Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
14 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 2015–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Brown v. Stategreen2 sentences2019Laird, 103 N.E.3d at 1175 (citing Brown v. State, 929 N.E.2d 204, 207 (Ind. 2010)). 2019Id. (citing Brown v. State , 929 N.E.2d 204 , 207 (Ind. 2010) ). | 5 | 7 |
Brown v. Stategreen2 sentences2018“The failure to make a contemporaneous objection to the admission of evidence at trial, so as to provide the trial court an opportunity to make a final ruling on the matter in the context in which the evidence is introduced, results in waiver of the error on appeal.” Brown v. State, 783 N.E.2d 1121, 1125 (Ind. 2003). 2018“The failure to make a contemporaneous objection to the admission of evidence at trial, so as to provide the trial court an opportunity to make a final ruling on the matter in the context in which the evidence is introduced, results in waiver of the error on appeal.” Brown v. State, 783 N.E.2d 1121, 1125 (Ind. 2003). | 3 | 3 |
Devon L. Hunter v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)green2 sentences2018We agree. [25] “A claim of evidentiary error may not be raised for the first time on appeal but rather must first be presented at trial[.]” Hunter v. State, 72 N.E.3d 928, 932 (Ind. Ct. App. 2017), trans. denied. 2018We agree. [11] “A claim of evidentiary error may not be raised for the first time on appeal but rather must first be presented at trial[.]” Hunter v. State, 72 N.E.3d 928, 932 (Ind. Ct. App. 2017), trans. denied. | 3 | 3 |
Robert Lee Laird v. State of Indianagreen2 sentences2019Laird, 103 N.E.3d at 1175 (citing Brown v. State, 929 N.E.2d 204, 207 (Ind. 2010)). 2019Laird v. State, 103 N.E.3d 1171, 1175 (Ind. Ct. App. 2018), trans. denied (citing Brown v. State, 929 N.E.2d 204, 207 (Ind. 2010)). | 2 | 3 |
Charles Stephenson v. State of Indianagreen2 sentences2017Stephenson v. State, 29 N.E.3d 111, 121 (Ind. 2015). 2017Stephenson v. State, 29 N.E.3d 111, 121 (Ind. 2015). | 2 | 2 |
Jackson v. Stategreen2 sentences2019Brown v. State, 929 N.E.2d 204, 207 (Ind. 2010) (citing Jackson v. State, 735 N.E.2d 1146, 1152 (Ind. 2000)). 2018Brown v. State , 929 N.E.2d 204 , 207 (Ind. 2010) (citing Jackson v. State , 735 N.E.2d 1146 , 1152 (Ind. 2000) ). | 1 | 2 |
Crain v. Stategreen1 sentence2018Crain v. State, 736 N.E.2d 1223, 1235 (Ind. 2000). [28] To preserve a claim of evidentiary error for purposes of appeal, a defendant must make a contemporaneous objection at the time the evidence is introduced. | 1 | 1 |
Andrew Conley v. State of Indianagreen1 sentence2017Conley v. State, 972 N.E.2d 864, 871 (Ind. 2012), reh’g denied. [20] “A claim of evidentiary error may not be raised for the first time on appeal but rather must first be presented at trial[.]” Hunter v. State, 72 N.E.3d 928, 932 (Ind. Ct. App. 2017), trans. denied. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Brian L. Harrison v. State of Indiana
green
2 sentences2019Id. [17] To preserve a claim of evidentiary error for purposes of appeal, a defendant must make a contemporaneous objection at the time the evidence is introduced. 2018Id. [14] To preserve a claim of evidentiary error for purposes of appeal, a defendant must make a contemporaneous objection at the time the evidence is introduced. | 2 | 2018–2019 |
In re Bouvean
green
1 sentence2019Id. [10] Moreover, to preserve a claim of evidentiary error for purposes of appeal, a defendant must make a contemporaneous objection at the time the evidence is introduced. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Boatner v. State
green
1 sentence2017Id. [13] Generally, to preserve a claim of evidentiary error for purposes of appeal, a defendant must make a timely objection to the admission of the evidence at issue. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Davis v. State
green
1 sentence2015Davis, 598 N.E.2d at 1048 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.