14 Nevada opinions name it 2 courts 2007–2023 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Nevada courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Five Star Capital Corp. v. Rubygreen2 sentences2023See Five Star, 124 Nev. at 1055 , 194 P.3d at 713 . 2023See Five Star, 124 Nev. at 1055 , 194 P.3d at 713 . | 6 | 6 |
Thompson v. City of North Las Vegasgreen2 sentences2017In deciding a motion to dismiss, if the district court considers matters outside the pleadings—as was the case here—the motion "shall be treated as one for summary judgment and disposed of as provided in Rule 56." NRCP 12(b); Thompson v. City of N. Las Vegas, 108 Nev. 435, 438, 833 P.2d 1132, 1134 (1992). 2017In deciding a motion to dismiss, if the district court considers matters outside the pleadings—as was the case here—the motion "shall be treated as one for summary judgment and disposed of as provided in Rule 56." NRCP 12(b); Thompson v. City of N. Las Vegas, 108 Nev. 435, 438, 833 P.2d 1132, 1134 (1992). | 2 | 2 |
Airframe Systems, Inc. v. Raytheon Co.green2 sentences2015The First Circuit recognized that "privity is a sufficient but not a necessary condition for a new defendant to invoke a claim preclusion defense." Id. at 17 . 2015The First Circuit recognized that "privity is a sufficient but not a necessary condition for a new defendant to invoke a claim preclusion defense." Id. at 17. | 1 | 3 |
Bonnell v. Lawrencegreen1 sentence2014Bonnell, 128 Nev. at , 282 P.3d at 717 (adopting the reasoning of Beggerly that independent actions for relief must meet a demanding standard to justify "departure from rigid adherence to the doctrine of res judicata" (internal quotation omitted)); see also Arnie, 106 Nev. at 542 , 796 P.2d at 234 ("The right to bring an independent action for equitable relief is not necessarily barred by res judicata."). 3 Society has no interest in the finality of a 3 Our decision in Tomlinson v. Tomlinson, 102 Nev. 652, 654 , 729 P.2d 1363, 1364 (1986), held that an action for partition of a military pensio | 1 | 1 |
Amie v. Amiegreen2 sentences2014Bonnell, 128 Nev. at 282 P.3d at 717 (adopting the reasoning of Beggerly that independent actions for relief must meet a demanding standard to justify "departure from rigid adherence to the doctrine of res judicata" (internal quotation omitted)); see also Arnie, 106 Nev. at 542, 796 P.2d at 234 ("The right to bring an independent action for equitable relief is not necessarily barred by res judicata."). 3 Society has no interest in the finality of a 3 Our decision in Tomlinson v. Tomlinson, 102 Nev. 652, 654, 729 P.2d 1363, 1364 (1986), held that an action for partition of a military pension wa 2014Bonnell, 128 Nev. at 282 P.3d at 717 (adopting the reasoning of Beggerly that independent actions for relief must meet a demanding standard to justify "departure from rigid adherence to the doctrine of res judicata" (internal quotation omitted)); see also Arnie, 106 Nev. at 542, 796 P.2d at 234 ("The right to bring an independent action for equitable relief is not necessarily barred by res judicata."). 3 Society has no interest in the finality of a 3 Our decision in Tomlinson v. Tomlinson, 102 Nev. 652, 654, 729 P.2d 1363, 1364 (1986), held that an action for partition of a military pension wa | 1 | 1 |
Tomlinson v. Tomlinsongreen2 sentences2014Bonnell, 128 Nev. at 282 P.3d at 717 (adopting the reasoning of Beggerly that independent actions for relief must meet a demanding standard to justify "departure from rigid adherence to the doctrine of res judicata" (internal quotation omitted)); see also Arnie, 106 Nev. at 542, 796 P.2d at 234 ("The right to bring an independent action for equitable relief is not necessarily barred by res judicata."). 3 Society has no interest in the finality of a 3 Our decision in Tomlinson v. Tomlinson, 102 Nev. 652, 654, 729 P.2d 1363, 1364 (1986), held that an action for partition of a military pension wa 2014Bonnell, 128 Nev. at 282 P.3d at 717 (adopting the reasoning of Beggerly that independent actions for relief must meet a demanding standard to justify "departure from rigid adherence to the doctrine of res judicata" (internal quotation omitted)); see also Arnie, 106 Nev. at 542, 796 P.2d at 234 ("The right to bring an independent action for equitable relief is not necessarily barred by res judicata."). 3 Society has no interest in the finality of a 3 Our decision in Tomlinson v. Tomlinson, 102 Nev. 652, 654, 729 P.2d 1363, 1364 (1986), held that an action for partition of a military pension wa | 1 | 1 |
Gospel Missions Of America v. City Of Los Angelesgreen1 sentence2007See Gospel Missions of America v. City of Los Angeles, 328 F.3d 548, 555 (9th Cir. 2003). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nevada. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Love v. Love
green
2 sentences2015The first exception is that "[a] decision of paternity will not operate as res judicata where extrinsic fraud existed in the original proceeding." Love, 114 Nev. at 576 , 959 P.2d at 526 . 2015The first exception is that "[a] decision of paternity will not operate as res judicata where extrinsic fraud existed in the original proceeding." Love, 114 Nev. at 576 , 959 P.2d at 526 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.