Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
15 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1997–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Williams v. Stategreen2 sentences2013But, when “collaterally attacked, the judgments reflecting those convictions are presumed to be regular, and the accused bears the burden of defeating that presumption.” Williams v. State, 946 S.W.2d 886, 900 (Tex. App.—Waco 1997, no pet.). 2008Williams v. State , 946 S.W.2d 886, 900 (Tex.App.--Waco 1997, no pet.). | 6 | 6 |
Swanson v. Stategreen2 sentences2016Id. 2011Swanson v. State, 722 S.W.2d 158, 164 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1986, pet. ref’d). | 2 | 4 |
Disheroon v. Stategreen2 sentences2017See Disheroon, 687 S.W.2d at 334 ; Maddox, 591 S.W.2d at 903 . 1997Campise v. State, 745 S.W.2d 534, 535 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1988, no pet.). 19 “Bald assertions by a defendant that he was without the assistance of counsel at his prior convictions are not sufficient to overcome the presumption of regularity of the records before the court in the case.” Swanson v. State, 722 S.W.2d 158, 164 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1986, pet. ref'd) (citing Disheroon v. State, 687 S.W.2d 332, 334 (Tex.Crim.App.1985)). | 2 | 2 |
James v. Stategreen1 sentence2000See James, 997 S.W.2d at 902 . | 1 | 1 |
Campise v. Stategreen1 sentence1997Campise v. State, 745 S.W.2d 534, 535 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1988, no pet.). 19 “Bald assertions by a defendant that he was without the assistance of counsel at his prior convictions are not sufficient to overcome the presumption of regularity of the records before the court in the case.” Swanson v. State, 722 S.W.2d 158, 164 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1986, pet. ref'd) (citing Disheroon v. State, 687 S.W.2d 332, 334 (Tex.Crim.App.1985)). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Jones v. State
green
2 sentences2023Jones v. State, 77 S.W.3d 819 , 823 n.15 (Tex. Crim. 2015Jones v. State, 77 S.W.3d 819 , 823 n. 15 (Tex. Crim. | 3 | 2014–2023 |
Maddox v. State
green
1 sentence2017See Disheroon, 687 S.W.2d at 334 ; Maddox, 591 S.W.2d at 903 . | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Breazeale v. State
green
1 sentence1998Breazeale, 683 S.W.2d at 450 ; Williams v. State, 946 S.W.2d 886, 900 (Tex.App.-Waco 1997, no pet.). | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.