Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
17 New York opinions name it 5 courts 1993–2026 7 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New York courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re the Estate of Huntergreen2 sentences2023"The doctrine of res judicata precludes a party from litigating 'a claim where a judgment on the merits exits from a prior action between the same parties involving the same subject matter'" ( Matter of Josey v Goord , 9 NY3d 386, 389 , quoting Matter of Hunter , 4 NY3d 260, 269 ). 2023The doctrine of res judicata precludes a party from litigating "a claim where a judgment on the merits exists from a prior action between the same parties involving the same subject matter" Josey v. Goard, 9 N.Y.3d 386, 389 (2007), quoting Matter of Hunter, 4 N.Y.3d 260,269 (2005). | 7 | 9 |
O'Brien v. City of Syracusegreen2 sentences2006The doctrine of res judicata precludes a party from relitigating a claim where a judgment on the merits exists from a prior action between the same parties, or those in privity with those parties (see Matter of Hunter, 4 NY3d 260, 269 [2005]; Matter of Ranni [Ross], 58 NY2d 715, 717 [1982]; O’Brien v City of Syracuse, 54 NY2d 353, 357-358 [1981]). 1993The doctrine of res judicata precludes a party from relitigating a claim already litigated and from litigating a claim based upon the same facts and transactions underlying the previously litigated action (see, O’Brien v City of Syracuse, 54 NY2d 353 ; Smith v Russell Sage Coll., 54 NY2d 185 ; Matter of Reilly v Reid, 45 NY2d 24 ; Davie v Dwyer, 155 AD2d 921 ). | 6 | 9 |
MATTER OF JOSEY v. Goordgreen2 sentences2026Res Judicata "The doctrine of res judicata precludes a party from litigating a claim where a judgment on the merits exists from a prior action between the same parties involving the same subject matter" (Josey v Goord, 9 NY3d 386, 389 [2007] [citations and internal quotation marks omitted]). 2023"The doctrine of res judicata precludes a party from litigating 'a claim where a judgment on the merits exits from a prior action between the same parties involving the same subject matter'" ( Matter of Josey v Goord , 9 NY3d 386, 389 , quoting Matter of Hunter , 4 NY3d 260, 269 ). | 6 | 8 |
Webb v. Greater New York Automobile Dealers Ass'ngreen1 sentence2025Dealers Assn., Inc. , 144 AD3d 1134, 1134 [2d Dept 2016] [internal quotation marks omitted]). | 1 | 1 |
Cartagena v. Leegreen1 sentence2024Under New York law, "[t]he doctrine of res judicata precludes a party from litigating a claim where a judgment on the merits exists from a prior action between the same parties involving the same subject" ( Cartagena v Lee , 202 AD3d 746, 747 [internal quotation marks omitted]). | 1 | 1 |
Clifford v. County of Rocklandgreen1 sentence2023Under New York's transactional approach to the rule, "once a claim is brought to a final conclusion, all other claims arising out of the same transaction or series of transactions are barred, even if based upon different theories or if seeking a different remedy" id. quoting O'Brien v. City ofSyracuse, 54 N.Y.2d 353, 357 , (1981). ''Collateral estoppel comes into play when four conditions are fulfilled: (I) the issues in both proceedings are identical, (2) the issue in the prior proceeding was actually litigated and decided, (3) there was a full and fair opportunity to litigate in the prior pr | 1 | 1 |
Conason v. Megan Holding, LLCgreen1 sentence2023Under New York's transactional approach to the rule, "once a claim is brought to a final conclusion, all other claims arising out of the same transaction or series of transactions are barred, even if based upon different theories or if seeking a different remedy" id. quoting O'Brien v. City ofSyracuse, 54 N.Y.2d 353, 357 , (1981). ''Collateral estoppel comes into play when four conditions are fulfilled: (I) the issues in both proceedings are identical, (2) the issue in the prior proceeding was actually litigated and decided, (3) there was a full and fair opportunity to litigate in the prior pr | 1 | 1 |
In re the Claim of Rannigreen1 sentence2006The doctrine of res judicata precludes a party from relitigating a claim where a judgment on the merits exists from a prior action between the same parties, or those in privity with those parties (see Matter of Hunter, 4 NY3d 260, 269 [2005]; Matter of Ranni [Ross], 58 NY2d 715, 717 [1982]; O’Brien v City of Syracuse, 54 NY2d 353, 357-358 [1981]). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Binder v. Tolou Realty Assoc., Inc.
green
1 sentence2024Here, the Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiffs' motion for leave to enter a default judgment against the defendant ( see Newrez, LLC v City of Middletown , 216 AD3d at 656-657; Binder v Tolou Realty Assoc., Inc. , 205 AD3d 870, 871 ). | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Milione v. City University of New York
green
1 sentence2023Under New York's transactional approach to the rule, "once a claim is brought to a final conclusion, all other claims arising out of the same transaction or series of transactions are barred, even if based upon different theories or if seeking a different remedy" id. quoting O'Brien v. City ofSyracuse, 54 N.Y.2d 353, 357 , (1981). ''Collateral estoppel comes into play when four conditions are fulfilled: (I) the issues in both proceedings are identical, (2) the issue in the prior proceeding was actually litigated and decided, (3) there was a full and fair opportunity to litigate in the prior pr | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Ricatto v. Mapliedi
green
1 sentence2023Thus, a party asserting that an action is barred by the doctrine of res judicata must show the existence of a prior judgment on the merits between the same parties involving the same subject matter ( see Matter of Hunter , 4 NY3d at 269 ; Ricatto v Mapliedi , 133 AD3d 737, 738 ). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Charlene Simmons v. Trans Express Inc
green
1 sentence2022Under the doctrine of res judicata, "once a claim is brought to a final conclusion, all other claims arising out [*2]of the same transaction or series of transactions are barred, even if based upon different theories or if seeking a different remedy" ( Simmons v Trans Express Inc. , 37 NY3d 107 , 111 [emphasis and internal quotation marks omitted]; see Gramatan Home Invs. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Tuper v. Tuper
green
1 sentence2008(O’Brien v City of Syracuse, 54 NY2d 353 [1981]; Tuper v Tuper, 34 AD3d 1280 [4th Dept 2006].) The decisions handed down by the Court of Claims involving the same parties to this proceeding resolved only the procedural issue of the amendment of an answer to assert a counterclaim, not the substantive resolution of the merits of the counterclaim itself, i.e., the right of offset. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Davie v. Dwyer
neutral
1 sentence1993The doctrine of res judicata precludes a party from relitigating a claim already litigated and from litigating a claim based upon the same facts and transactions underlying the previously litigated action (see, O’Brien v City of Syracuse, 54 NY2d 353 ; Smith v Russell Sage Coll., 54 NY2d 185 ; Matter of Reilly v Reid, 45 NY2d 24 ; Davie v Dwyer, 155 AD2d 921 ). | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Reilly v. Reid
green
1 sentence1993The doctrine of res judicata precludes a party from relitigating a claim already litigated and from litigating a claim based upon the same facts and transactions underlying the previously litigated action (see, O’Brien v City of Syracuse, 54 NY2d 353 ; Smith v Russell Sage Coll., 54 NY2d 185 ; Matter of Reilly v Reid, 45 NY2d 24 ; Davie v Dwyer, 155 AD2d 921 ). | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Smith v. Russell Sage College
green
1 sentence1993The doctrine of res judicata precludes a party from relitigating a claim already litigated and from litigating a claim based upon the same facts and transactions underlying the previously litigated action (see, O’Brien v City of Syracuse, 54 NY2d 353 ; Smith v Russell Sage Coll., 54 NY2d 185 ; Matter of Reilly v Reid, 45 NY2d 24 ; Davie v Dwyer, 155 AD2d 921 ). | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.