15 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1896–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Martin v. Stategreen2 sentences2001Id. (citing Martin v. State, 622 N.E.2d 185, 188 (Ind.1993)); see Ind.Evidence Rule 103(a). 1999See id. at 460 (citing Martin v. State, 622 N.E.2d 185, 188 (Ind.1993)). | 2 | 2 |
Dontae M. Clark v. State of Indianagreen2 sentences2018Clark v. State, 6 N.E.3d 992, 998 (Ind. Ct. App. 2014). “[A] trial court cannot be found to have erred as to an issue or argument that it never had an opportunity to consider.” Washington, 808 N.E.2d at 625 . 2018Clark v. State , 6 N.E.3d 992 , 998 (Ind. Ct. App. 2014). "[A] trial court cannot be found to have erred as to an issue or argument that it never had an opportunity to consider." Washington , 808 N.E.2d at 625 . | 1 | 2 |
Ford v. Stategreen2 sentences2001Id. (citing Martin v. State, 622 N.E.2d 185, 188 (Ind.1993)); see Ind.Evidence Rule 103(a). 1999See id. at 460 (citing Martin v. State, 622 N.E.2d 185, 188 (Ind.1993)). | 1 | 2 |
Thompson v. Stategreen1 sentence2011See, e.g., Thompson, 690 N.E.2d at 238 (Shepard, C.J., concurring) (“What particular parts of this mass might be fair rebuttal will, of course, depend on how the two parties elect to shape the presentation of their principal cases.”) Harmful error, if any, will occur when the court makes its decision during trial. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Akins v. State
green
2 sentences2015Id. 1991The supreme court stated in Akins v. State (1981), Ind., 429 N.E.2d 232 , 237: “Harmful error, if any, occurs when the questioned evidence is admitted at trial, and if error in its admission is to be available for appellate review, a proper objection must be entered at the time it is offered.” (citing Young v. State (1980), Ind., 409 N.E.2d 579 ). | 3 | 1986–2015 |
Young v. State
green
2 sentences1991The supreme court stated in Akins v. State (1981), Ind., 429 N.E.2d 232 , 237: “Harmful error, if any, occurs when the questioned evidence is admitted at trial, and if error in its admission is to be available for appellate review, a proper objection must be entered at the time it is offered.” (citing Young v. State (1980), Ind., 409 N.E.2d 579 ). 1986Akins, supra; Young v. State (1980), 274 Ind. 107 , 409 N.E.2d. 579. | 3 | 1981–1991 |
Washington v. State
green
2 sentences2018Clark v. State, 6 N.E.3d 992, 998 (Ind. Ct. App. 2014). “[A] trial court cannot be found to have erred as to an issue or argument that it never had an opportunity to consider.” Washington, 808 N.E.2d at 625 . 2018Clark v. State , 6 N.E.3d 992 , 998 (Ind. Ct. App. 2014). "[A] trial court cannot be found to have erred as to an issue or argument that it never had an opportunity to consider." Washington , 808 N.E.2d at 625 . | 2 | 2018–2018 |
Shane v. State
green
2 sentences2000When conducting this inquiry, the • appellate court must review the record as a whole to determine the probable impact of the evidence on the jury.” Id. at 398 . 2000When conducting this inquiry, the appellate court must review the record as a whole to determine the probable impact of the evidence on the jury." Id. at 398 . | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Phillips v. State
green
1 sentence1991Phillips, supra, at 1296 . | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. Campbell
neutral
2 sentences1974Equitable Life, etc. Society v. Campbell (1925), 85 Ind. App. 450 , 150 N.E. 31 . 1974Equitable Life, etc. Society v. Campbell (1925), 85 Ind. App. 450 , 150 N.E. 31 . | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Fletcher v. State
green
1 sentence1927Fletcher v. State (1874), 49 Ind. 124, 128 , 19 Am. | 1 | 1927–1927 |
Ft. Wayne Cooperage Co. v. Page
green
1 sentence1910Fort Wayne Cooperage Co. v. Page (1908), 170 Ind. 585 ; Salem-Bedford Stone Co. v. Hilt (1901), 26 Ind. App. 543 . 18. | 1 | 1910–1910 |
Salem-Bedford Stone Co. v. Hilt
neutral
1 sentence1910Fort Wayne Cooperage Co. v. Page (1908), 170 Ind. 585 ; Salem-Bedford Stone Co. v. Hilt (1901), 26 Ind. App. 543 . 18. | 1 | 1910–1910 |
Riley v. State
neutral
1 sentence1896If it were merely a question as to whether the misconduct had subjected the jurors to corrupt influences, as in the case of Riley v. State, 95 Ind. 446 , and cases of the class to which that belongs, we might reach a different conclusion, but here the defendant has been deprived of a privilege guaranteed by the constitution, and it is not for the court to speculate about the prejudicial character of the misconduct. | 1 | 1896–1896 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.