10 South Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1992–2007 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by South Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
MULTIMEDIA PUB. OF SC v. Mullinsgreen2 sentences2007Multimedia Publ’g of S.C., Inc. v. Mullins, 314 S.C. 551, 553 , 431 S.E.2d 569, 571 (1993). 1996The second prong of Sturkie requires a plaintiff to "prove the `fundamental unfairness' of recognizing the corporate veil. . . ." Multimedia Publishing v. Mullins, 314 S.C. 551, 553 , 431 S.E.2d 569, 571 (1993). | 2 | 2 |
Gamble v. Stevensongreen2 sentences2004In Gamble v. Stevenson, this Court established eight factors for a trial court to apply in a post-verdict review of punitive damages. 305 S.C. 104, 111 , 406 S.E.2d 350, 354 (1991). 2004In Gamble v. Stevenson, this Court established eight factors for a trial court to apply in a post-verdict review of punitive damages. 305 S.C. 104, 111 , 406 S.E.2d 350, 354 (1991). | 1 | 2 |
State v. Corey D.green2 sentences2007See State v. Corey D., 339 S.C. 107, 118 , 529 S.E.2d 20, 27 (2000) (“In evaluating whether the family court abused its discretion [in transferring jurisdiction to the trial court], we consider the Kent factors and emphasize that the serious nature of the offense is a major factor in the transfer decision.”). 2007See State v. Corey D., 339 S.C. 107, 118 , 529 S.E.2d 20, 27 (2000) (“In evaluating whether the family court abused its discretion [in transferring jurisdiction to the trial court], we consider the Kent factors and emphasize that the serious nature of the offense is a major factor in the transfer decision.”). | 1 | 1 |
C.A.H. v. L.H.green1 sentence1997See generally C.A.H. v. L.H., 315 S.C. 389 , 434 S.E.2d 268 (1993) (court discussed prior case law under rehabilitative alimony statute); Eagerton v. Eagerton, 285 S.C. 279 , 328 S.E.2d 912 (Ct.App. 1985) (court listed the eight factors which apply in awarding rehabilitative alimony). | 1 | 1 |
Cah v. Lhgreen1 sentence1997See generally C.A.H. v. L.H., 315 S.C. 389 , 434 S.E.2d 268 (1993) (court discussed prior case law under rehabilitative alimony statute); Eagerton v. Eagerton, 285 S.C. 279 , 328 S.E.2d 912 (Ct.App. 1985) (court listed the eight factors which apply in awarding rehabilitative alimony). | 1 | 1 |
Sturkie v. Siflygreen2 sentences1992Ray Flemming Fruit Company, 540 F. (2d) 681 (4th Cir. 1976) (applying South Carolina law) (the conclusion to disregard the corporate entity must involve a number of the eight factors); Sturkie, 280 S.C. at 458 , 313 S.E. (2d) at 318 (proof of the existence of a sufficient number of the eight factors warranted inquiry into the second prong of the test). 1992Ray Flemming Fruit Company, 540 F. (2d) 681 (4th Cir. 1976) (applying South Carolina law) (the conclusion to disregard the corporate entity must involve a number of the eight factors); Sturkie, 280 S.C. at 458 , 313 S.E. (2d) at 318 (proof of the existence of a sufficient number of the eight factors warranted inquiry into the second prong of the test). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in South Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Dumas v. InfoSafe Corp.
green
2 sentences2007“The conclusion to disregard the corporate entity must involve a number of the eight factors, but need not involve them all.” Id. 4 Under the second prong of the Sturkie test, the party seeking to pierce the corporate veil must prove injustice or fundamental unfairness if the corporate veil is not pierced. 2004“The conclusion to disregard the corporate entity must involve a number of the eight factors, but need not involve them all.” Id. (citing *225 Cumberland Wood Prods. v. Bennett, 308 S.C. 268 , 417 S.E.2d 617 (Ct.App.1992)). | 3 | 1996–2007 |
Multimedia Publishing of South Carolina, Inc. v. Mullins
green
2 sentences2007Multimedia Publ’g of S.C., Inc. v. Mullins, 314 S.C. 551, 553 , 431 S.E.2d 569, 571 (1993). 1996The second prong of Sturkie requires a plaintiff to "prove the `fundamental unfairness' of recognizing the corporate veil. . . ." Multimedia Publishing v. Mullins, 314 S.C. 551, 553 , 431 S.E.2d 569, 571 (1993). | 2 | 1996–2007 |
Cumberland Wood Products, Inc. v. Bennett
green
2 sentences2004“The conclusion to disregard the corporate entity must involve a number of the eight factors, but need not involve them all.” Id. (citing *225 Cumberland Wood Prods. v. Bennett, 308 S.C. 268 , 417 S.E.2d 617 (Ct.App.1992)). 2004“The conclusion to disregard the corporate entity must involve a number of the eight factors, but need not involve them all.” Id. (citing *225 Cumberland Wood Prods. v. Bennett, 308 S.C. 268 , 417 S.E.2d 617 (Ct.App.1992)). | 2 | 1995–2004 |
Kent v. United States
green
2 sentences2007“The best interests of the public or of the juvenile may require the juvenile be held accountable as an adult for his criminal conduct.” Id. at 293 , 509 S.E.2d at 481 . *536 Here, the family court carefully considered the eight factors enumerated by the United States Supreme Court in Kent v. United States, 383 U.S. 541 , 86 S.Ct. 1045 , 16 L.Ed.2d 84 (1966), and condoned by our supreme court. 2007“The best interests of the public or of the juvenile may require the juvenile be held accountable as an adult for his criminal conduct.” Id. at 293 , 509 S.E.2d at 481 . *536 Here, the family court carefully considered the eight factors enumerated by the United States Supreme Court in Kent v. United States, 383 U.S. 541 , 86 S.Ct. 1045 , 16 L.Ed.2d 84 (1966), and condoned by our supreme court. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
State v. Avery
green
2 sentences2007“The best interests of the public or of the juvenile may require the juvenile be held accountable as an adult for his criminal conduct.” Id. at 293 , 509 S.E.2d at 481 . *536 Here, the family court carefully considered the eight factors enumerated by the United States Supreme Court in Kent v. United States, 383 U.S. 541 , 86 S.Ct. 1045 , 16 L.Ed.2d 84 (1966), and condoned by our supreme court. 2007“The best interests of the public or of the juvenile may require the juvenile be held accountable as an adult for his criminal conduct.” Id. at 293 , 509 S.E.2d at 481 . *536 Here, the family court carefully considered the eight factors enumerated by the United States Supreme Court in Kent v. United States, 383 U.S. 541 , 86 S.Ct. 1045 , 16 L.Ed.2d 84 (1966), and condoned by our supreme court. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Eagerton v. Eagerton
green
2 sentences1997See generally C.A.H. v. L.H., 315 S.C. 389 , 434 S.E.2d 268 (1993) (court discussed prior case law under rehabilitative alimony statute); Eagerton v. Eagerton, 285 S.C. 279 , 328 S.E.2d 912 (Ct.App. 1985) (court listed the eight factors which apply in awarding rehabilitative alimony). 1997See generally C.A.H. v. L.H., 315 S.C. 389 , 434 S.E.2d 268 (1993) (court discussed prior case law under rehabilitative alimony statute); Eagerton v. Eagerton, 285 S.C. 279 , 328 S.E.2d 912 (Ct.App. 1985) (court listed the eight factors which apply in awarding rehabilitative alimony). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
SEARCY, DENNEY, SCAROLA v. Poletz
green
1 sentence1996In Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. v. Poletz, 652 So. (2d) 366 (Fla. 1995), the Florida Supreme Court stated that the eight factors set forth in The Rules Regulating the Florida Bar provide a good starting point by which to determine an award which is fair to both the client and the attorney. | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.