15 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1990–2025 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
McNeil v. Wisconsingreen2 sentences2003Ed. 2d 158, 166-68 , 111 S. Ct. 2204, 2207-08 (1991) (in which the United States Supreme Court concluded that the defendant's statements, made in the wake of a valid Miranda waiver, were admissible at the defendant's trial, notwithstanding the defendant's earlier assertion of his offense-specific sixth-amendment right to counsel on an unrelated charge). 2003Ed. 2d 158, 166-68 , 111 S. Ct. 2204, 2207-08 (1991) (in which the United States Supreme Court concluded that the defendant’s statements, made in the wake of a valid Miranda waiver, were admissible at the defendant’s trial, notwithstanding the defendant’s earlier assertion of his offense-specific sixth amendment right to counsel on an unrelated charge). | 2 | 2 |
People v. Bernascogreen2 sentences2000A valid Miranda waiver requires "`both an uncoerced choice and the requisite level of comprehension.' [Citation.]" (Emphasis in original.) Bernasco 138 Ill.2d at 354-55 , 150 Ill.Dec. 155 , 562 N.E.2d at 960 . 2000A valid Miranda waiver requires "`both an uncoerced choice and the requisite level of comprehension.' [Citation.]" (Emphasis in original.) Bernasco 138 Ill.2d at 354-55 , 150 Ill.Dec. 155 , 562 N.E.2d at 960 . | 1 | 8 |
People v. Pattersongreen1 sentence2019People v. Patterson, 217 Ill. 2d 407, 438 (2005). ¶ 39 A valid Miranda waiver occurs where (1) the decision to relinquish those rights was voluntary and (2) it was made with full awareness of the rights being abandoned and the consequences of doing so. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Moran v. Burbine
green
2 sentences1990Ed. 2d 954, 965 , 107 S. Ct. 851, 857 .) A valid Miranda waiver would thus require “both an uncoerced choice and the requisite level of comprehension.” (Emphasis added.) (Burbine, 475 U.S. at 421 , 89 L. 1990Ed. 2d 954, 965 , 107 S. Ct. 851, 857 .) A valid Miranda waiver would thus require “both an uncoerced choice and the requisite level of comprehension.” (Emphasis added.) (Burbine, 475 U.S. at 421 , 89 L. | 2 | 1990–2025 |
Colorado v. Connelly
green
2 sentences2004The court perceived the issue as “two fold”: whether defendant’s statements were obtained free of police coercion, misconduct, or overreaching; and whether “a valid Miranda waiver must be knowing and intelligent.” Citing Colorado v. Connelly, 479 U.S. 157 , 93 L. 2004The court perceived the issue as “two fold”: whether defendant’s statements were obtained free of police coercion, misconduct, or overreaching; and whether “a valid Miranda waiver must be knowing and intelligent.” Citing Colorado v. Connelly, 479 U.S. 157 , 93 L. | 2 | 2004–2004 |
People v. Pabello
green
1 sentence2024People v. Pabello, 2019 IL App (2d) 170867, ¶ 39 . | 1 | 2024–2024 |
People v. Goins
green
1 sentence2019People v. Goins, 2013 IL App (1st) 113201, ¶ 48 . | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Colorado v. Spring
green
1 sentence1990Ed. 2d 954, 965 , 107 S. Ct. 851, 857 .) A valid Miranda waiver would thus require “both an uncoerced choice and the requisite level of comprehension.” (Emphasis added.) (Burbine, 475 U.S. at 421 , 89 L. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.