contemplated rule in New Jersey

2003Notice and comment rulemaking gives “those affected by the proposed rule an opportunity to participate in the rule-making process not just as a matter of fairness but also as ‘a means of informing regulators of possibly unanticipated dimensions of a contemplated rule.’ ” Coalition for Quality Health Care v. New Jersey Dep’t of Banking and Ins., 348 N.J.Super. 272, 295 , 791 A.2d 1085 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 174 N.J. 194 , 803 A.2d 1165 (2002) (quoting In re Adoption of Regulations Governing Volatile Organic Substances in Consumer Prods., N.J.A.C. 7:27-23, 239 N.J.Super. 407, 411 , 571 A.2d

2003Notice and comment rulemaking gives “those affected by the proposed rule an opportunity to participate in the rule-making process not just as a matter of fairness but also as ‘a means of informing regulators of possibly unanticipated dimensions of a contemplated rule.’ ” Coalition for Quality Health Care v. New Jersey Dep’t of Banking and Ins., 348 N.J.Super. 272, 295 , 791 A.2d 1085 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 174 N.J. 194 , 803 A.2d 1165 (2002) (quoting In re Adoption of Regulations Governing Volatile Organic Substances in Consumer Prods., N.J.A.C. 7:27-23, 239 N.J.Super. 407, 411 , 571 A.2d

2002The purpose of the notice requirement is "to give those affected by the proposed rule an opportunity to participate in the rule-making process not just as a matter of fairness but also as `a means of informing regulators of possibly unanticipated dimensions of a contemplated rule.'" In re Adoption of Regulations Governing Volatile Organic Substances in Consumer Prods., N.J.A.C. 7:27-23, 239 N.J.Super. 407, 411 , 571 A. 2d 971 (App. Div.1990) (quoting American Employers' Ins. v. Commissioner of Ins., 236 N.J.Super. 428, 434 , 566 A. 2d 202 (App.Div.1989)).

2002The purpose of the notice requirement is "to give those affected by the proposed rule an opportunity to participate in the rule-making process not just as a matter of fairness but also as `a means of informing regulators of possibly unanticipated dimensions of a contemplated rule.'" In re Adoption of Regulations Governing Volatile Organic Substances in Consumer Prods., N.J.A.C. 7:27-23, 239 N.J.Super. 407, 411 , 571 A. 2d 971 (App. Div.1990) (quoting American Employers' Ins. v. Commissioner of Ins., 236 N.J.Super. 428, 434 , 566 A. 2d 202 (App.Div.1989)).

2000The agency must also: [p]repare for public distribution at the time the notice appears in the [New Jersey] Register a statement setting forth a summary of the proposed rule, a clear and concise explanation of the purpose and effect of the rule, the specific legal authority under which its adoption is authorized, [and] a description of the expected socioeconomic impact of the rule____ [N.J.S.A 52:14B-4(a)(2).] “Where rule-making is concerned, the purpose of the procedure set forth in the A.P.A. is to give those affected by the proposed rule an opportunity to participate in the rule-making proce

2000The agency must also: [p]repare for public distribution at the time the notice appears in the [New Jersey] Register a statement setting forth a summary of the proposed rule, a clear and concise explanation of the purpose and effect of the rule, the specific legal authority under which its adoption is authorized, [and] a description of the expected socioeconomic impact of the rule____ [N.J.S.A 52:14B-4(a)(2).] “Where rule-making is concerned, the purpose of the procedure set forth in the A.P.A. is to give those affected by the proposed rule an opportunity to participate in the rule-making proce

2026"Such notice affords interested parties the opportunity to participate meaningfully in the rule-making process and to 'inform[] regulators of possibly unanticipated dimensions of a contemplated rule.'" Id. at 507 (quoting In re A-2936-22 69 Protest of Coastal Permit Program Rules, 354 N.J. Super. 293, 365 (App. Div. 2002)).

2026"Such notice affords interested parties the opportunity to participate meaningfully in the rule-making process and to 'inform[] regulators of possibly unanticipated dimensions of a contemplated rule.'" Id. at 507 (quoting In re A-2936-22 69 Protest of Coastal Permit Program Rules, 354 N.J. Super. 293, 365 (App. Div. 2002)).

2011Among the purposes of the APA is “to give those affected by the proposed rule an opportunity to participate in the rule-making process, not just as a matter of fairness but also as a means of informing regulators of possibly unanticipated dimensions of a contemplated rule.” In re Comm’r’s Failure to Adopt 861 CPT Codes, 358 N.J.Super. 135, 142-43 , 817 A.2d 355 (App.Div.2003) (citations and internal quotations omitted).

2011Among the purposes of the APA is “to give those affected by the proposed rule an opportunity to participate in the rule-making process, not just as a matter of fairness but also as a means of informing regulators of possibly unanticipated dimensions of a contemplated rule.” In re Comm’r’s Failure to Adopt 861 CPT Codes, 358 N.J.Super. 135, 142-43 , 817 A.2d 355 (App.Div.2003) (citations and internal quotations omitted).

2003Notice and comment rulemaking gives “those affected by the proposed rule an opportunity to participate in the rule-making process not just as a matter of fairness but also as ‘a means of informing regulators of possibly unanticipated dimensions of a contemplated rule.’ ” Coalition for Quality Health Care v. New Jersey Dep’t of Banking and Ins., 348 N.J.Super. 272, 295 , 791 A.2d 1085 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 174 N.J. 194 , 803 A.2d 1165 (2002) (quoting In re Adoption of Regulations Governing Volatile Organic Substances in Consumer Prods., N.J.A.C. 7:27-23, 239 N.J.Super. 407, 411 , 571 A.2d

2003Notice and comment rulemaking gives “those affected by the proposed rule an opportunity to participate in the rule-making process not just as a matter of fairness but also as ‘a means of informing regulators of possibly unanticipated dimensions of a contemplated rule.’ ” Coalition for Quality Health Care v. New Jersey Dep’t of Banking and Ins., 348 N.J.Super. 272, 295 , 791 A.2d 1085 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 174 N.J. 194 , 803 A.2d 1165 (2002) (quoting In re Adoption of Regulations Governing Volatile Organic Substances in Consumer Prods., N.J.A.C. 7:27-23, 239 N.J.Super. 407, 411 , 571 A.2d

1978Plainfield, 64 N.J. 582 (1974) and cases cited therein at 587.

1978The Court then stated that in the employment case “the contemplated hearing does not embrace any determination analogous to the ‘second step’ of the parole revocation proceeding, which would in effect be a determination of whether or not, conceding that the report were true, the employee was properly refused re-employment.” 429 U. S. at 627-628 , 97 S. Ct. at 884 , 51 L.

1978The Court then stated that in the employment case “the contemplated hearing does not embrace any determination analogous to the ‘second step’ of the parole revocation proceeding, which would in effect be a determination of whether or not, conceding that the report were true, the employee was properly refused re-employment.” 429 U. S. at 627-628 , 97 S. Ct. at 884 , 51 L.

1975Id. 418 U.S. at 353-54 , 94 S.Ct. 2997 (concurring opinion), 355 (dissenting opinion), 366-367 (dissenting opinion).

1975Id. 418 U.S. at 353-54 , 94 S.Ct. 2997 (concurring opinion), 355 (dissenting opinion), 366-367 (dissenting opinion).

1967Thus, in Graham v. Asbury Park, supra , plaintiff recovered back salary though no departmental hearing was given him.