17 Oregon opinions name it 1 courts 2000–2026 15 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oregon courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Parle v. Runnelsgreen2 sentences2024E.g., Parle v. Runnels, 505 F3d 922, 928 (9th Cir 2007). 2024E.g., Parle v. Runnels, 505 F3d 922, 928 (9th Cir 2007). | 1 | 1 |
Superior Protection, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Boardgreen1 sentence2017See Ryan v. Palmateer, 338 Or 278, 290 , 108 P3d 1127 , cert den, 546 US 874 (2005) (rejecting as incompatible with Oregon law the petitioner’s contention that “trial counsel’s errors, taken together, were so egregious that he should be granted a new trial without” being required to show actual prejudice, “because the entire underlying trial was infected with ‘structural error.’”); id. at 298-99 (explaining that, although “structural error”—error in which prejudice is presumed—-is a viable theory under federal law in some circumstances, the United States Supreme Court has limited its applicati | 1 | 1 |
Ryan v. Palmateergreen2 sentences2017See Ryan v. Palmateer, 338 Or 278, 290 , 108 P3d 1127 , cert den, 546 US 874 (2005) (rejecting as incompatible with Oregon law the petitioner’s contention that “trial counsel’s errors, taken together, were so egregious that he should be granted a new trial without” being required to show actual prejudice, “because the entire underlying trial was infected with ‘structural error.’”); id. at 298-99 (explaining that, although “structural error”—error in which prejudice is presumed—-is a viable theory under federal law in some circumstances, the United States Supreme Court has limited its applicati 2017See Ryan v. Palmateer, 338 Or 278, 290 , 108 P3d 1127 , cert den, 546 US 874 (2005) (rejecting as incompatible with Oregon law the petitioner’s contention that “trial counsel’s errors, taken together, were so egregious that he should be granted a new trial without” being required to show actual prejudice, “because the entire underlying trial was infected with ‘structural error.’”); id. at 298-99 (explaining that, although “structural error”—error in which prejudice is presumed—-is a viable theory under federal law in some circumstances, the United States Supreme Court has limited its applicati | 1 | 1 |
Taylor v. Werner Enterprises, Inc.green1 sentence2000See 329 Or at 465, 471 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Monica v. Myers
neutral
2 sentences2025Monica v. Myers, 319 Or App 376, 386-87 , 510 P3d 238 , rev den, 370 Or 212 (2022). 2025Monica v. Myers, 319 Or App 376, 386-87 , 510 P3d 238 , rev den, 370 Or 212 (2022). | 8 | 2023–2025 |
Vega-Arrieta v. Blewett
green
2 sentences2026Vega-Arrieta v. Blewett, 331 Or App 416, 428 , 545 P3d 746 , rev den, 372 Or 763 (2024). 2026Vega-Arrieta v. Blewett, 331 Or App 416, 428 , 545 P3d 746 , rev den, 372 Or 763 (2024). | 5 | 2024–2026 |
Farmer v. Premo
green
2 sentences2024Monica v. Myers, 319 Or App 376, 386-87 , 510 P3d 238 (2022), rev den, 370 Or 212 (2022) (citing Farmer v. Premo, 283 Or App 731 , 754 n 13, 390 P3d 1054 (2017), rev’d on other grounds, 363 Or 679 , 427 P3d 170 (2018)). 2024Monica v. Myers, 319 Or App 376, 386-87 , 510 P3d 238 (2022), rev den, 370 Or 212 (2022) (citing Farmer v. Premo, 283 Or App 731 , 754 n 13, 390 P3d 1054 (2017), rev’d on other grounds, 363 Or 679 , 427 P3d 170 (2018)). | 3 | 2024–2024 |
Farmer v. Premo
neutral
2 sentences2024Monica v. Myers, 319 Or App 376, 386-87 , 510 P3d 238 (2022), rev den, 370 Or 212 (2022) (citing Farmer v. Premo, 283 Or App 731 , 754 n 13, 390 P3d 1054 (2017), rev’d on other grounds, 363 Or 679 , 427 P3d 170 (2018)). 2024Monica v. Myers, 319 Or App 376, 386-87 , 510 P3d 238 (2022), rev den, 370 Or 212 (2022) (citing Farmer v. Premo, 283 Or App 731 , 754 n 13, 390 P3d 1054 (2017), rev’d on other grounds, 363 Or 679 , 427 P3d 170 (2018)). | 3 | 2024–2024 |
Roy v. Fhuere
neutral
2 sentences2025“In his fourth assignment of error, petitioner contends that the post-conviction court Nonprecedential Memo Op: 340 Or App 650 (2025) 655 erred in denying his claim alleging cumulative error. 2025The post-conviction court properly rejected that claim because Oregon courts have not recognized a cumulative error theory Nonprecedential Memo Op: 340 Or App 650 (2025) 655 of relief.” Vega-Arrieta v. Blewett, 331 Or App 461 , 428, 545 P3d 746 , rev den, 372 Or 763 (2024). | 2 | 2025–2025 |
Hale v. Kelly
neutral
1 sentence2024Given the prosecution’s consistent theory of the case, as well as the state of law at the time which did not require a concurrence instruction in that situation, we determine that the post-conviction court did not commit legal error in rejecting that claim.2 2 Despite appealing the denial of his ninth and tenth claims for relief, which both related to the inconsistent jury verdicts, petitioner does not present any independent argument as to why the post-conviction court committed legal error Nonprecedential Memo Op: 332 Or App 129 (2024) 133 Cumulative error. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
State v. Craigen
green
2 sentences2024In State v. Craigen, 370 Or 696 , 524 P3d 85 (2023), the defendant’s Article I, sec- tion 11, right to counsel was violated when police questioned him about charges on which he was represented by counsel, but without counsel present. 2024In State v. Craigen, 370 Or 696 , 524 P3d 85 (2023), the defendant’s Article I, sec- tion 11, right to counsel was violated when police questioned him about charges on which he was represented by counsel, but without counsel present. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.