Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
15 New Jersey opinions name it 2 courts 2017–2025 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Grossgreen2 sentences2021The court also admitted into evidence, after a Miranda2 hearing, defendant's police interrogation, in which he generally denied wrongdoing. 1 See State v. Gross, 121 N.J. 1, 15-17 (1990) (adopting a multi-factor test for the admission of a trial witness's sworn prior inconsistent statements). 2 Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966). 2021The court also admitted into evidence, after a Miranda2 hearing, defendant's police interrogation, in which he generally denied wrongdoing. 1 See State v. Gross, 121 N.J. 1, 15-17 (1990) (adopting a multi-factor test for the admission of a trial witness's sworn prior inconsistent statements). 2 Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Stasgreen1 sentence2020A-4250-17T1 26 defendant's credibility at trial if he testifies." State v. Stas, 212 N.J. 37, 53 (2012) (citing Jenkins v. Anderson, 447 U.S. 231, 238-41 (1980)). | 1 | 1 |
Jenkins v. Andersongreen1 sentence2020A-4250-17T1 26 defendant's credibility at trial if he testifies." State v. Stas, 212 N.J. 37, 53 (2012) (citing Jenkins v. Anderson, 447 U.S. 231, 238-41 (1980)). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Miranda v. Arizona
green
2 sentences2021The court also admitted into evidence, after a Miranda2 hearing, defendant's police interrogation, in which he generally denied wrongdoing. 1 See State v. Gross, 121 N.J. 1, 15-17 (1990) (adopting a multi-factor test for the admission of a trial witness's sworn prior inconsistent statements). 2 Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966). 2021The court also admitted into evidence, after a Miranda2 hearing, defendant's police interrogation, in which he generally denied wrongdoing. 1 See State v. Gross, 121 N.J. 1, 15-17 (1990) (adopting a multi-factor test for the admission of a trial witness's sworn prior inconsistent statements). 2 Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966). | 14 | 2017–2025 |
State v. Harvey
green
2 sentences2017Harvey I, supra, 121 N.J. at 425 . 2017Harvey I, supra, 121 N.J. at 425 . | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.