special assignments error (Georgia) · Go Syfert
← Georgia issues

special assignments error in Georgia

14 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1901–1963 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (6)

CaseFollowedCited
Perry v. Stategreen
ga · 1938 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 1963–1963
2 sentences

1963See Perry v. State, 185 Ga. 408, 411 (2) ( 195 SE 175 ); Hudson v. State, 24 Ga. App. 310 ( 100 SE 784 ); Thomas v. State, 86 Ga. App. 15 ( 70 SE2d 539 ); Odom v. State, 106 Ga. App. 60 ( 126 SE2d 472 ).

1963See Perry v. State, 185 Ga. 408, 411 (2) ( 195 SE 175 ); Hudson v. State, 24 Ga. App. 310 ( 100 SE 784 ); Thomas v. State, 86 Ga. App. 15 ( 70 SE2d 539 ); Odom v. State, 106 Ga. App. 60 ( 126 SE2d 472 ).

11
Fitzgerald v. Stategreen
gactapp · 1911 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 1945–1945
2 sentences

1945The court did not commit reversible error in admitting over objection evidence as to the general reputation of the inmates of the hotel in question, for “the reputation of the inmates of the hotel for lewdness may be a circumstance to be considered by the jury, as tending to show the continuing character of the offense and in corroboration of other evidence of the essential fact that fornication or adultery was actually committed at the hotel.” Ward v. State, 14 Ga. App. 110 ( 80 S. E. 295 ); Fitzgerald v. State, 10 Ga. App. 70, 74 (4) ( 72 S. E. 541 ); Smith v. State, 52 Ga. App. 88 ( 182 S.

1945The court did not commit reversible error in admitting over objection evidence as to the general reputation of the inmates of the hotel in question, for “the reputation of the inmates of the hotel for lewdness may be a circumstance to be considered by the jury, as tending to show the continuing character of the offense and in corroboration of other evidence of the essential fact that fornication or adultery was actually committed at the hotel.” Ward v. State, 14 Ga. App. 110 ( 80 S. E. 295 ); Fitzgerald v. State, 10 Ga. App. 70, 74 (4) ( 72 S. E. 541 ); Smith v. State, 52 Ga. App. 88 ( 182 S.

11
Baker v. Stategreen
gactapp · 1916 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 1934–1934
2 sentences

1934See also Baker v. State, 19 Ga. App. 84 ( 90 S. E. 983 ).

1934See also Baker v. State, 19 Ga. App. 84 ( 90 S. E. 983 ).

11
Crowe v. Stategreen
gactapp · 1932 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 1932–1932
2 sentences

1932See, in this connection, Crowe v. State, 44 Ga. App. 719 ( 162 S. E. 849 ).

1932See, in this connection, Crowe v. State, 44 Ga. App. 719 ( 162 S. E. 849 ).

11
Pullen v. Stategreen
gactapp · 1923 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 1925–1925
2 sentences

1925See Pullen v. State, 30 Ga. App. 24 ( 116 S. E. 871 ); Johnson v. State, 152 Ga. 271 ( 109 S. E. 662 , 19 A. L.

1925See Pullen v. State, 30 Ga. App. 24 ( 116 S. E. 871 ); Johnson v. State, 152 Ga. 271 ( 109 S. E. 662 , 19 A. L.

11
Daniel v. Hannahgreen
ga · 1898 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 1901–1901
1 sentence

1901See Daniel v. Hannah, 106 Ga. 91 ; Lucas v. State, 110 Ga. 757 (3), and cases cited; Fletcher v. Collins, 111 Ga. 253 . 5.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (16)

CaseCitedYears
Thomas v. State neutral
gactapp · 1952
2 sentences

1963See Perry v. State, 185 Ga. 408, 411 (2) ( 195 SE 175 ); Hudson v. State, 24 Ga. App. 310 ( 100 SE 784 ); Thomas v. State, 86 Ga. App. 15 ( 70 SE2d 539 ); Odom v. State, 106 Ga. App. 60 ( 126 SE2d 472 ).

1963See Perry v. State, 185 Ga. 408, 411 (2) ( 195 SE 175 ); Hudson v. State, 24 Ga. App. 310 ( 100 SE 784 ); Thomas v. State, 86 Ga. App. 15 ( 70 SE2d 539 ); Odom v. State, 106 Ga. App. 60 ( 126 SE2d 472 ).

11963–1963
Odom v. State green
gactapp · 1962
2 sentences

1963See Perry v. State, 185 Ga. 408, 411 (2) ( 195 SE 175 ); Hudson v. State, 24 Ga. App. 310 ( 100 SE 784 ); Thomas v. State, 86 Ga. App. 15 ( 70 SE2d 539 ); Odom v. State, 106 Ga. App. 60 ( 126 SE2d 472 ).

1963See Perry v. State, 185 Ga. 408, 411 (2) ( 195 SE 175 ); Hudson v. State, 24 Ga. App. 310 ( 100 SE 784 ); Thomas v. State, 86 Ga. App. 15 ( 70 SE2d 539 ); Odom v. State, 106 Ga. App. 60 ( 126 SE2d 472 ).

11963–1963
Hudson v. State neutral
gactapp · 1919
2 sentences

1963See Perry v. State, 185 Ga. 408, 411 (2) ( 195 SE 175 ); Hudson v. State, 24 Ga. App. 310 ( 100 SE 784 ); Thomas v. State, 86 Ga. App. 15 ( 70 SE2d 539 ); Odom v. State, 106 Ga. App. 60 ( 126 SE2d 472 ).

1963See Perry v. State, 185 Ga. 408, 411 (2) ( 195 SE 175 ); Hudson v. State, 24 Ga. App. 310 ( 100 SE 784 ); Thomas v. State, 86 Ga. App. 15 ( 70 SE2d 539 ); Odom v. State, 106 Ga. App. 60 ( 126 SE2d 472 ).

11963–1963
McCain v. State green
ga · 1876
1 sentence

1945The court did not commit reversible error in admitting over objection evidence as to the general reputation of the inmates of the hotel in question, for “the reputation of the inmates of the hotel for lewdness may be a circumstance to be considered by the jury, as tending to show the continuing character of the offense and in corroboration of other evidence of the essential fact that fornication or adultery was actually committed at the hotel.” Ward v. State, 14 Ga. App. 110 ( 80 S. E. 295 ); Fitzgerald v. State, 10 Ga. App. 70, 74 (4) ( 72 S. E. 541 ); Smith v. State, 52 Ga. App. 88 ( 182 S.

11945–1945
Ward v. State green
gactapp · 1913
2 sentences

1945The court did not commit reversible error in admitting over objection evidence as to the general reputation of the inmates of the hotel in question, for “the reputation of the inmates of the hotel for lewdness may be a circumstance to be considered by the jury, as tending to show the continuing character of the offense and in corroboration of other evidence of the essential fact that fornication or adultery was actually committed at the hotel.” Ward v. State, 14 Ga. App. 110 ( 80 S. E. 295 ); Fitzgerald v. State, 10 Ga. App. 70, 74 (4) ( 72 S. E. 541 ); Smith v. State, 52 Ga. App. 88 ( 182 S.

1945The court did not commit reversible error in admitting over objection evidence as to the general reputation of the inmates of the hotel in question, for “the reputation of the inmates of the hotel for lewdness may be a circumstance to be considered by the jury, as tending to show the continuing character of the offense and in corroboration of other evidence of the essential fact that fornication or adultery was actually committed at the hotel.” Ward v. State, 14 Ga. App. 110 ( 80 S. E. 295 ); Fitzgerald v. State, 10 Ga. App. 70, 74 (4) ( 72 S. E. 541 ); Smith v. State, 52 Ga. App. 88 ( 182 S.

11945–1945
Smith v. State green
gactapp · 1935
2 sentences

1945The court did not commit reversible error in admitting over objection evidence as to the general reputation of the inmates of the hotel in question, for “the reputation of the inmates of the hotel for lewdness may be a circumstance to be considered by the jury, as tending to show the continuing character of the offense and in corroboration of other evidence of the essential fact that fornication or adultery was actually committed at the hotel.” Ward v. State, 14 Ga. App. 110 ( 80 S. E. 295 ); Fitzgerald v. State, 10 Ga. App. 70, 74 (4) ( 72 S. E. 541 ); Smith v. State, 52 Ga. App. 88 ( 182 S.

1945The court did not commit reversible error in admitting over objection evidence as to the general reputation of the inmates of the hotel in question, for “the reputation of the inmates of the hotel for lewdness may be a circumstance to be considered by the jury, as tending to show the continuing character of the offense and in corroboration of other evidence of the essential fact that fornication or adultery was actually committed at the hotel.” Ward v. State, 14 Ga. App. 110 ( 80 S. E. 295 ); Fitzgerald v. State, 10 Ga. App. 70, 74 (4) ( 72 S. E. 541 ); Smith v. State, 52 Ga. App. 88 ( 182 S.

11945–1945
LaGrange Ice & Fuel Co. v. McManamy neutral
gactapp · 1924
2 sentences

1942Co. v. McManamy, 32 Ga. App. 195 ( 122 S. E. 708 ).” The other special assignments of error aTe without merit; and the general grounds of the motion for new trial are not now passed upon.

1942Co. v. McManamy, 32 Ga. App. 195 ( 122 S. E. 708 ).” The other special assignments of error aTe without merit; and the general grounds of the motion for new trial are not now passed upon.

11942–1942
Chapman v. State green
gactapp · 1919
2 sentences

1941Chapman v. State, 23 Ga. App. 359 ( 98 S. E. 243 ), and cit. *129 The other special assignments of error are based on the admission in evidence of the shoes and a knife of the defendant.

1941Chapman v. State, 23 Ga. App. 359 ( 98 S. E. 243 ), and cit. *129 The other special assignments of error are based on the admission in evidence of the shoes and a knife of the defendant.

11941–1941
Bourquin v. Bourquin neutral
gactapp · 1924
2 sentences

1939The special assignments of error complain of the court’s failure to give in charge certain principles of law which are stated therein. *239 The contentions oí both parties were fairly and fully presented to the jury; there was no request to charge the abstract principles, and “The defendant in a case can not complain that certain abstract principles of law pertinent to his contentions were not charged, where no written request therefor was made, and where the charge of the court made clear the specific application of such abstract principles of law by enumerating all the material contentions o

1939The special assignments of error complain of the court’s failure to give in charge certain principles of law which are stated therein. *239 The contentions oí both parties were fairly and fully presented to the jury; there was no request to charge the abstract principles, and “The defendant in a case can not complain that certain abstract principles of law pertinent to his contentions were not charged, where no written request therefor was made, and where the charge of the court made clear the specific application of such abstract principles of law by enumerating all the material contentions o

11939–1939
Bedsole v. State neutral
gactapp · 1924
1 sentence

1927Bedsole v. State, 32 Ga. App. 792 .

11927–1927
Johnson v. State green
ga · 1921
2 sentences

1925See Pullen v. State, 30 Ga. App. 24 ( 116 S. E. 871 ); Johnson v. State, 152 Ga. 271 ( 109 S. E. 662 , 19 A. L.

1925See Pullen v. State, 30 Ga. App. 24 ( 116 S. E. 871 ); Johnson v. State, 152 Ga. 271 ( 109 S. E. 662 , 19 A. L.

11925–1925
Phillips v. State neutral
gactapp · 1922
2 sentences

1922As conceded in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error, the remaining special assignments of error are concluded against the defendant by the rulings in Phillips v. State, 28 Ga. App. 100 ( 110 S. E. 639 ), a companion case to this one. 4.

1922As conceded in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error, the remaining special assignments of error are concluded against the defendant by the rulings in Phillips v. State, 28 Ga. App. 100 ( 110 S. E. 639 ), a companion case to this one. 4.

11922–1922
Center Point Gin v. Hathcock green
gactapp · 1922
2 sentences

1922The special assignments of error, in so far as they are not controlled by the decision rendered in the companion case of Center Point Gin v. Hathcock, 28 Ga. App. 305 ( 111 S. E. 575 ), are without merit. 2.

1922The special assignments of error, in so far as they are not controlled by the decision rendered in the companion case of Center Point Gin v. Hathcock, 28 Ga. App. 305 ( 111 S. E. 575 ), are without merit. 2.

11922–1922
Lewis v. State neutral
gactapp · 1912
1 sentence

1912As to the special assignments of error this ease is fully controlled by the decision in Lewis v. State, ante, 102 ( 74 S. E. 708 ). 2.

11912–1912
Tripp v. Fausett green
ga · 1894
1 sentence

1905There was no specific complaint against that portion of the verdict which reduced the mesne profits by the amount of taxes paid by the defendant, nor is there anything in the brief of counsel for plaintiffs in error on this subject; We express no opinion as to whether this was a proper reduction; but see, in this connection, Clewis v. Hartman, 71 Ga. 813 , Austell v. Swann, 74 Ga. 281 , and Tripp v. Fausett, 94 Ga. 330 (3).

11905–1905
Fletcher v. Collins green
ga · 1900
1 sentence

1901See Daniel v. Hannah, 106 Ga. 91 ; Lucas v. State, 110 Ga. 757 (3), and cases cited; Fletcher v. Collins, 111 Ga. 253 . 5.

11901–1901

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check