Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
15 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 2004–2022 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Wallmullergreen2 sentences2021See Wallmuller, 194 Wn.2d at 244-45 . 2020The Supreme Court further concluded that the constitutional vagueness doctrine does not require sentencing courts “to specifically list every place a person convicted of victimizing children is prohibited from loitering.” Id. at 244 . | 1 | 2 |
State v. Padillagreen2 sentences2022See State v. Padilla, 190 Wn.2d 672, 677 , 416 P.3d 712 (2018). 2022See State v. Padilla, 190 Wn.2d 672, 677 , 416 P.3d 712 (2018). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Hai Minh Nguyengreen1 sentence2021See Nguyen, 191 Wn.2d at 679-80 . 9 No. 80793-5-I/10 explicit material for subsequent viewing. | 1 | 1 |
Hi-Starr, Inc. v. Liquor Control Boardgreen1 sentence2021See Hi-Starr, 106 Wn.2d at 465 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
City of Spokane v. Douglass
green
2 sentences2021App. 337, 355 , 254 P.3d 927 (2011) (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting State v. Williams, 144 Wn.2d 197, 203 , 26 P.3d 890 (2001)). 65 Id. (quoting City of Spokane v. Douglass, 115 Wn.2d 171, 180 , 795 P.2d 693 (1990)). 66 162 Wn. 2021App. 337, 355 , 254 P.3d 927 (2011) (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting State v. Williams, 144 Wn.2d 197, 203 , 26 P.3d 890 (2001)). 65 Id. (quoting City of Spokane v. Douglass, 115 Wn.2d 171, 180 , 795 P.2d 693 (1990)). 66 162 Wn. | 3 | 2004–2021 |
State v. Riley
green
2 sentences2016The analysis from Bah! states, 10 State v. K.H.-H., No. 91934-8 A condition that constitutes a "[!]imitation[] upon fundamental rights" is "permissible, provided [it is] imposed sensitively." Riley, 121 Wn.2d at 37 . 2016The analysis from Bahl states, A condition that constitutes a “[1] imitation [ ] upon fundamental rights” is “permissible, provided [it is] imposed sensitively.” Riley, 121 Wn.2d at 37 . | 3 | 2016–2016 |
State v. Bahl
green
2 sentences2016Bah!, 164 Wn.2d at 743 . 2016Bahl, 164 Wn.2d at 743 . ¶13 In Bahl, this court held that sentence conditions that implicate free speech rights must be narrowly tailored to serve an important government interest and must be reasonably necessary to achieving that interest. | 3 | 2016–2016 |
State Of Washington v. Samuel Lee Irwin
green
1 sentence2022Irwin, 191 Wn. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
State v. Williams
green
1 sentence2021App. 337, 355 , 254 P.3d 927 (2011) (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting State v. Williams, 144 Wn.2d 197, 203 , 26 P.3d 890 (2001)). 65 Id. (quoting City of Spokane v. Douglass, 115 Wn.2d 171, 180 , 795 P.2d 693 (1990)). 66 162 Wn. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
KING CTY. DEPT. OF ADULT DETEN. v. Parmelee
neutral
1 sentence2021App. 337, 355 , 254 P.3d 927 (2011) (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting State v. Williams, 144 Wn.2d 197, 203 , 26 P.3d 890 (2001)). 65 Id. (quoting City of Spokane v. Douglass, 115 Wn.2d 171, 180 , 795 P.2d 693 (1990)). 66 162 Wn. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
State v. Williams
green
2 sentences2021App. 337, 355 , 254 P.3d 927 (2011) (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting State v. Williams, 144 Wn.2d 197, 203 , 26 P.3d 890 (2001)). 65 Id. (quoting City of Spokane v. Douglass, 115 Wn.2d 171, 180 , 795 P.2d 693 (1990)). 66 162 Wn. 2021App. 337, 355 , 254 P.3d 927 (2011) (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting State v. Williams, 144 Wn.2d 197, 203 , 26 P.3d 890 (2001)). 65 Id. (quoting City of Spokane v. Douglass, 115 Wn.2d 171, 180 , 795 P.2d 693 (1990)). 66 162 Wn. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
King County Department of Adult & Juvenile Detention v. Parmelee
green
2 sentences2021In the criminal context, a statute is unconstitutionally vague if it “‘does not define the criminal offense with sufficient definiteness that ordinary people can understand what conduct is proscribed’” or it “‘does not provide ascertainable 63 CP at 220, 240. 18 No. 82418-0-I/19 standards of guilt to protect against arbitrary enforcement.’”64 “When determining whether a statute provides fair warning of the proscribed conduct, we examine the context of the entire enactment, giving the language a “‘sensible, meaningful, and practical interpretation.’”65 In King County Department of Adult and Juv 2021App. 337, 355 , 254 P.3d 927 (2011) (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting State v. Williams, 144 Wn.2d 197, 203 , 26 P.3d 890 (2001)). 65 Id. (quoting City of Spokane v. Douglass, 115 Wn.2d 171, 180 , 795 P.2d 693 (1990)). 66 162 Wn. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
State v. Baldwin
green
2 sentences2020In Baldwin, our Supreme Court analyzed a constitutional vagueness challenge to two sentencing guideline statutes in the Sentencing Reform Act (SRA) of 1981, chapter 9.94A. 150 Wn.2d at 458-49 . 2020On the first point, the court explained that “[s]entencing guidelines do not inform the public of the penalties attached to a criminal conduct nor do they vary the statutory maximum and minimum penalties assigned to illegal conduct by the legislature.” Baldwin, 150 Wn.2d at 459 . | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Vec v. State Public Disclosure Com'n
green
1 sentence2019Id. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
State v. Smith
green
2 sentences2015State v. Smith. 111 Wn.2d 1, 4-5 , 759 P.2d 372 (1988). 2015State v. Smith. 111 Wn.2d 1, 4-5 , 759 P.2d 372 (1988). | 1 | 2015–2015 |
State v. Coria
green
2 sentences2014Where- a statute does not impinge on First Amendment rights, we evaluate a vagueness challenge "by examining the statute as applied under the particular facts of the case." State v. Coria, 120 Wn.2d 156, 163 , 839 P.2d 890 (1992). 2014Where- a statute does not impinge on First Amendment rights, we evaluate a vagueness challenge "by examining the statute as applied under the particular facts of the case." State v. Coria, 120 Wn.2d 156, 163 , 839 P.2d 890 (1992). | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.