Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
17 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1987–2011 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
El Chico Corp. v. Poolered2 sentences2011El Chico Corp. v. Poole, 732 S.W.2d 306, 311 (Tex.1987). “[Djuty is the function of several interrelated factors, the foremost and dominant consideration being foreseeability of the risk.” Id. (citing Otis Eng’g, 668 S.W.2d at 309 ; Corbin v. Safeway Stores, Inc., 648 S.W.2d 292, 296 (Tex.1983)); see also Mellon Mortg. 2011El Chico Corp. v. Poole, 732 S.W.2d 306, 311 (Tex.1987). “[Djuty is the function of several interrelated factors, the foremost and dominant consideration being foreseeability of the risk.” Id. (citing Otis Eng’g, 668 S.W.2d at 309 ; Corbin v. Safeway Stores, Inc., 648 S.W.2d 292, 296 (Tex.1983)); see also Mellon Mortg. | 7 | 11 |
Corbin v. Safeway Stores, Inc.green2 sentences2011El Chico Corp. v. Poole, 732 S.W.2d 306, 311 (Tex.1987). “[Djuty is the function of several interrelated factors, the foremost and dominant consideration being foreseeability of the risk.” Id. (citing Otis Eng’g, 668 S.W.2d at 309 ; Corbin v. Safeway Stores, Inc., 648 S.W.2d 292, 296 (Tex.1983)); see also Mellon Mortg. 2011El Chico Corp. v. Poole , 732 S.W.2d 306, 311 (Tex. 1987). “[D]uty is the function of several interrelated factors, the foremost and dominant consideration being foreseeability of the risk.” Id. (citing Otis Eng’g , 668 S.W.2d at 309 ; Corbin v. Safeway Stores, Inc ., 648 S.W.2d 292, 296 (Tex. 1983)); see also Mellon Mortg. | 5 | 5 |
Mellon Mortgage Co. v. Holdergreen2 sentences2011Co. v. Holder, 5 S.W.3d 654, 659 (Tex.1999) (noting that foreseeability is an essential component of duty). 2011Co. v. Holder , 5 S.W.3d 654, 659 (Tex. 1999) (noting that foreseeability is an essential component of duty). | 2 | 2 |
Peek v. Oshman's Sporting Goods, Inc.green2 sentences1989Factors weighing against imposition of a duty are the magnitude of the burden of guarding against the injury and consequence of placing that burden on the defendant.” Peek, 768 S.W.2d at 846 (citations omitted). 1989Factors weighing against imposition of a duty are the magnitude of the burden of guarding against the injury and consequence of placing that burden on the defendant." Peek, 768 S.W.2d at 846 (citations omitted). | 2 | 2 |
Walker v. Harrisgreen1 sentence2000See Walker v. Harris, 924 S.W.2d 375, 377 (Tex.1996). “[Djuty is the function of several interrelated factors, the foremost and dominant consideration being foreseeability of the risk.” El Chico, 732 S.W.2d at 311 . | 1 | 1 |
Bird v. W.C.W.green1 sentence1997Duty is the function of several interrelated factors, including “the risk, foreseeability, and likelihood of injury weighed against the social utility of the actor’s conduct, the magnitude of the burden of guarding against the injury and the consequences of placing that burden on the actor.” Bird v. W.C.W., 868 S.W.2d 767, 769 (Tex.1994). | 1 | 1 |
Gibbs v. General Motors Corporationgreen1 sentence1989El Chico Corp., supra at 311. | 1 | 1 |
Group Hospital Services, Inc. v. Danielgreen1 sentence1989Hendricks, 722 S.W.2d at 460 . “[D]uty is the function of several interrelated factors, the foremost and dominant consideration being foreseeability of the risk.” El Chico, 732 S.W.2d at 311 ; see also Group Hospital Services, Inc. v. Daniel, 704 S.W.2d 870, 877 (Tex.App.1985, no writ). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Otis Engineering Corp. v. Clark
green
2 sentences2011El Chico Corp. v. Poole, 732 S.W.2d 306, 311 (Tex.1987). “[Djuty is the function of several interrelated factors, the foremost and dominant consideration being foreseeability of the risk.” Id. (citing Otis Eng’g, 668 S.W.2d at 309 ; Corbin v. Safeway Stores, Inc., 648 S.W.2d 292, 296 (Tex.1983)); see also Mellon Mortg. 2011El Chico Corp. v. Poole , 732 S.W.2d 306, 311 (Tex. 1987). “[D]uty is the function of several interrelated factors, the foremost and dominant consideration being foreseeability of the risk.” Id. (citing Otis Eng’g , 668 S.W.2d at 309 ; Corbin v. Safeway Stores, Inc ., 648 S.W.2d 292, 296 (Tex. 1983)); see also Mellon Mortg. | 6 | 1987–2011 |
Greater Houston Transportation Co. v. Phillips
green
2 sentences1993Greater Houston Transp., 801 S.W.2d at 525 ; El Chico Corp. v. Poole, 732 S.W.2d 306, 311 (Tex.1987); Otis, 668 S.W.2d at 309 ; Corbin v. Safeway Stores, Inc., 648 S.W.2d 292, 296 (Tex.1983). 1993Greater Houston Transp. , 801 S.W.2d at 525 ; El Chico Corp. v. Poole , 732 S.W.2d 306, 311 (Tex. 1987); Otis , 668 S.W.2d at 309 ; Corbin v. Safeway Stores, Inc. , 648 S.W.2d 292, 296 (Tex. 1983). | 2 | 1993–1993 |
Avalos v. Brown Automotive Center, Inc.
green
1 sentence2007Avalos , 63 S.W.3d at 47 . | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Hendricks v. Todora
green
1 sentence1989Hendricks, 722 S.W.2d at 460 . “[D]uty is the function of several interrelated factors, the foremost and dominant consideration being foreseeability of the risk.” El Chico, 732 S.W.2d at 311 ; see also Group Hospital Services, Inc. v. Daniel, 704 S.W.2d 870, 877 (Tex.App.1985, no writ). | 1 | 1989–1989 |