Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 Kentucky opinions name it 3 courts 1923–2024 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kentucky courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Carroll v. First Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of Lexingtongreen2 sentences2022Co. of Lexington, 312 Ky. 380, 381 , 227 S.W.2d 410, 410 (1950) (“The doctrine of virtual representation . . . acknowledges the impracticability, in certain types of proceedings, of making all persons parties who might have a contingent or remote interest in the subject matter.”). 2022Co. of Lexington, 312 Ky. 380, 381 , 227 S.W.2d 410, 410 (1950) (“The doctrine of virtual representation . . . acknowledges the impracticability, in certain types of proceedings, of making all persons parties who might have a contingent or remote interest in the subject matter.”). | 2 | 4 |
Masonic Widows' & Orphan Home & Infirmary v. Hieatt Bros.green2 sentences1951Masonic Widows’ and Orphans’ Home v. Hieatt Bros., 197 Ky. 301 , 247 S.W. 34 ; Cox v. Corrigan-McKinney Steel Co., 248 Ky. 426 , 58 S.W.2d 625 . 2. 1951Masonic Widows’ and Orphans’ Home v. Hieatt Bros., 197 Ky. 301 , 247 S.W. 34 ; Cox v. Corrigan-McKinney Steel Co., 248 Ky. 426 , 58 S.W.2d 625 . 2. | 1 | 3 |
Munday v. Mayfair Diagnostic Laboratorygreen1 sentence2024Equitable Estoppel Equitable estoppel “may arise to prevent a party from relying on a statute of limitations by virtue of a false representation or fraudulent concealment.” Hawkins, 594 S.W.3d at 196 (Ky. 2020) (quoting Munday v. Mayfair Diagnostic Lab., 831 S.W.2d 912, 914 (Ky. 1992)). | 1 | 1 |
Jarvis v. National Citygreen1 sentence2024“The doctrine of virtual representation ‘recognizes that a party joined in a law suit may effectively represent another not so joined, where they have a common interest, and the former may be depended upon to present the merits of the controversy which would protect the rights of the latter.’” Jarvis v. Nat’l City, 410 S.W.3d 148, 159 (Ky. 2013) (quoting Carroll v. First Nat’l Bank & Tr. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kentucky. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Harris v. Jackson
green
2 sentences2024Harris v. Jackson, 192 S.W.3d 297 , 303–04 (Ky. 2006). 2020The doctrine of virtual representation “recognizes that a party joined in a law suit may effectively represent another not so joined, where they have a common interest and the former may be depended upon to present the merits of the controversy which would protect the rights of the latter.” Id. at 303 (quoting Carroll v. First Nat’l Bank & Tr. | 3 | 2008–2024 |
Lowe v. Taylor
green
2 sentences1949Lowe v. Taylor, 222 Ky. 846 , 2 S.W.2d 1042 ; Middleton v. Graves, 229 Ky. 640 , 17 S.W.2d 741 . 1949Lowe v. Taylor, 222 Ky. 846 , 2 S.W.2d 1042 ; Middleton v. Graves, 229 Ky. 640 , 17 S.W.2d 741 . | 2 | 1930–1949 |
Hansberry v. Lee
green
2 sentences2006The doctrine of virtual representation, if adequately assured, meets the standards of “due process.” Hansberry v. Lee, 311 U.S. 32, 43 , 61 S.Ct. 115, 119 , 85 L.Ed. 22 (1940). 2006The doctrine of virtual representation, if adequately assured, meets the standards of “due process.” Hansberry v. Lee, 311 U.S. 32, 43 , 61 S.Ct. 115, 119 , 85 L.Ed. 22 (1940). | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Cox v. Corrigan-Mckinney Steel Co.
neutral
2 sentences1951Masonic Widows’ and Orphans’ Home v. Hieatt Bros., 197 Ky. 301 , 247 S.W. 34 ; Cox v. Corrigan-McKinney Steel Co., 248 Ky. 426 , 58 S.W.2d 625 . 2. 1951Masonic Widows’ and Orphans’ Home v. Hieatt Bros., 197 Ky. 301 , 247 S.W. 34 ; Cox v. Corrigan-McKinney Steel Co., 248 Ky. 426 , 58 S.W.2d 625 . 2. | 1 | 1951–1951 |
Middleton v. Graves
green
2 sentences1949Lowe v. Taylor, 222 Ky. 846 , 2 S.W.2d 1042 ; Middleton v. Graves, 229 Ky. 640 , 17 S.W.2d 741 . 1949Lowe v. Taylor, 222 Ky. 846 , 2 S.W.2d 1042 ; Middleton v. Graves, 229 Ky. 640 , 17 S.W.2d 741 . | 1 | 1949–1949 |
Johnson v. Jacob
green
1 sentence1939The case of Johnson v. Jacob, supra, so confidently relied on by counsel for the trustee, was one wherein the interest of the preceding taker was antagonistic to that of future ones whose *737 interest was either vested or contingent, and in which condition the doctrine of virtual representation does not apply, as we have hereinbefore pointed out. | 1 | 1939–1939 |
Hermann v. Parsons
green
1 sentence1923The text has been adopted and applied by this court in numerous cases, among which are: Hermann v. Parson, 117 Ky. 239 ; Fritsche v. Klausing, 11 Ky. L. | 1 | 1923–1923 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.