1938); Hall v. State, 176 Md. 488 , 5 A. 2d 916 (1939); Dayhoff v. State, 206 Md. 25 , 109 A. 2d 760 (1954); Clark v. State, 208 Md. 316 , 118 A. 2d *622 366 (1955); Note, The “Lord Mansfield Rule” As To “Bastardising The Issue”, 3 Md. | 1 | 1968–1968 |
Scanlon v. Walshe
green
2 sentences1968Appellants, relying on Scanlon v. Walshe, et al., 81 Md. 118 , 31 Atl. 498 (1895), and the Lord Mansfield rule, contend it was error to admit Smith’s testimony. 1968Appellants, relying on Scanlon v. Walshe, et al., 81 Md. 118 , 31 Atl. 498 (1895), and the Lord Mansfield rule, contend it was error to admit Smith’s testimony. | 1 | 1968–1968 |
Commissioner of Public Welfare v. Koehler
green
2 sentences1954In the case of Commissioner of Public Welfare v. Koehler, 284 N. Y. 260 , 30 N. E. 2d 587 , decided November 19, 1940, the Court of Appeals of New York held in adjudging the defendant as the father of the child and directing him to pay for its support, that in the absence of statute “* * * it is well settled that neither husband nor wife are competent to prove non-access during wedlock, whatever may be the form of legal proceedings, or whoever may be the parties thereto.” The opinion further pointed out that the New York Legislature had provided that in paternity proceedings, brought in the ci 1954In the case of Commissioner of Public Welfare v. Koehler, 284 N. Y. 260 , 30 N. E. 2d 587 , decided November 19, 1940, the Court of Appeals of New York held in adjudging the defendant as the father of the child and directing him to pay for its support, that in the absence of statute “* * * it is well settled that neither husband nor wife are competent to prove non-access during wedlock, whatever may be the form of legal proceedings, or whoever may be the parties thereto.” The opinion further pointed out that the New York Legislature had provided that in paternity proceedings, brought in the ci | 1 | 1954–1954 |
Lynch v. Rosenberger
green
2 sentences1954The appellant relied on a number of out of State cases: Loudon v. Loudon, N. J., 168 A. 840 ; Lynch v. Rosenberger, Kan., 249 Pac. 682 ; State v. Snyder, 157 Ohio St. 15 , 104 N. E. 2d 169 ; People v. Powers, 340 Ill. 1954The appellant relied on a number of out of State cases: Loudon v. Loudon, N. J., 168 A. 840 ; Lynch v. Rosenberger, Kan., 249 Pac. 682 ; State v. Snyder, 157 Ohio St. 15 , 104 N. E. 2d 169 ; People v. Powers, 340 Ill. | 1 | 1954–1954 |
Loudon v. Loudon
green
2 sentences1954In the ease of London v. Loudon, supra, the New Jersey Court, relying on Professor Wig-more, held that the Lord Mansfield rule was in the first place limited strictly to filiation proceedings and allowed one spouse to testify against the other as to non-access in a divorce action. 1954In the ease of London v. Loudon, supra, the New Jersey Court, relying on Professor Wig-more, held that the Lord Mansfield rule was in the first place limited strictly to filiation proceedings and allowed one spouse to testify against the other as to non-access in a divorce action. | 1 | 1954–1954 |
People v. Powers
neutral
2 sentences1954It is apparent that the statement required of the mother by the statute is accusatory, that it forms no part of the evidence adduced at the trial of the charge, and that the statute itself makes no reference to the nature or quality of the evidence to be given at any trial of the charge made by the mother, nor to the competence of witnesses who may be called at any such trial.” Certainly, if this statute, Article 12, Section 1, supra, does not conflict with the Lord Mansfield rule, Article 89C, supra, for the reasons *35 above given, under no reasonable interpretation, can so conflict. 1954It is apparent that the statement required of the mother by the statute is accusatory, that it forms no part of the evidence adduced at the trial of the charge, and that the statute itself makes no reference to the nature or quality of the evidence to be given at any trial of the charge made by the mother, nor to the competence of witnesses who may be called at any such trial.” Certainly, if this statute, Article 12, Section 1, supra, does not conflict with the Lord Mansfield rule, Article 89C, supra, for the reasons *35 above given, under no reasonable interpretation, can so conflict. | 1 | 1954–1954 |
State v. James
green
2 sentences1954The only provision of Article 89C, supra, under “Criminal Enforcement” is that providing for the extradition of persons charged with non-support. *34 It was specifically held in the case of State v. James, 203 Md. 113 , 100 A. 2d 12 , that Article 89C, Section 3, supra, now relied on by the appellant, was not substituted as a remedy for the criminal prosecution sought by the State under Article 27, Section 96 (b), supra, under which the appellant here was convicted. 1954The only provision of Article 89C, supra, under “Criminal Enforcement” is that providing for the extradition of persons charged with non-support. *34 It was specifically held in the case of State v. James, 203 Md. 113 , 100 A. 2d 12 , that Article 89C, Section 3, supra, now relied on by the appellant, was not substituted as a remedy for the criminal prosecution sought by the State under Article 27, Section 96 (b), supra, under which the appellant here was convicted. | 1 | 1954–1954 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.