Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
14 Alabama opinions name it 2 courts 2001–2025 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Armstrong Business Services, Inc. v. AmSouth Bankgreen2 sentences2025Servs., Inc. v. AmSouth Bank, 817 So. 2d 665, 679 (Ala. 2001)." Prill v. Marrone, 23 So. 3d 1, 6 (Ala. 2009). 2011Servs., Inc. v. AmSouth Bank, 817 So.2d 665, 679 (Ala.2001) (“The elements of a negligence claim are a duty, a breach of that duty, causation, and damage.”); Alfa Mut. | 8 | 9 |
Prill v. Marronegreen2 sentences2025Servs., Inc. v. AmSouth Bank, 817 So. 2d 665, 679 (Ala. 2001)." Prill v. Marrone, 23 So. 3d 1, 6 (Ala. 2009). 2024See Prill v. Marrone, 23 So. 3d 1, 6 (Ala. 2009) (" 'The elements of a negligence claim are a duty, a breach of that duty, causation, and damage.' " (citation omitted)). | 2 | 2 |
AALAR, Ltd., Inc. v. Francisgreen2 sentences2017Servs., Inc. v. AmSouth Bank , 817 So.2d 665 , 679 (Ala. 2001) (citing AALAR, Ltd. v. Francis , 716 So.2d 1141 , 1144 (Ala. 1998) ). 2009AALAR, Ltd., Inc. v. Francis, 716 So.2d 1141,1144 (Ala.1998). | 1 | 3 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Turner v. Westhampton Court, L.L.C.
green
1 sentence2025Id. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Martin v. Arnold
green
1 sentence2024The only authority that Griggs cites in this section of her principal brief is Martin v. Arnold, 643 So. 2d 564 (Ala. 1994), which she cites for the elements of a negligence claim. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Pulley v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
green
1 sentence2016Viewing the record in a light that is most favorable to the employee, see Pulley, supra, we conclude that the employee presented substantial evidence of each of the elements of a negligence claim pursuant to the FELA such that entry of a summary judgment in favor of the employer was inappropriate. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Prince v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
green
2 sentences2003Prince v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. , 804 So.2d 1102 (Ala.Civ.App. 2001). 1 "The elements of a negligence claim are a duty, a breach of that duty, causation, and damage." Armstrong Bus. 2003Prince v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 804 So.2d 1102 (Ala.Civ.App. 2001). [1] "The elements of a negligence claim are a duty, a breach of that duty, causation, and damage." Armstrong Bus. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.