Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
16 Nevada opinions name it 1 courts 2011–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Nevada courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Hallmark v. Eldridgegreen2 sentences2020"To testify as an expert witness . . . , the witness must satisfy the following three 18 requirements: (1) he or she must be qualified in an area of 'scientific, technical or other specialized 19 knowledge (the qualification requirement); (2) his or her specialized knowledge must 'assist the 20 trier of fact to understand the evidence or to detertnine a fact in issue' (the assistance requirement); 21 and (3) his or her testimony must be limited 'to matters within the scope of [his or her specialized] 22 knowledge' (the limited scope requirement)." Hallmark v. Eldridge, 124 Nev. 492, 498 , 189 2018An expert witness must satisfy three requirements before being permitted to testify as an expert under NRS 50.275 : "(1) he or she must be qualified in an area of scientific, technical or other specialized knowledge (the qualification requirement); (2) his or her specialized knowledge must assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue (the assistance requirement); and (3) his or her testimony must be limited to matters within the scope of [his or her specialized] knowledge (the limited scope requirement)." Hallmark v. Eldridge , 124 Nev. 492 , 498, 189 P.3 | 13 | 16 |
Higgs v. Stategreen2 sentences2020"To testify as an expert witness . . . , the witness must satisfy the following three 18 requirements: (1) he or she must be qualified in an area of 'scientific, technical or other specialized 19 knowledge (the qualification requirement); (2) his or her specialized knowledge must 'assist the 20 trier of fact to understand the evidence or to detertnine a fact in issue' (the assistance requirement); 21 and (3) his or her testimony must be limited 'to matters within the scope of [his or her specialized] 22 knowledge' (the limited scope requirement)." Hallmark v. Eldridge, 124 Nev. 492, 498 , 189 2020For the limited scope requirement, the expert testimony must be related to the 18 "highly particularized facts" of the case, Higgs, 126 Nev. at 20 , 222 P.3d at 660 , and fall within 19 the scope of the witness's specialized knowledge. | 4 | 4 |
Perez v. Stategreen2 sentences2020See Perez, 129 Nev. at 861 , 313 P.3d at 869 . 20 125. 2020See Perez, 129 Nev. at 861 , 313 P.3d at 869 . 20 125. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nevada. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.