Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
15 Missouri opinions name it 2 courts 1950–2002 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Drainage District No. 1 Reformed v. Matthewsgreen2 sentences1974These safeguards are objectively expressed in Drainage District No. 1 Reformed v. Matthews, 234 S.W.2d 567, 574 (Mo.1950): “The doctrine of virtual representation, well recognized in equity, is based upon considerations of necessity and paramount convenience and may be invoked to prevent a failure of justice. 1974These safeguards are objectively expressed in Drainage District No. 1 *121 Reformed v. Matthews, 234 S.W.2d 567, 574 (Mo. 1950): "The doctrine of virtual representation, well recognized in equity, is based upon considerations of necessity and paramount convenience and may be invoked to prevent a failure of justice. | 3 | 4 |
Brown v. Bibbgreen2 sentences1981Insurer seeks solace under the doctrine of virtual representation, citing Brown v. Bibb, 356 Mo. 148 , 201 S.W.2d 370 (banc 1947) and Drainage Dist. 1981Insurer seeks solace under the doctrine of virtual representation, citing Brown v. Bibb, 356 Mo. 148 , 201 S.W.2d 370 (banc 1947) and Drainage Dist. | 2 | 6 |
Helton v. Hakegreen2 sentences1987First, individual firefighters could be subject to unlimited liability under the doctrine of virtual representation, Helton v. Hake, 564 S.W.2d 313, 322 (Mo.App.1978), and although firefighters who do not assent to strike will not be held responsible, State v. Kansas City Firefighters Local supra, 672 S.W.2d at 125 , this potential for liability may prevent competent persons from pursuing careers as firefighters. 1984Helton v. Hake, 564 S.W.2d 313, 322 [12] (Mo.App.1978); Sommer v. City of St. | 2 | 2 |
In Re Estate of Remmelegreen1 sentence2002See In re Estate of Remmele, 853 S.W.2d 476, 482 (Mo.App.1993) (holding interests of non-joined parties adequately protected based on the doctrine of virtual representation). | 1 | 1 |
Campbell v. Webbgreen2 sentences1960See Campbell v. Webb, 363 Mo. 1192 , 258 S.W.2d 595 , loc. cit. page 601, wherein the only difference between the equitable doctrine of virtual representation and their statutory class action is said to be the requirements of Supreme Court Rule 3.07. 1960See Campbell v. Webb, 363 Mo. 1192 , 258 S.W.2d 595 , loc. cit. page 601, wherein the only difference between the equitable doctrine of virtual representation and their statutory class action is said to be the requirements of Supreme Court Rule 3.07. | 1 | 1 |
Robinson v. Nickgreen2 sentences1950And there are several Missouri decisions rendered both before and after the enactment of the fore; going Code provision in 1943, holding such rights may be determined [9] in equity even in the absence of a statute so permitting, under the doctrine of virtual representation. 3 In particular it was held in Robinson v. Nick et al., 235 Mo. App. 461, 479-80 (2, 3), 136 SW. (2d) 374, 385 (2-5), decided in 1940, that the doctrine of virtual representation applied to labor unions. 1950And there are several Missouri decisions rendered both before and after the enactment of the fore; going Code provision in 1943, holding such rights may be determined [9] in equity even in the absence of a statute so permitting, under the doctrine of virtual representation. 3 In particular it was held in Robinson v. Nick et al., 235 Mo. App. 461, 479-80 (2, 3), 136 SW. (2d) 374, 385 (2-5), decided in 1940, that the doctrine of virtual representation applied to labor unions. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
White v. City of Columbia
green
1 sentence1988In holding the subsequent attack was not barred, the court said the following: In view of that situation we do not think it would be just and equitable to hold that the virtual representation doctrine is fully applicable and that these plaintiffs are barred from litigating the issue of reasonableness of the annexation because of the White [v. City of Columbia, 461 S.W.2d 806 (Mo. banc 1970) ] judgment. | 1 | 1988–1988 |
State Ex Inf. Ashcroft v. Kansas City Firefighters Local No. 42
green
1 sentence1987First, individual firefighters could be subject to unlimited liability under the doctrine of virtual representation, Helton v. Hake, 564 S.W.2d 313, 322 (Mo.App.1978), and although firefighters who do not assent to strike will not be held responsible, State v. Kansas City Firefighters Local supra, 672 S.W.2d at 125 , this potential for liability may prevent competent persons from pursuing careers as firefighters. | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Seibert v. City of Columbia
green
2 sentences1972Seibert v. City of Columbia, Mo., 461 S.W.2d 808 . 1972Seibert v. City of Columbia, Mo., 461 S.W.2d 808 . | 1 | 1972–1972 |
Clark v. Grand Lodge of the Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen
green
2 sentences1960The present case is not upon an insurance contract, or other contract, entered into by an unincorporated association in circumstances considered sufficient to bring it within certain statutory provisions relating to such contracts, as was the situation in Clark v. Grand Lodge, etc., 328 Mo. 1084 , 43 S.W.2d 404 [11-14], 88 A.L.R. 150 . 1960The present case is not upon an insurance contract, or other contract, entered into by an unincorporated association in circumstances considered sufficient to bring it within certain statutory provisions relating to such contracts, as was the situation in Clark v. Grand Lodge, etc., 328 Mo. 1084 , 43 S.W.2d 404 [11-14], 88 A.L.R. 150 . | 1 | 1960–1960 |
Powell v. City of Joplin
green
2 sentences1957See Drainage District No. 1, Reformed of Stoddard County, v. Matthews, 361 Mo. 286 , 234 S.W.2d 567, 572 ; Powell v. City of Joplin, 335 Mo. 562 , 73 S.W.2d 408 . 1957See Drainage District No. 1, Reformed of Stoddard County, v. Matthews, 361 Mo. 286 , 234 S.W.2d 567, 572 ; Powell v. City of Joplin, 335 Mo. 562 , 73 S.W.2d 408 . | 1 | 1957–1957 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.