Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
111 North Carolina opinions name it 1 courts 1998–2026 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Anders v. California
green
2 sentences2026Analysis Counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S. Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and State v. Kinch, 314 N.C. 99 , 331 S.E.2d 665 (1985), indicating she “is unable to identify an issue with sufficient merit to support a meaningful argument for relief on appeal.” Counsel asks this Court to conduct its own review of the record for possible prejudicial error and to determine whether counsel overlooked any meritorious issues. 2026Analysis Counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S. Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and State v. Kinch, 314 N.C. 99 , 331 S.E.2d 665 (1985), indicating she “is unable to identify an issue with sufficient merit to support a meaningful argument for relief on appeal.” Counsel asks this Court to conduct its own review of the record for possible prejudicial error and to determine whether counsel overlooked any meritorious issues. | 108 | 1998–2026 |
State v. Kinch
green
2 sentences2026Analysis Counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S. Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and State v. Kinch, 314 N.C. 99 , 331 S.E.2d 665 (1985), indicating she “is unable to identify an issue with sufficient merit to support a meaningful argument for relief on appeal.” Counsel asks this Court to conduct its own review of the record for possible prejudicial error and to determine whether counsel overlooked any meritorious issues. 2026Analysis Counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S. Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and State v. Kinch, 314 N.C. 99 , 331 S.E.2d 665 (1985), indicating she “is unable to identify an issue with sufficient merit to support a meaningful argument for relief on appeal.” Counsel asks this Court to conduct its own review of the record for possible prejudicial error and to determine whether counsel overlooked any meritorious issues. | 49 | 2004–2026 |
O'Bryan v. Chandler
green
2 sentences2009Ed. 2d 493 , reh'g denied, 388 U.S. 924 , 18 L. 2008Counsel has shown to the satisfaction of this Court that he has complied with the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 18 L.Ed. 2d 493 , reh'g denied, 388 U.S. 924 , 18 L. | 5 | 2000–2009 |
Potter v. California
green
2 sentences2009Ed. 2d 493 , reh'g denied, 388 U.S. 924 , 18 L. 2008Counsel has shown to the satisfaction of this Court that he has complied with the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 18 L.Ed. 2d 493 , reh'g denied, 388 U.S. 924 , 18 L. | 5 | 2000–2009 |
State v. Frink
green
1 sentence2025“Under our review pursuant to Anders and Kinch, we must determine from a full examination of all the proceedings whether the appeal is wholly frivolous.” State v. Frink, 177 N.C. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
In Re Harrison
green
2 sentences2018"Our Court has held that SBM hearings and proceedings are not criminal actions, but are instead a 'civil regulatory scheme [.]' " "[T]his jurisdiction has not extended the procedures and protections afforded in Anders and Kinch to civil cases." In re Harrison , 136 N.C. 2018“Our Court has held that SBM hearings and proceedings are not criminal actions, but are instead a ‘civil regulatory scheme[.]’” “[T]his jurisdiction has not extended the procedures and protections afforded in Anders and Kinch to civil cases.” In re Harrison, 136 N.C. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
State v. Renkosiak
neutral
1 sentence2014Accordingly, “[D]efendant’s failure to serve the notice of appeal and [her] mistake in failing to name this Court in [her] notice of appeal do not warrant dismissal.” See id. -4- On appeal, counsel appointed to represent Defendant has been unable to identify any issue with sufficient merit to support a meaningful argument for relief and asks this Court to conduct its own review of the record for possible prejudicial error. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.