Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
17 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1984–2025 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ex Parte Rahul Sudhakargreen2 sentences2015See Ex parte Sudhakar, 406 S.W.3d at 702 . 9 Alvarez’ sole response to this seismic shift in the case law against him is to argue that the State waived the point. 2015See Ex parte Sudhakar, 406 S.W.3d at 702 . 9 Alvarez’ sole response to this seismic shift in the case law against him is to argue that the State waived the point. | 4 | 4 |
State of Texas v. Guerrero, Ex Parte Marcelinogreen2 sentences2015Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356, 368-69 , 130 S.Ct. 1473, 1483 , L.Ed.2d 284 (2010); State v. Guerrero, 400 S.W.3d 576, 587 (Tex.Crim.App. 2013). 2015Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356, 368-69 , 130 S.Ct. 1473, 1483 , L.Ed.2d 284 (2010); State v. Guerrero, 400 S.W.3d 576, 587 (Tex.Crim.App. 2013). | 4 | 4 |
Diversicare General Partner, Inc. v. Rubiogreen2 sentences2009See Diversicare , 185 S.W.3d at 849 (Tex. 2005); Rose , 156 S.W.3d at 544 . 2009See Diversicare, 185 S.W.3d at 849 (Tex. 2005); Rose, 156 S.W.3d at 544 . | 2 | 2 |
Ervin v. Stategreen1 sentence2025See Ervin v. State, 991 S.W.2d 804, 817 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Olivo v. Stategreen1 sentence2025See Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 523 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Neily v. Arrongreen2 sentences2024“There is a strong policy behind the requirements of [R]ules 321 and 322.” Neily, 724 S.W.2d at 911 . 2024See id. | 1 | 1 |
Strickland v. Washingtongreen1 sentence2023See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984); Thompson v. State, 9 S.W.3d 808, 812 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Thompson v. Stategreen1 sentence2023See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984); Thompson v. State, 9 S.W.3d 808, 812 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Branum v. Stategreen1 sentence2018In determining whether the trial court abused its discretion in allowing Officer Villarreal to testify over Alvarez’s objection, we must evaluate whether the record supports a “showing of bad faith on the part of the prosecutor in the late designation and whether [Alvarez] could reasonably anticipate that the witness would testify although his name was not previously disclosed.” See Branum v. State, 535 S.W.3d 217, 226 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2017, no pet.) (citing Nobles v. State, 843 S.W.2d 503 , 514–15 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Cantu v. Peralesgreen2 sentences2006While we agree that section 143.036(f) expressly authorizes a civil service commission to hear appeals from promotional pass-overs, see Stauffer, 344 S.W.2d at 160 and Cantu v. Perales, 97 S.W.3d 861, 863 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 2003, no pet.), the issue in this case does not involve a promotional pass-over. 2006While we agree that section 143.036(f) expressly authorizes a civil service commission to hear appeals from promotional pass-overs, see Stauffer, 344 S.W.2d at 160 and Cantu v. Perales, 97 S.W.3d 861, 863 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 2003, no pet.), the issue in this case does not involve a promotional pass-over. | 1 | 1 |
County of Cameron v. Browngreen1 sentence2002P. 299a (stating that findings of fact shall not be recited in a judgment). [3] The trial court’s judgment recited no other grounds for its dismissal than failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. [4] Because this issue is dispositive of the appeal, we address it first. [5] See, e.g., County of Cameron v. Brown , 80 S.W.3d 549, 555, 559 (Tex. 2002) (reversing dismissal on plea to jurisdiction for failure to allow opportunity to replead); Friesenhahn v. Ryan , 960 S.W.2d 656, 659 (Tex. 1998) (reversing summary judgment based on failure to state a claim without allowing opport | 1 | 1 |
Friesenhahn v. Ryangreen1 sentence2002P. 299a (stating that findings of fact shall not be recited in a judgment). [3] The trial court’s judgment recited no other grounds for its dismissal than failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. [4] Because this issue is dispositive of the appeal, we address it first. [5] See, e.g., County of Cameron v. Brown , 80 S.W.3d 549, 555, 559 (Tex. 2002) (reversing dismissal on plea to jurisdiction for failure to allow opportunity to replead); Friesenhahn v. Ryan , 960 S.W.2d 656, 659 (Tex. 1998) (reversing summary judgment based on failure to state a claim without allowing opport | 1 | 1 |
Texas Department of Corrections v. Herringgreen1 sentence2002P. 299a (stating that findings of fact shall not be recited in a judgment). [3] The trial court’s judgment recited no other grounds for its dismissal than failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. [4] Because this issue is dispositive of the appeal, we address it first. [5] See, e.g., County of Cameron v. Brown , 80 S.W.3d 549, 555, 559 (Tex. 2002) (reversing dismissal on plea to jurisdiction for failure to allow opportunity to replead); Friesenhahn v. Ryan , 960 S.W.2d 656, 659 (Tex. 1998) (reversing summary judgment based on failure to state a claim without allowing opport | 1 | 1 |
Meza v. Stategreen1 sentence1999See Meza v. State, 895 S.W.2d 399, 401 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1994, no pet.) (citing McIntire v. State, 698 S.W.2d 652, 662 (Tex.Crim.App.1985)). 1 . | 1 | 1 |
McIntire v. Stategreen1 sentence1999See Meza v. State, 895 S.W.2d 399, 401 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1994, no pet.) (citing McIntire v. State, 698 S.W.2d 652, 662 (Tex.Crim.App.1985)). 1 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Padilla v. Kentucky
green
2 sentences2015Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356, 368-69 , 130 S.Ct. 1473, 1483 , L.Ed.2d 284 (2010); State v. Guerrero, 400 S.W.3d 576, 587 (Tex.Crim.App. 2013). 2015Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356, 368-69 , 130 S.Ct. 1473, 1483 , L.Ed.2d 284 (2010); State v. Guerrero, 400 S.W.3d 576, 587 (Tex.Crim.App. 2013). | 4 | 2015–2015 |
Garland Community Hospital v. Rose
green
2 sentences2009Therefore, examining the underlying nature of Alvarez's claim, Rose , 156 S.W.3d at 543 , and being careful not to extend chapter 74's reach beyond its stated bounds, Pallares, 267 S.W.3d at 71 , we conclude that the alleged act of improperly using the laser is not, in this case, an inseparable part of the rendition of health care services. 2009Therefore, examining the underlying nature of Alvarez's claim, Rose, 156 S.W.3d at 543 , and being careful not to extend chapter 74's reach beyond its stated bounds, Pallares, 267 S.W.3d at 71 , we conclude that the alleged act of improperly using the laser is not, in this case, an inseparable part of the rendition of health care services. | 2 | 2009–2009 |
Pallares v. Magic Valley Electric Cooperative, Inc.
green
2 sentences2009Therefore, examining the underlying nature of Alvarez's claim, Rose , 156 S.W.3d at 543 , and being careful not to extend chapter 74's reach beyond its stated bounds, Pallares, 267 S.W.3d at 71 , we conclude that the alleged act of improperly using the laser is not, in this case, an inseparable part of the rendition of health care services. 2009Therefore, examining the underlying nature of Alvarez's claim, Rose, 156 S.W.3d at 543 , and being careful not to extend chapter 74's reach beyond its stated bounds, Pallares, 267 S.W.3d at 71 , we conclude that the alleged act of improperly using the laser is not, in this case, an inseparable part of the rendition of health care services. | 2 | 2009–2009 |
Ybarra v. Illinois
green
2 sentences2024Alleged “general exploratory search” Relying on Ybarra v. Illinois, 444 U.S. 85 (1979), and Chatrie, 590 F.Supp.3d 901 , Alvarez appears to argue that the geofence-warrant was impermissibly overbroad because it lacked probable cause to search every single individual that may be located in the geofence. 2024Ybarra involved a warrant to search a tavern and the person of the bartender for drugs, see Ybarra, 444 U.S. at 88 , but a geofence-warrant “is not the same as the search of a body of a person, such that Ybarra would be implicated.” See State v. Contreras-Sanchez, 5 N.W.3d 151 , 170 (Minn.Ct.App. 2024), review granted (May 29, 2024)(quoting In re Warrant Application for Use of Canvassing Cell-Site Simulator, 654 F.Supp.3d 694 , 709 (N.D. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Nobles v. State
green
1 sentence2018In determining whether the trial court abused its discretion in allowing Officer Villarreal to testify over Alvarez’s objection, we must evaluate whether the record supports a “showing of bad faith on the part of the prosecutor in the late designation and whether [Alvarez] could reasonably anticipate that the witness would testify although his name was not previously disclosed.” See Branum v. State, 535 S.W.3d 217, 226 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2017, no pet.) (citing Nobles v. State, 843 S.W.2d 503 , 514–15 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Tesoro v. Alvarez
green
1 sentence2010Id. at 660–61. | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Stauffer v. City of San Antonio
green
2 sentences2006While we agree that section 143.036(f) expressly authorizes a civil service commission to hear appeals from promotional pass-overs, see Stauffer, 344 S.W.2d at 160 and Cantu v. Perales, 97 S.W.3d 861, 863 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 2003, no pet.), the issue in this case does not involve a promotional pass-over. 2006While we agree that section 143.036(f) expressly authorizes a civil service commission to hear appeals from promotional pass-overs, see Stauffer, 344 S.W.2d at 160 and Cantu v. Perales, 97 S.W.3d 861, 863 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 2003, no pet.), the issue in this case does not involve a promotional pass-over. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Wilson Finance Company v. State
green
1 sentence1984Wilson Finance Co. v. State, 348 S.W.2d 639 (Tex.Civ.App.1961, no writ). | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.