Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
15 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 1950–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Young Hee Kang v. Hyundai Corp. (U.S.A.)green2 sentences2016Kang v. Hyundai Corp. (U.S.A.), 992 S.W.2d 499, 503 (Tex.App.Dallas 1999, no pet.); See Bowles v. Clipp, 920 S.W.2d 752, 761 (Tex.App.-Dallas 1996, writ denied). 2016P. 52.3(h); In re Estate of Taylor, 305 S.W.3d 829, 836 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2010, no pet.) (“Failure to cite legal authority or to provide substantive analysis of the legal issues presented results in waiver of the complaint.”); Kang v. Hyundai Corp. (U.S.A.), 992 S.W.2d 499, 503 (Tex. App.—Dallas 1999, no pet.) (“Failure to cite any authority constitutes a waiver of the alleged error.”). | 3 | 7 |
Bowles v. Clippgreen2 sentences2016Kang v. Hyundai Corp. (U.S.A.), 992 S.W.2d 499, 503 (Tex.App.Dallas 1999, no pet.); See Bowles v. Clipp, 920 S.W.2d 752, 761 (Tex.App.-Dallas 1996, writ denied). 1999See Bowles v. Clipp, 920 S.W.2d 752, 761 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1996, writ denied). | 2 | 2 |
Raitano v. Texas Department of Public Safetygreen2 sentences1998When an appellant raises a point of error on appeal, but fails to cite to any authority, this failure “constitutes a waiver of the alleged error.” Raitano v. Texas Department of Public Safety, 860 S.W.2d 549, 554 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1993, writ denied); Olson v. Central Power and Light Co., 803 S.W.2d 808, 813 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1991, writ denied). 1996Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 74(f) states that a party’s brief of the argument shall include “such discussion of the facts and authorities relied upon as may be requisite to maintain the point at issue.” When an appellant raises a point of error on appeal, but fails to cite to any authority, this failure “constitutes a waiver of the alleged error.” Raitano v. Texas Department of Public Safety, 860 S.W.2d 549, 554 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1993, writ denied): Olson v. Central Power and Light Co., 803 S.W.2d 808, 813 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1991, writ denied). | 2 | 2 |
Olson v. Central Power and Light Co.green2 sentences1998When an appellant raises a point of error on appeal, but fails to cite to any authority, this failure “constitutes a waiver of the alleged error.” Raitano v. Texas Department of Public Safety, 860 S.W.2d 549, 554 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1993, writ denied); Olson v. Central Power and Light Co., 803 S.W.2d 808, 813 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1991, writ denied). 1996Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 74(f) states that a party’s brief of the argument shall include “such discussion of the facts and authorities relied upon as may be requisite to maintain the point at issue.” When an appellant raises a point of error on appeal, but fails to cite to any authority, this failure “constitutes a waiver of the alleged error.” Raitano v. Texas Department of Public Safety, 860 S.W.2d 549, 554 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1993, writ denied): Olson v. Central Power and Light Co., 803 S.W.2d 808, 813 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1991, writ denied). | 2 | 2 |
Texaco, Inc. v. Pennzoil, Co.green2 sentences1993Texaco, Inc. v. Pennzoil Co., 729 S.W.2d 768, 810 (Tex.App. — Houston [1st Dist.] 1987, writ ref'd n.r.e.). 1990Texaco, Inc. v. Pennzoil Co., 729 S.W.2d 768, 810 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1987, writ ref’d n.r.e.), cert. dismissed, 485 U.S. 994 , 108 S.Ct. 1305 , 99 L.Ed.2d 686 (1988). | 2 | 2 |
In Re Estate of Taylorgreen1 sentence2016P. 52.3(h); In re Estate of Taylor, 305 S.W.3d 829, 836 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2010, no pet.) (“Failure to cite legal authority or to provide substantive analysis of the legal issues presented results in waiver of the complaint.”); Kang v. Hyundai Corp. (U.S.A.), 992 S.W.2d 499, 503 (Tex. App.—Dallas 1999, no pet.) (“Failure to cite any authority constitutes a waiver of the alleged error.”). | 1 | 1 |
Murrco Agency, Inc. v. Ryangreen1 sentence1996Murrco Agency, Inc. v. Ryan, 800 S.W.2d 600, 607 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1990, no writ). | 1 | 1 |
Grimes v. Hallgreen1 sentence1988Grimes v. Hall, 211 S.W.2d 956, 958 (Tex. Civ.App.—Eastland 1948, no writ). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Pratt & Whitney Canada Inc. v. Rainey
green
1 sentence1990Texaco, Inc. v. Pennzoil Co., 729 S.W.2d 768, 810 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1987, writ ref’d n.r.e.), cert. dismissed, 485 U.S. 994 , 108 S.Ct. 1305 , 99 L.Ed.2d 686 (1988). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Udolf v. Plan & Zoning Commission of West Hartford
green
2 sentences1990Texaco, Inc. v. Pennzoil Co., 729 S.W.2d 768, 810 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1987, writ ref’d n.r.e.), cert. dismissed, 485 U.S. 994 , 108 S.Ct. 1305 , 99 L.Ed.2d 686 (1988). 1990Texaco, Inc. v. Pennzoil Co., 729 S.W.2d 768, 810 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1987, writ ref’d n.r.e.), cert. dismissed, 485 U.S. 994 , 108 S.Ct. 1305 , 99 L.Ed.2d 686 (1988). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Ramirez v. Acker
green
2 sentences1950City of Waco v. Rook, Tex.Civ.App., 55 S.W.2d 649 ; Ramirez v. Acker, 134 Tex. 647 , 138 S.W.2d 1054 ; and Texas Employers’ Insurance Ass’n v. Cooper, Tex.Civ.App., 194 S.W.2d 819 . 1950City of Waco v. Rook, Tex.Civ.App., 55 S.W.2d 649 ; Ramirez v. Acker, 134 Tex. 647 , 138 S.W.2d 1054 ; and Texas Employers’ Insurance Ass’n v. Cooper, Tex.Civ.App., 194 S.W.2d 819 . | 1 | 1950–1950 |
Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. Cooper
neutral
1 sentence1950City of Waco v. Rook, Tex.Civ.App., 55 S.W.2d 649 ; Ramirez v. Acker, 134 Tex. 647 , 138 S.W.2d 1054 ; and Texas Employers’ Insurance Ass’n v. Cooper, Tex.Civ.App., 194 S.W.2d 819 . | 1 | 1950–1950 |
City of Waco v. Rook
green
1 sentence1950City of Waco v. Rook, Tex.Civ.App., 55 S.W.2d 649 ; Ramirez v. Acker, 134 Tex. 647 , 138 S.W.2d 1054 ; and Texas Employers’ Insurance Ass’n v. Cooper, Tex.Civ.App., 194 S.W.2d 819 . | 1 | 1950–1950 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.