Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
14 New Jersey opinions name it 3 courts 1985–2024 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Wingate v. Estate of Ryangreen2 sentences2004Thus, the Uniform Parentage Act was not intended to affect the limitations period for actions to prove heirship. [ Wingate, supra, 149 N.J. at 240, 693 A2d 457 .] We concluded: Because our Parentage Act is modeled after the Uniform Parentage Act, and for the other reasons stated, we hold that the Legislature did not intend its 1991 amendment to change the Probate Code’s limitation on when claims can be filed thereunder for determination of heirship. [Ibid.] In a sense, Wingate is the flip-side of this case insofar as the twenty-three year statute of limitations in the Parentage Act was being u 2004Thus, the Uniform Parentage Act was not intended to affect the limitations period for actions to prove heirship. [ Wingate, supra, 149 N.J. at 240, 693 A2d 457 .] We concluded: Because our Parentage Act is modeled after the Uniform Parentage Act, and for the other reasons stated, we hold that the Legislature did not intend its 1991 amendment to change the Probate Code’s limitation on when claims can be filed thereunder for determination of heirship. [Ibid.] In a sense, Wingate is the flip-side of this case insofar as the twenty-three year statute of limitations in the Parentage Act was being u | 2 | 2 |
State v. Del Finogreen2 sentences1990What constitutes good cause for delay will depend upon the circumstances. * * * Moreover, the merits of the underlying assertion must be persuasive if an untimely challenge is to be otherwise allowed for good cause. *563 [ Id. at 160-61 , 495 A. 2d 60 ]. 1990What constitutes good cause for delay will depend upon the circumstances. * * * Moreover, the merits of the underlying assertion must be persuasive if an untimely challenge is to be otherwise allowed for good cause. [Id. at 160-61, 495 A.2d 60]. | 1 | 2 |
David W. Opderbeck v. Midland Park Board of Educationgreen1 sentence2020A-0320-19T1 11 N.J.S.A. 10:4-8(d).6 An agenda, as the term is used in the OPMA, is "a list or outline of things to be considered or done." Opderbeck v. Midland Park Bd. of Educ., 442 N.J. | 1 | 1 |
University Cottage Club v. Princeton Boroughgreen1 sentence2018See University Cottage Club of Princeton v. Borough of Princeton, 26 N.J. | 1 | 1 |
Williams v. Bell Telephone Laboratories, Inc.green2 sentences2008See White, supra, 354 N.J.Super. at 290 , 806 A. 2d 843 (comparing pre-trial assertion of a new defense with post-verdict assertion in Williams, supra, 132 N.J. at 119-20 , 623 A. 2d 234 ). 2008See White, supra, 354 N.J.Super. at 290 , 806 A. 2d 843 (comparing pre-trial assertion of a new defense with post-verdict assertion in Williams, supra, 132 N.J. at 119-20 , 623 A. 2d 234 ). | 1 | 1 |
White v. Karlssongreen2 sentences2008See White, supra, 354 N.J.Super. at 290 , 806 A. 2d 843 (comparing pre-trial assertion of a new defense with post-verdict assertion in Williams, supra, 132 N.J. at 119-20 , 623 A. 2d 234 ). 2008See White, supra, 354 N.J.Super. at 290 , 806 A. 2d 843 (comparing pre-trial assertion of a new defense with post-verdict assertion in Williams, supra, 132 N.J. at 119-20 , 623 A. 2d 234 ). | 1 | 1 |
Reed v. Rossgreen2 sentences1985See Reed v. Ross, — U.S.-, 104 S. Ct. 2901 , 82 L.Ed.2d 1 (1984) (presence of novel legal issue contributes to finding of good cause for failure to raise issue in state court proceedings); State v. Allaband, 134 N.J.Super. 353 (App.Div.1974) (motion to suppress evidence after eleven-month delay without more will not justify good cause to accept belated challenge); State v. Hughes, 128 N.J.Super. 363 (App.Div.), certif. den., 66 N.J. 307 (1974) (failure to show invidious discrimination against blacks in the grand jury indicting defendant part of lack of good cause to raise an untimely challenge 1985See Reed v. Ross, — U.S.-, 104 S. Ct. 2901 , 82 L.Ed.2d 1 (1984) (presence of novel legal issue contributes to finding of good cause for failure to raise issue in state court proceedings); State v. Allaband, 134 N.J.Super. 353 (App.Div.1974) (motion to suppress evidence after eleven-month delay without more will not justify good cause to accept belated challenge); State v. Hughes, 128 N.J.Super. 363 (App.Div.), certif. den., 66 N.J. 307 (1974) (failure to show invidious discrimination against blacks in the grand jury indicting defendant part of lack of good cause to raise an untimely challenge | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Roa v. Roa
green
2 sentences2021He argued some of the gender-based actions taken by plaintiff's 4 Roa v. Roa, 200 N.J. 555 (2010). 2021He argued some of the gender-based actions taken by plaintiff's 4 Roa v. Roa, 200 N.J. 555 (2010). | 2 | 2021–2021 |
GMAC v. Pittella
green
1 sentence2024Our Supreme Court in GMAC warned: as of [March 23, 2011], litigants and lawyers in New Jersey are on notice that all orders compelling and denying arbitration shall be deemed final for purposes of appeal, regardless of whether such orders dispose of all issues and all parties, and the time for appeal therefrom starts from the date of the entry of that order. [ 205 N.J. at 587 .] A-0188-23 5 Plaintiff failed to file an appeal of the order within forty-five days pursuant to Rule 2:4-1(a), and therefore he is precluded from raising this untimely challenge now. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Southport Development Group, Inc. v. Township of Wall
green
1 sentence2021Id. at 556 . | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Prime Accounting Department v. Township of Carney's Point
green
1 sentence2018Ibid. “[N]o other pleading is allowed, 1 Evidently, this rule does not, and cannot, permit an amendment to assert an untimely claim or cause of action. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
F.M.C. Stores Co. v. Borough of Morris Plains
green
1 sentence2015Stores, supra, 100 N.J. at 425, 495 A.2d 1313 ; does not comply with tax payment requirements, N.J.S.A. 54:3-27; N.J.S.A. 54:51A-1(b); Dover-Chester Assocs. v. Township of Randolph, 419 N.J.Super. 184, 190 , 16 A.3d 467 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 208 N.J. 338 , 27 A.3d 951 (2011); does not respond to discovery requests, R. 4:23- 5; or fails during its case-in-ehief to overcome the presumption of validity attached to the assessment, even though the assessment may be excessive, Pantasote Co., supra. In each of these instances, the Uniformity Clause does not mandate that the assessment must be r | 1 | 2015–2015 |
DOVER-CHESTER ASSOC. v. Randolph
green
2 sentences2015Stores, supra, 100 N.J. at 425, 495 A.2d 1313 ; does not comply with tax payment requirements, N.J.S.A. 54:3-27; N.J.S.A. 54:51A-1(b); Dover-Chester Assocs. v. Township of Randolph, 419 N.J.Super. 184, 190 , 16 A.3d 467 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 208 N.J. 338 , 27 A.3d 951 (2011); does not respond to discovery requests, R. 4:23- 5; or fails during its case-in-ehief to overcome the presumption of validity attached to the assessment, even though the assessment may be excessive, Pantasote Co., supra. In each of these instances, the Uniformity Clause does not mandate that the assessment must be r 2015Stores, supra, 100 N.J. at 425, 495 A.2d 1313 ; does not comply with tax payment requirements, N.J.S.A. 54:3-27; N.J.S.A. 54:51A-1(b); Dover-Chester Assocs. v. Township of Randolph, 419 N.J.Super. 184, 190 , 16 A.3d 467 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 208 N.J. 338 , 27 A.3d 951 (2011); does not respond to discovery requests, R. 4:23- 5; or fails during its case-in-ehief to overcome the presumption of validity attached to the assessment, even though the assessment may be excessive, Pantasote Co., supra. In each of these instances, the Uniformity Clause does not mandate that the assessment must be r | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Miller v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, POLICE AND FIREMEN'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM
neutral
1 sentence2015Stores, supra, 100 N.J. at 425, 495 A.2d 1313 ; does not comply with tax payment requirements, N.J.S.A. 54:3-27; N.J.S.A. 54:51A-1(b); Dover-Chester Assocs. v. Township of Randolph, 419 N.J.Super. 184, 190 , 16 A.3d 467 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 208 N.J. 338 , 27 A.3d 951 (2011); does not respond to discovery requests, R. 4:23- 5; or fails during its case-in-ehief to overcome the presumption of validity attached to the assessment, even though the assessment may be excessive, Pantasote Co., supra. In each of these instances, the Uniformity Clause does not mandate that the assessment must be r | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Division of State Police v. Maguire
green
1 sentence2005Ibid. [3] On appeal, Grubb abandoned this issue. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
State v. McKnight
green
1 sentence1990What constitutes good cause for delay will depend upon the circumstances. * * * Moreover, the merits of the underlying assertion must be persuasive if an untimely challenge is to be otherwise allowed for good cause. *563 [ Id. at 160-61 , 495 A. 2d 60 ]. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
United States v. Mechanik
green
2 sentences1986In Mechanik , the United States Supreme Court held that an error in the grand jury proceeding connected with the *600 charging decision is rendered harmless by a supervening guilty verdict. ___ U.S. at ___-___, 106 S.Ct. at 941-944 , 89 L.Ed. 2d at 56-58 . 1986In Mechanik , the United States Supreme Court held that an error in the grand jury proceeding connected with the *600 charging decision is rendered harmless by a supervening guilty verdict. ___ U.S. at ___-___, 106 S.Ct. at 941-944 , 89 L.Ed. 2d at 56-58 . | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Brutscher v. Borough of Avalon
neutral
2 sentences1985See Reed v. Ross, — U.S.-, 104 S. Ct. 2901 , 82 L.Ed.2d 1 (1984) (presence of novel legal issue contributes to finding of good cause for failure to raise issue in state court proceedings); State v. Allaband, 134 N.J.Super. 353 (App.Div.1974) (motion to suppress evidence after eleven-month delay without more will not justify good cause to accept belated challenge); State v. Hughes, 128 N.J.Super. 363 (App.Div.), certif. den., 66 N.J. 307 (1974) (failure to show invidious discrimination against blacks in the grand jury indicting defendant part of lack of good cause to raise an untimely challenge 1985See Reed v. Ross, — U.S.-, 104 S. Ct. 2901 , 82 L.Ed.2d 1 (1984) (presence of novel legal issue contributes to finding of good cause for failure to raise issue in state court proceedings); State v. Allaband, 134 N.J.Super. 353 (App.Div.1974) (motion to suppress evidence after eleven-month delay without more will not justify good cause to accept belated challenge); State v. Hughes, 128 N.J.Super. 363 (App.Div.), certif. den., 66 N.J. 307 (1974) (failure to show invidious discrimination against blacks in the grand jury indicting defendant part of lack of good cause to raise an untimely challenge | 1 | 1985–1985 |
State v. Allaband
green
2 sentences1985See Reed v. Ross, — U.S.-, 104 S. Ct. 2901 , 82 L.Ed.2d 1 (1984) (presence of novel legal issue contributes to finding of good cause for failure to raise issue in state court proceedings); State v. Allaband, 134 N.J.Super. 353 (App.Div.1974) (motion to suppress evidence after eleven-month delay without more will not justify good cause to accept belated challenge); State v. Hughes, 128 N.J.Super. 363 (App.Div.), certif. den., 66 N.J. 307 (1974) (failure to show invidious discrimination against blacks in the grand jury indicting defendant part of lack of good cause to raise an untimely challenge 1985See Reed v. Ross, — U.S.-, 104 S. Ct. 2901 , 82 L.Ed.2d 1 (1984) (presence of novel legal issue contributes to finding of good cause for failure to raise issue in state court proceedings); State v. Allaband, 134 N.J.Super. 353 (App.Div.1974) (motion to suppress evidence after eleven-month delay without more will not justify good cause to accept belated challenge); State v. Hughes, 128 N.J.Super. 363 (App.Div.), certif. den., 66 N.J. 307 (1974) (failure to show invidious discrimination against blacks in the grand jury indicting defendant part of lack of good cause to raise an untimely challenge | 1 | 1985–1985 |
State v. Hughes
green
2 sentences1985See Reed v. Ross, — U.S.-, 104 S. Ct. 2901 , 82 L.Ed.2d 1 (1984) (presence of novel legal issue contributes to finding of good cause for failure to raise issue in state court proceedings); State v. Allaband, 134 N.J.Super. 353 (App.Div.1974) (motion to suppress evidence after eleven-month delay without more will not justify good cause to accept belated challenge); State v. Hughes, 128 N.J.Super. 363 (App.Div.), certif. den., 66 N.J. 307 (1974) (failure to show invidious discrimination against blacks in the grand jury indicting defendant part of lack of good cause to raise an untimely challenge 1985See Reed v. Ross, — U.S.-, 104 S. Ct. 2901 , 82 L.Ed.2d 1 (1984) (presence of novel legal issue contributes to finding of good cause for failure to raise issue in state court proceedings); State v. Allaband, 134 N.J.Super. 353 (App.Div.1974) (motion to suppress evidence after eleven-month delay without more will not justify good cause to accept belated challenge); State v. Hughes, 128 N.J.Super. 363 (App.Div.), certif. den., 66 N.J. 307 (1974) (failure to show invidious discrimination against blacks in the grand jury indicting defendant part of lack of good cause to raise an untimely challenge | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.