Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
14 Indiana opinions name it 1 courts 1981–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Cardwell v. Stategreen1 sentence2016The principal role of appellate review is to “leaven the outliers, . . . not to achieve a perceived ‘correct’ result in each case.” Cardwell v. State, 895 N.E.2d 1219, 1225 (Ind. 2008). | 1 | 1 |
Gurley v. Stategreen2 sentences1981See, Gurley v. State (1980), Ind., 398 N.E.2d 1282 ; Rinard v. State (1979), Ind., 394 N.E.2d 160 (incompetent counsel not a mitigating factor to waiver of prosecutorial misconduct issue where Supreme Court found counsel to be competent). 1981See, Gurley v. State (1980), Ind., 398 N.E.2d 1282 ; Rinard v. State (1979), Ind., 394 N.E.2d 160 (incompetent counsel not a mitigating factor to waiver of prosecutorial misconduct issue where Supreme Court found counsel to be competent). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Rogers v. State
green
2 sentences2015Id. 2015Id. | 10 | 2012–2015 |
Healey v. State
green
2 sentences2016“A trial court does not err in failing to find a mitigating factor where that claim is highly disputable in nature, weight, or significance.” Id. 2016“A trial court does not err in failing to find a mitigating factor where that claim is highly disputable in nature, weight, or significance.” Healey, 969 N.E.2d at 616 . [14] Finally, as to Pearson’s claim that her twenty-year sentence is inappropriate, we may revise a sentence “if, after due consideration of the trial court’s decision, the Court finds that the sentence is inappropriate in light of the nature of the offense and the character of the offender.” Ind. Appellate Rule 7(B). | 2 | 2016–2016 |
Tommy Orlando Townsend, Sr. v. State of Indiana
green
1 sentence2018Id. at 830–31. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Rinard v. State
neutral
2 sentences1981See, Gurley v. State (1980), Ind., 398 N.E.2d 1282 ; Rinard v. State (1979), Ind., 394 N.E.2d 160 (incompetent counsel not a mitigating factor to waiver of prosecutorial misconduct issue where Supreme Court found counsel to be competent). 1981See, Gurley v. State (1980), Ind., 398 N.E.2d 1282 ; Rinard v. State (1979), Ind., 394 N.E.2d 160 (incompetent counsel not a mitigating factor to waiver of prosecutorial misconduct issue where Supreme Court found counsel to be competent). | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.