Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
15 Louisiana opinions name it 1 courts 1985–2008 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
La. Paddlewheels v. La. Riverboat Gaminggreen2 sentences1997NO CAUSE OF ACTION The exception of no cause of action questions "whether the law extends a remedy to anyone under the factual allegations of the petition." Louisiana Paddlewheels v. Louisiana Riverboat Gaming Commission, 646 So.2d at 888, n. 3 ; Treasure Chest Casino, L.L.C. v. Parish of Jefferson, 691 So.2d at 754 . 1997NO CAUSE OF ACTION The exception of no cause of action questions "whether the law extends a remedy to anyone under the factual allegations of the petition." Louisiana Paddlewheels v. Louisiana Riverboat Gaming Commission, 646 So.2d at 888 n. 3; Williams v. Mumphrey, 668 So.2d at 1275 . | 2 | 3 |
Wonycott v. Wonycottgreen2 sentences1993Wonycott v. Wonycott, 579 So.2d 506, 508 (La.App. 4th Cir.1991), citing Lambert v. Donald G. 1993Wonycott v. Wonycott, 579 So.2d 506, 508 (La.App. 4th Cir.1991), citing Lambert v. Donald G. | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Delta Bank & Trust Co. v. Lassiter
green
2 sentences1989EXCEPTIONS OF NO CAUSE OF ACTION The standard for sustaining an exception of no cause of action was set forth in Delta Bank & Trust Co. v. Lassiter, 383 So.2d 330 (La.1980), as follows: "In ruling on the peremptory exception of no cause of action, the court must presume the correctness of the well pleaded allegations of fact in the plaintiff's petition, and must determine if the fact of the petition presents a case which legally entitles the plaintiff to the relief sought." Delta Bank & Trust Co. v. Lassiter, 383 So.2d 330 at page 336 (La. 1980). 1989EXCEPTIONS OF NO CAUSE OF ACTION The standard for sustaining an exception of no cause of action was set forth in Delta Bank & Trust Co. v. Lassiter, 383 So.2d 330 (La.1980), as follows: "In ruling on the peremptory exception of no cause of action, the court must presume the correctness of the well pleaded allegations of fact in the plaintiff's petition, and must determine if the fact of the petition presents a case which legally entitles the plaintiff to the relief sought." Delta Bank & Trust Co. v. Lassiter, 383 So.2d 330 at page 336 (La. 1980). | 3 | 1985–1989 |
Treasure Chest Casino, L.L.C. v. Parish of Jefferson
green
2 sentences1998The exception of no cause of action questions "whether the law extends a remedy to anyone under the factual allegations of the petition." Louisiana Paddlewheels v. Louisiana Riverboat Gaming Commission, 94-2015, p. 5, n. 3 (La.11/30/94), 646 So.2d 885, 888, n. 3 ; Treasure Chest Casino, L.L.C. v. Parish of Jefferson, 96-1010, p. 5 (La.App. 1st Cir. 3/27/97), 691 So.2d 751, 754 , writ denied, 97-1066 (La.6/13/97), 695 So.2d 982 . 1997Louisiana Paddlewheels v. Louisiana Riverboat Gaming Commission, 94-2015, p. 4 (La. 11/30/94), 646 So.2d 885, 888 ; Treasure Chest Casino, L.L.C. v. Parish of Jefferson, 96-1010, p. 4 (La.App. 1st Cir. 3/27/97), 691 So.2d 751, 754 , writ denied, 97-1066 (La. 6/13/97), 695 So.2d 982 . | 2 | 1997–1998 |
TREASURE CHEST v. Parish of Jefferson
green
2 sentences1998The exception of no cause of action questions "whether the law extends a remedy to anyone under the factual allegations of the petition." Louisiana Paddlewheels v. Louisiana Riverboat Gaming Commission, 94-2015, p. 5, n. 3 (La.11/30/94), 646 So.2d 885, 888, n. 3 ; Treasure Chest Casino, L.L.C. v. Parish of Jefferson, 96-1010, p. 5 (La.App. 1st Cir. 3/27/97), 691 So.2d 751, 754 , writ denied, 97-1066 (La.6/13/97), 695 So.2d 982 . 1997NO CAUSE OF ACTION The exception of no cause of action questions "whether the law extends a remedy to anyone under the factual allegations of the petition." Louisiana Paddlewheels v. Louisiana Riverboat Gaming Commission, 646 So.2d at 888, n. 3 ; Treasure Chest Casino, L.L.C. v. Parish of Jefferson, 691 So.2d at 754 . | 2 | 1997–1998 |
Rebman v. Reed
neutral
2 sentences1987Plaquemines Parish Commission Council v. Perez, 379 So.2d 1373 (La.1980); Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc., 310 So.2d 93 (La.1975); Rebman v. Reed, 286 So.2d 341 (La.1973). 1985Plaquemines Parish Commission Council v. Perez, 379 So.2d 1373 (La.1980); Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc., 310 So.2d 93 (La.1975); Rebman v. Reed, 286 So.2d 341 (La.1973). | 2 | 1985–1987 |
Plaquemines Parish Com'n Council v. Perez
green
2 sentences1987Plaquemines Parish Commission Council v. Perez, 379 So.2d 1373 (La.1980); Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc., 310 So.2d 93 (La.1975); Rebman v. Reed, 286 So.2d 341 (La.1973). 1985Plaquemines Parish Commission Council v. Perez, 379 So.2d 1373 (La.1980); Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc., 310 So.2d 93 (La.1975); Rebman v. Reed, 286 So.2d 341 (La.1973). | 2 | 1985–1987 |
Hero Lands Company v. Texaco, Inc.
green
2 sentences1987Plaquemines Parish Commission Council v. Perez, 379 So.2d 1373 (La.1980); Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc., 310 So.2d 93 (La.1975); Rebman v. Reed, 286 So.2d 341 (La.1973). 1985Plaquemines Parish Commission Council v. Perez, 379 So.2d 1373 (La.1980); Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc., 310 So.2d 93 (La.1975); Rebman v. Reed, 286 So.2d 341 (La.1973). | 2 | 1985–1987 |
Howard v. Administrators of Tulane Ed. Fund
green
1 sentence2008Howard v. Administrators of Tulane Educational Fund, 2007-2224, p. 16 (La.7/1/08), 986 So.2d 47, 59 . | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Johnson v. State
green
1 sentence2007She argues that the trial court erred in finding that she did not have a cause of action pursuant to HIPAA, and that it erred by dismissing her suit in full rather than allowing her to amend her petition. *470 EXCEPTION OF NO CAUSE OF ACTION The standard of review pertaining to an exception of no cause of action was laid out by the court in Johnson v. State of Louisiana, 06-2024, p. 3 (La.App. 1 Cir. 6/8/07), 965 So.2d 866 : The function of the peremptory exception of no cause of action is to test the legal sufficiency of the petition, which is done by determining whether the law affords a rem | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Ramey v. DeCaire
green
1 sentence2007Ramey v. DeCaire, XXXX-XXXX, p. 7 (La.3/19/04), 869 So.2d 114, 118 . | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Greenbriar Nursing Home, Inc. v. Pilley
green
1 sentence2003Greenbriar Nursing Home, Inc. v. Pilley, 93-2059 (La.5/23/94), 637 So.2d 429 ; La.Code Civ.P. art. 681. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
McDonald v. Zapata Protein (USA), Inc.
green
2 sentences2001McDonald v. Zapata Protein (USA), Inc., 97-10 (La.App. 3 Cir. 4/30/97) ; 693 So.2d 296 . 2001McDonald v. Zapata Protein (USA), Inc., 97-10 (La.App. 3 Cir. 4/30/97) ; 693 So.2d 296 . | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Arcadian Corp. v. Olin Corp.
green
1 sentence2000Arcadian Corp. v. Olin Corp., 97-174 (La.App. 3 Cir. 6/18/97) ; 698 So.2d 9 . | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Sivils v. Mitchell
green
1 sentence1999Sivils v. Mitchell, 96-2528, p. 3 (La.App. 1st Cir. 11/7/97), 704 So.2d 25, 27 . | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Williams v. Mumphrey
green
1 sentence1997Louisiana Paddlewheels v. Louisiana Riverboat Gaming Commission, 94-2015, p. 4 (La.11/30/94); 646 So.2d 885, 888 ; Williams v. Mumphrey, 95-643, p. 3 (La.App. 5th Cir. 1/30/96); 668 So.2d 1274, 1275-76 , writ denied, 96-0569 (La.3/29/96); 670 So.2d 1240 . | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Williams v. Mumphrey
green
2 sentences1997NO CAUSE OF ACTION The exception of no cause of action questions "whether the law extends a remedy to anyone under the factual allegations of the petition." Louisiana Paddlewheels v. Louisiana Riverboat Gaming Commission, 646 So.2d at 888 n. 3; Williams v. Mumphrey, 668 So.2d at 1275 . 1997Louisiana Paddlewheels v. Louisiana Riverboat Gaming Commission, 94-2015, p. 4 (La.11/30/94); 646 So.2d 885, 888 ; Williams v. Mumphrey, 95-643, p. 3 (La.App. 5th Cir. 1/30/96); 668 So.2d 1274, 1275-76 , writ denied, 96-0569 (La.3/29/96); 670 So.2d 1240 . | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Julius Ducre v. The Executive Officers of Halter Marine, Inc.
green
1 sentence1989"EXECUTIVE OFFICERS EXCEPTION OF NO CAUSE OF ACTION The issue is simply whether this court should follow the holding of the U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit, in Ducre v. Executive Officers of Halter Marine, Inc., 752 F.2d 976 (5th Cir.1985). | 1 | 1989–1989 |