15 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1982–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Kent v. United Statesgreen2 sentences2026In deciding whether to decline jurisdiction, the court considered each of the eight factors under Kent v. United States, 383 U.S. 541 , 86 S. Ct. 1045 , 16 L. 2026In deciding whether to decline jurisdiction, the court considered each of the eight factors under Kent v. United States, 383 U.S. 541 , 86 S. Ct. 1045 , 16 L. | 1 | 6 |
Charles H. Keating, Jr. v. Office of Thrift Supervisiongreen1 sentence2017The eight factors are (1) the extent to which a defendant's Fifth Ame dment rights are implicated, (2) the similarities between the civil and crimi al cases,(3) the status of the criminal case,(4) the interest of the plaintiffs 4 Keating v. Office of Thrift Supervision, 45 F.3d 322, 326 (9th Cir. 1995). 5 Olympic Pipe Line, 104 Wn. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hoagland v. MOUNT VERNON SCHOOL DIST.
green
2 sentences1986Dist. 320, 95 Wn.2d 424, 429-30 , 623 P.2d 1156 (1981), this court enunciated eight factors for consideration in teacher discharge cases because " [t]hey are obviously relevant to any determination of teaching effectiveness, the touchstone for all dismissals." (Italics ours.) Of the eight factors, two explicitly concern the students. 1986Dist. 320, 95 Wn.2d 424, 429-30 , 623 P.2d 1156 (1981), this court enunciated eight factors for consideration in teacher discharge cases because " [t]hey are obviously relevant to any determination of teaching effectiveness, the touchstone for all dismissals." (Italics ours.) Of the eight factors, two explicitly concern the students. | 4 | 1986–2011 |
Clarke v. Shoreline School District No. 412
green
2 sentences1997Id. at 114 , 720 P.2d 793 (quoting Hoagland, 95 Wash.2d at 429-30 , 623 P.2d 1156 ). 1997Id. at 114 , 720 P.2d 793 (quoting Hoagland, 95 Wash.2d at 429-30 , 623 P.2d 1156 ). | 2 | 1997–1997 |
State v. Bash
green
1 sentence2019This court looks to the eight factors adopted in State v. Bash, 130 Wn.2d 594, 605-06 , 925 P.2d 978 (1996), to determine whether a statute that is silent as to mens rea defines a strict liability offense. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
State v. Bash
green
1 sentence2019This court looks to the eight factors adopted in State v. Bash, 130 Wn.2d 594, 605-06 , 925 P.2d 978 (1996), to determine whether a statute that is silent as to mens rea defines a strict liability offense. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Burnet v. Spokane Ambulance
green
1 sentence2019The Supreme Court rejected the eight factors embraced by this court and instead adopted three factors the court previously announced in Burnet v. Spokane Ambulance, 131 Wn.2d 484 (1997) with regard to whether an untimely disclosed witness should be permitted to testify at trial. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
State Of Washington v. Docie Burch
green
1 sentence2019Burch, 197 Wn. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
King v. Olympic Pipe Line Co.
green
2 sentences2017The eight factors are (1) the extent to which a defendant's Fifth Ame dment rights are implicated, (2) the similarities between the civil and crimi al cases,(3) the status of the criminal case,(4) the interest of the plaintiffs 4 Keating v. Office of Thrift Supervision, 45 F.3d 322, 326 (9th Cir. 1995). 5 Olympic Pipe Line, 104 Wn. 2017App. at 348 . 6 Olympic Pipe Line, 104 Wn. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
State v. Anderson
green
1 sentence2016State v. Anderson, 141 Wn.2d 357, 363 , 5 P.3d 1247 (2000). | 1 | 2016–2016 |
State v. Anderson
green
1 sentence2016State v. Anderson, 141 Wn.2d 357, 363 , 5 P.3d 1247 (2000). | 1 | 2016–2016 |
State v. Furman
green
2 sentences2015In determining whether to transfer or retain jurisdiction, the court must consider the eight factors originally set forth in Kent, 383 U.S. at 566-67 .5 State v. Furman, 122 Wn.2d 440, 447 , 858 P.2d 1092 (1993). 2015In determining whether to transfer or retain jurisdiction, the court must consider the eight factors originally set forth in Kent, 383 U.S. at 566-67 .5 State v. Furman, 122 Wn.2d 440, 447 , 858 P.2d 1092 (1993). | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Fox v. Sackman
green
1 sentence2014App. 707, 709, 591 P.2d 855 (1979). ¶30 Eight factors assist us in determining whether a delay resulted from excusable neglect: (1) The prejudice to the opponent; (2) the length of the delay and its potential impact on the course of judicial proceedings; (3) the cause for the delay, and whether those causes were within the reasonable control of the moving party; (4) the moving party’s good faith; (5) whether the omission reflected professional incompetence, such as an ignorance of the procedural rules; (6) whether the omission reflected an easily manufactured excuse that the court could not ve | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.