16 Missouri opinions name it 1 courts 1988–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Gamble v. Browninggreen1 sentence2019That being said, this specific issue was not before the trial court and we cannot “convict the trial court of reversible error based on the admission of evidence . . . [as] to which no objections were made,” or where the “argument [ ] on appeal [is] materially different from the objection [ ] … raised at trial.” Gamble v. Browning, 379 S.W.3d 194, 204-05 (Mo. App. 2012).6 The circuit court did not abuse its discretion in allowing Exhibit RR. | 1 | 1 |
N.J.S v. K.S.green2 sentences2019On June 11, 2019, the trial court entered its findings of fact, conclusions of law, and judgment denying Thomas’s motion to retax costs, and determining that Thomas was not entitled to a refund of the $372.00 that he paid to Scotland County and still owed a balance of $774.19 for the assessed courts costs.3 Acknowledging the recent holding from our Court in State v. Boston, 572 S.W.3d 160 (Mo. App. E.D. 2019), in which we held that a county to which a 2 Thomas also filed a “Petition in Mandamus and Motion for Civil Judgment” in the Circuit Court of Scotland County on November 2, 2018, in which 2019See Boston, 572 S.W.3d at 163 ; Carter, 518 S.W.3d at 800 . | 1 | 1 |
Dixon v. Thompsongreen1 sentence2010Dixon v. Thompson, 235 S.W.3d 568, 574 (Mo.App.2007). | 1 | 1 |
Care & Treatment of Thomas v. Stategreen2 sentences2005In light of Thomas , this Court “determined] that the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and the cause remanded to allow the State the opportunity to present evidence and make a submissible case under the Thomas standard.” Id. at 416; see also Thomas, 74 S.W.3d at 791-92 . 2005In light of Thomas , this Court “determined] that the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and the cause remanded to allow the State the opportunity to present evidence and make a submissible case under the Thomas standard.” Id. at 416; see also Thomas, 74 S.W.3d at 791-92 . | 1 | 1 |
Jungerman v. City of Raytowngreen1 sentence2002Jungerman v. City of Raytown, 925 S.W.2d 202, 204 (Mo. banc 1996). | 1 | 1 |
Helfenbein v. Helfenbeingreen2 sentences1998“Past due support payments owed by a former husband to the former wife pursuant to a court order for support payments constitute a debt so that accrued and unpaid installments become judgments in favor of former wife.” Helfenbein v. Helfenbein, 871 S.W.2d 131, 134 (Mo.App. 1998"Past due support payments owed by a former husband to the former wife pursuant to a court order for support payments constitute a debt so that accrued and unpaid installments become judgments in favor of former wife." Helfenbein v. Helfenbein, 871 S.W.2d 131, 134 (Mo.App. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Love v. State
green
2 sentences2003Id. 2003Id. | 2 | 2003–2003 |
In Re the Treatment & Care of Luckabaugh
green
2 sentences2003Following the reversal and remand for a new trial, we encourage the trial court to make a specific finding in line with the Thomas standard; however, we agree with the analysis from the South Carolina Supreme Court where it did not accept that Crane mandated a court to make a separate and specific lack of control determination, “only that a court must determine the individual lacks control while looking at the totality of the evidence.” Luckabaugh, 568 S.E.2d at 348 . 2003Following the reversal and remand for a new trial, we encourage the trial court to make a specific finding in line with the Thomas standard; however, we agree with the analysis from the South Carolina Supreme Court where it did not accept that Crane mandated a court to make a separate and specific lack of control determination, “only that a court must determine the individual lacks control while looking at the totality of the evidence.” Luckabaugh, 568 S.E.2d at 348 . | 2 | 2003–2003 |
Thomas v. State
green
2 sentences1988Thomas, 736 S.W.2d at 519 . 1988Thomas, 736 S.W.2d at 519 . | 2 | 1988–1988 |
Brady v. Maryland
green
1 sentence2025This appeal follows. 3 Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963). 3 Standard of Review Appellate court review of denial of post-conviction relief is limited to determining whether the findings and conclusions of the motion court are clearly erroneous. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Spicer v. Donald N. Spicer Revocable Living Trust
green
1 sentence2023Spicer, 336 S.W.3d at 471 . 6 Thomas’s motion to dismiss is granted. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
State ex rel. Merrell v. Carter
green
1 sentence2019See Boston, 572 S.W.3d at 163 ; Carter, 518 S.W.3d at 800 . | 1 | 2019–2019 |
State of Missouri v. George Richey, and State of Missouri v. John B. Wright
green
1 sentence2019On June 11, 2019, the trial court entered its findings of fact, conclusions of law, and judgment denying Thomas’s motion to retax costs, and determining that Thomas was not entitled to a refund of the $372.00 that he paid to Scotland County and still owed a balance of $774.19 for the assessed courts costs.3 Acknowledging the recent holding from our Court in State v. Boston, 572 S.W.3d 160 (Mo. App. E.D. 2019), in which we held that a county to which a 2 Thomas also filed a “Petition in Mandamus and Motion for Civil Judgment” in the Circuit Court of Scotland County on November 2, 2018, in which | 1 | 2019–2019 |
State of Missouri v. Sylvester Porter
green
1 sentence2015Porter, 439 S.W.3d at 211 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Crider v. Barnes-Jewish St. Peters Hospital, Inc.
green
1 sentence2014In Crider , this Court addressed the difference between lack of consent and manner of consent when determining whether a plaintiffs true claim is for medical negligence. 363 S.W.3d at 131 . | 1 | 2014–2014 |
ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.
green
1 sentence2000Id. | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Craig v. Iowa Kemper Mutual Insurance Co.
green
1 sentence1993In its order, the trial court held that an insured plaintiff could not “maintain a claim for ‘vexatious refusal’ in an uninsured motorist case until there is an adjudication that the alleged uninsured motorist is in fact liable to the plaintiff.” The trial court cited Craig v. Iowa Kemper Mutual Insurance Co., 565 S.W.2d 716 (Mo.App.1978), in support of its judgment. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.