continuing wrong will not prevent doctrine (Indiana) · Go Syfert
← Indiana issues

continuing wrong will not prevent doctrine in Indiana

16 Indiana opinions name it 1 courts 1999–2026 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (5)

CaseFollowedCited
C & E CORP. v. Ramco Industries, Inc.green
indctapp · 1999 · cited in 12 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2002–2026
2 sentences

2026However, “the doctrine of continuing wrong will not prevent the statute of limitations from beginning to run when the plaintiff learns of facts which should lead to the discovery of his cause of action even if his relationship with the tortfeasor continues beyond that point.” Fox v. Rice, 936 N.E.2d 316, 322 (Ind. Ct. App. 2010) (quoting C & E Corp. v. Ramco Indus., Inc., 717 N.E.2d 642, 645 (Ind. Ct. App. 1999)), trans. denied (2011).

2020However, “the doctrine of continuing wrong will not prevent the statute of limitations from beginning to run when the plaintiff learns of facts which should lead to the discovery of his cause of action even if his relationship with the tortfeasor continues beyond that point.” Fox v. Rice, 936 N.E.2d 316, 322 (Ind. Ct. App. 2010) (quoting C & E Corp. v. Ramco Indus., Inc., 717 N.E.2d 642, 645 (Ind. Ct. App. 1999)), trans. denied (2011). [21] Here, Chariton was notified of past-due registration fees and the imposition of late fines on October 16, 2013.

1012
Fox v. Ricegreen
indctapp · 2010 · cited in 6 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2012–2026
2 sentences

2026However, “the doctrine of continuing wrong will not prevent the statute of limitations from beginning to run when the plaintiff learns of facts which should lead to the discovery of his cause of action even if his relationship with the tortfeasor continues beyond that point.” Fox v. Rice, 936 N.E.2d 316, 322 (Ind. Ct. App. 2010) (quoting C & E Corp. v. Ramco Indus., Inc., 717 N.E.2d 642, 645 (Ind. Ct. App. 1999)), trans. denied (2011).

2020However, “the doctrine of continuing wrong will not prevent the statute of limitations from beginning to run when the plaintiff learns of facts which should lead to the discovery of his cause of action even if his relationship with the tortfeasor continues beyond that point.” Fox v. Rice, 936 N.E.2d 316, 322 (Ind. Ct. App. 2010) (quoting C & E Corp. v. Ramco Indus., Inc., 717 N.E.2d 642, 645 (Ind. Ct. App. 1999)), trans. denied (2011). [21] Here, Chariton was notified of past-due registration fees and the imposition of late fines on October 16, 2013.

66
Hendrickson v. Alcoa Fuels, Inc.green
indctapp · 2000 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015
1 sentence

2015Indeed, the amended complaint did not allege any relevant new facts, Manley did not announce any new law (and was subsequently vacated by our supreme court), and it is well settled that “the doctrine of continuing wrong will not prevent the statute of limitations from beginning to run when the plaintiff learns 7 But see Hendrickson v. Alcoa Fuels, Inc., 735 N.E.2d 804, 818 (Ind. Ct. App. 2000) (“The Hendricksons moved to amend their complaint for a third time almost four years after filing their original complaint and three months after Peabody and Alcoa filed summary judgment motions with res

11
Parks v. Madison Countygreen
indctapp · 2002 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2007–2007
1 sentence

2007This alleged fact, however, does not preserve the Coopers' claims. "[T]he doctrine of continuing wrong will not prevent the statute of limitations from beginning to run when the plaintiff learns of facts which should lead to the discovery of his cause of action even if his relationship with the tortfeasor continues beyond that point." Parks v. Madison County, 783 N.E.2d 711, 719 (Ind. Ct. App. 2002) (quoting C & E Corp. v. Ramco Indus., Inc., 717 N.E.2d 642, 645 (Ind. Ct. App. 1999)), trans. denied.

11
Doe v. United Methodist Churchgreen
indctapp · 1996 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 1999–1999
1 sentence

1999Doe v. United Methodist Church, 673 N.E.2d 839, 845 (Ind.Ct.App.1996), trans. denied (1997).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
Garneau v. Bush green
indctapp · 2005
2 sentences

2014However, "[t]he doctrine of continuing wrong will not prevent the statute of limitations from beginning to run when the plaintiff learns of [the malpractice] even if his relationship with the tortfeasor continues beyond that point.” Garneau, 838 N.E.2d at 1145 (quoting C & E Corp. v. Ramco Indus., Inc., 717 N.E.2d 642, 645 (Ind.Ct.App.1999)).

2014However, “[t]he doctrine of continuing wrong will not prevent the statute of limitations from beginning to run when the plaintiff learns of [the malpractice] even if his relationship with the tortfeasor continues beyond that point.” Garneau, 838 N.E.2d at 1145 (quoting E Corp. v. Ramco Indus., Inc., 717 N.E.2d 642, 645 (Ind. Ct. App. 1999)).

22006–2014
Snyder v. Town of Yorktown green
indctapp · 2014
1 sentence

2019As we said in Snyder , "the doctrine of continuing wrong will not prevent the statute of limitations from beginning to run when the plaintiff learns of facts which should lead to the discovery of his cause of action even if his relationship with the tortfeasor continues beyond that point." Id. (citations omitted); cf. Elkhart Foundry & Mach.

12019–2019
GRADUS-PIZLO v. Acton green
indctapp · 2012
1 sentence

2018“However, ‘the doctrine of continuing wrong will not prevent the statute of limitations from beginning to run when the plaintiff learns of facts which should lead to the discovery of his cause of action even if his relationship with the tortfeasor continues beyond that point.’” Id. (quoting Fox v. Rice, 936 N.E.2d 316, 322 (Ind. Ct. App. 2010), trans. denied). [13] Here, the Halls allege in their complaint that the District’s breach was “continuous,” but they do not allege facts sufficient to show that the District’s injury-producing conduct was of a continuous nature for purposes of the conti

12018–2018

Statutes the citing opinions construe

IN § Ind. Code § 34-13-3-10 (4) IN § Ind. Code § 34-13-3-12 (4) IN § Ind. Code § 34-13-3-8 (4) IN § Ind. Code § 34-11-2-4 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check